Advertisement

Fungal Diversity

, Volume 71, Issue 1, pp 141–164 | Cite as

Dismantling Melaspileaceae: a first phylogenetic study of Buelliella, Hemigrapha, Karschia, Labrocarpon and Melaspilea

  • Damien Ertz
  • Paul Diederich
Article

Abstract

Melaspileaceae is a heterogeneous group of Ascomycota including lichenized, lichenicolous and saprobic fungi. A first phylogenetic study of Melaspileaceae is presented and is based on mtSSU and nuLSU sequence data. We obtained 49 new sequences for 28 specimens representing 15 species. The genera Buelliella, Hemigrapha, Karschia, Labrocarpon and Melaspilea s. str. are included in a molecular phylogeny for the first time. Melaspileaceae is recovered as polyphyletic, with members placed in two main lineages of Dothideomycetes. Melaspilea s. str. is included in Eremithallales. Eremithallaceae is placed in synonymy with Melaspileaceae. The genus Encephalographa is placed in Melaspileaceae. The genera Buelliella, Karschia, Labrocarpon and several members of Melaspilea are demonstrated to belong to Asterinales, while Hemigrapha is confirmed in this order. The genera Melaspileella, Melaspileopsis, Stictographa are reinstated for former Melaspilea species now placed in Asterinales. Karschia cezannei is described as new, and the new combinations Melaspilea costaricensis, M. enteroleuca, M. urceolata, Melaspileella proximella and Melaspileopsis diplasiospora are made. Melaspileaceae as newly defined includes lichenized and saprobic species. The lichenicolous and saprobic life styles form different intermixed lineages in Asterinales that do not include lichenized taxa. The phylogenetic data provide a first framework for dismantling further the genus Melaspilea for which most of the species are expected to belong to Asterinales.

Keywords

Asterinales Eremithallales Lichenicolous fungi Phylogeny Taxonomy 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the curators of herbaria cited in Materials and Methods for the loan of specimens. Anders Nordin is warmly thanked for information provided about Gyalecta sprengelianaMelaspilea urceolata material in UPS, Peter Poschlod for searching for the original material of Lichen cascarillae in REG, and André Fraiture for help with the code of nomenclature. Andre Aptroot kindly shared with us useful information on the taxonomy of Melaspilea s.l. Marion Eichler, Rainer Cezanne, Harrie Sipman and Pieter van den Boom provided fresh specimens used in this study. Ann Bogaerts, Cyrille Gerstmans, Myriam Dehaan and Wim Baert are thanked for technical assistance. Collection and export permits, and support during field work were provided to DE by the Office National des Forêts (ONF) + DIREN (Reunion), the Institut Polaire Français Paul-Emile Victor (IPEV) in the frame of the program 136 Subanteco (Dr. David Renault & Dr. Maryvonne Charrier; Kerguelen) and the RAMK herbarium (Thailand). Finally, the first author acknowledges financial support from the Fonds National de la Recherche Scientifique (FNRS) from Belgium (F.R.F.C. 2.4567.08).

References

  1. Akaike H (1973) Information theory as an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov BN, Caski F (eds) Second international symposium on information theory. Akademiai Kiado, BudapestGoogle Scholar
  2. Aptroot A, Diederich P, Sérusiaux E, Sipman HJM (1997) Lichens and lichenicolous fungi from New Guinea. Bibl Lichenol 64:1–220Google Scholar
  3. Ariyawansa HA, Thambugala KM, Kang J-C, Alias SA, Chukeatirote E, Hyde KD (2014) Towards a natural classification of Dothideomycetes 2: The genera Cucurbidothis, Heterosphaeriopsis, Hyalosphaera, Navicella and Pleiostomellina (Dothideomycetes incertae sedis). Phytotaxa 176:7–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Barkhalov SO, Novruzov VS (1977) Lichenes ex Azerbaidzhania pro URSS novi. Novitates Systematicae Plantarum non Vascularium 14:141–143Google Scholar
  5. Boehm EWA, Mugambi GK, Miller AN, Huhndorf SM, Marincowitz S, Spatafora JW, Schoch CL (2009a) A molecular phylogenetic reappraisal of the Hysteriaceae, Mytilinidiaceae and Gloniaceae (Pleosporomycetidae, Dothideomycetes) with keys to world species. Stud Mycol 64:49–83CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Boehm EWA, Schoch CL, Spatafora JW (2009b) On the evolution of the Hysteriaceae and Mytilinidiaceae (Pleosporomycetidae, Dothideomycetes, Ascomycota) using four nuclear genes. Mycol Res 113:461–479CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bricaud O, Roux C (1991) L’Encephalographetum elisae Bricaud et Roux ass. nov., une association lichénique saxicole-calcicole, sciaphile. Bull Soc Linn Provence 42:79–90Google Scholar
  8. Cáceres M, Lücking R (2000) Three new species and one new combination of foliicolous lichens and lichenicolous fungi from the atlantic rainforest in Pernambuco state, Brazil. Nova Hedwigia 70:217–226Google Scholar
  9. Clauzade G, Roux C (1985) Likenoj de okcidenta europo ilustrita determinlibro. Bull Soc Bot Centre – Ouest, N.S., (Numéro special) 7: 1–893Google Scholar
  10. Coppins BJ (1989) Notes on the Arthoniaceae in the British Isles. Lichenologist 21:195–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coppins BJ, James PW, Hawksworth DL (1992) New species and combinations in the lichen flora of Great Britain and Ireland. Lichenologist 24:351–369Google Scholar
  12. Coppins B, Kondratyuk S, Khodosovtsev A, Wolseley P, Zelenko S (2001) New for Crimea and Ukraine species of the lichens. Ukrayins’kyi Botanichnyi Zhurnal 58(6):716–722Google Scholar
  13. Diederich P (2003) New species and new records of American lichenicolous fungi. Herzogia 16:41–90Google Scholar
  14. Diederich P, Wedin M (2000) The species of Hemigrapha (lichenicolous Ascomycetes, Dothideales) on Peltigerales. Nord J Bot 20:203–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Doyle JJ, Doyle JL (1990) Isolation of plant DNA from fresh tissue. Focus 12:13–15Google Scholar
  16. Eichler M, Cezanne R, Diederich P, Ertz D, Van den Broeck D, van den Boom P, Sérusiaux E (2010) New or interesting lichens and lichenicolous fungi from Belgium, Luxembourg and northern France. XIII. Bull Soc Nat Luxemb 111:33–46Google Scholar
  17. Eriksson O (1981) The families of bitunicate ascomycetes. Opera Botanica 60:1–220Google Scholar
  18. Eriksson OE, Baral HO, Currah RS, Hansen K, Kurtzman CP, Laessøe T, Rambold G (eds) (2001) Notes on ascomycete systematics. Nos 3128–3302. Myconet 6: 1–26Google Scholar
  19. Ertz D, Lawrey JD, Common RS, Diederich P (2014a) Molecular data resolve a new order of Arthoniomycetes sister to the primarily lichenized Arthoniales and composed of black yeasts, lichenicolous and rock-inhabiting species. Fungal Divers 66:113–137. doi: 10.1007/s13225-013-0250-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ertz D, Tehler A, Irestedt M, Frisch A, Thor G, van den Boom P (2014b) A large-scale phylogenetic revision of Roccellaceae (Arthoniales) reveals eight new genera. Fungal Divers. doi: 10.1007/s13225-014-0286-5 Google Scholar
  21. Etayo J (1998) Aportación a la flora liquénica de las Islas Canarias. iv. Líquenes epifitos de La Gomera (Islas Canarias). Trop Bryol 14:85–107Google Scholar
  22. Fée ALA (1825) [‘1824’] Essai sur les cryptogames des écorces exotiques officinales [etc.]. Firmin Didot, ParisGoogle Scholar
  23. Fink B (1935) The Lichen Flora of the United States. Completed for Publication by Joyce Hedrick. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor. xii + 426 ppGoogle Scholar
  24. Fries EM (1825) Systema orbis vegetabilis. Lundae, e Typographia Academica, 374 ppGoogle Scholar
  25. Fries EM (1831) Lichenographia europea reformata. Typis Berlingianis, Lund, 486 ppGoogle Scholar
  26. Frisch A, Thor G, Ertz D, Grube M (2014) The Arthonialean challenge: restructuring Arthoniaceae. Taxon 63:727–744CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gasparyan A, Sipman HJM (2013) New lichen records from Armenia. Mycotaxon 123: link page 491 (http://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/mtax/mt/2013/00000123/00000001/art00062;jsessionid=13x6v0i5xej7q.alice)
  28. Gelman A, Rubin DB (1992) Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Stat Sci 7:457–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hafellner J (1979) Karschia. Revision einer Sammelgattung an der Grenze von lichenisierten und nichlichenisierten Ascomyceten. Beiheft zur Nova Hedwigia 62:1–248Google Scholar
  30. Hafellner J (1984) Studien in Richtung einer natürlichen Gliederung der Sammelfamilien Lecanoraceae und Lecideaceae. Beiheft zur Nova Hedwigia 79:241–371Google Scholar
  31. Hafellner J, Triebel D, Ryan BD, Nash TH III (2002) On lichenicolous fungi from North America. II. Mycotaxon 84:293–329Google Scholar
  32. Hawksworth DL (1975) Notes on British lichenicolous fungi, I. Kew Bull 30:183–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hawksworth DL (1982) Melaspilea canariensis sp. nov. and other lichenicolous fungi from Tenerife. Lichenologist 14:83–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hawksworth DL (1994) Discussion 10. Families and genera of uncertain position. In Hawksworth DL. Ascomycete Systematics: Problems and Perspectives in the Nineties – Outline of the Ascomycetes. NATO ASI Series A 269:1–453Google Scholar
  35. Hofmann TA, Kirschner R, Piepenbring M (2010) Phylogenetic relationships and new records of Asterinaceae (Dothideomycetes) from Panama. Fungal Divers 43:39–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Holm K, Holm L (1986) [1985] Kleinpilze auf Dryas-Stämmchen. Sydowia 38: 136–145Google Scholar
  37. Hongsanan S, Li Y-M, Liu J-K, Hofmann T, Piepenbring M, Bhat JD, Boonmee S, Doilom M, Singtripop C, Tian Q, Mapook A, Zeng X-Y, Bahkali AH, Xu J-C, Mortimer PE, Wu X-H, Yang J-B, Hyde KD (2014) Revision of genera in Asterinales. Fungal Divers 68:1–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F (2001) MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17:754–755CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Hyde KD, Gareth Jones EB, Liu J-K et al (2013) Families of Dothideomycetes. Fungal Divers 63:1–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Inoue M (1982) The genera Lecidea, Lecidella and Huilia in Japan I. Lecidea. J Sci Hiroshima Univ Series B Div 2 (Botany) 18:1–55Google Scholar
  41. Kalb K, Buaruang K, Mongkolsuk P, Boonpragob K (2012) New or otherwise interesting lichens. VI, including a lichenicolous fungus. Phytotaxa 42:35–47Google Scholar
  42. Kantvilas G, Coppins BJ (1997a) Melaspilea circumserpens Nyl. rediscovered and referred to Glonium; with discussion on the provenance of some of Robert brown’s lichen specimens. Lichenologist 29:525–531Google Scholar
  43. Kantvilas G, Coppins BJ (1997b) Notes on the Tasmanian records of Melaspilea gemella (Eschw.) Nyl. Australasian Lichenol 41:16–17Google Scholar
  44. Karsten PA (1885) Revisio monographica atque synopsis, ascomycetum in Fennia hucusove detectorum. Acta Soc Pro Fauna et Flora Fennica 2(6):1–174Google Scholar
  45. Khodosovtsev AY, Naumovich GO, Elix JA, Kondratyuk SY (2009) Lecanora panticapaensis sp. nova and Buelliella poetshii, two noteworthy species from Ukraine. Bibl Lichenol 100:189–197Google Scholar
  46. Kirk PM, Cannon PF, Minter DW, Stalpers JA (2008) Ainsworth & Bisby’s dictionary of the fungi, 10th edn. CABI Publishing, UKGoogle Scholar
  47. Kutorga E, Hawksworth DL (1997) A reassessment of the genera referred to the family Patellariaceae (Ascomycota). Syst Ascomycetum 15:1–110Google Scholar
  48. Lücking R, Lumbsch HT, Stéfano JFD, Lizano D, Carranza J, Bernecker A, Chaves JL, Umaña L (2008) Eremithallus costaricensis (Ascomycota: Lichinomycetes: Eremithallales), a new fungal lineage with a novel lichen symbiotic lifestyle discovered in an urban relict forest in Costa Rica. Symbiosis 46:161–170Google Scholar
  49. Lumbsch HT, Huhndorf SM (2007) Outline of Ascomycota – 2007. Myconet 13:1–58Google Scholar
  50. Lumbsch HT, Ahti T, Altermann S et al (2011) One hundred new species of lichenized fungi: a signature of undiscovered global diversity. Phytotaxa 18:1–127Google Scholar
  51. Maddison D, Maddison W (2002) MacClade Version 4.03PPC: Analysis of Phylogeny and Character Evolution. In. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MAGoogle Scholar
  52. Matzer M (1996) Lichenicolous ascomycetes with fissitunicate asci on foliicolous lichens. Mycological Papers, 171. CAB International, WallingfordGoogle Scholar
  53. Miadlikowska J, McCune B, Lutzoni F (2002) Pseudocyphellaria perpetua, a new lichen from Western North America. Bryologist 105:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Miller MA, Pfeiffer W, Schwartz T (2010) Creating the CIPRES science gateway for inference of large phylogenetic trees. In: Proceedings of the Gateway Computing Environments Workshop (GCE), 14 November 2010, New Orleans, pp 1–8Google Scholar
  55. Muggia L, Gueidan C, Knudsen K, Perlmutter G, Grube M (2013) The lichen connections of Black fungi. Mycopathologia 175:523–535CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Müller J (1887) Graphideae Feeanae inclus. trib. affinibus nec non Graphideae exoticae Acharii, El. Friesii et Zenkeri e novo studio speciminum originalum expositae et in novam dispositionem ordinatae. Mémoires de la Société de Physique et d’Histoire Naturelle de Genève 29:1–80Google Scholar
  57. Müller E, von Arx JA (1962) Die Gattungen der didymosporen Pyrenomyceten. Beiträge zur Kryptogamenflora der Schweiz 11:1–922Google Scholar
  58. Nograsek A, Matzer M (1991) Nicht-pyrenokarpe Ascomyceten au Gefässplanzen der Polsterseggenrasen I. Arten auf Dryas octopetala. Nova Hedwigia 53:445–475Google Scholar
  59. Nylander W (1863) Lichenes. In: Triana J, Planchon JE. Prodromus Florae Novo-Granatensis ou Énumération des plantes de la Nouvelle-Grénade avec description des espèces nouvelles. Ann Sci Nat 20: 228–279Google Scholar
  60. Pérez-Ortega S, Etayo J (2010) Labrocarpon gen. nov. for Melaspilea canariensis, with the description of Buelliella protoparmeliopsis sp. nov. from South America. Lichenologist 42:271–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Poelt J (1973) Classification. In: Ahmadjian V, Hale ME (eds) The lichens. Academic, New York and London, pp 599–632CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Posada D, Crandall KA (1998) MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817–818CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Rambaut A, Drummond AJ (2007) Tracer v1.4, Available from http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/
  64. Rambaut A (2012) FigTree v1.3.1, available from: http://tree.bio.ed.ac.uk/software/figtree/
  65. Redinger K (1938) Familie Graphidaceae. In: Rabenhorst’s Kryptogamen – Flora von Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz. 9 (2/1/2). Leipzig, Akad. Verlagsges. M.B.H., pp 181–404Google Scholar
  66. Reinke J (1895) Abhandlungen über Flechten III. Einige Voraussetzungen einer phylogenetischen Morphologie der Flechten. Jahrbuch für wissenschaftliche Botanik 28:39–150Google Scholar
  67. Renobales G, Aguirre B (1990) The nomenclature and systematic position of the genus Encephalographa. Syst Ascomycetum 8:87–92Google Scholar
  68. Ronquist F, Huelsenbeck JP (2003) MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models. Bioinforma 19:1572–1574CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Roux et coll. (2014) Catalogue des lichens et champignons lichénicoles de France métropolitaine. Des Abbayes, Fougères (Ille-et-Vilaine), pp 1525Google Scholar
  70. Ruibal C, Gueidan C, Selbmann L, Gorbushina AA, Crous PW, Groenewald JZ, Muggia L, Grube M, Isola D, Schoch CL, Staley JT, Lutzoni F, de Hoog GS (2009) Phylogeny of rock-inhabiting fungi related to Dothideomycetes. Stud Mycol 64:123–133CrossRefPubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Ryan BD, Nimis PL (2004) Melaspilea. In: Nash TH III, Ryan BD, Diederich P, Gries C, Bungartz F (eds) Lichen Flora of the Greater Sonoran Desert Region, vol 2, Lichens Unlimited. Arizona State University, Tempe, pp 358–359Google Scholar
  72. Sanderson NA, Hawksworth DL, Aptroot A (2009) Melaspilea Nyl. (1857). In: Smith CW, Aptroot A, Coppins BJ, Fletcher A, Gilbert OL, James PW, Wolseley PA (eds) The lichens of Great Britain and Ireland. The British Lichen Society, the Natural History Museum, London, pp 576–579Google Scholar
  73. Santesson R, Moberg R, Nordin A, Tonsberg T, Vitikainen O (2004) Lichen-forming and lichenicolous fungi of Fennoscandia. Museum of Evolution, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden. pp 359Google Scholar
  74. Swofford DL (2002) PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MAGoogle Scholar
  75. Tretiach M, Modenesi P (1999) Critical notes on the lichen genus Encephalographa A. Massal. (?Hysteriaceae). Nova Hedwigia 68:527–544Google Scholar
  76. Vainio EA (1921) Lichenes Insularum Philippinarum III. Acta Soc Sci Fennicae, Ser A 15:1–368Google Scholar
  77. Vilgalys R, Hester M (1990) Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. J Bacteriol 172:4238–4246PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. von Arx JA, Müller E (1975) A re-evaluation of the bitunicate ascomycetes with keys to families and genera. Stud Mycol 9:1–159Google Scholar
  79. Watson W (1929) The classification of lichens. New Phytol 28:85–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Wei J-C (1991) An enumeration of lichens in China. International Academic Publishers, Beijing, p 278Google Scholar
  81. Wirth V, Hauck M, Schultz M (2013) Die Flechten Deutschlands. Ulmer 2:1244Google Scholar
  82. Yoshimura I, Yamamoto Y, Nakano T, Finnie J (2002) Isolation and culture of lichen photobionts and mycobionts. In: Kranner I, Beckett RP, Varma A (eds) Protocols in Lichenology - Culturing, Biochemistry, Physiology and Use in Biomonitoring. Springer, Berlin, pp 3–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Zeller L, Tóth S (1960) Banhegyia, eine neue Gattung der Lecanorales. Sydowia 14:326–329Google Scholar
  84. Zoller S, Scheidegger C, Sperisen C (1999) PCR primers for the amplification of mitochondrial small subunit ribosomal DNA of lichen-forming ascomycetes. Lichenologist 31:511–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Zhurbenko MP, Zhdanov IS (2013) Melaspilea galligena sp. nov. and some other lichenicolous fungi from Russia. Folia Cryptog Estonica 50:89–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Zwickl DJ (2006) Genetic algorithm approaches for the phylogenetic analysis of large biological sequence datasets under the maximum likelihood criterion. Ph. D. dissertation, The University of Texas at AustinGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© School of Science 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department Bryophytes-Thallophytes (BT)Botanic Garden MeiseMeiseBelgium
  2. 2.Musée national d’histoire naturelleLuxembourgLuxembourg

Personalised recommendations