Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology

, Volume 6, Issue 4, pp 519–532 | Cite as

Computational Bench Testing to Evaluate the Short-Term Mechanical Performance of a Polymeric Stent

  • A. C. BobelEmail author
  • S. Petisco
  • J. R. Sarasua
  • W. Wang
  • P. E. McHugh


Over the last decade, there has been a significant volume of research focussed on the utilization of biodegradable polymers such as poly-l-lactide-acid (PLLA) for applications associated with cardiovascular disease. More specifically, there has been an emphasis on upgrading current clinical shortfalls experienced with conventional bare metal stents and drug eluting stents. One such approach, the adaption of fully formed polymeric stents has led to a small number of products being commercialized. Unfortunately, these products are still in their market infancy, meaning there is a clear non-occurrence of long term data which can support their mechanical performance in vivo. Moreover, the load carry capacity and other mechanical properties essential to a fully optimized polymeric stent are difficult, timely and costly to establish. With the aim of compiling rapid and representative performance data for specific stent geometries, materials and designs, in addition to reducing experimental timeframes, Computational bench testing via finite element analysis (FEA) offers itself as a very powerful tool. On this basis, the research presented in this paper is concentrated on the finite element simulation of the mechanical performance of PLLA, which is a fully biodegradable polymer, in the stent application, using a non-linear viscous material model. Three physical stent geometries, typically used for fully polymeric stents, are selected, and a comparative study is performed in relation to their short-term mechanical performance, with the aid of experimental data. From the simulated output results, an informed understanding can be established in relation to radial strength, flexibility and longitudinal resistance, that can be compared with conventional permanent metal stent functionality, and the results show that it is indeed possible to generate a PLLA stent with comparable and sufficient mechanical performance. The paper also demonstrates the attractiveness of FEA as a tool for establishing fundamental mechanical characteristics of polymeric stent performance.


Biodegradable polymer Poly-l-lactid-acid (PLLA) Finite-element analysis Biodegradable stents Radial strength Computational bench test 



The authors like to acknowledge the funding of this project through a Hardiman Scholarship at NUI Galway.

Conflict of Interest

Author Anna C. Bobel, Author Susana Petisco, Author Jose R. Sarasua Author Wenxin Wang and Author Peter E. McHugh declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Human and Animal Rights and Informed Consent

No human and animal studies were carried out by the authors for this article.

Supplementary material

13239_2015_235_MOESM1_ESM.docx (122 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 121 kb)


  1. 1.
    Agrawal, C., K. Haas, D. Leopold, et al. Evaluation of poly (l-lactic acid) as a material for intravascular polymeric stents. Biomaterials 13:176–182, 1992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anonymous: In, 2014.
  3. 3.
    Auras, R. A., L.-T. Lim, S. E. Selke, et al. Poly (Lactic Acid): Synthesis, Structures, Properties, Processing, and Applications. New York: Wiley, 2011.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bedoya, J., C. A. Meyer, L. H. Timmins, et al. Effects of stent design parameters on normal artery wall mechanics. J. Biomech. Eng. 128:757, 2006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bergström, J., and M. Boyce. Constitutive modeling of the time-dependent and cyclic loading of elastomers and application to soft biological tissues. Mech. Mater. 33:523–530, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bressloff, N. W., SP, Al-Lamee, K.: Multi-objective design refinement of coronary stents. In: ECCOMAS 2012. Vienna, Austria, 2012.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bressloff, N. W., Pant, S., Al-Lamee, K. G. Stent. In: Google Patents, 2014.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Buckley, C., and D. Jones. Glass-rubber constitutive model for amorphous polymers near the glass transition. Polymer 36:3301–3312, 1995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Colombo, A., and E. Karvouni. Biodegradable stents:” Fulfilling the mission and stepping away”. Circulation 102:371–373, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Anonymous: Datasheet 04. In: Physical Properties., 2010.
  11. 11.
    Conway, C., F. Sharif, J. Mcgarry, et al. A computational test-bed to assess coronary stent implantation mechanics using a population-specific approach. Cardiovasc. Eng. Technol. 3:374–387, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Etave, F., G. Finet, M. Boivin, et al. Mechanical properties of coronary stents determined by using finite element analysis. J. Biomech. 34:1065–1075, 2001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Finn, A. V., G. Nakazawa, M. Joner, et al. Vascular responses to drug eluting stents. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 27:1500–1510, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gonzalo, N., and C. Macaya. Absorbable stent: focus on clinical applications and benefits. Vasc. Health Risk Manag. 8:125, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Grabow, N., M. Schlun, K. Sternberg, et al. Mechanical properties of laser cut poly (L-lactide) micro-specimens: implications for stent design, manufacture, and sterilization. J. Biomech. Eng. 127:25, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Grogan, J., S. Leen, and P. Mchugh. Comparing coronary stent material performance on a common geometric platform through simulated bench testing. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 12:129–138, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hayman, D., C. Bergerson, S. Miller, et al. The effect of static and dynamic loading on degradation of PLLA stent fibers. J. Biomech. Eng. 136:081006, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hsiao, H.-M., Y.-H. Chiu, K.-H. Lee, et al. Computational modeling of effects of intravascular stent design on key mechanical and hemodynamic behavior. Comput. Aided Design 44:757–765, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hsiao, H., C. Yeh, C. Wang, et al. Effects of stent design on new clinical issue of longitudinal stent compression in interventional cardiology. Biomed. Microdevices 16:599–607, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hsiao, H.-M., C. Wang, C.-T. Yeh, et al. Does the reinforcement of end rings improve longitudinal stent compression of coronary. Exp. Clin. Cardiol. 20:1914–1922, 2014.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hyun Kim, J., T. Jin Kang, and W.-R. Yu. Simulation of mechanical behavior of temperature-responsive braided stents made of shape memory polyurethanes. J. Biomech. 43:632–643, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Khan, K. A., and T. El-Sayed. A phenomenological constitutive model for the nonlinear viscoelastic responses of biodegradable polymers. Acta Mech. 224:287–305, 2013.zbMATHMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Leenslag, J., and A. Pennings. High-strength poly (l-lactide) fibres by a dry-spinning/hot-drawing process. Polymer 28:1695–1702, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Migliavacca, F., L. Petrini, M. Colombo, et al. Mechanical behavior of coronary stents investigated through the finite element method. J. Biomech. 35:803–811, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Moore, J. E., J. S. Soares, and K. R. Rajagopal. Biodegradable Stents: Biomechanical Modeling Challenges and Opportunities. Cardiovasc. Eng. Technol. 1:52–65, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mortier, P., M. De Beule, P. Segers, et al. Virtual bench testing of new generation coronary stents. EuroIntervention 7:369–376, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Muliana, A., and K. Rajagopal. Modeling the response of nonlinear viscoelastic biodegradable polymeric stents. Int. J. Solids Struct. 49:989–1000, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ogden, R., G. Saccomandi, and I. Sgura. Fitting hyperelastic models to experimental data. Comput. Mech. 34:484–502, 2004.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Onuma, Y., and P. W. Serruys. Bioresorbable scaffold the advent of a new era in percutaneous coronary and peripheral revascularization? Circulation 123:779–797, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ormiston, J. A., and P. W. S. Serruys. Bioabsorbable coronary stents. Circ. Cardiovasc. Interv. 2:255–260, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ormiston, J. A., P. W. Serruys, E. Regar, et al. A bioabsorbable everolimus-eluting coronary stent system for patients with single de-novo coronary artery lesions (ABSORB): a prospective open-label trial. Lancet 371:899–907, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Pauck, R., and B. Reddy. Computational analysis of the radial mechanical performance of PLLA coronary artery stents. Med. Eng. Phys. 37:7–12, 2015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Anon: Abaqus 6.12 Analysis User’s Manual. DS SIMULIA Corp, Providence, RI, USA, 2012.Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Soares, J. S., J. E. Moore, Jr, and K. R. Rajagopal. Constitutive framework for biodegradable polymers with applications to biodegradable stents. Asaio J. 54:295, 2008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Soares, J. S., J. E. Moore, Jr, and K. R. Rajagopal. Modeling of deformation-accelerated breakdown of polylactic acid biodegradable stents. J. Med. Devices 4:041007, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Srivastava, V., S. A. Chester, and L. Anand. Thermally actuated shape-memory polymers: Experiments, theory, and numerical simulations. J. Mech. Phys. Solids 58:1100–1124, 2010.zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Staehr, P.: ABSORB Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold System. In: 17th Asian Harmonization Working Party Annual Conference, edited by Vascular, A. Taipei, 2012.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Sweeney, J., R. Spares, and M. Woodhead. A constitutive model for large multiaxial deformations of solid polypropylene at high temperature. Polym Eng. Sci. 49:1902–1908, 2009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Tamai, H., K. Igaki, T. Tsuji, et al. A biodegradable poly-l-lactic acid coronary stent in the porcine coronary artery. J. Interv. Cardiol. 12:443–450, 1999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Van Der Hoeven, B. L., N. M. M. Pires, H. M. Warda, et al. Drug-eluting stents: results, promises and problems. Int. J. Cardiol. 99:9–17, 2005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Vieira, A., J. Vieira, J. Ferra, et al. Mechanical study of PLA-PCL fibers during in vitro degradation. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 4:451–460, 2010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Vieira, A. C., R. M. Guedes, and V. Tita. Constitutive modeling of biodegradable polymers: Hydrolytic degradation and time-dependent behavior. Int. J. Solids Struct. 51:1164–1174, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Waksman, R. Promise and challenges of bioabsorbable stents. Catheter. Cardiovasc. Interv. 70:407–414, 2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wang, Y.: Bioabsorbable scaffolds made from composites. In: Google Patents, 2013.Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Weir, N., F. Buchanan, J. Orr, et al. Degradation of poly-l-lactide. Part 1: in vitro and in vivo physiological temperature degradation. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng. H J. Eng. Med. 218:307–319, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Weir, N., F. Buchanan, J. Orr, et al. Processing, annealing and sterilisation of poly-l-lactide. Biomaterials 25:3939–3949, 2004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Welch, T. R., R. C. Eberhart, S. V. Reddy, et al. Novel bioresorbable stent design and fabrication: Congenital heart disease applications. Cardiovasc. Eng. Technol. 4:171–182, 2013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Welt, F. G. P., and C. Rogers. Inflammation and restenosis in the stent era. Arterioscler. Thromb. Vasc. Biol. 22:1769–1776, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Wong, Y., Z. Stachurski, and S. Venkatraman. Modeling shape memory effect in uncrosslinked amorphous biodegradable polymer. Polymer 52:874–880, 2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Eswaran, S. K., Kelley, J. A., Bergstrom, J. S. et al. Material Modeling of Polylactide. In: SIMULIA Customer Conference. 2011.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Biomedical Engineering Society 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. C. Bobel
    • 1
    Email author
  • S. Petisco
    • 2
  • J. R. Sarasua
    • 2
  • W. Wang
    • 3
  • P. E. McHugh
    • 1
  1. 1.Biomechanics Research Centre (BMEC), Biomedical Engineering, College of Engineering and InformaticsNUI GalwayGalwayIreland
  2. 2.Basque Center for Macromolecular Design and Engineering, POLYMATUniversity of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU)BilbaoSpain
  3. 3.The Charles Institute of Dermatology, School of Medicine and Medical ScienceUniversity College of DublinDublinIreland

Personalised recommendations