Advertisement

KI - Künstliche Intelligenz

, Volume 31, Issue 3, pp 299–304 | Cite as

The Cognitive Service Robotics Apartment

A Versatile Environment for Human–Machine Interaction Research
  • Sebastian Wrede
  • Christian Leichsenring
  • Patrick Holthaus
  • Thomas Hermann
  • Sven Wachsmuth
  • The CSRA Team
Research Project

Abstract

The emergence of cognitive interaction technology offering intuitive and personalized support for humans in daily routines is essential for the success of future smart environments. Social robotics and ambient assisted living are well-established, active research fields but in the real world the number of smart environments that support humans efficiently on a daily basis is still rather low. We argue that research on ambient intelligence and human–robot interaction needs to be conducted in a strongly interdisciplinary process to facilitate seamless integration of assistance technologies into the users daily lives. With the cognitive service robotics apartment (CSRA), we are developing a novel kind of laboratory following this interdisciplinary approach. It combines a smart home with ambient intelligence functionalities with a cognitive social robot with advanced manipulation capabilities to explore the all day use of cognitive interaction technology for human assistance. This lab in conjunction with our development approach opens up new lines of inquiry and allows us to address new research questions in human–machine, human–agent and human–robot interaction

Keywords

Smart environments Social robotics Human–machine interaction Ubiquitous computing 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the development team (Birte Carlmeyer, Eduard Frese, Michael Goerlich, Michael Götting, Norman Köster, Florian Lier, Sebastian Meyer zu Borgsen, Jan Moringen, Marian Pohling, Viktor Richter, Simon Schulz, Johannes Wienke, René Zorn) for their hard work on the development of re-usable software, system integration and administration. This work was funded as part of the Cluster of Excellence Cognitive Interaction Technology ‘CITEC’ (EXC 277), Bielefeld University.

References

  1. 1.
    Bernotat J, Schiffhauer B, Eyssel F et al (2016) Welcome to the future—How naïve users intuitively address an intelligent robotics apartment. In: International conference on social roboticsGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bruyninckx H, Klotzbücher M, Hochgeschwender N et al (2013) The BRICS component model. In: Annual symposium on applied computing. ACM, p 1758Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Carlmeyer B, Schlangen D, Wrede B (2014) Towards closed feedback loops in HRI: integrating InproTK and PaMini. In: workshop on multimodal, multi-party, real-world human–robot interaction. ACM, pp 1–6Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carlmeyer B, Schlangen D, Wrede B (2016) ”Look at me!”—self-interruptions as attention booster? In: International conference on human–agent interactionGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dankert T, Goerlich M, Wrede S et al (2016) Engagement detection during deictic references in human robot interaction. In: International conference on social roboticsGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Engelmann K-F, Holthaus P, Wrede S et al (2016) An interaction-centric dataset for learning automation rules in smart homes. In: International conference on language resources and evaluationGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Holthaus P, Leichsenring C, Bernotat J et al (2016) How to address smart homes with a social robot? A multimodal corpus of user interactions with an intelligent environment. In: International conference on language resources and evaluationGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Köster N, Wrede S, Cimiano P (2016) An ontology of human machine interaction data in smart environments. In: Intelligent systems conference IEEEGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Li R, Lu B, McDonald-Maier KD (2015) Cognitive assisted living ambient system: a survey. Digit Commun Netw 1(4):229–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lier F, Wienke J, Nordmann A et al (2014) The cognitive interaction toolkit—improving reproducibility of robotic systems experiments. In: International conference on simulation, modeling, and programming for autonomous robots. Springer International Publishing, pp 400−411Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lütkebohle I, Hegel F, Schulz S et al (2010) The bielefeld anthropomorphic robot head “Flobi”. In: International conference on robotics and automation. IEEE, pp 3384–3391Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Meyer zu Borgsen S, Korthals T, Wachsmuth S (2016) ToBI—Team of Bielefeld the human–robot interaction system for RoboCup@Home 2016. In: Team description paperGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Richter V, Carlmeyer B, Lier F et al (2016) Are you talking to me? Improving the robustness of dialogue systems in a multi party HRI scenario by incorporating gaze direction and lip movement of attendees. In: International conferance on human-agent interactionGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wienke J, Wrede S (2011) A middleware for collaborative research in experimental robotics. In: International symposium on system integration. IEEE, pp 1183–1190Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.CITECBielefeld UniversityBielefeldGermany

Personalised recommendations