Pressure and Flow Rate Changes During Contrast Injections in Cerebral Angiography: Correlation to Reflux Length
- 108 Downloads
Cerebral angiography involves the antegrade injection of contrast media through a catheter into the vasculature to visualize the region of interest under X-ray imaging. Depending on the injection and blood flow parameters, the bolus of contrast can propagate in the upstream direction and proximal to the catheter tip, at which point contrast is said to have refluxed. In this in vitro study, we investigate the relationship of fundamental hemodynamic variables to this phenomenon. Contrast injections were carried out under steady and pulsatile flow using various vessel diameters, catheter sizes, working fluid flow rates, and injection rates. The distance from the catheter tip to the proximal edge of the contrast bolus, called reflux length, was measured on the angiograms; the relation of this reflux length to different hemodynamic parameters was evaluated. Results show that contrast reflux occurs when the pressure distal to the catheter tip increases to be greater than the pressure proximal to the catheter tip. The ratio of this pressure difference to the baseline flow rate, called reflux resistance here, was linearly correlated to the normalized reflux length (reflux length/vessel diameter). Further, the ratio of blood flow to contrast fluid momentums, called the Craya–Curtet number, was correlated to the normalized reflux length via a sigmoid function. A sigmoid function was also found to be representative of the relationship between the ratio of the Reynolds numbers of blood flow to contrast and the normalized reflux length. As described by previous reports, catheter based contrast injections cause substantial increases in local flow and pressure. Contrast reflux should generally be avoided during standard antegrade angiography. Our study shows two specific correlations between contrast reflux length and baseline and intra-injection parameters that have not been published previously. Further studies need to be conducted to fully characterize the phenomena and to extract reliable indicators of clinical utility. Parameters relevant to cerebral angiography are studied here, but the essential principles are applicable to all angiographic procedures involving antegrade catheter injections.
KeywordsReflux length Efflux length Craya–Curtet number Pressure gradient Reflux resistance Logistic function
Conflict of interest
Author BK is partly employed by Vascular Simulations LLC. All other authors have stock ownership in Vascular Simulations LLC.
No human or animal studies were carried out by the authors for this article.
Supplementary material 1 (AVI 201 kb)
- 2.Becker, H. A. Discussion:“Confined jet mixing for nonseparating conditions”(Razinsky, E., and Brighton, JA, 1971, ASME J. Basic Eng., 93, pp. 333–347). J. Basic Eng. 93(3):347, 1971.Google Scholar
- 5.Dublin, A. B., and B. N. French. Cerebral aneurysmal rupture during angiography with confirmation by computed tomography: a review of intra-angiographic aneurysmal rupture. Surg. Neurol. 13(1):19–26, 1980.Google Scholar
- 7.Endres, J., Redel, T., Kowarschik, M., Hutter, J., Hornegger, J., Doerfler, A. (eds.). Virtual angiography using CFD simulations based on patient-specific parameter optimization. In: 2012 9th IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging (ISBI), IEEE, 2012.Google Scholar
- 9.Genereux, P., R. Mehran, M. B. Leon, N. Bettinger, and G. W. Stone. Classification for assessing the quality of diagnostic coronary angiography. J. Invasive Cardiol. 29:417–420, 2017.Google Scholar
- 15.Hingwala, D. R., B. Thomas, C. Kesavadas, and T. R. Kapilamoorthy. Suboptimal contrast opacification of dynamic head and neck MR angiography due to venous stasis and reflux: technical considerations for optimization. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 32(2):310–314, 2011. https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A2301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 18.Keenan, J. H., E. P. Neumann, and F. Lustwerk. An investigation of ejector design by analysis and experiment. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Guided Missiles Program, 1948.Google Scholar
- 25.Morris, T. W., M. Francis, and H. W. Fischer. A comparison of the cardiovascular responses to carotid injections of ionic and nonionic contrast media. Investig. Radiol. 14(3):217–223, 1979.Google Scholar
- 28.Prasad, A., C. Ortiz-Lopez, D. M. Kaye, M. Byrne, S. Nanayakkara, S. H. Ahmed, et al. The use of the AVERT system to limit contrast volume administration during peripheral angiography and intervention. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 86(7):1228–1233, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.26155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 31.Saitoh, H., K. Hayakawa, K. Nishimura, Y. Okuno, C. Murayama, T. Miyazawa, et al. Intracarotid blood pressure changes during contrast medium injection. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 17(1):51–54, 1996.Google Scholar
- 32.Saitoh, H., K. Hayakawa, K. Nishimura, Y. Okuno, T. Teraura, K. Yumitori, et al. Rerupture of cerebral aneurysms during angiography. Am. J. Neuroradiol. 16(3):539–542, 1995.Google Scholar
- 33.Sampei, T., N. Yasui, M. Mizuno, S. Nakajima, T. Ishikawa, H. Hadeishi, et al. Contrast medium extravasation during cerebral angiography for ruptured intracranial aneurysm; clinical analysis of 26 cases. Neurol. Med. Chir. 30(13):1011–1015, 1990. https://doi.org/10.2176/nmc.30.1011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 43.Woodfield, P. L. , Nakabe, K., Suzuki, K. (eds.). Numerical computation on recirculation flow structures in co-axial confined laminar jets. In: 14th Symposium on Computational Fluid Dynamics 2000. Japan: Japanese Society of Fluid Mechanics.Google Scholar
- 44.Yamashita, K., K. Hayakawa, M. Tanaka, and J. Konishi. Cardiovascular responses following the intracarotid injections of ionic and nonionic contrast media compared with various mannitol solutions. Correl. Osmolality Investig. Radiol. 23(9):680–686, 1988.Google Scholar
- 45.Yousem, D. M., and B. C. Trinh. Injection rates for neuroangiography: results of a survey. AJNR Am. J. Neuroradiol. 22(10):1838–1840, 2001.Google Scholar