KI - Künstliche Intelligenz

, Volume 27, Issue 1, pp 45–52 | Cite as

Solving Wicked Social Problems with Socio-computational Systems

  • Joshua Introne
  • Robert Laubacher
  • Gary Olson
  • Thomas Malone
Research Project

Abstract

Global climate change is one of the most challenging problems humanity has ever faced. Fortunately, a new way of solving large, complex problems has become possible in just the last decade or so. Examples like Wikipedia and Linux illustrate how the work of thousands of people can be combined in ways that would have been impossible only a few years ago. Inspired by systems like these, we developed the Climate CoLab—a global, on-line platform in which thousands of people around the world work together to create, analyze, and ultimately select detailed plans for what we humans can do about global climate change.

The Climate CoLab has been operating since November 2009, and has an active community of thousands of users. In this article, we outline some of the challenges faced in developing the system, describe our current solutions to these problems, and report on our experiences.

Keywords

Collective intelligence Collaborative planning Climate change 

References

  1. 1.
    Introne J, Laubacher R, Olson G, Malone T (2011) The climate CoLab: large scale model-based collaborative planning. In: 2011 international conference on collaboration technologies and systems (CTS), pp 40–47 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Churchman CW (1967) Guest editorial: wicked problems. Manag Sci 14(4):B141–B142 Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rittel HWJ, Webber MM (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sci 4(2):155–169 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Conklin J (2005) Dialogue mapping: building shared understanding of wicked problems. Wiley, New York Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Levin K, Cashore B, Bernstein S, Auld G, Student D (2007) Playing it forward: path dependency, progressive incrementalism, and the ‘super wicked’ problem of global climate change. In: International studies association 48th annual convention, February, vol 28 Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nunamaker JF, Dennis AR, Valacich JS, Vogel D, George JF (1991) Electronic meeting systems. Commun ACM 34(7):40–61 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    DeSanctis G, Gallupe RB (1987) A foundation for the study of group decision support systems. Manag Sci 33(5):589–609 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Malone TW, Laubacher R, Dellarocas C (2010) The collective intelligence genome. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 51(3):21–31 Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Climate CoLab credits, 03-Aug-2010. Online available: http://www.climatecolab.org/web/guest/resources/-/wiki/Main/Credits. Accessed: 04-Aug-2010 N1
  10. 10.
    Kulkarni AP, Can M, Hartmann B (2011) Turkomatic: automatic recursive task and workflow design for mechanical turk. In: Proceedings of the 2011 annual conference extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems. New York, NY, USA, pp 2053–2058 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kittur A, Smus B, Khamkar S, Kraut RE (2011) CrowdForge: crowdsourcing complex work. In: Proceedings of the 24th annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology. New York, NY, USA, pp 43–52 Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Zhang H, Law E, Miller R, Gajos K, Parkes D, Horvitz E (2012) Human computation tasks with global constraints. In: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM annual conference on human factors in computing systems. New York, NY, USA, pp 217–226 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Metz B, Davidson OR, Bosch PR, Dave R, Meyer LA Eds (2007) Contribution of working group III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, 2007. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Eds CE Hanson (2007) Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, 2007. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Laubacher R (2012) What, where, who taxonomy—full view. The Climate CoLab, 2012. Online available: http://climatecolab.org/web/guest/resources/-/wiki/Main/What%2C+Where%2C+Who+taxonomy–Full+view. Accessed: 18-Sep-2012 Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Matthies M, Giupponi C, Ostendorf B (2007) Environmental decision support systems: current issues, methods and tools. Environ Model Softw 22(2):123–127 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mayer IS, Van Bueren E, Bots P, van der Voort H, Seijdel R (2005) Collaborative decisionmaking for sustainable urban renewal projects: a simulation-gaming approach. Environ Plan B, Plan Des 32(3):403–423 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Introne J, Laubacher R, Malone T (2011) Enabling open development methodologies in climate change assessment modeling. IEEE Softw 28(6):56–61 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Climate CoLab model help. 10-Aug-2010. Online available: http://www.climatecolab.org/web/guest/resources/-/wiki/Main/Models+Help. Accessed: 04-Aug-2010N2
  20. 20.
    Salganik MJ, Dodds PS, Watts DJ (2006) Experimental study of inequality and unpredictability in an artificial cultural market. Science 311(5762):854–856 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Toplak J (2010) Preferential voting: definition and classification. In: Annual meeting of the Midwest political science association 67th annual national conference. Chicago, IL Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Smith WD (2010) Range voting. Dec-2000 Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Surowiecki J (2005) The wisdom of crowds. Anchor, New York Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joshua Introne
    • 1
  • Robert Laubacher
    • 1
  • Gary Olson
    • 2
  • Thomas Malone
    • 1
  1. 1.Center for Collective IntelligenceMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA
  2. 2.Donald Bren School of Information and Computer ScienceUniversity of California at IrvineIrvineUSA

Personalised recommendations