, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 61–67 | Cite as

Search Engine for Children: User-Centered Design

  • Tatiana Gossen
  • Michael Kotzyba
  • Andreas Nürnberger


Children are a fast growing user group on the Internet. Among different online activities, children use web search engines in order to gather information related to their personal interests and school activities. Children’s knowledge, cognitive abilities and fine motor skills are different from those of adults. Therefore, they may experience difficulties with search engines that are built using standard information retrieval algorithms and search interfaces for adults. Special or targeted search engines for children are essential in order to better support children in their search tasks. However, the design of search solutions for children is not an easy task. Not only are children’s abilities different from the abilities of adults, children also undergo relatively fast changes in their abilities. In order to tackle this challenge, an age-adaptable information terminal for children with a special focus on the search user interface (SUI) has been developed in three stages following a user-centered design. Specifically, it addresses the changing characteristics of the users by providing a means of adaptation. Several user studies have been conducted with children during the development to ensure the usability of the information terminal.


Interactive search Search user interface Information retrieval Children Adaptation Context support 



This work was supported by the Transregional Collaborative Research Centre SFB/TRR 62 “A Companion-Technology for Cognitive Technical Systems” funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG).


  1. 1.
    Akkersdijk S, Brandon M, Jochmann-Mannak H, Hiemstra D, Huibers T (2011) Imagepile: An alternative for vertical results lists of ir-systems. Univ. of Twente, Twente (Tech. Rep. ISSN 1381-3625, TR-CTIT-11-11)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Amstad T (1978) Wie verständlich sind unsere zeitungen? Ph.D. thesis, Univ. ZürichGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Behrens P, Rathgeb T (2010) Kim-studie 2010. Kinder + Medien. Computer + Internet. Basisuntersuchung zum Medienumgang 6‑ bis 13-jähriger in Deutschland. Medienpädagogischer Forschungsverbund Südwest, Stuttgart (Tech. rep.)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bilal D, Kirby J (2002) Differences and similarities in information seeking: children and adults as Web users. Inf Process Manag 38(5):649–670CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Budiu R, Nielsen J (2010) Usability of Websites for Children: Design Guidelines for Targeting Users Aged 3–12 Years, 2nd edn. Nielsen Norman Group Report.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Card S, Moran T, Newell A (1986) The model human processor – an engineering model of human performance. In: Handb. of perception and human performance, vol 2.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Erikson E (1963) Children and society. Narton, NYGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gossen T (2015) Search Engines for Children: Search User Interfaces and Information-Seeking Behaviour. Springer Fachmedien, WiesbadenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gossen T, Hempel J, Nürnberger A (2013) Find it if you can: usability case study of search engines for young users. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 17(8):1593–1603CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gossen T, Höbel J, Nürnberger A (2014) A comparative study about children’s and adults’ perception of targeted web search engines. In: Proc. of the SIGCHI Conf. on Human Factors in Computing Systems CHI ’14. ACM, pp 1821–1824Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gossen T, Höbel J, Nürnberger A (2014) Usability and perception of young users and adults on targeted web search engines. In: Proc. of the 5th Information Interaction in Context Symposium IIIX ’14. ACM, pp 18–27Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gossen T, Kotzyba M, Nürnberger A (2015) Knowledge journey exhibit: Towards age-adaptive search user interfaces. In: Advances in IR, 37th European Conference on IR Research ECIR 2015. Springer, pp 781–784Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Gossen T, Low T, Nürnberger A (2011) What are the real differences of children’s and adults’ web search. In: Proc. of the 34th int. ACM SIGIR conf. on Research and development in Information. ACM, pp 1115–1116Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gossen T, Nitsche M, Nürnberger A (2012) Knowledge journey: A web search interface for young users. In: Proc. of the Sixth Symposium on HCIR 2012. ACMGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gossen T, Nitsche M, Nürnberger A (2012) Search user interface design for children: Challenges and solutions. In: Proc. of euroHCIR 2012 WorkshopGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Gossen T, Nitsche M, Nürnberger A (2013) Evolving search user interfaces. In: Proc. of the Workshop on euroHCIR at SIGIR Conf, pp 31–34Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gossen T, Nitsche M, Nürnberger A (2014) My first search user interface. In: Advances in Information Retrieval 36th Europ. Conf. on IR Research, ECIR 2014. LNCS. Springer, pp 746–749CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gossen T, Nitsche M, Vos J, Nürnberger A (2013) Adaptation of a search user interface towards user needs – a prototype study with children & adults. In: Proc. of the 7th ann. Symposium on HCIR 2013. ACMGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Gossen T, Nürnberger A (2013) Specifics of information retrieval for young users: A survey. Inf Process Manag 49(4):739–756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gutnick A, Robb M, Takeuchi L, Kotler J, Bernstein L, Levine M (2011) Always connected: The new digital media habits of young children (Tech. rep.)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hackfort D (2003) Studientext Entwicklungspsychologie 1: Theoretisches Bezugssystem, Funktionsbereiche, Interventionsmöglichkeiten. Vandenhoeck & RuprechtGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hourcade JP, Bederson BB, Druin A, Guimbretière F (2004) Differences in pointing task performance between preschool children and adults using mice. Acm Tochi 11(4):357–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hutchinson HB, Druin A, Bederson BB, Reuter K, Rose A, Weeks AC (2005) How do i find blue books about dogs? the errors and frustrations of young digital library users. In: Proc. of the 11th Int. Conf. on HCII 2005Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Jochmann-Mannak H, Huibers T, Lentz L, Sanders T (2010) Children searching information on the internet: Performance on children’s interfaces compared to google. In: Towards Accessible Search Systems – Workshop of the 33rd ann. int. ACM SIGIR conf. on Research and Development in IR. ACM, Geneva, pp 27–35Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Jochmann-Mannak H, Lentz L, Huibers T, Sanders T (2014) How interface design and search strategy influence children’s search performance and evaluation. In: Evaluating Websites and Web Services: Interdisciplinary Perspectives on User Satisfaction. IGI Global, Hershey, PA, USA, pp 241–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kail R (2001) Children and their development. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Livingstone S (2003) Children’s use of the internet: Reflections on the emerging research agenda. New Media Soc 5(2):147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Piaget J, Inhelder B (1969) The psychology of the child. Basic BooksGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Solomon P (1993) Children’s information retrieval behavior: A case analysis of an OPAC. J Am Soc Inf Sci 44(5):245–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Stuart A (2007) When Should Kids Learn to Read, Write, and Do Math? WebMD. Accessed 2012-07-18Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tatiana Gossen
    • 1
  • Michael Kotzyba
    • 1
  • Andreas Nürnberger
    • 1
  1. 1.Data and Knowledge Engineering GroupOtto-von-Guericke University MagdeburgMagdeburgGermany

Personalised recommendations