Advertisement

One-Year Follow-Up of Women with Severe Acute Maternal Morbidity (SAMM): A Cohort Study

  • Shobha A. Alluvala
  • Nuzhat Aziz
  • Ashwin Tumkur
  • Hari K. Boorugu
Original Article
  • 17 Downloads

Abstract

Background

Some women experience unforeseen complications during pregnancy and childbirth, which may be life threatening; their survival depends on intensive support and timely interventions. The aim of this study was to assess the long-term prevalence of adverse health conditions and their impact on quality of life in women who had severe acute maternal morbidity (SAMM).

Methods

This is a prospective cohort study comprising 43 women with SAMM during 2015 (exposure group) and 43 women who had an uneventful pregnancy and delivery (non-exposure group) during the same study period. Those who consented were given an additional follow-up date for free medical health check at 1 year.

Results

The incidence of SAMM during study period was 8.6/1000 births. There were five deaths in the exposure group. Adverse health events were seen in 30 (78.94%) out of 38 survivors. Abnormal lipid profile, thrombocytopenia, cardiac diastolic dysfunction, amenorrhoea, Sheehan and Asherman syndrome were major findings in the exposed group. Four (10.52%) women required re-admission, and eight (20.05%) required additional procedures to confirm screening abnormalities. The exposure group had higher mean scores on the EPDS scale, incidence of suicidal thoughts and poorer performance in the WHOQOL BREF psychological domain.

Conclusion

Health programmes need to focus on maternal health, provide medical treatment and psychological support for a longer duration than the traditional 6 weeks postpartum in women who experience SAMM.

Keywords

Severe maternal morbidity Near miss Follow-up Pregnancy India 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The authors acknowledge and thank all the women who consented to participate in this study.

Funding

The Fernandez Hospital Educational and Research Foundation funded this study, for the laboratory and radiological investigations for the study and non-exposure group. The funding agency had no role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

Authors SAA, NA, AT and HKB declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were done after an informed consent and were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The Fernandez Hospital ethical committee (Reg No. ECR/933/Inst/TG/2017) reviewed and approved the protocol (Protocol Ref. No. 32_2014, 19 January 2015 at Fernandez Hospital, Hyderabad, India).

Informed Consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

References

  1. 1.
    Parmar N, Parmar A, Mazumdar V. Incidence of maternal “near-miss” events in a tertiary care hospital of central Gujarat, India. J Obstetr Gynecol India. 2016;66(S1):315–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Intarut N, et al. Indirect causes of severe adverse maternal outcomes: a secondary analysis of the WHO multicountry survey on maternal and newborn health. BJOG Int J Obstetr Gynaecol. 2014;121:32–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Silveira C, Parpinelli MA, Pacagnella RC, et al. A cohort study of functioning and disability among women after severe maternal morbidity. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2016;134:87–92.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.10.027.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hinton L, Locock L, Knight M. Support for mothers and their families after life-threatening illness in pregnancy and childbirth: a qualitative study in primary care. Br J Gen Pract. 2015;65(638):e563–9.  https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp15x686461.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Knight M, Lewis G, Acosta C, et al. Maternal near-miss case reviews: the UK approach. BJOG. 2014;121:112–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Oliveira LC, Costa AA. Fetal and neonatal deaths among cases of maternal near miss. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2013;59(5):487–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Rathod A, Chavan R, Bhagat V, et al. Analysis of near-miss and maternal mortality at tertiary referral centre of rural India. J Obstetr Gynecol India. 2016;66(S1):295–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    De Mucio B, Abalos E, Cuesta C, et al. Maternal near miss and predictive ability of potentially life-threatening conditions at selected maternity hospitals in Latin America. Reprod Health. 2016;13:134.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-016-0250-9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Andreucci CB, Bussadori JC, Pacagnella RC, et al. Sexual life and dysfunction after maternal morbidity: a systematic review. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2015;15:307.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Assarag B, Dujardin B, Essolbi A, et al. Consequences of severe obstetric complications on women’s health in Morocco: please, listen to me! Tropical Med Int Health. 2015;20(11):1406–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mbalinda S, Nakimuli A, Nakubulwa S, et al. Male partners’ perceptions of maternal near miss obstetric morbidity experienced by their spouses. Reprod Health. 2015;12:23.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12978-015-0011-1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Storeng K, Drabo S, Ganaba R, et al. Mortality after near miss obstetric complications in Burkina Faso: medical, social and health-care factors. Bull World Health Organ. 2012;90(6):418–425C.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Prada E, Bankole A, Oladapo OT, et al. Maternal near-miss due to unsafe abortion and associated short-term health and socioeconomic consequences in Nigeria. Afr J Reprod Health. 2015;19(2):52–62.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ilboudo P, Russell S, D'Exelle B. The long term economic impact of severe obstetric complications for women and their children in Burkina Faso. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(11):e80010.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Soma-Pillay P, Makin JD, Pattinson RC. Quality of life 1 year after a maternal near-miss event. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2018;141(1):133–8.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.12432 (Epub 2018 Jan 31).CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Upadhyay RP, Chowdhury R, Salehi A, et al. Postpartum depression in India: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Bull World Health Organ. 2017;95:706–717C.  https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.17.192237.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    VanderKruik R, Barreix M, Chou D, et al. The global prevalence of postpartum psychosis: a systematic review. BMC Psychiatry. 2017;17(1):272.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1427-7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ps R, Verma S, Rai L, et al. “Near Miss” obstetric events and maternal deaths in a tertiary care hospital: an audit. J Pregnancy. 2013;2013:393758.  https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/393758.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bansal M, Lagoo J, Pujari K. Study of near miss cases in obstetrics and maternal mortality in Bastar, Chhattisgarh, India. Int J Reprod Contracept Obstetr Gynecol. 2016;5:620–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    International Institute for Population Sciences (IIPS) and ICF. National family health survey (NFHS-4), India, 2015–16: Telangana. Mumbai: IIPS; 2017.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Federation of Obstetric & Gynecological Societies of India 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shobha A. Alluvala
    • 1
  • Nuzhat Aziz
    • 1
  • Ashwin Tumkur
    • 2
  • Hari K. Boorugu
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of ObstetricsFernandez HospitalHyderabadIndia
  2. 2.Consultant Interventional CardiologistFernandez HospitalHyderabadIndia
  3. 3.Consultant PhysicianFernandez HospitalHyderabadIndia

Personalised recommendations