Solving Wicked Social Problems with Socio-computational Systems
Global climate change is one of the most challenging problems humanity has ever faced. Fortunately, a new way of solving large, complex problems has become possible in just the last decade or so. Examples like Wikipedia and Linux illustrate how the work of thousands of people can be combined in ways that would have been impossible only a few years ago. Inspired by systems like these, we developed the Climate CoLab—a global, on-line platform in which thousands of people around the world work together to create, analyze, and ultimately select detailed plans for what we humans can do about global climate change.
The Climate CoLab has been operating since November 2009, and has an active community of thousands of users. In this article, we outline some of the challenges faced in developing the system, describe our current solutions to these problems, and report on our experiences.
KeywordsCollective intelligence Collaborative planning Climate change
We would especially like to thank John Sterman and Hal Abelson of MIT for their support and participation in many phases of this project. We would also like to thank the following for financial support of this project: the National Science Foundation, BT plc, Cisco Systems, Argosy Foundation, the MIT Energy Initiative, and the MIT Sloan Sustainability Initiative. In addition, we are grateful to Stuart Scott and the members of the Climate Summit for their participation in the early outreach efforts, Mark Klein for his advice in developing an interface to enable on-line debates, Janusz Parfienuik and TopCoder, Inc. for their development work, and our experts, moderators, advisors and other community members for volunteering their time to this project.
- 2.Churchman CW (1967) Guest editorial: wicked problems. Manag Sci 14(4):B141–B142 Google Scholar
- 4.Conklin J (2005) Dialogue mapping: building shared understanding of wicked problems. Wiley, New York Google Scholar
- 5.Levin K, Cashore B, Bernstein S, Auld G, Student D (2007) Playing it forward: path dependency, progressive incrementalism, and the ‘super wicked’ problem of global climate change. In: International studies association 48th annual convention, February, vol 28 Google Scholar
- 8.Malone TW, Laubacher R, Dellarocas C (2010) The collective intelligence genome. MIT Sloan Manag Rev 51(3):21–31 Google Scholar
- 9.Climate CoLab credits, 03-Aug-2010. Online available: http://www.climatecolab.org/web/guest/resources/-/wiki/Main/Credits. Accessed: 04-Aug-2010 N1
- 11.Kittur A, Smus B, Khamkar S, Kraut RE (2011) CrowdForge: crowdsourcing complex work. In: Proceedings of the 24th annual ACM symposium on user interface software and technology. New York, NY, USA, pp 43–52 Google Scholar
- 13.Metz B, Davidson OR, Bosch PR, Dave R, Meyer LA Eds (2007) Contribution of working group III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, 2007. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
- 14.Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Eds CE Hanson (2007) Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change, 2007. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK Google Scholar
- 15.Laubacher R (2012) What, where, who taxonomy—full view. The Climate CoLab, 2012. Online available: http://climatecolab.org/web/guest/resources/-/wiki/Main/What%2C+Where%2C+Who+taxonomy–Full+view. Accessed: 18-Sep-2012 Google Scholar
- 19.Climate CoLab model help. 10-Aug-2010. Online available: http://www.climatecolab.org/web/guest/resources/-/wiki/Main/Models+Help. Accessed: 04-Aug-2010N2
- 21.Toplak J (2010) Preferential voting: definition and classification. In: Annual meeting of the Midwest political science association 67th annual national conference. Chicago, IL Google Scholar
- 22.Smith WD (2010) Range voting. Dec-2000 Google Scholar
- 23.Surowiecki J (2005) The wisdom of crowds. Anchor, New York Google Scholar