KI - Künstliche Intelligenz

, Volume 30, Issue 2, pp 189–192 | Cite as

SEPAL: Schema Enhanced Programming for Linked Data

  • Stefan Scheglmann
  • Martin Leinberger
  • Thomas Gottron
  • Steffen Staab
  • Ralf Lämmel
Research Project
  • 118 Downloads

Abstract

The linked data cloud provides a large collection of interlinked data and is supposed to be seen as one, big data source. However, when developing applications against this data source, it becomes apparent that different challenges arise in the various steps of programming. Among these are the selection and conceptualization of data as well as the process of actually accessing the data. The schema enhanced programming for linked data (SEPAL) project provides a new approach for integrating linked data sources when developing semantic web applications. It does this by crawling the LOD cloud, analyzing the extracted data and providing this information to a developer during development through a framework that extends the programing language. In this paper, we will motivate the necessity for a project like SEPAL and explain the core components of the project.

References

  1. 1.
    Ding L, Finin T, Joshi A, Pan R, Cost RS, Peng Y, Reddivari P, Vishal D, Sachs J (2004) Swoogle: a search and metadata engine for the semantic web. In: Proceedings of the thirteenth international conference on information and knowledge management. ACM, pp 652–659Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gottron T, Scherp A, Krayer B, Peters A (2013) Lodatio: using a schema-level index to support users infinding relevant sources of linked data. In: Proceedings of the seventh international conference on knowledge capture. ACM, pp 105–108Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schwarte A, Haase P, Hose K, Schenkel R, Schmidt M (2011) FedX: optimization techniques for federated query processing on linked data. In: Proceedings of the 10th international semantic web conference, vol 7031. Springer, New York, pp 601–616Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Görlitz Olaf O, Staab S (2011) SPLENDID: SPARQL endpoint federation exploiting VOID descriptions. In: Proceedings of the second international workshop on consuming linked data (COLD’11), BonnGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buil-Aranda C, Hogan A, Umbrich J, Vandenbusshe P-Y (2013) Sparql web-querying infrastructure: ready for action? In: Proceedings of the 12th international semantic web conference, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Intizar AM, Mileo A (2014) How good is your SPARQL endpoint. In: On the move to meaningful internet systems, OTM’14. Springer, New York, pp 491–508Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Scheglmann S, Gröner G, Staab S, Lämmel R (2013) Incompleteness-aware programming with RDF data. In: 2013 workshop on data driven functional programming (DDFP), Rome, pp 11–14Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang X, Vitvar T, Kerrigan M, Toma I (2006) A QoS-aware selection model for semantic web services. In: Proceedings of the 4th international conference on service oriented computing (ICSOC). Springer, New York, pp 390–401Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Oren E, Delbru R, Gerke S, Haller A, Decker S (2007) Activerdf: object-oriented semantic web programming. In: WWW’07. ACM, pp pp 817–824Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Parreiras FS, Saathoff C, Walter T, Franz T, Staab S (2009) A gogo: automatic generation of ontology APIs. In: ICSC’09. IEEE Press, PiscatawayGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kalyanpur A, Pastor DJ, Battle S, Padget JA (2004) Automatic mapping of OWL ontologies into Java. In: SEKE’04Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Scheglmann S, Scherp A, Staab S (2012) Declarative representation of programming access to ontologies. In: ESWC’12. LNCS, vol 7295. Springer, New York, pp 659–673Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Leinberger M, Scheglmann S, Lämmel R, Staab S, Thimm M, Viegas E (2014) Semantic web application development with LITEQ. In: Proceedings of the 13th international semantic web conference, Riva del GardaGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Konrath M, Gottron T, Staab S, Scherp A (2012) SchemEX—efficient construction of a data catalogue by stream-based indexing of linked data. J Web Semant 16:52–58 (Elsevier)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stefan Scheglmann
    • 1
  • Martin Leinberger
    • 1
  • Thomas Gottron
    • 1
  • Steffen Staab
    • 1
  • Ralf Lämmel
    • 2
  1. 1.Institute for Web Science and TechnologiesUniversity of Koblenz-LandauKoblenzGermany
  2. 2.The Software Languages TeamUniversity of Koblenz-LandauKoblenzGermany

Personalised recommendations