Modeling Right Ventricle Failure After Continuous Flow Left Ventricular Assist Device: A Biventricular Finite-Element and Lumped-Parameter Analysis
The risk of right ventricle (RV) failure remains a major contraindication for continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) implantation in patients with heart failure. It is therefore critical to identify the patients who will benefit from early intervention to avoid adverse outcomes. We sought to advance the computational modeling description of the mechanisms underlying RV failure in LVAD-supported patients. RV failure was studied by computational modeling of hemodynamic and cardiac mechanics using lumped-parameter and biventricular finite element (FE) analysis. Findings were validated by comparison of bi-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiographic strain assessment of the RV free wall vs. patient-specific computational strain estimations, and by non-invasive lumped-based hemodynamic predictions vs. invasive right heart catheterization data. Correlation analysis revealed that lumped-derived RV cardiac output (R = 0.94) and RV stroke work index (R = 0.85) were in good agreement with catheterization data collected from 7 patients with CF-LVAD. Biventricular FE analysis showed abnormal motion of the interventricular septum towards the left ventricular free wall, suggesting impaired right heart mechanics. Good agreement between computationally predicted and echocardiographic measured longitudinal strains was found at basal (− 19.1 ± 3.0% for ECHO, and − 16.4 ± 3.2% for FEM), apical (− 20.0 ± 3.7% for ECHO, and − 17.4 ± 2.7% for FEM), and mid-level of the RV free wall (− 20.1 ± 5.9% for echo, and − 18.0 ± 5.4% for FEM). Simulation approach here presented could serve as a tool for less invasive and early diagnosis of the severity of RV failure in patients with LVAD, although future studies are needed to validate our findings against clinical outcomes.
KeywordsRight ventricular failure Left ventricular assist device Speckle-tracking echocardiography Lumped-parameter Finite-element analysis
Mr. Francesco Scardulla acknowledges the Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research for supporting his research, and Dr. Pasta of the Fondazione Ri.MED for supporting his research on cardiovascular biomechanics. The authors thank Mr Warren Blumberg for his editorial assistance.
Conflict of interest
Author F Scardulla, Author V Agnese, Author G Romano, Author G Di Gesare, Author S Sciacca, Author D Bellavia, Author F Clemenza, Author M Pilato, Author S Pasta declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000 (5). Informed consent was obtained from all patients for being included in the study. Additional informed consent was obtained from all patients for which identifying information is included in this article
- 1.Argiriou, M., S. M. Kolokotron, T. Sakellaridis, O. Argiriou, C. Charitos, P. Zarogoulidis, et al. Right heart failure post left ventricular assist device implantation. J. Thorac. Dis. 6(1):S52–S59, 2014. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2013.10.26.Google Scholar
- 2.Atluri, P., A. B. Goldstone, A. S. Fairman, J. W. MacArthur, Y. Shudo, J. E. Cohen, et al. Predicting right ventricular failure in the modern, continuous flow left ventricular assist device era. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 96(3):857–863, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.03.099; (discussion 63-4).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Bonnemain, J., A. C. Malossi, M. Lesinigo, S. Deparis, A. Quarteroni, and L. K. von Segesser. Numerical simulation of left ventricular assist device implantations: comparing the ascending and the descending aorta cannulations. Med. Eng. Phys. 35(10):1465–1475, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medengphy.2013.03.022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Carrick, R., L. Ge, L. C. Lee, Z. Zhang, R. Mishra, L. Axel, et al. Patient-specific finite element-based analysis of ventricular myofiber stress after Coapsys: importance of residual stress. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 93(6):1964–1971, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2012.03.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Di Molfetta, A., G. Ferrari, R. Iacobelli, S. Filippelli, L. Fresiello, P. Guccione, et al. Application of a lumped parameter model to study the feasibility of simultaneous implantation of a continuous flow ventricular assist device (VAD) and a pulsatile flow VAD in BIVAD patients. Artif Organs. 41(3):242–252, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1111/aor.12911.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.Fitzpatrick, 3rd, J. R., J. R. Frederick, W. Hiesinger, V. M. Hsu, R. C. McCormick, E. D. Kozin, et al. Early planned institution of biventricular mechanical circulatory support results in improved outcomes compared with delayed conversion of a left ventricular assist device to a biventricular assist device. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 137(4):971–977, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.09.021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Genet, M., L. C. Lee, R. Nguyen, H. Haraldsson, G. Acevedo-Bolton, Z. H. Zhang, et al. Distribution of normal human left ventricular myofiber stress at end diastole and end systole: a target for in silico design of heart failure treatments. J. Appl. Physiol. 117(2):142–152, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1152/japplphysiol.00255.2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Heidenreich, P. A., N. M. Albert, L. A. Allen, D. A. Bluemke, J. Butler, G. C. Fonarow, et al. Forecasting the impact of heart failure in the United States: a policy statement from the American Heart Association. Circ. Heart Fail. 6(3):606–619, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1161/HHF.0b013e318291329a.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 17.Kerckhoffs, R. C., M. L. Neal, Q. Gu, J. B. Bassingthwaighte, J. H. Omens, and A. D. McCulloch. Coupling of a 3D finite element model of cardiac ventricular mechanics to lumped systems models of the systemic and pulmonic circulation. Ann. Biomed. Eng. 35(1):1–18, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10439-006-9212-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Kormos, R. L., J. J. Teuteberg, F. D. Pagani, S. D. Russell, R. John, L. W. Miller, et al. Right ventricular failure in patients with the HeartMate II continuous-flow left ventricular assist device: incidence, risk factors, and effect on outcomes. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc Surg. 139(5):1316–1324, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.11.020.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 21.Lumens, J., T. Arts, B. Broers, K. A. Boomars, P. van Paassen, F. W. Prinzen, et al. Right ventricular free wall pacing improves cardiac pump function in severe pulmonary arterial hypertension: a computer simulation analysis. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 297(6):H2196–H2205, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00870.2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.Matthews, J. C., T. M. Koelling, F. D. Pagani, and K. D. Aaronson. The right ventricular failure risk score a pre-operative tool for assessing the risk of right ventricular failure in left ventricular assist device candidates. J. Am. Coll. Cardiol. 51(22):2163–2172, 2008. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2008.03.009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 24.McMurray, J. J., S. Adamopoulos, S. D. Anker, A. Auricchio, M. Bohm, K. Dickstein, et al. ESC guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012: the Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2012 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 14(8):803–869, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjhf/hfs105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Rosamond, W., K. Flegal, K. Furie, A. Go, K. Greenlund, N. Haase, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics–2008 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation. 117(4):e25–e146, 2008.Google Scholar
- 27.Sack, K. L., B. Baillargeon, G. Acevedo-Bolton, M. Genet, N. Rebelo, E. Kuhl, et al. Partial LVAD restores ventricular outputs and normalizes LV but not RV stress distributions in the acutely failing heart in silico. Int. J Artif. Organ. 39(8):421–430, 2016. https://doi.org/10.5301/ijao.5000520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 35.Wenk, J. F., L. Ge, Z. Zhang, M. Soleimani, D. D. Potter, A. W. Wallace, et al. A coupled biventricular finite element and lumped-parameter circulatory system model of heart failure. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 16(8):807–818, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1080/10255842.2011.641121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar