Abstract
The use of two inhibitors of Mek1/2 and Gsk3β (2i) promotes the generation of mouse diploid and haploid embryonic stem cells (ESCs) from the inner cell mass of biparental and uniparental blastocysts, respectively. However, a system enabling long-term maintenance of imprints in ESCs has proven challenging. Here, we report that the use of a two-step a2i (alternative two inhibitors of Src and Gsk3β, TSa2i) derivation/culture protocol results in the establishment of androgenetic haploid ESCs (AG-haESCs) with stable DNA methylation at paternal DMRs (differentially DNA methylated regions) up to passage 60 that can efficiently support generating mice upon oocyte injection. We also show coexistence of H3K9me3 marks and ZFP57 bindings with intact DMR methylations. Furthermore, we demonstrate that TSa2i-treated AG-haESCs are a heterogeneous cell population regarding paternal DMR methylation. Strikingly, AG-haESCs with late passages display increased paternal-DMR methylations and improved developmental potential compared to early-passage cells, in part through the enhanced proliferation of H19-DMR hypermethylated cells. Together, we establish AG-haESCs that can long-term maintain paternal imprints.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
INTRODUCTION
Culture conditions with 2i (inhibitors of Mek1/2 and Gsk3β) supplemented with leukemia inhibitory factor (LIF) (2i/L) enhance the derivation of embryonic stem cells (ESCs) with naïve ground-state pluripotency (Ying et al., 2008). However, recent studies indicate that prolonged application of 2i results in a widespread loss of DNA methylation, including repetitive elements and imprinted genes, and impaired developmental potential in ESCs (Choi et al., 2017b; Yagi et al., 2017). An alternative 2i/L (Mek1/2 inhibitor is substituted with the Src inhibitor, known as a2i/L) has been developed (Shimizu et al., 2012) and used to preserve the epigenetic integrity and developmental potential of ESCs (Choi et al., 2017b; Yagi et al., 2017). Nevertheless, the long-term culture of female ESCs in a2i/L induced a reduction of ICR (imprinting control region) methylation (Yagi et al., 2017). Meanwhile, although male ESCs under a2i/L can stable maintain DMR methylation until passage 15 (Yagi et al., 2017), whether prolonged culture ensures intact DMR methylation is still unknown. Similarly, the conventional serum plus LIF (S/L) medium also induced loss of DNA methylation at ICRs in mouse ESCs upon prolonged culturing (Dean et al., 1998; Humpherys et al., 2001; Yagi et al., 2017). Therefore, there is an unmet need for the establishment or employment of appropriate derivation and culture conditions that would enable the long-term stable maintenance of imprinting marks in ESCs.
Application of 2i/L culture conditions has enabled the successes in deriving mouse haploid ESCs (haESCs) from parthenogenetic and androgenetic embryos (termed PG-haESCs and AG-haESCs, respectively) (Elling et al., 2011; Leeb and Wutz, 2011; Li et al., 2012; Yang et al., 2012). Both PG and AG-haESCs can be employed for high-throughput genetic analyses at a cellular level (Elling et al., 2011; Leeb et al., 2014; Leeb and Wutz, 2011; Sagi et al., 2016; Yang et al., 2013; Zhong et al., 2016b). Notably, AG-haESCs can be used as sperm replacement to support embryonic development upon injection into oocytes, leading to the production of semi-cloned (SC) embryos (Li et al., 2012; Yang et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2020). However, 2i/L-treated PG-haESCs were globally hypomethylated (Choi et al., 2017a; Elling et al., 2011; Zhong et al., 2016a). Meanwhile, AG-haESCs lost DNA methylation at differentially DNA methylated regions (DMRs), i.e., H19-DMR and IG-DMR, that control two paternal imprinted loci, H19-Igf2 and Dlk1-Dio3, respectively, resulting in the low birth rate of SC mice (Yang et al., 2012). Interestingly, deleting both DMRs in AG-haESCs (termed DKO-AG-haESCs) could decrease the expression of H19 and Gtl2 and dramatically rescue the developmental potential of resultant SC embryos (Li et al., 2020; Zhong et al., 2015). We reasoned that, if AG-haESCs could be generated under a2i/L conditions, they might stably maintain paternal imprinting features at least at early passages, which allows for the better developmental potential of SC embryos without removal of paternal DMRs and thus provides a useful tool for an efficient combination of in vitro and in vivo studies of imprinting regulation.
In this study, we tested our hypothesis using a2i/L with serum, w/o serum or a two-step protocol (Yagi et al., 2017) (a2i/L with serum for derivation followed by a2i/L without serum for maintenance, TSa2i/L) and found that TSa2i/L enabled generating AG-haESCs with stable DNA methylation in paternal DMRs up to 60 passages. Furthermore, we showed that H3K9me3 deposition and ZFP57 binding are preserved at H19 and IG DMRs and highly correlated with DMR methylation, which are likely involved in the stable maintenance of paternal imprints in TSa2i/L-derived AG-haESCs. In contrast, H3K4me3 deposition may prevent DMRs from de novo methylation upon loss of imprints. Strikingly, we found that TSa2i/L-treated AG-haESCs with late passages exhibited higher paternal DMR methylations and increased developmental potential compared to cells of early passages. We further demonstrated that TSa2i/L-treated AG-haESCs are a heterogeneous cell population regarding H19-DMR methylation levels and cells with hypermethylated H19-DMR display better proliferation potential compared to cells with hypomethylated H19-DMR, partially accounting for long-term maintenance of paternal imprints.
RESULTS
A two-step a2i/L derivation/culture condition enables generation of AG-haESCs with hypermethylated paternal DMRs
To derive haploid ESCs, we reconstructed haploid embryos through sperm nuclear transfer, i.e., injection of sperm head into enucleated oocytes (Yang et al., 2012). The sperm-cloned embryos developed to the blastocyst stage in vitro, followed by ESC derivation in one of three culture conditions, S/L, S/L supplemented with 2i (2i/L) or S/L with a2i (a2i/L). Both 2i/L and a2i/L conditions promoted the derivation of ESCs from sperm-cloned blastocysts compared to S/L (Fig. S1A and S1B). Among 12 2i/L-derived and 8 a2i/L-derived ESC lines, 7 and 4 of them respectively contained a subpopulation of haploid cells that can be enriched and maintained through regular fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS) (Fig. S1B–D). Consistent with our previous observations (Yang et al., 2012), 2i/L-derived AG-haESCs could give rise to SC mice upon intracytoplasmic AG-haESC injection (ICAHCI) at low efficiency at early passages, but lost the ability upon prolonged culturing, due to decreased DNA methylation at H19-DMR and IG-DMR (Li et al., 2020; Zhong et al., 2015) (Fig. S1E and S1F; Table S1). Expectedly, a2i/L-cultured haploid cells of early passages sustained DNA methylation at H19-DMR and IG-DMR and exhibited better developmental potential demonstrated by ICAHCI compared to 2i/L cells (Fig. S1G and S1H; Table S1). However, DNA methylation of paternal DMRs was progressively reduced in a2i/L-cultured haploid cells of later passages, leading to the decreased birth rate of SC mice (Fig. S1H; Table S1), most likely due to the use of serum that causes loss of DNA methylation at DMRs in diploid ESCs upon prolonged culturing (Dean et al., 1998; Humpherys et al., 2001; Yagi et al., 2017).
We next adopted a well-defined serum-free ESC medium (DMEM/F12 + Nerobasal + N2 + B27 + LIF) supplemented with a2i (termed SF/a2i/L) for AG-haESC derivation. From a total of 25 sperm-cloned blastocysts, we obtained 16 outgrowths. However, none of them could be passaged, indicating that serum or its replacement is critical for ESC derivation (Martello and Smith, 2014). We next employed a two-step protocol (Yagi et al., 2017), in which, a2i/L medium was employed for formation of outgrowths and a few times of cell passaging before the use of SF/a2i/L conditions for long-term maintenance (termed TSa2i/L protocol) (Fig. 1A). We found that one time of expansion in a2i/L followed by transferring into SF/a2i/L could give rise to stable haploid cell lines from different genetic backgrounds through regular FACS-enrichment of haploid cells (Figs. 1B, 1C, S2A, and S2B). Surprisingly, DNA methylations at both H19 and IG-DMRs were stably maintained at high levels upon prolonged culturing (up to passage 59, p59) in three tested lines (TSa2i-14, TSa2i-C57, and TSa2i-F1), although Rasgrf1-DMR was not stable in these cell lines (Figs. 1D and S2C). Consistently, ICAHCI analysis showed that all three tested TSa2i/L-treated haploid cells at early passages (<p30) efficiently supported the full-term embryonic development of SC embryos (Fig. 1E; Table 1), reaching an efficiency similar to DKO-AG-haESCs cultured in 2i/L (Zhong et al., 2015). Meanwhile, while cesarean section (C-section) was required to obtain SC pups when 2i/L or a2i/L-cultured cells were used for ICAHCI, the recipient females delivered TSa2i/L-treated-cell-derived SC pups by themselves similar to those carrying SC embryos derived from DKO-AG-haESCs (Fig. S2D) (Zhong et al., 2015).
Derivation of ground-state AG-haESCs maintaining hypermethylated paternal DMRs. (A) Diagram for the two-step derivation/culture protocol of AG-haESCs in a2i/L medium (TSa2i/L protocol). TSa2i-14, TSa2i-C57, and TSa2i-F1 are cell lines derived using TSa2i/L protocol, which were studied in this study. Haploid and diploid cells were labeled in blue and yellow, respectively. Haploid cells were enriched by FACS. (B) Establishment of AG-haESCs by FACS enrichment for haploid cells (Left). A DAPI filter was used to detect a signal of Hoechst 33342-stained DNA. Right, FACS data of diploid ESCs for comparison. (C) Summary of diploid and haploid ESC lines derived using TSa2i/L method from cloned blastocysts generated from sperm with different genetic backgrounds. Diploid cells are from diploidized haploid ESCs during ESC derivation and maintenance. (D) DNA methylation state of H19 and IG DMRs in TSa2i-derived AG-haESCs (TSa2i-14, TSa2i-C57, and TSa2i-F1) with different passages determined by bisulfite sequencing. Open and filled circles represent unmethylated and methylated CpG sites, respectively. (E) Diagram showing the generation of semi-cloned (SC) mice through intracytoplasmic AG-haESC injection (ICAHCI)
Prolonged SF/a2i/L culture enhances the developmental potential of AG-haESCs
We next examined whether genetic alterations can be introduced into these TSa2i/L-treated AG-haESCs, followed by ICAHCI to efficiently produce SC mice carrying expected genetic traits. To this end, we generated AG-haESCs carrying different genetic modifications, including a single mutant gene (Tet3), triple mutant genes (Tet1, 2, and 3), or a tagged gene (Dusp9-HA) (Choi et al., 2017a) by performing CRISPR-Cas9-based genetic manipulations (Fig. S2E and S2F). Surprisingly, all gene-modified TSa2i/L-treated haploid cells could give rise to corresponding SC mice via ICAHCI at a higher efficiency compared to haploid cells before manipulation (Table 1). Interestingly, wildtype TSa2i/L-cultured haploid cells, upon prolonged in vitro culture (p30-p62), also exhibited better ability to produce SC mice via ICAHCI (Fig. 2A), thus excluding the possibility that genetic manipulations result in higher developmental potential in haploid cells and suggesting that prolonged period of culturing in SF/a2i/L per se may enhance the development of SC embryos. Postnatal growth profiling analysis showed that SC pups obtained from TSa2i/L-treated haploid cells displayed better growth compared to DKO-AG-haESCs (Fig. S2G), probably due to decreased H19 and increased Igf2 expression in organs like liver during development (Fig. S2H–K), consistent with the recent observations in 2i/L-cultured AG-haESCs with H19, H19-DMR and IG-DMR deletions (Li et al., 2020).
Prolonged SF/a2i/L culture increases the developmental potential of AG-haESCs by ICAHCI. (A) Birth rate of the SC mice generated from TSa2i/L-derived cells with early and late passages. Passage 30 is a cutoff used to divide cells into early and late groups. SC pups obtained by cesarean section (C-section) were not used to calculate the birth rate. All error bars indicate the average mean ± SEM. P value was calculated by t test. *, P < 0.05. (B) DNA methylation levels at H19 and IG DMRs of early- and late-passage AG-haESCs derived by TSa2i/L conditions. 2i/L (2i-14) AG-haESCs are as controls. (C) Boxplot showing the DNA methylation levels of genome and gamete DMRs in 2i/L (2i-14 and 2i-O48), a2i/L (a2i-8), and TSa2i/L-derived (TSa2i-C57 and TSa2i-14) AG-ESCs. O48 is a cell line with both H19- and IG-DMR deletions derived previously (Zhong et al., 2015). N.D., not detected. (D) Snapshots of DNA methylation levels of a paternal DMR (IG-DMR) and a maternal DMR (Nespas-DMR) in 2i/L (2i-14 and 2i-O48), a2i/L (a2i-8), and TSa2i/L-derived (TSa2i-C57 and TSa2i-14) AG-ESCs. The red dashed box represents the deleted region in 2i-O48
Epigenetic integrity of paternal DMRs is preserved in TSa2i/L-cultured AG-haESCs
Given the strong correlation of DNA methylation patterns and in vivo developmental potentials of ESCs (Choi et al., 2017b; Yagi et al., 2017; Zwaka, 2017) and previous studies have highlighted that H19 and IG DMR methylation state in AG-haESCs are related to their developmental potential through ICAHCI (Zhang et al., 2015; Zhong et al., 2015), we thus investigated DNA methylation state in cells with prolonged culture. Bisulfite-PCR analysis indicated increased DNA methylation at both of H19 and IG DMRs in TSa2i/L-treated haploid cells of late passages compared to early passages (Fig. 2B). To further assess their methylation patterns, we performed whole-genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) using haploid cells of early (<p30) and late passages (p30~p60). The results indicated that TSa2i/L-treated haploid cells sustained high levels of DNA methylation at DMRs of paternally imprinted genes at both early and late passages, even though the genome-wide DNA methylation level showed a slight decrease upon prolonged culture (Figs. 2C and S3A). In contrast, majority of tested canonical maternal DMRs (n = 20) were unmethylated in TSa2i/L-treated AG-haESCs during long-term culturing (Figs. 2C, 2D and S3B). We further analyzed secondary (somatic) DMRs in paternally imprinted loci which are known to depend on the presence of a germline DMR and established after fertilization (Barlow and Bartolomei, 2014; Ferguson-Smith, 2011) and found that two tested regions sustained hypermethylation in TSa2i/L-treated cells (Fig. S3C).
DNA methylation and H3K9 methylation are strongly associated (Du et al., 2015). In mouse ESCs cultured in 2i, while exhibiting globally hypomethylated DNA compared to ESCs maintained in conventional conditions involving serum, elevated DNA methylation correlates with the presence of H3K9me3 on imprinted loci (Habibi et al., 2013). Moreover, both parental genomes undergo large-scale H3K9me3 reestablishment after fertilization (Wang et al., 2018). We thus hypothesized that maintenance of hypermethylated germline DMRs in our sperm genome-bearing haploid cells may also correlate with the presence of H3K9me3, which is probably established during pre-implantation development of sperm-cloned embryos. To this end, we first analyzed the allelic H3K9me3 pattern on DMRs during mouse early embryo development based on single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) (Wang et al., 2018). As expected, both parental DMRs showed allelic-specific H3K9me3 patterns, which were established after fertilization and stably sustained from the zygote stage to the ICM stage (Fig. S4A and S4B). We then investigated the distributions of H3K9me3 in our TSa2i/L and 2i/L haploid cells that were derived from ICMs by performing ChIP-seq analysis. Consistent with a published report in mouse diploid ESCs (Walter et al., 2016), H3K9me3 was also mainly enriched at repetitive elements, especially LTRs and LINEs in haploid ESCs (Fig. S4C and S4D). Intriguingly, both H19 and IG DMRs were stably enriched with strong H3K9me3 signals in TSa2i/L-derived AG-haESCs during long-term culturing (Fig. 3A). In contrast, H3K9me3 of paternal DMRs was gradually lost in 2i/L-derived AG-haESCs upon prolonged culture. Furthermore, H3K9me3 specifically marked paternal DMRs rather than maternal DMRs in TSa2i/L AG-haESCs, while all DMRs were free of H3K9me3 in 2i/L AG-haESCs (Figs. 3B and S4E). We also noted the loss of H3K9me3 at Rasgrf1-DMR in TSa2i-C57 cells with late passages (Fig. S4F), in which, Rasgrf1-DMR methylation was absent (Fig. S2C). Our results thus demonstrate that H3K9me3 of paternal DMRs is maintained in TSa2i/L AG-haESCs, which positively correlates with the DNA methylation state of DMRs.
H3K9me3 deposition and ZFP57 binding correlate with maintenance of paternal DMR methylation in TSa2i/L-derived AG-haESCs. (A) Representative snapshots of H3K9me3 signals at H19-DMR and IG-DMR for the AG-haESCs derived in 2i/L (2i-14) and TSa2i/L (TSa2i-14 and TSa2i-C57) with different generations. (B) Boxplot showing H3K9me3 levels at maternal and paternal DMRs for 2i/L (2i-14) and TSa2i/L (TSa2i-14 and TSa2i-C57)-derived AG-haESCs. (C) Snapshots of ZFP57 binding signals and DNA methylation in H19-DMR and IG-DMR for the AG-haESCs derived in 2i/L (2i-14) and TSa2i/L (TSa2i-C57). ZFP57 ChIP-seq of mouse diploid ESCs (mESCs) is from the published data (Shi et al., 2019). (D) Boxplot showing ZFP57 levels at maternal and paternal DMRs for 2i/L (2i-14, p61) and TSa2i/L (TSa2i-C57, p63)-derived AG-haESCs. (E) The DNA methylation levels of H19-DMR and IG-DMR in wide-type AG-haESCs (TSa2i-C57) and the same AG-haESCs with Zfp57 knockout culturing for 10 passages (Zfp57 KO-10-p) and 20 passages (Zfp57 KO-20-p). (F) Snapshot showing ZFP57 and H3K9me3 signals at H19-DMR and IG-DMR in wide-type and Zfp57 KO TSa2i/L AG-haESCs
ZFP57 is one of the Kruppel-associated box zinc finger proteins (KRAB-ZFPs) that can target and maintain genomic imprints after fertilization (Takahashi et al., 2015). Our sperm genome-carrying haploid cells were derived from androgenetic blastocysts, in which, paternal methylation imprints should be protected as those in normal diploid blastocysts (Li et al., 2008). Meanwhile, ZFP57 protein is highly expressed in ESCs, binds at all known imprinted DMRs in a parental origin-specific and methylation-sensitive manner and Zfp57-null ESCs lost imprints at all tested imprinted DMRs (Quenneville et al., 2011; Strogantsev et al., 2015). Together, these observations suggest that ZFP57 may be critical for maintenance of the paternal DMR methylation in TSa2i/L cells. As expected, ChIP-seq analysis indicated that methylated DMRs (in TSa2i/L cells) rather than unmethylated DMRs (in 2i/L cells) were bound by ZFP57 (Figs. 3C and S4G). Similarly, maternal DMRs were free of ZFP57 bindings in both 2i/L and TSa2i/L AG-mESCs (Fig. 3D). We then deleted Zfp57 in TSa2i/L AG-haESCs and cultured them in SF/a2i/L for up to 20 passages (Fig. S4H). Expectedly, both H19 and IG DMRs gradually lost methylation (Fig. 3E). Furthermore, WGBS analysis indicated that Zfp57-null cells were globally hypermethylated and sustained a reduced level of DNA methylations at paternal DMRs specifically (Fig. S4I). Consistently, H3K9me3 ChIP-seq analysis of Zfp57-null cells showed overt reduced signals on paternal DMRs (Fig. 3F). Taken together, TSa2i/L AG-haESCs preserve the epigenetic integrity of paternal imprints, including hypermethylated DNA methylation, deposition of H3K9me3 marks, and ZFP57 bindings.
Deposition of H3K4me3 prevents de novo methylation of DMRs in 2i/L-SF/a2i/L-switched AG-haESCs
Next, we sought to investigate whether imprints can be restored in 2i/L-cultured cells after being switched to SF/a2i/L conditions. Interestingly, switching 2i/L-treated haploid cells to SF/a2i/L for 5–10 passages induced global hypermethylation shown by 5mC immunoblotting (Fig. S5A), which was probably caused by the increased protein levels of DNA methyltransferases including DNMT1 and DNMT3A/3B (Fig. S5B). WGBS analysis further confirmed that while the whole genome underwent extensive de novo methylation in 2i/L-SF/a2i/L-switched AG-haESCs, both maternal and paternal DMRs maintained hypomethylated state (Fig. 4A). Bisulfite-PCR analysis further confirmed that paternal DMRs (H19 and IG DMRs) and maternal DMRs (Snrpn and Peg10 DMRs) did not undergo significant de novo methylation (Fig. 4B). Interestingly, when H19 and IG DMR deletions existed in 2i/L-cultured haploid cells, the somatic DMRs (Gtl2-DMR and Igf2-DMR) were significantly methylated after being switched to SF/a2i/L culture conditions (Fig. 4C). Given that Gtl2-DMR and Igf2-DMR showed higher DNA methylation levels in TSa2i/L AG-haESCs when compared to 2i/L AG-haESCs (Fig. S3C), our results together further confirmed that establishment of somatic DMRs relies on germline-derived DMRs and deletion of germline-derived DMRs can partially mimic DMR methylation state (Edwards and Ferguson-Smith, 2007; Tucker et al., 1996). Although the global H3K9me3 signals were rescued with the global increase of DNA methylation (Figs. 4D and S5C), the absence of H3K9me3 signals on paternal DMR loci of 2i/L-cultured cells could not be restored after being switched to SF/a2i/L conditions, which was consistent with DNA methylation changes (Fig. 4E). Of note, ICAHCI analysis showed that switched cells even with global hypermethylation didn’t restore the developmental potential when germline DMRs were not established (Table S2). Meanwhile, when H19 and IG DMR deletions existed in haploid cells, the switched cells displayed relatively high developmental potential similar to original 2i/L-treated DKO cells (Table S2). Collectively, these results indicate that imprints once lost can’t be restored in cultured ESCs under SF/a2i/L conditions, consistent with previous observations in other culture conditions (Tucker et al., 1996; Yagi et al., 2017).
Imprints cannot be restored in 2i/L-SF/a2i/L-switched AG-haESCs. (A) Boxplot showing the DNA methylation levels of different gene elements in AG-haESCs (2i-14) cultured in 2i/L or switched to SF/a2i/L. (B) Bar plot showing the DNA methylation levels at germline and somatic DMRs for the 2i/L-cultured AG-haESCs (2i-R9 and 2i-14) and the same cells switched to SF/a2i/L for 5–10 passages. IAPLTR1 and Musd1 are two repeat elements. N.D., not detected. (C) Bar plot showing the DNA methylation levels at germline and somatic DMRs for the 2i/L-cultured AG-haESCs with both H19 and IG DMR deletions (2i-RHG23 and 2i-O48-TKO) and the same cells switched to SF/a2i/L for 5–10 passages. IAPLTR1 and Musd1 are two repeat elements. N.D., not detected. (D) Hierarchical clustering analysis of H3K9me3 for the 2i/L, TSa2i/L, and 2i/L-SF/a2i/L switched AG-haESCs. (E) Snapshot of H3K9me3 levels at Etv5, H19-DMR, and IG-DMR for the AG- haESCs cultured in 2i/L or the same cells switched to SF/a2i/L. Deleted regions were labeled by dashed rectangles. 2i-O48-TKO cells were generated previously (Li et al., 2020)
We next sought to reveal factors that are involved in preventing the de novo methylation at DMRs. Previous studies have shown that H3K4me3 is negatively correlated with DNA methylation that is associated with transcriptional activation and removing DNA methylation may lead to the spread of H3K27me3 to DNA that is otherwise protected from methylation (Atlasi and Stunnenberg, 2017), we thus analyzed the distributions of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 in our cells. The results showed that nearly all unmethylated maternal DMRs were marked by H3K4me3 but not by H3K27me3 in 2i/L and TSa2i/L AG-haESCs (Fig. 5A and 5B). Meanwhile, paternal DMRs with hypomethylation also showed higher H3K4me3 enrichment in 2i/L-cultured AG-haESCs compared to TSa2i/L-cultured AG-haESCs with hypermethylated DMRs (Fig. 5C). Moreover, paternal DMRs showed enhanced H3K4me3 signals when AG-haESCs were switched from 2i/L to SF/a2i/L conditions (Fig. 5B and 5C). Consistently, high-throughput analyses showed that the loci with H3K4me3 peak lost during switching (Group I) were highly methylated in 2i/L-SF/a2i/L-switched cells, while the loci with maintained (Group III) or newly generated (Group II) H3K4me3 peaks were free of DNA methylation (Fig. 5D). Taken together, these results indicate that de novo methylation rigidly excludes the regions marked with H3K4me3. Due to the direct antagonism of H3K4me3 to DNMTs (Guo et al., 2015; Ooi et al., 2007), we proposed that H3K4me3 deposition at DMRs upon loss of both DNA methylation and H3K9me3 may prevent DMRs from de novo DNA methylation.
Deposition of H3K4me3 prevents de novo methylation of hypomethylated germline DMRs. (A) Heatmap representing the H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 levels of maternal and paternal DMRs in 2i/L (2i-14), TSa2i/L (TSa2i-14), and 2i/L-SF/a2i/L-switched (2i-14-2i/L-SF/a2i-10-p) AG-haESCs. (B) Bar plot showing H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 enrichment at maternal and paternal DMRs for 2i/L-cultured (2i-14), SF/a2i/L-cultured (TSa2i-14), and 2i/L-SF/a2i/L-switched (2i-14, switched from 2i/L to SF/a2i/L for 10 passages) AG-haESCs. (C) Snapshot of H3K4me3 and H3K27me3 at IG-DMR and H19-DMR for AG- haESCs cultured in 2i/L (2i-14), SF/a2i/L (TSa2i-14), or 2i/L-SF/a2i/L-switched (2i-14, 10 passages after swtiching) conditions. (D) Heatmap showing the H3K4me3 and DNA methylation levels within three groups of H3K4me3 peaks in 2i/L-cultured and 2i/L-SF/a2i/L-switched AG-haESCs. Each region was defined by extending H3K4me3 peaks for 2.5 kb upstream and downstream respectively
Enhanced proliferation potential of AG-haESCs with hypermethylated H19-DMR accounts for increased DMR methylation in cells of late passages
Previous studies have shown that 2i/L-cultured AG-haESCs are a heterogeneous cell population regarding paternal DMR methylations, in which cells with different DNA methylation levels at H19 and IG DMRs upon injection into oocytes result in different developmental potential of resulting SC embryos (Li et al., 2020; Yang et al., 2012; Zhong et al., 2015). Interestingly, two knockin haploid cell lines carrying Dusp9-HA established through single-cell expansion from the same experiment resulted in distinct differences in the birth rate of SC pups upon ICAHCI (32.5% vs. 8.3%, Table 1). As expected, higher levels of DNA methylation at H19 and IG DMRs were indeed relative to a better birth rate (Fig. 6A). These observations implied that TSa2i/L-cultured haploid cells even with a high level of DMR methylations are still a heterogeneous population containing cells with different DNA methylation levels at H19 and IG DMRs, leading to gene-modified cell lines with distinct DNA methylation and corresponding developmental potential. To confirm this, we first performed C-section at 18.5 days of gestation (E18.5) to recover a total of 111 SC pups originated from 111 single haploid cells of 3 cell lines, and found 3 growth-retarded pups (otherwise could not be obtained through natural delivery), which lost DNA methylation at H19-DMR as expected (Figs. 6B, S6A, and S6B). These results confirmed the heterogeneous methylome in TSa2i/L-cultured cells, excluding the roles of genome-editing manipulations in DMR methylation loss.
Enhanced proliferation of cells with hypermethylated H19-DMR accounts for increased developmental potential of late-passage haploid cells. (A) DNA methylation levels of H19-DMR and IG-DMR in the two Dusp9-HA-tagged AG-haESC lines (5’HA-120 and 5’HA-138) with distinct developmental potential. (B) The body weights of E18.5 SC pups produced by ICAHCI (from TSa2i-14, TSa2i-C57, and TSa2i-F1 AG-haESCs). Pups derived from DKO-AG-haESCs (2i-O48) and sperm are as controls. (C) DNA methylation levels of H19 and IG DMRs in subclones from TSa2i-C57 (sc1 to sc21) were obtained through single-cell expansion. (D) DNA methylation levels of H19-DMR in the 2nd subclones expanded from single cells of the 1st subclones with high (sc6), middle (sc13), and low (sc16) levels of H19-DMR methylation. (E) Increased DNA methylation levels of H19-DMR in sc13 during culture. (F) Growth curve of the cells from subclones with high (sc6 and sc8), middle (sc13), and low (sc16) levels of H19-DMR methylation. ***, P < 0.0001. (G) Expression of Igf2 and H19 in sc6, sc8, sc13, and sc16 were analyzed by qPCR. ****, P < 0.00001; ns, not siginificant. (H) Growth curve of sc16-originated cells with hypomethylated H19-DMR and the same cells with H19 KO (sc16-H19-KO-40, 72, or 84 representing three different KO lines). ****, P < 0.00001. I Birth rate of SC mice generated from TSa2i AG-haESCs (TSa2i-14, p60 and TSa2i-C57, p58), and TSa2i AG-haESCs with H19 and IG DMR deletions (DKO-20, p68 and DKO-187, p68) or H19-DMR deletion (H19KO-40, p68-69). ns, not significant
To further characterize the heterogeneity, we performed clonal expansion of single cells and bisulfite sequence analysis of H19 and IG DMRs. From a total of 21 single-cell clones (1st clones), while three (sc11, sc13, and sc16) retained H19-DMR methylation at a reduced level, the rest clones sustained relatively higher methylation levels of H19 and IG DMRs (Figs. 6C and S6C). These results suggested that most single cells carried hypermethylated H19-DMR and a small proportion of cells lost imprints during cell proliferation, consistent with a recent report that single-cell clonal expansion of diploid ESCs in S/L produces heterogeneous methylomes (Wang et al., 2020). In order to further determine the DNA methylation state of H19-DMR at single cell level of 1st clones, we performed secondary single-cell expansion using cells from 1st clones with hypermethylated (sc6), moderately-methylated (sc13), and hypomethylated (sc16) H19-DMR respectively. The results showed that the 2nd single-cell clones (2nd clones) from cells of 1st clones with hypermethylation or hypomethylation exhibited similar DNA methylation patterns at both DMRs (Fig. 6D), excluding the possibility of rigid DMR methylation changes in TSa2i/L-treated cells.
Interestingly, 2nd clones from cells of clone 13 were separated into two groups: one with hypermethylated H19-DMR and the other with hypomethylated H19-DMR (Fig. 6D). These results imply that a small proportion of cells displays more dynamically and less reliably at paternal DMRs, probably due to that DNMT1 has imprecise activity and H3K9me3-marked-region-related de novo activity during ESC division (Wang et al., 2020). Consistent with this postulation, Dnmt1 mutation but not Dnmt3a/3b double knockout induced methylation loss at paternal germline DMRs in TSa2i/L AG-haESCs (Fig. S6D). We next investigated the changes of DNA methylation at paternal DMRs during prolonged culturing. To this, we expanded 1st clones with different methylation levels for 10 passages or more and analyzed DMR methylations. The results showed that clones with hypermethylation or hypomethylation overall maintained similar patterns (Fig. S6E). Consistently, in TSa2i/L-cultured cells that lost H19-DMR methylation, H3K9me3 signals were depleted, and as expected H3K4me3 marks were established (Fig. S6F). Interestingly, the sc13 with medium methylation of H19-DMR displayed increased methylation upon prolonged culture (Figs. 6E and S6E), consistent with our previous observations that late-passage cells sustained higher H19-DMR methylation level compared to early passages (Fig. 2B).
Finally, we attempted to determine what factors are involved in higher DMR methylation in TSa2i/L-treated haploid cells of late passages. Previous studies showed that androgenetic mouse embryonic fibroblasts (MEFs) display a shorter cell cycle compared with biparental MEFs, due to increased Igf2 expression (Hernandez et al., 2003) and H19 plays a physiological role in limiting the growth of the placenta before birth through suppresses cell proliferation (Keniry et al., 2012). As expected, cell proliferation analysis indicated that cell clones with H19-DMR hypermethylation displayed a better growth rate compared to cells with hypomethylation at H19-DMR (Fig. 6F). Of note, the sc13 with increased H19-DMR methylation after 10-passage expansion exhibited better proliferation (Fig. S6G). Consistently, cells with intact H19-DMR methylation had higher Igf2 mRNA levels while cells with reduced H19-DMR methylation displayed increased H19 expression (Fig. 6G). However, the perturbation of Igf2 didn’t affect cell proliferation in clones with intact H19-DMR methylation (Fig. S6H and S6I). In contrast, deletion of H19 induced increased cell proliferation in the clones with reduced H19-DMR methylation (Figs. 6H and S6J). We also characterized the self-diploidization of H19 and IG DMR hyper- and hypo-methylated haploid cells and found that they displayed a similar diploidization rate (Fig. S6K). These results indicate that H19 overexpression impairs the cell proliferation, implying that a better growth rate of haploid cells with H19-DMR hypermethylation may account for increased methylation levels in haploid cells of late passages under SF/a2i/L conditions.
Considering that a small fraction of TSa2i/L-treated cells carried hypomethylated H19-DMR that are related to the growth-retarded SC pups, we thus investigated whether removal of H19-DMR or both H19 and IG DMRs in TSa2i/L-treated haploid cells may further improve their birth rate of SC pups through ICAHCI. However, DMR deletions did not improve the developmental potential of SC embryos (Table 1). In contrast, these deletions led to a slight reduction in the birth rate (Figs. 6I, S6L, and S6M), implying that original germline DMRs may sustain better developmental potential than DMR deletions. Moreover, these results further suggest that epigenetic integrity is critical for in vivo development. Taken together, our study suggest that H19- and IG-DMR methylation and H3K9me3 marks sustained in ICM cells are generally maintained during haploid ESC derivation and long-term expansion under TSa2i/L conditions; and epigenetic balance may be achieved during cell proliferation through joint roles of enhanced division rate by cells with intact H19-DMR methylation and a small proportion of cell gradually losing paternal DMR methylation due to imprecise DNMT1 activity-induced epimutation (Wang et al., 2020).
DISCUSSION
The breakthrough of the derivation of mouse ESCs from embryos was made in 1981 under the conditions containing feeder layers and serum (Evans and Kaufman, 1981). Following studies identified that the cytokine LIF produced by feeder cells is the principal factor to support ESC self-renewal, which can replace feeders in both derivation and long-term culture of germline-competent ESCs (Martello and Smith, 2014). Nonetheless, S/L conditions yield overt cellular heterogeneity, consisting of a substantial number of differentiating cells. Meanwhile, there are nonpermissive strains of mice for ESC derivation using S/L. Moreover, while early-passage ESCs under S/L can develop to all ESC-derived fetuses upon injection into tetraploid blastocysts, upon prolonged culturing the developmental potential of many ESC lines becomes impaired due to epigenetic alterations in imprinted genes (Dean et al., 1998; Nagy et al., 1990, 1993; Wang et al., 1997). The advent of 2i, however, not only enables efficient and reliable derivation of ESC lines from all mouse strains (Kiyonari et al., 2010; Nichols et al., 2009) but also establishes ground state pluripotency with robust self-renewal of a biologically homogeneous population of cells (Ying et al., 2008). Nevertheless, two recent studies have shown that prolonged culture of ESCs in 2i conditions induces a widespread loss of DNA methylation, leading to the impaired developmental potential of ESCs (Choi et al., 2017b; Yagi et al., 2017). In both reports, a2i/L (Shimizu et al., 2012) was employed to preserve the epigenetic integrity as well as the developmental potential of ESCs. However, one study showed that prolonged culture of female ESCs in a2i/L resulted in a reduction of germline DMR methylation although with increased global methylation (Yagi et al., 2017). Meanwhile, stable maintenance of DMR methylation in XY ESCs has been reported only to passage 15, leaving an intriguing question whether germline DMR methylation can be stably maintained in mouse ESCs during long-term culturing. Although recent studies have been examining the maintenance of genomic imprints in diploid ESC under different media (Lee et al., 2018; Wu et al., 2020, 2021), an ESC line with stable imprints during long-term culture is still not established. In our study, we generated multiple haESC lines from androgenetic blastocysts of different strains with stably hypermethylated H19 and IG DMRs up to passage 60 using a reported two-step derivation/culture protocol with a2i/L (Yagi et al., 2017). These cells result in efficient generation of SC mice through ICAHCI. Strikingly, in contrast to previous observations in mouse ESCs, our TSa2i/L-treated AG-haESCs have increased paternal DMR methylation and improved developmental potential upon prolonged culture.
TSa2i/L conditions ensure the dynamic equilibrium of typical paternal epigenetic makeups and improved sperm-like features without compromising genetic integrity in AG-haESCs. Multiple factors may be involved in this epigenetic balance, including: (1) the coexistence of DNA methylation and H3K9me3 marks and ZFP57 bindings ensures stable maintenance of paternal imprints; (2) the imprecise DNA methylation of DNMT1 may cause methylation loss at paternal DMRs in a small number of cells; (3) H3K4me3 deposition after loss of DNA methylation and H3K9me3 marks precludes de novo methylation at germline DMRs, and (4) cells with hypermethylated H19-DMR have enhanced proliferation potential compared to cells with hypomethylated H19-DMR (Fig. 7). In addition, haploid cells cultured in a2i/L with serum lost paternal imprints in late passages, which indicates that serum may result in loss of DMR methylation during prolonged culturing. Considering that our haploid cells were always maintained on feeder cells, we also wanted to know if feeder cells are an important factor for maintenance of imprints in our SF/a2i/L conditions. Although short-term culture without feeders didn’t change the DMR methylations (Fig. S7), feeder cells may probably release important but unknown factors that contribute to paternal imprint maintenance during long-term culturing. Moreover, DNMT1 has H3K9me3-marked-region-related de novo activity during ESC division (Wang et al., 2020), which may also play a role for the increased H19-DMR methylation in late-passage haploid cells. Future studies will be needed to understand the detailed mechanism underlying the long-term stable maintenance of paternal imprints through simplifying the culture conditions, such as using a feeder-free system.
A model showing that epigenetic integrity of paternal DMRs enhances the developmental potential of AG-haESCs. Schematic of epigenetic features of paternal DMRs in TSa2i/L-treated AG-haESCs (upper) and 2i-SF/a2i-switched AG-haESCs (bottom). Open and filled circles represent unmethylated and methylated CpG sites, respectively
Thus, TSa2i/L-treated AG-haESCs serve as a unique ESC system for imprinting control analysis in vitro. Importantly, in combination with ICAHCI technology, these analyses can be promoted to the organismal level in one step (Li and Li, 2019). Unlike mature sperm or round spermatids, a small proportion of TSa2i/L-treated AG-haESCs lost H19-DMR methylation during cell division. While DNMT1-mediated imprecise DNA methylation may partially account for this loss (Wang et al., 2020), the detailed mechanisms require further elucidation. Moreover, Rasgrf1-DMR methylation is stably maintained in two cell lines but dramatically lost in the other one at late passages. Further investigation into the underlying difference may help us to understand how Rasgrf1-DMR methylation is controlled. These comparative studies may also yield clues to further define conditions for stable maintenance of Rasgrf1 imprinting in vitro, which may facilitate the potential applications of these cells. One intriguing application is the derivation of PG-haESCs carrying oocyte genome that can long-term maintain methylation of the majority of maternal DMRs.
METHODS
Animals
All mice were housed in individually ventilated cages (IVC) under specific pathogen-free conditions and a 12:12 h light/dark cycle. MII oocytes were all from B6D2F1 (C57BL/6♀ × DBA/2♂) female mice. All the pseudopregnant foster mothers were ICR females. All animal procedures were performed under the ethical guidelines of the Shanghai Institute of Biochemistry and Cell Biology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Derivation of AG-haESCs
Mature oocytes were obtained from superovulated B6D2F1 (C57BL/6 × DBA2) female mice and enucleated in a droplet of HEPES-CZB medium containing 5 μg/mL cytochalasin B (CB) using a blunt Piezo-driven pipette. After enucleation, a single sperm head was injected into oocyte cytoplasts. The reconstructed oocytes were cultured in the CZB medium for 1 h and then activated for 5–6 h in the activation medium containing 10 mmol/L Sr2+. Following activation, all the reconstructed embryos were cultured in the KSOM medium with amino acids at 37 °C under 5% CO2 in the air. The reconstructed embryos that reached the blastocyst stage by 4.5 days were used for derivation of ESC lines. The zona pellucida was removed using acid Tyrode solution. Each blastocyst was transferred into one well of a 96-well plate seeded with ICR embryonic fibroblast feeders in different ESC media. For the establishment of S/L haESCs, the culture media was DMEM (MILLIPORE), 100× NEAA (MILLIPORE), 100× Nucleosides (MILLIPORE), 100× L-Glutamine (MILLIPORE), 100× P/S (GIBCO), 100× β-mercaptoethanol (MILLIPORE), 15% FBS and 1,000 U/mL LIF. For the establishment of 2i/L and a2i/L haESCs, the culture medium was DMEM, 100× NEAA, 100× Nucleosides, 100× L-Glutamine, 100× P/S, 100× β-mercaptoethanol, 15% FBS and 1,000 U/mL LIF which was supplemented with 1 μmol/L PD0325901 (SELLECK) and 3 μmol/L CHIR99021 (SELLECK) for 2i/L and 1.5 μmol/L CGP77675 (SIGMA) and 3 μmol/L CHIR99021 for a2i/L. For the derivation of TSa2i/L haESCs, a blastocyst was cultured in a2i/L medium firstly. After two passages, the cells were maintained in SF/a2i/L medium containing DMEM/F12 (GIBCO) and Neurobasal (GIBCO) supplemented with B27 (GIBCO) and N2 cell-supplements (GIBCO), 100×P/S, 2 mmol/L Glutamax (GIBCO), and 1,000 U/mL LIF, 1.5 μmol/CGP77675 and 3 μmol/L CHIR99021. To enrich haploid cells, ESCs were trypsinized, washed by DPBS (GIBCO), and then incubated with 15 mg/mL Hoechst 33342 in a 37 °C water bath, followed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting (FACS, BD FACS AriaII) for 1C peak.
CRISPR-Cas9-mediated gene manipulation in haploid cells
To generate CRISPR-Cas9 plasmids for gene mutation, sgRNAs (Table S3) of target genes were synthesized, annealed, and ligated to the pX330-mCherry plasmids (Wu et al., 2013) that were digested with BpiI (Thermo Scientific). AG-haESCs were transfected with the corresponding pX330-mCherry plasmids using Lipofectamine 3000 (Life Technologies) following the manufacturer’s instruction manual. 24 h after transfection, the haploid cells expressing red fluorescence protein were enriched by flow cytometry (FACS AriaII, BD Biosciences) and plated at low density. Six days after plating, single colonies were picked for the derivation of AG-haESCs.
Intracytoplasmic AG-haESC or sperm injection and embryo transfer
To generate SC embryos, AG-haESCs were treated with 0.05 μg/mL Demecolcine solution (Sigma, USA) for 10–12 h and synchronized to the M phase. Next, the M-phase clones were treated with trypsin and suspended in the HCZB medium. MII oocytes were collected from oviducts of superovulated B6D2F1 females (8 weeks old). AG-haESCs were injected into the cytoplasm of MII oocytes in a droplet of HCZB medium containing 5 μg/mL cytochalasin B (Sigma, USA) using a Piezo-drill micromanipulator. The injected oocytes were cultured in the CZB medium for 30 min and then activated for 5–6 h in Ca2+ free CZB with SrCl2. For sperm injection, the procedures were the same as described above. Following activation, the reconstructed embryos were cultured in AA-KSOM (Merk, Germany) medium at 37 °C under 5% CO2 in the air. The embryos obtained through Intracytoplasmic AG-haESC Injection (ICAHCI) were cultured in KSOM medium for 24 h to reach the two-cell stage. Thereafter, 18–20 two-cell embryos were transferred into each oviduct of pseudopregnant ICR female mice at 0.5 dpc. Recipient mothers carrying SC embryos derived from 2i/L or a2i/L medium were euthanized at 18.5 or 19.5 days of gestation, and the pups were quickly removed from the uteri.
RNA extraction and Real-time quantitative PCR
Total RNA was isolated from the cells using TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen). The cDNA was obtained from about 1 μg RNA with a reverse transcription reaction by the ReverTra Ace qPCR RT Master Mix (TOYOBO). Real-time quantitative PCR reactions (RT-qPCR) were performed on a Bio-Rad CFX96 using the SYBR Green Mix (TOYOBO) in triplicate. All the gene expression levels were normalized to the internal standard gene Gapdh or β-actin. The primer sequences are listed in Table S3.
Bisulfite PCR
The genome extraction from ESCs used the TIANamp Genomic DNA Kit (TIANGEN, China). RNA was removed using RNaseA (Thermo Scientific) in a 37 °C water bath for 1 h. DNA was recovered using a Universal DNA Purification Kit (TIANGEN, China). The bisulfite conversion was performed using the EZ DNA Methylation-Gold TM Kit (ZYMO research, USA) for 200–500 ng genomic DNA, following the manufacturer’s instructions. The bisulfite DNA products were amplified by nested PCR. PCR primers are listed in Table S3. The amplified products were purified by gel electrophoresis using a Universal DNA Purification Kit and cloned into pMD™19-T Vector Cloning Kit (Takara, 6013). For each sample, more than 12 E. coli clones were picked for sequencing. The results were analyzed by the DNA methylation analysis platform. (http://services.ibc.unistuttgart.de/BDPC/BISMA/). To detect DNA methylation in multiple regions with high efficiency, we mixed all bisulfite PCR products from one sample and performed the high-throughput sequencing library preparation described later. The sequencing reads were mapped to mm9 using BSMAP with parameters –r 0 –w 100 –v 0.1 –A AGATCGGAAGAGC. Methylation level was calculated using methylated read number versus total read number for one CpG site. For each bisulfite PCR region, the average DNA methylation level of all CpG sites in it was calculated.
Whole-genome bisulfite sequence (WGBS)
A total amount of 5–10 μg genomic DNA was mixed with 25 ng lambda DNA and sonicated to 200–500 bp, followed by end repair and dATP adding with the homemade Kit. Next, methylated adapters (synthesized by ThermoFisher Scientific) were ligated to the sonicated DNA. Ampure beads (Vazyme) were used to remove <200 bp fragments. Bisulfite treatment was performed using the EZ DNA Methylation-Gold TM Kit (ZYMO research, USA). After bisulfite conversion, the single-stranded, uracil-containing DNA was subjected to 10–12 cycles of PCR reaction with Illumina TruSeq PCR primers and 2.5 U of Pfu Turbo Cx Hotstart DNA polymerase (Agilent Technologies) to recover enough DNA for sequencing. The sequencing reads were aligned to mm9 using BSMAP with parameters –r 0 –w 100 –v 0.1 –A AGATCGGAAGAGC. Multiple mapped reads and PCR duplicates were removed. After mapping, those reads with total CG coverage less than 5 within 200 bp were removed. The methylation level was calculated using methylated CpG versus total CpG in each bin. The file with DNA methylation levels for each 200 bp bin was used for further analysis. For the boxplots about DNA methylation, we calculated the average DNA methylation levels of each region for each kinds of gene elements. The genomic information of maternal DMRs (n = 20) and paternal DMRs (n = 3) used in the WGBS analysis were shown in Table S4.
ChIP-seq
Cells were collected and cross-linked with 1% formaldehyde. Cells were then suspended in cell lysis buffer (0.3% SDS, 50 mmol/L Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 20 mmol/L EDTA, and freshly added protease inhibitors) and incubated for 10 min on ice followed by sonication. About 30–60 μg of fragmented chromatin was diluted in dilution buffer (16.7 mmol/L of Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 1.1% Triton X-100, 1.2 mmol/L of EDTA, 167 mmol/L of NaCl, freshly added protease inhibitor) and then incubated with 5 μg antibody at 4 °C for 6–8 h. Next, the pretreated Dynabeads (catalog no. 11201D; Invitrogen) were incubated with chromatin and antibody mixture overnight at 4 °C. Then, Dynabeads were washed with washing buffer (50 mmol/L of HEPES, pH 8.0, 1% NP-40, 0.7% deoxycholate, 0.5 mol/L of LiCl, freshly added protease inhibitor) 5 times followed by washing with Tris-EDTA buffer (10 mmol/L of Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 0.1 mmol/L of EDTA) once. Then, 100 μL of elution buffer (50 mmol/L of Tris-HCl, pH 8.0, 1 mmol/L of EDTA, 1% SDS) was added and Dynabeads were incubated in ThermoMixer at 65 °C for 30 min at maximum speed. The supernatant was collected and treated with proteinase K at 55 °C for 2 h, then purified with the TIANquick Mini Purification Kit (catalog no. DP203-02; Tiangen). RNA was removed by treatment with RNase at 37 °C for 1 h. DNA was then purified by AMPure beads (Vazyme) and subjected to DNA library preparation as described later on. ChIP-seq reads were aligned to mm9 with Bowtie2 (version 2.2.2) with parameters -t -q -N 1 -L 25. All unmapped reads, multiply mapped reads and PCR duplicates were removed. To generate the ChIP-Seq signals for each histone modification shown in the UCSC genome browser, we normalized the read counts by computing the number of reads per kilobase of bin per million reads sequenced (RPKM). The RPKM file was used to generate genome browser snapshots and further analysis. The used antibodies included Histone H3K9me3 antibody (Active Motif, Cat. No. 39161, Lot. No. 09919003), Histone H3K4me3 antibody (MERCK, Cat. No. 04-745, Lot. No. 3068440), Histone H3K27me3 antibody (Diagenode, Cat. No. C15410069, Lot. No. A1818P) and ZFP57 antibody (Abcam, Cat. No. ab45341, Lot. No. GR3270465-1).
High-throughput sequencing library preparation and sequencing
DNA was end-repaired, adenylated, and ligated to TruSeq sequencing adapters. After purification with VAHTS DNA Clean Beads (Vazyme), DNA was amplified by Phusion High-Fidelity DNA Polymerase (catalog no. M0530L; New England Biolabs) or Pfu Turbo Cx Hotstart DNA polymerase (for bisulfite-treated DNA libraries). The amplified DNA was size-selected using 2% agarose gel or VAHTS DNA Clean Beads for 200 to 500-bp DNA fragments. All libraries were sequenced using an Illumina HiSeq 2500 or X10 system according to the manufacturer’s instructions.
RNA-seq
500–1000 haploid cells were calculated by trypan blue staining. Amplificated cDNAs were collected by Single-Cell Full Length mRNA-Amplification Kit (Vazyme) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. RNA-seq libraries were prepared by TruePrep DNA Library Prep Kit V2 for Illumina (Vazyme) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. All RNA-seq reads were mapped to mm9 with TopHat (version 2.2.1). The mapped reads were further analyzed by Cufflinks, and the expression levels for each transcript were quantified as Fragments Per Kilobase of transcript per Million mapped reads (FPKM).
5mC dot blot
DNA samples diluted to the defined concentration were treated with 0.4 mol/L of NaOH and 10 mmol/L of EDTA at 99 °C for 10 min before being cooled on ice immediately. The denatured DNA was loaded onto a nylon transfer membrane (catalog no. RNP303B; GE Healthcare) followed by ultraviolet cross-linking. The membrane was air-dried and blocked in a blocking buffer (10% milk, 1% BSA in PBS with Tween 20 (PBST)) at room temperature for 1 h. 5mC antibody (1:1000 dilution; Eurogentec, BI-MECY-1000) was diluted in a blocking buffer and incubated with the membrane at room temperature for 3 h. The membrane was washed with 1× PBST and incubated with a secondary antibody at room temperature for another 1 h. Then, the membrane was incubated with enhanced chemiluminescence substrate for exposure after washing with 1× PBST.
Western blot
Proteins were separated by SDS–PAGE and then blotted on a PVDF (polyvinylidene difluoride) membrane, blocked with blocking solution (5% non-fat dry milk in TBST buffer) for 1 h and incubated with the appropriate primary antibody in blocking solution overnight at 4 °C. The membranes were washed three times for 10 min each with TBST and incubated with the appropriate secondary antibody in blocking solution for 1 h at room temperature. Chemiluminescence detection was performed using an ECL Western Blotting Detection kit from GE Healthcare. The used antibodies included anti-DNMT1 (1:2,000 dilution; Cell Signaling Technology, 5032S), anti-UHRF1 (1:2,000 dilution; Santa Cruz, sc-98817), anti-DNMT3A (1:2,000 dilution; Proteintech, 20954-1-AP), anti-DNMT3B (1:2,000 dilution; Abcam, ab2851), anti-DNMT3L (1:2,000 dilution; Santa Cruz, sc-393603), anti-ZFP57 (1:2,000 dilution; Abcam, ab45341), and anti-ACTB (1:10,000 dilution; Sigma, A5441).
Change history
14 January 2022
Please include the missing supplementary figures S1 to S7.
References
Atlasi Y, Stunnenberg HG (2017) The interplay of epigenetic marks during stem cell differentiation and development. Nat Rev Genet 18:643–658
Barlow DP, Bartolomei MS (2014) Genomic imprinting in mammals. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 6:a018382
Choi J, Clement K, Huebner AJ, Webster J, Rose CM, Brumbaugh J, Walsh RM, Lee S, Savol A, Etchegaray JP et al (2017a) DUSP9 modulates DNA hypomethylation in female mouse pluripotent stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 20:706–719
Choi J, Huebner AJ, Clement K, Walsh RM, Savol A, Lin K, Gu H, Di Stefano B, Brumbaugh J, Kim SY et al (2017b) Prolonged Mek1/2 suppression impairs the developmental potential of embryonic stem cells. Nature 548:219–223
Dean W, Bowden L, Aitchison A, Klose J, Moore T, Meneses JJ, Reik W, Feil R (1998) Altered imprinted gene methylation and expression in completely ES cell-derived mouse fetuses: association with aberrant phenotypes. Development 125:2273–2282
Du J, Johnson LM, Jacobsen SE, Patel DJ (2015) DNA methylation pathways and their crosstalk with histone methylation. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 16:519–532
Edwards CA, Ferguson-Smith AC (2007) Mechanisms regulating imprinted genes in clusters. Curr Opin Cell Biol 19:281–289
Elling U, Taubenschmid J, Wirnsberger G, O’Malley R, Demers SP, Vanhaelen Q, Shukalyuk AI, Schmauss G, Schramek D, Schnuetgen F et al (2011) Forward and reverse genetics through derivation of haploid mouse embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 9:563–574
Evans MJ, Kaufman MH (1981) Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature 292:154–156
Ferguson-Smith AC (2011) Genomic imprinting: the emergence of an epigenetic paradigm. Nat Rev Genet 12:565–575
Guo X, Wang L, Li J, Ding Z, Xiao J, Yin X, He S, Shi P, Dong L, Li G et al (2015) Structural insight into autoinhibition and histone H3-induced activation of DNMT3A. Nature 517:640–644
Habibi E, Brinkman AB, Arand J, Kroeze LI, Kerstens HH, Matarese F, Lepikhov K, Gut M, Brun-Heath I, Hubner NC et al (2013) Whole-genome bisulfite sequencing of two distinct interconvertible DNA methylomes of mouse embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 13:360–369
Hernandez L, Kozlov S, Piras G, Stewart CL (2003) Paternal and maternal genomes confer opposite effects on proliferation, cell-cycle length, senescence, and tumor formation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:13344–13349
Humpherys D, Eggan K, Akutsu H, Hochedlinger K, Rideout WM 3rd, Biniszkiewicz D, Yanagimachi R, Jaenisch R (2001) Epigenetic instability in ES cells and cloned mice. Science 293:95–97
Keniry A, Oxley D, Monnier P, Kyba M, Dandolo L, Smits G, Reik W (2012) The H19 lincRNA is a developmental reservoir of miR-675 that suppresses growth and Igf1r. Nat Cell Biol 14:659–665
Kiyonari H, Kaneko M, Abe S, Aizawa S (2010) Three inhibitors of FGF receptor, ERK, and GSK3 establishes germline-competent embryonic stem cells of C57BL/6N mouse strain with high efficiency and stability. Genesis 48:317–327
Lee J, Matsuzawa A, Shiura H, Sutani A, Ishino F (2018) Preferable in vitro condition for maintaining faithful DNA methylation imprinting in mouse embryonic stem cells. Genes Cells 23:146–160
Leeb M, Wutz A (2011) Derivation of haploid embryonic stem cells from mouse embryos. Nature 479:131–134
Leeb M, Dietmann S, Paramor M, Niwa H, Smith A (2014) Genetic exploration of the exit from self-renewal using haploid embryonic stem cells. Cell Stem Cell 14:385–393
Li Y, Li J (2019) Technical advances contribute to the study of genomic imprinting. PLoS Genet 15:e1008151
Li X, Ito M, Zhou F, Youngson N, Zuo X, Leder P, Ferguson-Smith AC (2008) A maternal-zygotic effect gene, Zfp57, maintains both maternal and paternal imprints. Dev Cell 15:547–557
Li W, Shuai L, Wan H, Dong M, Wang M, Sang L, Feng C, Luo GZ, Li T, Li X et al (2012) Androgenetic haploid embryonic stem cells produce live transgenic mice. Nature 490:407–411
Li Q, Li Y, Yin Q, Huang S, Wang K, Zhuo L, Li W, Chang B, Li J (2020) Temporal regulation of prenatal embryonic development by paternal imprinted loci. Sci China Life Sci 63:1–17
Martello G, Smith A (2014) The nature of embryonic stem cells. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 30:647–675
Nagy A, Gocza E, Diaz EM, Prideaux VR, Ivanyi E, Markkula M, Rossant J (1990) Embryonic stem cells alone are able to support fetal development in the mouse. Development 110:815–821
Nagy A, Rossant J, Nagy R, Abramow-Newerly W, Roder JC (1993) Derivation of completely cell culture-derived mice from early-passage embryonic stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 90:8424–8428
Nichols J, Jones K, Phillips JM, Newland SA, Roode M, Mansfield W, Smith A, Cooke A (2009) Validated germline-competent embryonic stem cell lines from nonobese diabetic mice. Nat Med 15:814–818
Ooi SK, Qiu C, Bernstein E, Li K, Jia D, Yang Z, Erdjument-Bromage H, Tempst P, Lin SP, Allis CD et al (2007) DNMT3L connects unmethylated lysine 4 of histone H3 to de novo methylation of DNA. Nature 448:714–717
Quenneville S, Verde G, Corsinotti A, Kapopoulou A, Jakobsson J, Offner S, Baglivo I, Pedone PV, Grimaldi G, Riccio A et al (2011) In embryonic stem cells, ZFP57/KAP1 recognize a methylated hexanucleotide to affect chromatin and DNA methylation of imprinting control regions. Mol Cell 44:361–372
Sagi I, Chia G, Golan-Lev T, Peretz M, Weissbein U, Sui L, Sauer MV, Yanuka O, Egli D, Benvenisty N (2016) Derivation and differentiation of haploid human embryonic stem cells. Nature 532:107–111
Shi H, Strogantsev R, Takahashi N, Kazachenka A, Lorincz MC, Hemberger M, Ferguson-Smith AC (2019) ZFP57 regulation of transposable elements and gene expression within and beyond imprinted domains. Epigenetics Chromatin 12:49
Shimizu T, Ueda J, Ho JC, Iwasaki K, Poellinger L, Harada I, Sawada Y (2012) Dual inhibition of Src and GSK3 maintains mouse embryonic stem cells, whose differentiation is mechanically regulated by Src signaling. Stem Cells 30:1394–1404
Strogantsev R, Krueger F, Yamazawa K, Shi H, Gould P, Goldman-Roberts M, McEwen K, Sun B, Pedersen R, Ferguson-Smith AC (2015) Allele-specific binding of ZFP57 in the epigenetic regulation of imprinted and non-imprinted monoallelic expression. Genome Biol 16:112
Takahashi N, Gray D, Strogantsev R, Noon A, Delahaye C, Skarnes WC, Tate PH, Ferguson-Smith AC (2015) ZFP57 and the targeted maintenance of postfertilization genomic imprints. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 80:177–187
Tucker KL, Beard C, Dausmann J, Jackson-Grusby L, Laird PW, Lei H, Li E, Jaenisch R (1996) Germ-line passage is required for establishment of methylation and expression patterns of imprinted but not of nonimprinted genes. Genes Dev 10:1008–1020
Walter M, Teissandier A, Perez-Palacios R, Bourc’his D (2016) An epigenetic switch ensures transposon repression upon dynamic loss of DNA methylation in embryonic stem cells. Elife 5:e11418
Wang ZQ, Kiefer F, Urbanek P, Wagner EF (1997) Generation of completely embryonic stem cell-derived mutant mice using tetraploid blastocyst injection. Mech Dev 62:137–145
Wang C, Liu X, Gao Y, Yang L, Li C, Liu W, Chen C, Kou X, Zhao Y, Chen J et al (2018) Reprogramming of H3K9me3-dependent heterochromatin during mammalian embryo development. Nat Cell Biol 20:620–631
Wang Q, Yu G, Ming X, Xia W, Xu X, Zhang Y, Zhang W, Li Y, Huang C, Xie H et al (2020) Imprecise DNMT1 activity coupled with neighbor-guided correction enables robust yet flexible epigenetic inheritance. Nat Genet 52:828–839
Wang YH, Yan M, Zhang X, Liu XY, Ding YF, Lai CP, Tong MH, Li JS (2021) Rescue of male infertility through correcting a genetic mutation causing meiotic arrest in spermatogonial stem cells. Asian J Androl
Wu Y, Liang D, Wang Y, Bai M, Tang W, Bao S, Yan Z, Li D, Li J (2013) Correction of a genetic disease in mouse via use of CRISPR-Cas9. Cell Stem Cell 13:659–662
Wu B, Li L, Li B, Gao J, Chen Y, Wei M, Yang Z, Zhang B, Li S, Li K et al (2020) Activin A and BMP4 signaling expands potency of mouse embryonic stem cells in serum-free media. Stem Cell Rep 14:241–255
Wu B, Li Y, Li B, Zhang B, Wang Y, Li L, Gao J, Fu Y, Li S, Chen C et al (2021) DNMTs play an important role in maintaining the pluripotency of leukemia inhibitory factor-dependent embryonic stem cells. Stem Cell Rep 16:582–596
Yagi M, Kishigami S, Tanaka A, Semi K, Mizutani E, Wakayama S, Wakayama T, Yamamoto T, Yamada Y (2017) Derivation of ground-state female ES cells maintaining gamete-derived DNA methylation. Nature 548:224–227
Yang H, Shi L, Wang BA, Liang D, Zhong C, Liu W, Nie Y, Liu J, Zhao J, Gao X et al (2012) Generation of genetically modified mice by oocyte injection of androgenetic haploid embryonic stem cells. Cell 149:605–617
Yang H, Liu Z, Ma Y, Zhong C, Yin Q, Zhou C, Shi L, Cai Y, Zhao H, Wang H et al (2013) Generation of haploid embryonic stem cells from Macaca fascicularis monkey parthenotes. Cell Res 23:1187–1200
Ying QL, Wray J, Nichols J, Batlle-Morera L, Doble B, Woodgett J, Cohen P, Smith A (2008) The ground state of embryonic stem cell self-renewal. Nature 453:519–523
Zhang M, Liu Y, Liu G, Li X, Jia Y, Sun L, Wang L, Zhou Q, Huang Y (2015) Rapidly generating knockout mice from H19-Igf2 engineered androgenetic haploid embryonic stem cells. Cell Discov 1:15031
Zhang XM, Wu K, Zheng Y, Zhao H, Gao J, Hou Z, Zhang M, Liao J, Zhang J, Gao Y et al (2020) In vitro expansion of human sperm through nuclear transfer. Cell Res 30:356–359
Zhong C, Yin Q, Xie Z, Bai M, Dong R, Tang W, Xing YH, Zhang H, Yang S, Chen LL et al (2015) CRISPR-Cas9-mediated genetic screening in mice with haploid embryonic stem cells carrying a guide RNA library. Cell Stem Cell 17:221–232
Zhong C, Xie Z, Yin Q, Dong R, Yang S, Wu Y, Yang L, Li J (2016a) Parthenogenetic haploid embryonic stem cells efficiently support mouse generation by oocyte injection. Cell Res 26:131–134
Zhong C, Zhang M, Yin Q, Zhao H, Wang Y, Huang S, Tao W, Wu K, Chen ZJ, Li J (2016b) Generation of human haploid embryonic stem cells from parthenogenetic embryos obtained by microsurgical removal of male pronucleus. Cell Res 26:743–746
Zwaka TP (2017) Stem cells: the cost of perpetual youth. Nature 548:165–166
Acknowledgements
We thank G. Xu and D. Li for critical discussions. We thank G. Xu and X. Li for providing antibodies, N. Jing and M. Liu for providing equipment, L. Chen and C. Zhang for statistical analysis.
Abbreviations
2i, two inhibitors of Mek1/2 and Gsk3β; a2i, alternative two inhibitors of Src and Gsk3β; AG-haESCs, androgenetic haploid ESCs; B6D2F1, offspring from C57BL/6♀ × DBA/2♂; CB, cytochalasin B; C-section, cesarean section; DKO, double knockout; FACS, fluorescence-activated cell sorting; DMRs, differentially DNA methylated regions; ESCs, embryonic stem cells; haESCs, haploid ESCs; ICAHCI, intracytoplasmic AG-haESC injection; ICRs, imprinting control regions; IVC, individually ventilated cages; KRAB-ZFPs, the Kruppel-associated box zinc finger proteins; LIF, leukemia inhibitory factor; MEFs, mouse embryonic fibroblasts; PG-haESCs, parthenogenetic haploid ESCs; RPKM, reads per kilobase of bin per million reads sequenced; S/L, serum supplemented with leukemia inhibitory factor; 2i/L, S/L supplemented with 2i; SC, semi-cloned; SF: serum free; SNP, single-nucleotide polymorphism; SSCs: spermatogonial stem cells; TKO, triple knockout; TSa2i, the two-step derivation/culture protocol of AG-haESCs in a2i/L medium; WGBS, whole-genome bisulfite sequencing.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
This study was supported by Genome Tagging Project and grants from the Chinese Academy of Sciences, the National Key Research and Development Program of China, and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (2019YFA0109900, 2020YFA0509000, XDB19010204, QYZDJ-SSW-SMC023, Facility-based Open Research Program, 31821004, 32030029, and 31730062). The research is partly supported by the Fountain-Valley Life Sciences Fund of University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Education Foundation.
The authors declare no competing interests.
The raw data of RNA-seq, ChIP-seq, WGBS, and processed data in this study were deposited at Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) with accession numbers GSE168447.
J.L and H.Z conceived of the project. H.Z and Y.M derived the haploid cells. Y.M and Q.Y performed the ICAHCI and ICSI experiments. H.Z, Y.M and C.L performed the molecular biological experiments. Y.L and H.Z performed RNA-seq, ChIP-seq and WGBS. Y.L analyzed the high-throughput data. J.L. supervised the project and wrote the manuscript.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, H., Li, Y., Ma, Y. et al. Epigenetic integrity of paternal imprints enhances the developmental potential of androgenetic haploid embryonic stem cells. Protein Cell 13, 102–119 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13238-021-00890-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13238-021-00890-3