Advertisement

Datenbank-Spektrum

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 35–39 | Cite as

PubPsych: A Powerful Research Tool Providing Access to a Broad Supranational Body of Psychological Knowledge

  • Erich Weichselgartner
  • Christiane Baier
  • Roland Ramthun
Schwerpunktbeitrag

Abstract

In the scientific domain, millions of research papers in many different languages are published throughout the globe every year. This causes not only information overload, but because of the language barrier, researchers might not understand or even find articles that could be relevant for their work. Therefore, in the field of psychology, the Leibniz Institute for Psychology Information (ZPID) and its partners have created PubPsych (https://www.pubpsych.eu/), an open access vertical search engine for psychological literature, tests, treatment programs and research data (metadata, not the content itself). We discuss the motivation for creating the system, design decisions, connected problems and our solutions, especially concerning multilingual information.

Keywords

Psychology database Multilingual access Domain-specific vertical search engine 

References

  1. 1.
    Bittermann I, Clerc A, Naescher S, Schui G, Waeldin S, Weichselgartner E (2015) Ergebnisse der Befragung zum Produktstart von PubPsych: Bewertungen des Suchportals PubPsych und weiterer Produkte des ZPID. Zpid Sci Inf Online 15(3):1–10 (https://www.zpid.de/pub/research/2015_Ergebnisbericht_PubPsych_Befragung.pdf, accessed 14.12.2016)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bordons M, Gómez I (2004) Towards a single language in science? A Spanish view. Ser J Ser Community 17(2):189–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Draguns JG (2001) Toward a truly international psychology. Am Psychol 56(11):1019–1030CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Fingerman S (2006) Web of Science and Scopus: Current Features and Capabilities. Issues Sci Technol Librariansh 48. doi: 10.5062/F4G44N7B Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hearst MA (2009) Search user interfaces. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge [u.a.]CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Henrich J, Heine SJ, Norenzayan A (2010) Most people are not WEIRD. Nature 466(7302):29–29. doi: 10.1038/466029a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Houser J (2009) The VuFind implementation at Villanova University. Libr Hi Tech 27(1):93–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kornadt HJ, Trommsdorff G, Kobayashi RB (1994) „Mein Hund hat mich bestorben“: sprachlicher Ausdruck von Gefühlen im deutsch-japanischen Vergleich. In: Kornadt HJ et al (ed) Sprache und Kognition: Perspektiven moderner Sprachpsychologie. Spektrum Akad. Verl., Heidelberg, pp 233–250Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Larivière V, Haustein S, Mongeon P (2015) The oligopoly of academic publishers in the digital era. PLOS ONE. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0127502 Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Orduna-Malea E, Ayllón JM, Martín-Martín A, Delgado López-Cózar E (2015) Methods for estimating the size of Google Scholar. Scientometrics 104(3):931–949. doi: 10.1007/s11192-015-1614-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Plume A, van Weijen D (2014) Publish or perish? The rise of the fractional author. Trends J Sci Res 38:16–18Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    The Apache Software Foundation (2016) Solr. https://lucene.apache.org/solr/. Accessed 14 Dec 2016Google Scholar
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
    ZPID (ed) (2011) PSYNDEX Terms: Deskriptoren/Subject Terms zur Datenbank PSYNDEX (Lit & AV, Tests). https://www.zpid.de/pub/info/PSYNDEXterms2011.pdf. Accessed 14 Dec 2016 (9th edn. Trier)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    ZPID (2015) Tätigkeitsbericht. https://www.zpid.de/pub/profil/report2015.pdf. Accessed 14 Dec 2016 (Trier)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    ZPID (2016) PubPsych Help Guide. https://www.pubpsych.eu/Guide_PubPsych.pdf. Accessed 14 Dec 2016Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Leibniz Institute for Psychology Information (ZPID)TrierGermany

Personalised recommendations