Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

The Cognitive Service Robotics Apartment

A Versatile Environment for Human–Machine Interaction Research

  • 362 Accesses

  • 6 Citations


The emergence of cognitive interaction technology offering intuitive and personalized support for humans in daily routines is essential for the success of future smart environments. Social robotics and ambient assisted living are well-established, active research fields but in the real world the number of smart environments that support humans efficiently on a daily basis is still rather low. We argue that research on ambient intelligence and human–robot interaction needs to be conducted in a strongly interdisciplinary process to facilitate seamless integration of assistance technologies into the users daily lives. With the cognitive service robotics apartment (CSRA), we are developing a novel kind of laboratory following this interdisciplinary approach. It combines a smart home with ambient intelligence functionalities with a cognitive social robot with advanced manipulation capabilities to explore the all day use of cognitive interaction technology for human assistance. This lab in conjunction with our development approach opens up new lines of inquiry and allows us to address new research questions in human–machine, human–agent and human–robot interaction

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3


  1. 1.

  2. 2.


  1. 1.

    Bernotat J, Schiffhauer B, Eyssel F et al (2016) Welcome to the future—How naïve users intuitively address an intelligent robotics apartment. In: International conference on social robotics

  2. 2.

    Bruyninckx H, Klotzbücher M, Hochgeschwender N et al (2013) The BRICS component model. In: Annual symposium on applied computing. ACM, p 1758

  3. 3.

    Carlmeyer B, Schlangen D, Wrede B (2014) Towards closed feedback loops in HRI: integrating InproTK and PaMini. In: workshop on multimodal, multi-party, real-world human–robot interaction. ACM, pp 1–6

  4. 4.

    Carlmeyer B, Schlangen D, Wrede B (2016) ”Look at me!”—self-interruptions as attention booster? In: International conference on human–agent interaction

  5. 5.

    Dankert T, Goerlich M, Wrede S et al (2016) Engagement detection during deictic references in human robot interaction. In: International conference on social robotics

  6. 6.

    Engelmann K-F, Holthaus P, Wrede S et al (2016) An interaction-centric dataset for learning automation rules in smart homes. In: International conference on language resources and evaluation

  7. 7.

    Holthaus P, Leichsenring C, Bernotat J et al (2016) How to address smart homes with a social robot? A multimodal corpus of user interactions with an intelligent environment. In: International conference on language resources and evaluation

  8. 8.

    Köster N, Wrede S, Cimiano P (2016) An ontology of human machine interaction data in smart environments. In: Intelligent systems conference IEEE

  9. 9.

    Li R, Lu B, McDonald-Maier KD (2015) Cognitive assisted living ambient system: a survey. Digit Commun Netw 1(4):229–252

  10. 10.

    Lier F, Wienke J, Nordmann A et al (2014) The cognitive interaction toolkit—improving reproducibility of robotic systems experiments. In: International conference on simulation, modeling, and programming for autonomous robots. Springer International Publishing, pp 400−411

  11. 11.

    Lütkebohle I, Hegel F, Schulz S et al (2010) The bielefeld anthropomorphic robot head “Flobi”. In: International conference on robotics and automation. IEEE, pp 3384–3391

  12. 12.

    Meyer zu Borgsen S, Korthals T, Wachsmuth S (2016) ToBI—Team of Bielefeld the human–robot interaction system for RoboCup@Home 2016. In: Team description paper

  13. 13.

    Richter V, Carlmeyer B, Lier F et al (2016) Are you talking to me? Improving the robustness of dialogue systems in a multi party HRI scenario by incorporating gaze direction and lip movement of attendees. In: International conferance on human-agent interaction

  14. 14.

    Wienke J, Wrede S (2011) A middleware for collaborative research in experimental robotics. In: International symposium on system integration. IEEE, pp 1183–1190

Download references


The authors would like to thank the development team (Birte Carlmeyer, Eduard Frese, Michael Goerlich, Michael Götting, Norman Köster, Florian Lier, Sebastian Meyer zu Borgsen, Jan Moringen, Marian Pohling, Viktor Richter, Simon Schulz, Johannes Wienke, René Zorn) for their hard work on the development of re-usable software, system integration and administration. This work was funded as part of the Cluster of Excellence Cognitive Interaction Technology ‘CITEC’ (EXC 277), Bielefeld University.

Author information

Correspondence to Sebastian Wrede.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wrede, S., Leichsenring, C., Holthaus, P. et al. The Cognitive Service Robotics Apartment. Künstl Intell 31, 299–304 (2017).

Download citation


  • Smart environments
  • Social robotics
  • Human–machine interaction
  • Ubiquitous computing