A Spatio-Temporal Downscaler for Output From Numerical Models
- 866 Downloads
Often, in environmental data collection, data arise from two sources: numerical models and monitoring networks. The first source provides predictions at the level of grid cells, while the second source gives measurements at points. The first is characterized by full spatial coverage of the region of interest, high temporal resolution, no missing data but consequential calibration concerns. The second tends to be sparsely collected in space with coarser temporal resolution, often with missing data but, where recorded, provides, essentially, the true value. Accommodating the spatial misalignment between the two types of data is of fundamental importance for both improved predictions of exposure as well as for evaluation and calibration of the numerical model. In this article we propose a simple, fully model-based strategy to downscale the output from numerical models to point level. The static spatial model, specified within a Bayesian framework, regresses the observed data on the numerical model output using spatially-varying coefficients which are specified through a correlated spatial Gaussian process.
As an example, we apply our method to ozone concentration data for the eastern U.S. and compare it to Bayesian melding (Fuentes and Raftery 2005) and ordinary kriging (Cressie 1993; Chilès and Delfiner 1999). Our results show that our method outperforms Bayesian melding in terms of computing speed and it is superior to both Bayesian melding and ordinary kriging in terms of predictive performance; predictions obtained with our method are better calibrated and predictive intervals have empirical coverage closer to the nominal values. Moreover, our model can be easily extended to accommodate for the temporal dimension. In this regard, we consider several spatio-temporal versions of the static model. We compare them using out-of-sample predictions of ozone concentration for the eastern U.S. for the period May 1–October 15, 2001. For the best choice, we present a summary of the analysis. Supplemental material, including color versions of Figures 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8, and MCMC diagnostic plots, are available online.
Key WordsBayesian melding Calibration Markov chain Monte Carlo Ordinary kriging Spatial misalignment Spatially varying coefficient model
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Cowles, M. K., Zimmerman, D. L., Christ, A., and McGinnis, D. L. (2002), “Combining Snow Water Equivalent Data From Multiple Sources to Estimate Spatio-Temporal Trends and Compare Measurement Systems,” Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, 7, 536–557. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Cressie, N. A. C. (1993), Statistics for Spatial Data, New York: Wiley. Google Scholar
- McMillan, N., Holland, D. M., Morara, M., and Feng, J. (2009), “Combining Numerical Model Output and Particulate Data Using Bayesian Space-Time Modeling,” Environmetrics, to appear. Google Scholar
- Tolbert, P., Mulholland, J., MacIntosh, D., Xu, F., Daniels, D., Devine, O., Carlin, B. P., Klein, M., Dorley, J., Butler, A., Nordenberg, D., Frumkin, H., Ryan, P. B., and White, M. (2000), “Air Pollution and Pediatric Emergency Room Visits for Asthma in Atlanta,” American Journal of Epidemiology, 151, 798–810. Google Scholar
- West, M., and Harrison, J. (1999), Bayesian Forecasting and Dynamic Models (2nd ed.), New York: Springer-Verlag. Google Scholar