Advertisement

The Nucleus

pp 1–18 | Cite as

Wheat cytogenetics and cytogenomics: the present status

  • Pushpendra K. Gupta
  • Neeraj K. Vasistha
Review Article
  • 119 Downloads

Abstract

The chromosome number of hexaploid wheat (2n = 6x = 42) was first worked out in 1918 and was followed by research on intergeneric and interspecific hybridization, mainly in Japan under the leadership of Hitoshi Kihara. Starting in 1935, Ernie Sears in USA produced a large collection of aneuploids including nullisomics, monosomics, trisomics, tetrasomics, ditelocentrics and nullisomic–tetrasomic (NT) lines. In parallel, through a study of meiotic chromosome pairing in hybrids produced through interspecific and intergeneric crosses, progenitors of the A and D genomes of 6x wheat were determined with certainty; the progenitor of B genome was difficult and still not known with certainty. The diploidizing system and the Ph1 locus restricting meiotic chromosome pairing to only between homologous (but not between homoeologous) chromosomes was also initially discovered by Okamoto (Wheat Inf Serv 5:6, 1957), and was subsequently studied in more detail by Ralph Riley and his group at Cambridge, UK during late 1950s. With the establishment of International Triticeae Mapping Initiative (ITMI) and the development of ITMI mapping population in 1990, first genetic maps were produced for all the seven homoeologous groups involving 21 wheat chromosomes by 1995. High-density genetic maps were developed later through large-scale development of SNPs through next generation sequencing (NGS) technology. During 1990s, TR Endo and BS Gill at Kansas State University, USA also produced > 400 chromosome deletion stocks that were extensively used for the development of physical maps for all the 21 wheat chromosomes. More recently, during the last 12 years (2005–2017), cytogenomics research was conducted, which included separation of longest chromosome 3B and the 40 chromosome arms for the remaining 20 chromosomes through flow sorting and their utilization in the development of BAC libraries that were used for developing BAC-based physical maps. These maps were used in generating chromosome survey sequences, and assembly of the whole genome sequence of 6x wheat Chinese Spring. During 2017–2018, whole genome sequences for a wild emmer tetraploid wheat (T. turgidum) and those for the two diploid species (T. urartu, Ae. tauschii) representing the donors of A and D sub-genomes of 6x wheat, were also published. For hexaploid wheat, estimates of a pangenome with ~ 140,000 genes and that of the core genome with ~ 80,000 genes also became available. These resources are already being extensively utilized and will continue to be utilized throughout the world for several decades not only for basic research, but also for the improvement of wheat crop to feed the growing world population.

Keywords

Wheat Progenitors Pan Genome Ph1 locus Molecular maps Comparative genomics Whole genome sequencing 

Notes

Acknowledgements

NKV acknowledges receipt of funding support from the Science and Engineering Research Board, New Delhi (Award No. PDF/2016/000012).

References

  1. 1.
    Akbari M, Wenzl P, Caig V, Carling J, Xia L, Yang S, et al. Diversity arrays technology (DArT) for high-throughput profiling of the hexaploid wheat genome. Theor Appl Genet. 2006;113(8):1409–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anonymous. Genetic resources in the Triticeae. FAO/IBPGR Plant Genet Resources Newsletter. 1986;64:2–4.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Appels R. A consensus molecular genetic map of wheat-a cooperative international effort. In: Pogna NE, editor. Proceedings of the 10th International wheat genetics symposium. Paestum, 2003; pp 211–214.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Avni R, Nave M, Barad O, Baruch K, Twardziok SO, Gundlach H, et al. Wild emmer genome architecture and diversity elucidate wheat evolution and domestication. Science. 2017;357(6346):93–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Bagge M, Xia X, Lübberstedt T. Functional markers in wheat. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2007;10(2):211–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barkworth ME, Dewey DR. Genomically based genera in the perennial Triticeae of North America: identification and membership. Am J Bot. 1985;72(5):767–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Baum BR, Estes JR, Gupta PK. Assessment of the genomic system of classification in the Triticeae. Am J Bot. 1987;74(9):1388–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bowden WM. The taxonomy and nomenclature of the wheats, barleys, and ryes and their wild relatives. Can J Bot. 1959;37:657–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brenchley R, Spannagl M, Pfeifer M, Barker GL, D’Amore R, Allen AM, et al. Analysis of the bread wheat genome using whole-genome shotgun sequencing. Nature. 2012;491:705–10.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cabrera A, Friebe B, Jiang J, Gill BS. Characterization of Hordeum chilense chromosomes by C banding and in situ hybridization using highly repeated DNA probes. Genome. 1995;38:458–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cavanagh CR, Chao S, Wang S, Huang BE, Stephen S, Kiani S, et al. Genome-wide comparative diversity uncovers multiple targets of selection for improvement in hexaploid wheat landraces and cultivars. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2013;110:8057–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen Q. Detection of alien chromatin introgression from Thinopyrum into wheat using S genomic DNA as a probe: a landmark approach for Thinopyrum genome research. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005;9:350–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Clavijo BJ, Venturini L, Schudoma C, Accinelli GG, Kaithakottil G, Wright J, et al. An improved assembly and annotation of the allohexaploid wheat genome identifies complete families of agronomic genes and provides genomic evidence for chromosomal translocations. Genome Res. 2017;27:885–96.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cox DR, Burmeister M, Price ER, Kim S, Myers RM. Radiation hybrid mapping: a somatic cell genetic method for constructing high-resolution maps of mammalian chromosomes. Science. 1990;250(4978):245–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cui F, Zhang N, Fan XL, Zhang W, Zhao CH, Yang LJ, et al. Utilization of a Wheat 660K SNP array-derived high-density genetic map for high-resolution mapping of a major QTL for kernel number. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):3788.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Darvey NL, Driscoll CJ. Evidence against somatic association in wheat. Chromosoma. 1971;36:140–9.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Darvey NL, Driscoll CJ. Nucleolar behaviour in Triticum. Chromosoma. 1972;36:131–9.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Devos KM, Millan T, Gale MD. Comparative RFLP maps of the homoeologous group-2 chromosomes of wheat, rye and barley. Theor Appl Genet. 1993;85:784–92.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Devos KM, Dubcovsky J, Dvorák J, Chinoy CN, Gale MD. Structural evolution of wheat chromosomes 4A, 5A, and 7B and its impact on recombination. Theor Appl Genet. 1995;91:282–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Dewey DR. The genomic system of classification as a guide to intergeneric hybridization with the perennial Triticeae. In: Gustafson JP, editor. Gene manipulation in plant improvement. New York: Plenum Publishing Corporation; 1984. p. 209–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Driscoll CJ. Gene-centromere distances in wheat by aneuploid F2 observations. Genetics. 1966;54:131–5.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Dvorak J, Knott DR. A study of somatic association of wheat chromosomes. Can J Genet Cytol. 1973;15:411–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Edwards D, Wilcox S, Barrero RA, Fleury D, Cavanagh CR, Forrest KL, et al. Bread matters: a national initiative to profile the genetic diversity of Australian wheat. Plant Biotechnol J. 2012;10:703–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Endo TR. Induction of chromosomal structural changes by a chromosome of Aegilops cylendrica L. in common wheat. J Hered. 1988;79:366–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Endo TR, Gill BS. The deletion stocks of common wheat. J Hered. 1996;87:295–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    FAOSTAT. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome. 2017.Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Farkas A, Molnar I, Dulai S, Rapi S, Oldal V, Cseh A, et al. Increased micronutrient content (Zn, Mn) in the 3 Mb (4B) wheat: aegilops biuncialis substitution and 3 Mb.4BS translocation identified by GISH and FISH. Genome. 2014;57:61–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Feldman M. The effect of chromosomes 5B, 5D and 5A on chromosome pairing in Triticum aestivum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1966;55:1447–53.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Fluch S, Kopecky D, Burg K, Šimková H, Taudin S, Petzold A, et al. Sequence composition and gene content of the short arm of rye (Secale cereale) chromosome. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(2):e30784.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Friebe B, Mukai Y, Gill BS. C–banding polymorphisms in several accessions of Triticum tauschii (Aegilops squarrosa). Genome. 1992;35:192–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Friebe B, Mukai Y, Gill BS, Cauderon Y. C-banding and in situ hybridization analyses of Agropyron intermedium, a partial wheat × Ag. intermedium amphiploid, and six derived chromosome addition lines. Theor Appl Genet. 1992;84:899–905.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Friebe B, Schubert V, Blüthner WD, Hammer K. C-banding pattern and polymorphism of Aegilops caudata and chromosomal constitutions of the amphiploid T. aestivumAe. caudata and six derived chromosome addition lines. Theor Appl Genet. 1992;83:589–96.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Friebe B, Tuleen N, Jiang J, Gill BS. Standard karyotype of Triticum longissimum and its cytogenetic relationship with T. aestivum. Genome. 1993;36:731–42.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Friebe B, Jiang J, Tuleen N, Gill BS. Standard karyotype of Triticum umbellulatum and the characterization of derived chromosome addition and translocation lines in common wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 1995;90:150–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Friebe B, Tuleen NA, Gill BS. Standard karyotype of Triticum searsii and its relationship with other S-genome species and common wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 1995;91:248–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Friebe B, Tuleen NA, Badaeva ED, Gill BS. Cytogenetic identification of Triticum peregrinum chromosomes added to common wheat. Genome. 1996;39:272–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Friebe B, Qi LL, Nasuda A, Zhang P, Tuleen NA, Gill BS. Development of a complete set of Triticum aestivumAegilops speltoides chromosome addition lines. Theor Appl Genet. 2000;101:51–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Gale MD, Devos KM. Plant comparative genetics after 10 years. Science. 1998;282:656–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Gao LF, Jing RL, Huo NX, Li Y, Li XP, Zhou RH, et al. One hundred and one new microsatellite loci derived from ESTs (EST-SSRs) in bread wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2004;108(7):1392–400.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Gill BS, Kimber G. Giemsa C-banding and the evolution of wheat. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1974;71:4086–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Gill BS, Appels R, Botha-Oberholster AM, Buell CR, Bennetzen JL, Chalhoub B. A workshop report on wheat genome sequencing: international genome research on wheat consortium. Genetics. 2004;168(2):1087–96.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Goss SJ, Harris H. New method for mapping genes in human chromosomes. Nature. 1975;255(5511):680–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Goyal A, Bandopadhyay R, Sourdille P, Endo TR, Balyan HS, Gupta PK. Physical molecular maps of wheat chromosomes. Funct Integr Genom. 2005;5:260–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Gupta PK, Baum BR. Nomenclature and related taxonomic issues in wheats, triticales and some of their wild relatives. Taxon. 1986;35:144–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Gupta PK. Cytogenetics of wheat and its close wild relatives—Triticum and Aegilops. In: Gupta PK, Tsuchiya T, editors. Chromosome engineering in plants: Genetics, breeding, evolution. Amsterdam: Part A Elsevier; 1990. p. 243–62.Google Scholar
  46. 46.
    Gupta PK, Varshney RK, Sharma PC, Ramesh B. Molecular markers and their applications in wheat breeding. Plant Breed. 1999;118(5):369–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Gupta PK, Balyan HS, Edwards KJ, Isaac P, Korzun V, Röder M, et al. Genetic mapping of 66 new microsatellite (SSR) loci in bread wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2002;105(2–3):413–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Gupta PK, Rustgi S. Molecular markers from the transcribed/expressed region of the genome in higher plants. Funct Integr Genom. 2004;4:139–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Gupta PK, Mir RR, Mohan A, Kumar J. Wheat genomics: present status and future prospects. Int J Plant Genom. 2008.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2008/896451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Hill-Ambroz K, Webb CA, Matthews AR, Li W, Gill BS, Fellers JP. Expression analysis and physical mapping of a cDNA library of Fusarium head blight infected wheat spikes. Crop Sci. 2006;46:S15–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Jaccoud D, Peng K, Feinstein D, Kilian A. Diversity arrays: a solid state technology for sequence information independent genotyping. Nucleic Acids Res. 2001;29(4):E25.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Jenkins BC. Secale additions and substitutions to common wheat. In: Proceeding of 2nd international wheat genet symposium, Lund, 1966; pp 301–312.Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Jia J, Zhao S, Kong X, Li Y, Zhao G, He W, et al. Aegilops tauschii draft genome sequence reveals a gene repertoire for wheat adaptation. Nature. 2013;496:91–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Jiang J, Friebe B, Gill BS. Recent advances in alien gene transfer in wheat. Euphytica. 1994;73:199–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Jump UP, Wenzel P, Carling J, Kudma D, et al. Diversity arrays technology (DArT) for whole-genome profiling of barley. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2004;101(26):9915–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Kalavacharla V, Hossain K, Gu Y, Riera-Lizarazu O, Vales MI, Bhamidimarri S, et al. High-resolution radiation hybrid map of wheat chromosome 1D. Genetics. 2006;173(2):1089–99.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Kumar A, Simons K, Iqbal MJ, de Jiménez MM, Bassi FM, Ghavami F. Physical mapping resources for large plant genomes: radiation hybrids for wheat D-genome progenitor Aegilops tauschii. BMC Genom. 2012;13:597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Kumar S, Goyal A, Mohan A, Balyan HS, Gupta PK. An integrated physical map of simple sequence repeats in bread wheat. Aust J Crop Sci. 2013;7(4):460–8.Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Kuraparthy V, Chhuneja P, Dhaliwal HS, Kaur S, Bowden RL, Gill BS. Characterization and mapping of cryptic alien introgression from Aegilops geniculata with novel leaf rust and stripe rust resistance genes Lr57 and Yr40 in wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2007;114:1379–89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Kuraparthy V, Sood S, Chhuneja P, Dhaliwal HS, Kaur S, Bowden RL, et al. A cryptic wheat-Aegilops triuncialis translocation with leaf rust resistance gene Lr58. Crop Sci. 2007;47:1995–2003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Kuraparthy V, Sood S, Chhuneja P, Dhaliwal HS, Gill BS. Identification and mapping of tiller inhibition gene (tin3) in wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2007;114:285–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Kusch S, Panstruga R. mlo-based resistance: an apparently universal “weapon” to defeat powdery mildew disease. Mol Plant Microbe Interact. 2017;30:179–89.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Law CN, Snape JW, Worland AJ. Aneuploidy in wheat and its uses in genetic analysis. In: Lupton FGH, editor. Wheat breeding. Its scientific basis. London: Chapman and Hall; 1987. p. 71–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Ling HQ, Zhao S, Liu D, Wang J, Sun H, Zhang C, et al. Draft genome of the wheat A-genome progenitor Triticum urartu. Nature. 2013;496:87–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Ling HQ, Ma B, Shi B, Liu H, Dong L, Sun H, et al. Genome sequence of the progenitor of wheat A subgenome Triticum urartu. Nature. 2018;557:424–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Liu B, Segal G, Ron JK, Feldman M. A chromosome-specific sequence common to the B genome of polyploid wheat and Aegilops searsii. Plant Syst Evol. 2003;241:55–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Liu W, Rouse M, Friebe B, Jin Y, Gill BS, Pumphrey MO. Discovery and molecular mapping of a new gene conferring resistance to stem rust, Sr53, derived from Aegilops geniculata and characterization of spontaneous translocation stocks with reduced alien chromatin. Chromosome Res. 2011;15:669–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Löve A. Generic evolution of the wheatgrasses. Biol Centralblatt. 1982;101:199–212.Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Löve A. Conspectus of the Triticeae. Feddes Repert. 1984;5(7–8):425–52.Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Luo MC, Gu YQ, Puiu D, Wang H, Twardziok SO, Deal KR, et al. Genome sequence of the progenitor of the wheat D genome Aegilops tauschii. Nature. 2017;551(7681):498–502.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Maccaferri M, Ricci A, Salvi S, Milner SG, Noli E, Martelli PL, et al. A high-density, SNP-based consensus map of tetraploid wheat as a bridge to integrate durum and bread wheat genomics and breeding. Plant Biotechnol J. 2015;13:648–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Mayer KFX, Rogers J, Doleel J, Pozniak C, Eversole K, Feuillet C, et al. A chromosome-based draft sequence of the hexaploid bread wheat (Triticum aestivum) genome. Science. 2014;345(6194):1251788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    McGuire PE, Qualset CO, editors. Progress in genome mapping of wheat and related species: Proceedings of the 4th public workshop of the international Triticeae mapping initiative, San Diego CA USA, 22–23 Jan 1994. Report No. 15 University of California Genetic Resources Conservation Program, Davis.Google Scholar
  74. 74.
    McIntosh RA, Devos KM, Dubcovsky J, Morris CF, Rogers WJ. Catalogue of gene symbols for wheat. http://wheat.pw.usda.gov/ggpages/wgc/2003upd.html. Accessed 29 May 2018.
  75. 75.
    Melderis A. Festucopsis, Leymus, Elymus, Agropyron, Eremopyrum, Crithopsis. In: Mtin TG, et al., editors. Flora Europaea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1980. p. 190–200.Google Scholar
  76. 76.
    Mitra R, Bhatia CR. Repeated and non-repeated nucleotide sequences in diploid and polyploid wheat species. Heredity. 1973;31:251–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Mohan A, Goyal A, Singh R, Balyan HS, Gupta PK. Physical mapping of wheat and rye expressed sequence tag-simple sequence repeats on wheat chromosomes. Crop Sci. 2007;47:S3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Montenegro JD, Golicz AA, Bayer PE, Hurgobin B, Lee H, Chan C-KK, et al. The pangenome of hexaploid bread wheat. Plant J. 2017;90(5):1007–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Mukai Y. Perspectives in molecular cytogenetics of wheat. Wheat Inf Serv. 2005;100:17–31.Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Mukai Y, Gill BS. Detection of barley chromatin added to wheat by genomic in situ hybridization. Genome. 1991;34:448–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Mukai Y, Nakahara Y, Yamamoto M. Simultaneous discrimination of the three genomes in hexaploid wheat by multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization using total genomic and highly repeated DNA probes. Genome. 1993;36:489–95.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Mukai Y, Yamamoto M. Application of multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization to plant genome analysis. In: Gupta PK, editor. Genetics and biotechnology in crop improvement. Meerut: Rastogi Publications; 1998. p. 14–23.Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Okamoto M. Asynaptic effect of chromosome V. Wheat Inf Serv. 1957;5:6.Google Scholar
  84. 84.
    Olson EL, Rouse MN, Pumphrey MO, Bowden RL, Gill BS, Poland JA. Introgression of stem rust resistance genes SrTA10187 and SrTA10171 from Aegilops tauschii to wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 2013;15(10):2477–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Parida SK, Kumar KAR, Dalal V, Singh NK, Mohapatra N. Unigene derived microsatellite markers for the cereal genomes. Theor Appl Genet. 2006;112(5):808–17.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Pathak GN. Studies in the cytology of cereals. J Genet. 1940;39:437–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Pestsova E, Ganal MW, Röder MS. Isolation and mapping of microsatellite markers specific for the D genome of bread wheat. Genome. 2000;43(4):689–97.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Riley R, Chapman V. Genetic control of the cytologically diploid behavior of wheat. Nature. 1958;182:713–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Riley R, Unrau J, Chapman V. Evidence on the origin of the B genome of wheat. J Hered. 1958;49:90–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Riley R. Cytogenetics and plant breeding. Genet Today Proc XI Int Congr Genet. 1964;3:681–8.Google Scholar
  91. 91.
    Röder MS, Korzun V, Wendehake K, Plaschke J, Tixier MH, Leroy P, et al. A microsatellite map of wheat. Genetics. 1998;149(4):2007–23.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Šafář JH, Šimková H, Kubaláková M, Číhalíková J, Suchánková P, Bartoš J. Development of chromosome-specific BAC resources for genomics of bread wheat. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2010;129:211–23.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Sakamura T. Kurze Mitteilung über die Chromosomenzahlen und die Verwandtschaftsverhältnisse der Triticum-Arten. Bot Mag. 1918;32:151–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Sarkar P, Stebbins GL. Morphological evidence concerning the origin of the B genome in wheat. Am J Bot. 1956;43:297–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Sax K. Sterility in wheat hybrids. II. Chromosome behavior in partially sterile hybrids. Genetics. 1922;7:513–52.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  96. 96.
    Schwarzacher T, Anamthawat-Jónsson K, Harrison GE, Islam AKMR, Jia JZ, Kind P, et al. Genomic in situ hybridization to identify alien chromosomes and chromosome segments in wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 1992;84:778–86.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Sears ER. The aneuploids of common wheat. Univ Mo Agric Exp Stat Bull. 1954;572:1–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Sears ER. Nullisomic–tetrasomic combinations in hexaploid wheat. In: Lewis DR, editor. Chromosome manipulation and plant genetics. London: Oliver and Boyd; 1966. p. 29–47.Google Scholar
  99. 99.
    Sears ER, Okamoto M. Intergenomic chromosome relationship in hexaploid wheat. Proc Tenth Inc Congr Genet. 1958;2:258–9.Google Scholar
  100. 100.
    Sears ER. Genetic control of chromosome pairing in wheat. Annu Rev Genet. 1976;10:31–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Sears ER. An induced mutant with homoeologous pairing in common wheat. Can J Genet Cytol. 1977;19:583–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Semagn K, Bjørnstad Å, Skinnes H, Marøy AG, Tarkegne Y, William M. Distribution of DArT, AFLP, and SSR markers in a genetic linkage map of a doubled-haploid hexaploid wheat population. Genome. 2006;49(5):545–55.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Sidhu GK, Rustgi S, Shafqat MN, von Wettstein D, Gill KS. Fine structure mapping of a gene-rich region of wheat carrying Ph1, a suppressor of crossing over between homoeologous chromosomes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2008;105(15):5815–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Somers DJ, Isaac P, Edwards K. A high-density microsatellite consensus map for bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet. 2004;109(6):1105–14.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    Sourdille P, Singh S, Cadalen T, Brown-Guedira GL, Gay G, Qi LL, et al. Microsatellite-based deletion bin system for the establishment of genetic–physical map relationships in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Funct Integr Genom. 2004;4:12–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Tang ZX, Fu SL, Ren ZL, Zhang HQ, Yang ZJ, Yan BJ, et al. Production of a new wheat cultivar with a different 1B.1R translocation with resistance to powdery mildew and stripe rust. Cereal Res Commun. 2008;36(3):451–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Tiwari VK, Heesacker A, Riera-Lizarazu O, Gunn H, Wang S, Wang Y, et al. A whole-genome, radiation hybrid mapping resource of hexaploid wheat. Plant J. 2016;86:195–207.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Tiwari VK, Wang S, Sehgal S, Vrána J, Friebe B, Kubaláková M, et al. SNP discovery for mapping alien introgressions in wheat. BMC Genom. 2014;15:273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Tzvelev NN. Zlaki SSSR [Grasses of the Soviet Union]. Volumes 1,2. Leningrad: Academiya Nauk SSSR. New Delhi: [1983 English translation by Amerind Publishing Co.]. 1976.Google Scholar
  110. 110.
    Uauy C. Wheat genomics comes of age. Curr Opin Plant Biol. 2017;36:142–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Wang S, Wong D, Forrest K, Allen A, Chao S, Huang BE, et al. Characterization of polyploid wheat genomic diversity using a high-density 90, 000 single nucleotide polymorphism array. Plant Biotechnol J. 2014;12(6):787–96.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Wen W, He Z, Gao F, Liu J, Jin H, Zhai S, et al. A high-density consensus map of common wheat integrating four mapping populations scanned by the 90K SNP array. Front Plant Sci. 2017;8:1389.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Winfield MO, Allen AM, Burridge AJ, Barker GL, Benbow HR, Wilkinson HR, et al. High-density SNP genotyping array for hexaploid wheat and its secondary and tertiary gene pool. Plant Biotechnol J. 2016;14:1195–206.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Yu JK, Dake TM, Singh S, Benscher D, Li W, Gill B, et al. Development and mapping of EST-derived simple sequence repeat markers for hexaploid wheat. Genome. 2004;47(5):805–18.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Zhai H, Feng Z, Liu X, Cheng X, Peng H, Yao Y, et al. A genetic linkage map with 178 SSR and 1901 SNP markers constructed using a RIL population in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). J Integr Agric. 2015;14:1697–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Zimin AV, Puiu D, Hall R, Kingan S, Clavijo BJ, Salzberg SL. The first near-complete assembly of the hexaploid bread wheat genome, Triticum aestivum. Giga Sci. 2017;6:1–7.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Archana Sharma Foundation of Calcutta 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Molecular Biology Laboratory, Department of Genetic and Plant BreedingChaudhary Charan Singh UniversityMeerutIndia

Personalised recommendations