Image-Based Flow Simulations of Pre- and Post-left Atrial Appendage Closure in the Left Atrium
For patients with atrial fibrillation, the left atrial appendage (LAA) is often the site of thrombus formation due to low atrial ejection fraction that triggers strokes and other thromboembolic events. Recently introduced percutaneous LAA occlusion procedure is known to reduce LAA-induced strokes. Despite having the procedure, there are still 11% of the patients who continue to suffer from future strokes or transient ischemic attacks, not accounting for the procedural related complications. The high failure rate is largely due to the variabilities in LAA’s shape, size, and contractility which may result in ineffectiveness of this procedure. To correctly identify the candidates and evaluate the effectiveness of the procedure, we rely on patient-specific CT scans which provides the exact LA and LAA geometries and predictive hemodynamic analysis to assist in evaluating quantitative flow parameters pre- and post-LAA occlusion procedures. Hemodynamic parameters are critical to predict adverse hemodynamic flow patterns in LAA as well as the effectiveness of LAA closure in individual patient. The aim of this paper is to establish an image-based patient-specific computational fluid dynamic (CFD) simulation framework specific to the prediction of treatment outcomes of LAA closure with atrial fibrillation. This framework utilizes automated LA/LAA image segmentation which yields significant reduction in image processing. One set of patient data with successful procedure outcome is used to illustrate the potential of the proposed framework.
The proposed LAA occlusion simulation framework is composed of several components: (1) a novel image segmentation procedure, which is fully-automated to identify LA/LAA geometries from CT images, (2) a finite-element mesh generation procedure which transforms the surface geometry into a 3-D volume mesh and properly identified boundary planes, (3) performing CFD simulations with atrial fibrillation flow boundary conditions, and (4) analyzing flow characteristics (velocity, flow patterns, streamlines, vortices) within the LA for before and after LAA closure.
Based on the LA/LAA segmentation of a 65 year old female patient with chronic atrial fibrillation, a CFD analysis was pursued to examine flow characteristics upon LAA closure. The results showed that the flow velocity magnitudes were significantly reduced by a maximum factor of 2.21, flow streamlines were greatly stabilized, and mitral outflow appeared to be more organized. Vortices were dramatically reduced in size, number, intensity, as well as duration. During diastole, the peak vortex diameter was reduced from 2.8 to 1.5 cm, while the vortex duration was reduced from 0.210 to 0.135 s. These flow characteristics all indicated a reduced risk in future thrombus formation and strokes based on the established relationship between flow and thrombus formation. For the patient case under study, the effectiveness of the procedure is predicted and found to be consistent with the actual procedural outcome.
This framework successfully predicted patient-specific outcome of a LAA closure procedure for one patient with atrial fibrillation. It can be further developed into a useful tool for pre-procedural planning and candidate selection. More patient data are necessary for further validation studies.
KeywordsLeft atrial appendage Computational fluid dynamics Atrial fibrillation
Author LTZ would like to acknowledge the support from NSFC Grants 11650410650 and 11550110185. Authors BJ, HP and HC are supported by Leading Foreign Research Institute Recruitment Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (MSIP) (2012027176).
Conflict of interest
All authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
No human or animal studies were carried out by the authors for this article. The institutional review board approved this study and waived the requirement for informed consent due to its retrospective design.
Supplementary material 1 (MP4 952 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (MP4 966 kb)
Supplementary material 3 (MP4 903 kb)
Supplementary material 4 (MP4 968 kb)
Supplementary material 5 (MP4 975 kb)
Supplementary material 6 (MP4 793 kb)
- 1.3D-Doctor Brochure. Abel software Corp. 2019.Google Scholar
- 2.ANSYS, Inc. ANSYS Academic Research, Release 18, Fluent, 2017.Google Scholar
- 6.Backer, O. D., S. Arnous, N. Ihlemann, N. Vejlstrup, E. Jørgensen, S. Pehrson, T. D. W. Krieger, P. Meier, L. Søndergaard, and O. W. Franzen. Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: an update. Open Heart 1(1):e000020, 2014.Google Scholar
- 8.Biase, L. D., J. D. Burkhardt, P. Mohanty, J. Sanchez, S. Mohanty, R. Horton, G. J. Gallinghouse, S. M. Bailey, J. D. Zagrodzky, P. Santangeli, S. Hao, R. Hongo, S. Beheiry, S. Themistoclakis, A. Bonso, A. Rossillo, A. Corrado, A. Raviele, A. Al-Ahmad, P. Wang, J. E. Cummings, R. A. Schweikert, G. Pelargonio, A. D. Russo, M. Casella, P. Santarelli, W. R. Lewis, and A. Natale. Left atrial appendage. Circulation 122(2):109–118, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Caracciolo, G., H. Abe, J. Narula, P. P. Sengupta, G. Pedrizzetti, A. Kheradvar, and B. K. Khandheria. Contrast echocardiography for assessing left ventricular vortex strength in heart failure: a prospective cohort study. Eur. Heart J. 14(11):1049–1060, 04 2013.Google Scholar
- 13.Cignoni, P., M. Callieri, M. Corsini, M. Dellepiane, F. Ganovelli, and G. Ranzuglia. Meshlab: an open-source mesh processing tool. In: Eurographics Italian Chapter Conference, 2008, pp. 129–136.Google Scholar
- 18.García-Isla, G., A. L. Olivares, E. Silva, M. Nuñez-Garcia, C. Butakoff, D. Sanchez-Quintana, H. G. Morales, X. Freixa, J. Noailly, T. De Potter, et al. Sensitivity analysis of geometrical parameters to study haemodynamics and thrombus formation in the left atrial appendage. Int. J. Numer. Methods Biomed. Eng. 34(8):e3100, 2018.Google Scholar
- 19.Hoppe, H. New quadric metric for simplifiying meshes with appearance attributes. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Visualization’99: Celebrating Ten Years, 1999, pp. 59–66.Google Scholar
- 25.Kikinis, R., S. D. Pieper, and K. G. Vosburgh. 3d slicer: a platform for subject-specific image analysis, visualization, and clinical support. In: Intraoperative Imaging and Image-Guided Therapy. Berlin: Springer, pp. 277–289, 2014.Google Scholar
- 26.Kim, I.-C., G.-R. Hong, G. Pedrizzetti, C. Y. Shim, S.-M. Kang, and N. Chung. Usefulness of left ventricular vortex flow analysis for predicting clinical outcomes in patients with chronic heart failure: a quantitative vorticity imaging study using contrast echocardiography. Ultrasound Med. Biol. 44(9):1951–1959, 2018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 28.Kovács, T., P. Cattin, H. Alkadhi, S. Wildermuth, and G. Székely. Automatic segmentation of the vessel lumen from 3d cta images of aortic dissection. In: Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin. Berlin: Springer, 2006, pp. 161–165.Google Scholar
- 30.Long, B., J. Robertson, A. Koyfman, K. Maliel, and J. R. Warix. Emergency medicine considerations in atrial fibrillation. Am. J. Emerg. Med. 36(6):1070–1078, 2018.Google Scholar
- 31.Malchano, Z. J., P. Neuzil, R. C. Cury, G. Holmvang, J. Wwichet, E. J. Schmidt, J. N. Ruskin, and V. Y. Reddy. Integration of cardiac CT/MR imaging with three-dimensional electroanatomical mapping to guide catheter manipulation in the left atrium: implications for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. 17(11):1221–1229, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 32.Masci, A., M. Alessandrini, L. Dede, D. Forti, F. Menghini, C. Tomasi, A. Quarteroni, C. Corsi, and Ecole Polytecnique Fédérale de Lausanne EPFL CMCS. Development of a computational fluid dynamics model of the left atrium in atrial fibrillation on a patient specific basis. Computing 44:1, 2017.Google Scholar
- 34.Mimics. Materialise Inc. 2019.Google Scholar
- 37.Ostermayer, S. H., M. Reisman, P. H. Kramer, R. V. Matthews, W. A. Gray, P. C. Block, H. Omran, A. L. Bartorelli, P. D. Bella, C. Di Mario, C. Pappone, P. N. Casale, J. W. Moses, A. Poppas, D. O. Williams, B. Meier, A. Skanes, P. S. Teirstein, M. D. Lesh, T. Nakai, Y. Bayard, K. Billinger, T. Trepels, U. Krumsdorf, and H. Sievert. Percutaneous left atrial appendage transcatheter occlusion (plaato system) to prevent stroke in high-risk patients with non-rheumatic atrial fibrillation. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 46(1):9–14, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 40.Pozzoli, M., O. Febo, A. Torbicki, R. Tramarin, G. Calsamiglia, F. Cobelli, G. Specchia, and J. R. T. C. Roelandt. Left atrial appendage dysfunction: a cause of thrombosis? Evidence by transesophageal echocardiography-doppler studies. J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 4(5):435–441, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 41.Price, M. J. V. Y. Reddy, M. Valderrábano, J. L. Halperin, D. N. Gibson, N. Gordon, K. C. Huber, and D. R. Holmes. Bleeding outcomes after left atrial appendage closure compared with long-term warfarin: a pooled, patient-level analysis of the watchman randomized trial experience. JACC Cardiovasc. Interv. 8(15):1925–1932, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 44.Saygi, S., U. O. Turk, E. Alioglu, B. Kirilmaz, I. Tengiz, N. Tuzun, and E. Ercan. Left atrial appendage function in mitral stenosis: is it determined by cardiac rhythm? J. Heart Valve Dis. 20(4):417–424, 2011.Google Scholar
- 45.Schaap, M., C. T. Metz, T. van Walsum, A. G van der Giessen, A. C. Weustink, N. R. Mollet, C. Bauer, H. Bogunović, C. Castro, X. Deng, et al. Standardized evaluation methodology and reference database for evaluating coronary artery centerline extraction algorithms. Med. Image Anal. 13(5):701–714, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 49.Tabata, T., T. Oki, A. Iuchi, H. Yamada, K. Manabe, K. Fukuda, M. Abe, N. Fukuda, and S. Ito. Evaluation of left atrial appendage function by measurement of changes in flow velocity patterns after electrical cardioversion in patients with isolated atrial fibrillation. Am. J. Cardiol. 79(5):615–620, 1997.CrossRefGoogle Scholar