Protein & Cell

, Volume 8, Issue 3, pp 162–164 | Cite as

Zika virus in the testes: should we be worried?

  • Gary Wong
  • Shihua Li
  • Lei Liu
  • Yingxia Liu
  • Yuhai BiEmail author
Open Access


Nonhuman Primate Dengue Virus Male Reproductive System Cynomolgus Macaque Vaginal Fluid 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Zika virus (ZIKV) is a mosquito-borne pathogen from the family Flaviviridae, and infection of humans with ZIKV through mosquito bites may result in a disease known as Zika fever. Most Zika fever cases are asymptomatic and thus go unreported, but if symptoms do appear, they are usually mild in nature (fever, joint pain, headache and maculopapular rash), and self-resolve within one week (Chen and Hamer 2016). No deaths have ever been attributed to Zika fever; however, when a woman is infected with ZIKV during pregnancy, vertical transmission of the virus may result in microcephaly in the offspring (Rasmussen, Jamieson et al., 2016). ZIKV infections in adults are associated with episodes of Guillain-Barré syndrome, an autoimmune disorder of the peripheral nervous system, resulting in rapid-onset muscle weakness (Cao-Lormeau, Blake et al. 2016).

ZIKV was first isolated from a rhesus macaque in Uganda during 1947. Subsequent serological surveys showed that humans in Africa have long been exposed to the virus and many are seropositive for ZIKV-specific antibodies, suggesting that the virus had circulated amongst the human population for a considerable length of time (Dick, Kitchen et al. 1952). Until 2007, evidence of ZIKV infection in humans was observed only in African countries and Southeast Asia, with 14 confirmed cases reported during this time (Kindhauser, Allen et al. 2016). In 2007, an outbreak of Zika fever was reported in Yap Island, Federated States of Micronesia, which is the first outside Africa/Asia. There were 108 confirmed/suspect cases, but no hospitalizations or deaths (Duffy, Chen et al. 2009). Due to the minimal number of infections and the self-limiting nature of the disease, ZIKV was seen as an obscure pathogen of low public health priority and little scientific progress was made regarding this virus.

This changed when an outbreak of Zika fever began in Brazil in April 2015. Unlike previous instances, the virus spread rapidly to other countries throughout the Americas and the Caribbean, and has impacted 75 countries/territories as of November 2016 ( 2016). In particular, Singapore and Malaysia have both reported instances of locally-transmitted infections since August-September 2016 ( 2016). Meanwhile, China has reported over 20 cases of imported infections with ZIKV as of November 2016, and the viruses were shown to be highly genetically diverse (Zhang, Chen et al. 2016) (Shi, Zhang et al. 2016). Currently, over 100,000 people have been infected with ZIKV during this outbreak, and previously-unknown aspects of ZIKV infections are being reported as a result. For instance, male-to-female (Turmel, Abgueguen et al. 2016), male-to-male (Deckard, Chung et al. 2016) and female-to-male (Davidson, Slavinski et al. 2016) sexual transmission of ZIKV, a first for flavivirus infections, were all reported during this outbreak. Furthermore, ZIKV was observed to persist for at least six months in the semen of male patients after acute infection (Nicastri, Castilletti et al. 2016).

To characterize the nature of ZIKV infection in the male reproductive system, studies were published in Nature (Govero, Esakky et al. 2016) and Cell (Ma, Li et al. 2016) during October and November 2016, respectively. The studies showed that infection of (knockdown or knockout) Type I interferon (IFN) receptor-deficient mice with ZIKV resulted in chronic inflammation of the testes and epididymides (Govero, Esakky et al. 2016) (Ma, Li et al. 2016). Importantly, the virus persisted for weeks in the male reproductive tract after the initial infection, and led to an observable decrease in testes size (Govero, Esakky et al. 2016) (Ma, Li et al. 2016). A substantial reduction in sperm counts and fertility was observed in the Nature study (Govero, Esakky et al. 2016), while the Cell study showed that the mice have become infertile due to a complete destruction in testes morphology and the loss of stem-like cells (peritubular myoid cells and spermatogonia) (Ma, Li et al. 2016). Both studies also showed that this phenomenon was specific to ZIKV, as infection of mice with the closely-related Dengue virus (DENV) at similar or higher titers only resulted in transient, reversible damage to the male reproductive organs (Govero, Esakky et al. 2016) (Ma, Li et al. 2016).

What do these results mean from a public health perspective? While the results of these studies are no doubt concerning, they are not a cause for panic. It should be kept in mind that these findings, while novel and unexpected, are results derived from experiments with immunosuppressed mice. In the Nature paper, a mouse-adapted ZIKV (i.e. a strain that replicates well in mice) was used, in conjunction with IFN receptor-specific antibodies to weaken the host immune response (Govero, Esakky et al. 2016). In the Cell paper, while a clinical isolate of ZIKV was used, Ifnar1 / mice were used to observe the results (Ma, Li et al. 2016). Damage to the male reproductive system was only observed in wild-type, immunocompetent mice when the virus was directly injected into the rete testis, which is not a natural route of infection with ZIKV. Importantly, while mice with a suppressed Type I IFN response developed symptoms of the central nervous system (i.e. paralysis) and died between 7–10 days after a challenge with ZIKV (Lazear, Govero et al. 2016), humans do not develop severe disease from ZIKV infection. Therefore, it can be argued that observations from knockout mice experiments may not necessarily correlate well with those in humans. The strongest argument against panic after infection with ZIKV is that there have been no reports thus far demonstrating or suspecting infertility in convalescent male human patients.

What these results do mean, however, is the need to broaden and deepen our understanding of ZIKV pathogenesis, but in a way that is more relatable to humans. The first step to achieve this would be to develop an animal model that more accurately recapitulates important aspects of clinical ZIKV disease as observed in humans. In a previous study, a group inoculated rhesus and cynomolgus macaques subcutaneously with ZIKV. While the animals showed no signs of disease, the virus was detected in the blood, urine, cerebrospinal fluid, semen and saliva, and transiently in vaginal fluid (Osuna, Lim et al. 2016). The virus was cleared from urine 10 days after infection, but was still detectable in saliva and seminal fluids at 4 weeks after infection (and almost 3 weeks after the resolution of viremia) (Osuna, Lim et al. 2016). These findings are in agreement with those from another study with rhesus macaques (Li, Dong et al. 2016). Overall, the observations from studies in nonhuman primates appear to be more consistent with the current clinical knowledge on Zika fever in humans. Therefore, these results (and any future unexpected findings in mice) should at least be characterized in nonhuman primates to assess the extent of damage to the host by ZIKV, and based on experimental data in conjunction with current clinical findings, re-evaluate the real threat posed by ZIKV infections to humans.



This work was supported by the intramural special grant for influenza virus research from the Chinese Academy of Sciences (KJZD-EW-L09 and KJZD-EW-L15), the Sanming Project of Medicine in Shenzhen (ZDSYS201504301534057), and the Shenzhen Science and Technology Research and Development Project (JCYJ20160427151920801 and JCYJ20160427153238750). Y.B. is supported by the Youth Innovation Promotion Association of Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS). G.W. is the recipient of a Banting Postdoctoral Fellowship from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), and a President’s International Fellowship Initiative from the CAS. Gary Wong and Shihua Li are co-authors on the Cell study described in this manuscript. All authors declare no other competing interests.


  1. Cao-Lormeau VM, Blake A et al (2016) Guillain-barre syndrome outbreak associated with Zika virus infection in french polynesia: a case-control study. Lancet 387(10027):1531–1539CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Chen LH, Hamer DH (2016) Zika virus: rapid spread in the western hemisphere. Ann Int Med 164(9):613–615CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Davidson A, Slavinski S et al (2016) Suspected female-to-male sexual transmission of Zika virus—New York City, 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 65(28):716–717CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Deckard DT, Chung WM et al (2016) Male-to-male sexual transmission of Zika virus-Texas, January 2016. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 65(14):372–374CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Dick GW, Kitchen SF et al (1952) Zika virus. I. Isolations and serological specificity. Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg 46(5):509–520CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Duffy MR, Chen TH et al (2009) Zika virus outbreak on Yap Island, federated states of micronesia. N Engl J Med 360(24):2536–2543CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Govero JP, Esakky et al (2016) “Zika virus infection damages the testes in mice.” Nature [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
  8. Kindhauser MK, Allen T et al (2016) Zika: the origin and spread of a mosquito-borne virus. Bull World Health Organ 94(9):675–686CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Lazear HM, Govero J et al (2016) A mouse model of Zika virus pathogenesis. Cell Host Microbe 19(5):720–730CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Li XF, Dong HL et al (2016) Characterization of a 2016 clinical isolate of Zika virus in non-human primates. EBioMedicine 12:170–177CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Ma W, Li S et al (2016) Zika virus causes testis damage and leads to male infertility in mice. Cell S0092–8674(16):31537–31539Google Scholar
  12. (2016) “Zika: Ministry of Health.” Accessed 9 Dec 2016
  13. Nicastri E, Castilletti C et al (2016) “Persistent detection of Zika virus RNA in semen for six months after symptom onset in a traveller returning from Haiti to Italy, February 2016.”. Eurosurveillance 21(32):30314CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Osuna CE, Lim SY et al (2016) “Zika viral dynamics and shedding in rhesus and cynomolgus macaques.” Nat Med [Epub ahead of print]Google Scholar
  15. Rasmussen SA, Jamieson DJ et al (2016) Zika virus and birth defects-reviewing the evidence for causality. N Engl J Med 374(20):1981–1987CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Shi W, Zhang Z et al (2016) Increasing genetic diversity of Zika virus in the latin american outbreak. Emerg Microbes Infect 5:e68CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Turmel JM, Abgueguen P et al (2016) Late sexual transmission of Zika virus related to persistence in the semen. Lancet 387(10037):2501CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. (2016) “Zika situation report—24 November 2016.” Accessed 28 Nov 2016
  19. Zhang Y, Chen W et al (2016) Highly diversified Zika viruses imported to China, 2016. Protein Cell 7(6):461–464CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gary Wong
    • 1
    • 2
  • Shihua Li
    • 2
  • Lei Liu
    • 1
  • Yingxia Liu
    • 1
  • Yuhai Bi
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Pathogen and Immunity, State Key Discipline of Infectious DiseaseShenzhen Third People’s HospitalShenzhenChina
  2. 2.CAS Key Laboratory of Pathogenic Microbiology and Immunology, Institute of Microbiology, Center for Influenza Research and Early-warning (CASCIRE)Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations