Effects of visual and cognitive interference on joint contributions in perturbed standing: a temporal and spectral analysis
- 106 Downloads
Postural balance requires using joint strategies which may be changed from normal conditions by interfering with the sensory information. The goal of the present study was to quantitatively evaluate the role of the joint mechanisms during perturbed stance. Visual and cognitive interference was imposed to sixteen healthy young males under rotational toes-down or up perturbations. Power spectral analysis was employed to distinguish the joint contribution and their in- or out-phase co-works. Results showed that addition of cognitive loads reduce the stability by increasing the center of mass (CoM) power to three times greater. Besides the CoM, the knee and hip powers were also significantly enhanced by the cognitive loads (p < .004), but the ankle was not influenced by cognition involvement (p > .05). Elimination of the vision had lower effect on the time and spectral functions of the knee and hip while the ankle rotations were increased due to the lack of visual feedback (p = .001). The toes-down perturbations resulted in more prominent contribution of the knee while the toes-up evoked the hip joint to keep the balance more than the other joints. Addition of the cognitive loads hindered the reactions of the joint mechanisms and vision caused more conservative responses of the joints.
KeywordsPostural control Joint mechanism Vision Cognitive Power spectral
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- 15.Alexandrov A, Frolov A, Horak F, Carlson-Kuhta P, Park S (2005) Feedback equilibrium control during human standing. Biol Cybern 93:309–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pestbp.2011.02.012.Investigations CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 23.Sullivan EV, Rose J, Rohlfing T, Pfefferbaum A (2009) Postural sway reduction in aging men and women: relation to brain structure, cognitive status, and stabilizing factors. Neurobiol Aging 30:793–807. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2007.08.021 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 29.Bernard-Demanze L, Dumitrescu M, Lacour M (2009) Age-related changes in posture control are differentially affected by postural and cognitive task complexity age-related changes in posture control are differentially affected by postural and cognitive task complexity. J Gerontol Med Sci 59A:166–171. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874609810902020135 Google Scholar
- 32.Chong RKY, Mills B, Dailey L, Lane E, Smith S, Lee K (2010) Specific interference between a cognitive task and sensory organization for stance balance control in healthy young adults: visuospatial effects. Neuropsychologia 48:2709–2718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.05.018 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 42.Greenwood NL, Duffell LD, Alexander CM, Mcgregor AH (2011) Electromyographic activity of pelvic and lower limb muscles during postural tasks in people with benign joint hypermobility syndrome and non-hypermobile people. A pilot study. Man Ther 16:623–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.math.2011.07.005 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 44.Gauchard C, Vanc G, Meyer P, Mainard D, Perrin PP, Poincare H (2010) On the role of knee joint in balance control and postural strategies: effects of total knee replacement in elderly subjects with knee osteoarthritis. Gait Posture 32:155–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.04.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar