Evolutionary game theory is an increasingly important way to model the evolution of biological populations. Many early models were in the form of matrix games, or bi-matrix games in asymmetric situations when individuals occupy distinct roles within the contest, where rewards are accrued through independent contests against random members of the population. More recent models have not had the simple linear properties of matrix games, and more general analysis has been required. In this paper we carry out a general analysis of asymmetric games, comparing monomorphic and polymorphic populations. We are particularly interested in situations where the strategies that individuals play influence which role that they occupy, for example in a more realistic variant of the classical Owner-Intruder game. We both prove general results and consider specific examples to illustrate the difficulties of these more complex games.
Bi-matrix games ESS Population games Uncorrelated asymmetry Role
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
The research was supported by Simons Foundation grant 245400. We would also like to thank the reviewers whose comments helped to improve the clarity of the manuscript. This paper was handled by the Editor-in-Chief.
Argasinski K (2006) Dynamic multipopulation and density dependent evolutionary games related to replicator dynamics. A metasimplex concept. Math Biosci 202(1):88–114CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
Hofbauer J, Sigmund K (1998) Evolutionary games and population dynamics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
Kokko H, Johnstone RA (2002) Why is mutual mate choice not the norm? Operational sex ratios, sex roles and the evolution of sexually dimorphic and monomorphic signalling. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B 357(1419):319–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar