A comparative study of three small-field detectors for patient specific stereotactic arc dosimetry
- 202 Downloads
This paper examines the difference in patient specific dosimetry using three different detectors of varying active volume, density and composition, for quality assurance of stereotactic treatments. A PTW 60017 unshielded electron diode, an Exradin W1 scintillator, and a PTW 31014 PinPoint small volume ionisation chamber were setup in a Lucy 3D QA phantom, and were positioned at the isocentre of an Elekta Axesse, with beam modulator collimator, using Exactrac and a HexaPODTM couch. Dose measurements were acquired for 43 stereotactic arcs, and compared to BrainLAB iPlan version 3.0.0 treatment planning system (TPS) calculations using a pencil beam algorithm. It was found that for arcs with field sizes \(>15\) mm, the properties of a detector have minimal impact on the measured doses, with all three detectors agreeing with the TPS (to within 5%). However, for field sizes \(<15\) mm, only the scintillator was found to yield results to within 5% of the TPS. The dose discrepancies were found to increase with decreasing field size. It is recommended that for field sizes \(<15\) mm, a water equivalent dosimeter like the Exradin W1 scintillator be used in order to minimise detector composition perturbations in the measured doses.
KeywordsScintillator Stereotactic radiotherapy Small fields Patient dose verification
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflicts of interest
The authors declares that we have no conflicts of interest.
This study was performed using phantoms, as per my compliance with ethical standards there were no human or animal participants and therefore the study did not require ethics approval.
Research involving human and animal participants
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- 5.Fiandra C, Fusella M, Giglioli FR, Filippi AR, Mantovani C, Ricardi U, Ragona R (2013) Comparison of Gafchromic EBT2 and EBT3 for patient-specific quality assurance: cranial stereotactic radiosurgery using volumetric modulated arc therapy with multiple noncoplanar arcs. Med Phys 40(8):082105CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Ezzell GA, Burmeister JW, Dogan N, LoSasso TJ, Mechalakos JG, Mihailidis D, Molineu A, Palta JR, Ramsey CR, Salter BJ, Shi J, Xia P, Yue NJ, Xiao Y (2009) IMRT commissioning: multiple institution planning and dosimetry comparisons, a report from AAPM Task Group 119. Med Phys 36(11):5359–5373CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 10.Benedict SH, Yenice KM, Followill D, Galvin JM, Hinson W, Kavanagh B, Keall P, Lovelock M, Meeks S, Papiez L, Purdie T, Sadagopan R, Schell MC, Salter B, Schlesinger DJ, Shiu AS, Solberg T, Song DY, Stieber V, Timmerman R, Tomé WA, Verellen D, Wang L, Yin F-F (2010) Stereotactic body radiation therapy: the report of AAPM Task Group 101. Med Phys 37(8):4078–4101CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 15.Pappas E, Maris TG, Zacharopoulou F, Papadakis A, Manolopoulos S, Green S, Wojnecki C (2008) Small SRS photon field profile dosimetry performed using a PinPoint air ion chamber, a diamond detector, a novel silicon-diode array (DOSI), and polymer gel dosimetry. Analysis and intercomparison. Med Phys 35(10):4640–4648CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.Guillot M, Gingras L, Archambault L, Beddar S, Beaulieu L (2011) Spectral method for the correction of the Cerenkov light effect in plastic scintillation detectors: a comparison study of calibration procedures and validation in Cerenkov light-dominated situations. Med Phys 38(4):2140–2150CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar