Risks and Benefits of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and the Effect of Learning Curve on Them
Abstract
Study objective
The objective of this study was to prospectively analyze the risks and benefits of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) compared with total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) and the effects of learning curve on them over 4 years (March 2010–April 2014).
Design
It was a prospective randomized study.
Setting
The study was conducted in Delhi government hospital which had no staff with previous experience of advanced laparoscopic surgeries.
Patients
Two hundred fifty patients were operated on for benign gynecological conditions (35–65 years). The numbers of cases operated laparoscopically were as follows—22 in 2010, 25 in 2011, 32 in 2012, and 46 in 2013. Equal number. of patients operated by open surgery were taken in the study during the same time period.
Results
Two hundred fifty cases were operated since March 2010, by either laparoscopic or open surgery. Incidence of major complications was—1.6 % for TLH compared to 4 % in TAH. After the first year of surgery, this incidence has fallen to 0 % in subsequent years in TLH group. The incidence of minor complications declined from 14 to 4.5 % in the third year of study. Total rate of conversion to laparotomy was 9.7 %, which again had a significant decline after the first year. TLH also clearly showed superior benefits of less intraoperative blood loss, early postoperative ambulance, and shorter period of hospital stay in comparison with TAH.
Conclusion
The study has led us to conclude that TLH is a safe, effective, and reproducible technique after the completion of a period of training necessary to standardize the procedure. This approach must be established in our real, day-to-day clinical practice.
Keywords
Laparoscopy Hysterectomy Uterine manipulator Ureter uterine vesselsNotes
Compliance with Ethical Requirements and Conflict of Interest
The study was conducted in Deen Dayal Upadhyay Hospital (DDUH, Delhi Government) and financed by the institution. Informed consent was obtained from all patients before being included in the study. The Ethics Committee of DDUH approved the study protocol. The procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the ethics committee and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975. Poonam Agarwal, Neeta Bindal, and Reena Yadav declare that they have no conflict of interest.
References
- 1.Ren TLC, Kannaiah K. A review of clinical benefits of total laparoscopic hysterectomy and total abdominal hysterectomy. Sungai Petani: Hospital sultan Abdul Halim; 2010.Google Scholar
- 2.Baek JW, Gong DS, Lee GH. A comparative study of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) and total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH). Korean J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;48(6):1490–6.Google Scholar
- 3.Sutasanasuang S. Laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: a retrospective comparative study. J Med Assoc Thail. 2011;94(1):8–16.Google Scholar
- 4.Persson P, Wijma K, Hammar M, et al. Psychological wellbeing after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy—a randomised controlled multicentre study. BJOG. 2006;113(9):1023–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Johnson N, Barlow D, Lethaby A, et al. Methods of hysterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2005;330:1478.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 6.Perino A, Cucinella G, Venezia R, et al. Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: an assessment of the learning curve in a prospective randomized study. Hum Reprod. 1999;14(12):2996–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Siren PH, Sjoberg J. Evaluation and the learning curve of the first 100 laparoscopic hysterectomies. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1995;74:638–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Chaperon C, Querleu D, Bruhat M, et al. Surgical complications of diagnostic and operative gynecological laparoscopy: a series of 29,966 cases. Hum Reprod. 1998;13:867–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar