Behaviour Coordination for Models of Affective Behaviour

Dissertationen und Habilitationen

Abstract

Software or robotic agents that can reproduce some of the (human) phenomena labelled as emotional have a range of applications in entertainment, pedagogy, and human computer interaction in general. Based on previous experience in modelling emotion, the method of scenario-based analysis for the comparison and design of affective agent architectures as well as a new approach towards incremental modelling of emotional phenomena are introduced. The approach uses concurrent processes, resources, and explicitly modelled related limitations as building blocks for affective agent architectures in order to work towards coordination mechanisms in a concurrent model of affective competences.

Schlüsselwörter

Behaviour control Agent architectures Emotion-oriented systems Virtual characters 

References

  1. 1.
    Agre PE, Horswill I (1997) Lifeworld analysis. J Artif Intell Res 6:111–145 Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anderson ML (2003) Embodied cognition: a field guide. Artif Intell 149:91–130 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Barsalou LW, Breazeal C, Smith LB (2007) Cognition as coordinated non-cognition. Cogn Process 8(2):79–91 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chrisley R, Ziemke T (2003) Embodiment. In: Nadel L (ed) Encyclopedia of cognitive science. Nature Publishing Group/Macmillan, London, pp 1102–1108 Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Frijda NH (2007) The laws of emotion. Erlbaum, Mahwah Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fum D, Del Missier F, Stocco A (2007) The cognitive modeling of human behavior: why a model is (sometimes) better than 10,000 words. Cogn Syst Res 8(3):135–142 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Marsella SC, Gratch J (2009) EMA: a process model of appraisal dynamics. Cogn Syst Res 10(1):70–90. Special issue: J Gratch, S Marsella, P Petta (eds.): Modeling the cognitive antecedents and consequences of emotion CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Parkinson B (2001) Putting appraisal in context. In: Scherer KR, Schorr A, Johnstone T (eds) Appraisal processes in emotion: theory, methods, research. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 173–186 Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Petta P (2003) The role of emotions in a tractable architecture for situated cognisers. In: Trappl R, Petta P, Payr S (eds) Emotions in humans and artifacts. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 251–288 Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Rank S (2004) Affective acting: an appraisal-based architecture for agents as actors. Master’s thesis, Institute for Medical Cybernetics and Artificial Intelligence, Medical University of Vienna & Vienna University of Technology, Diplomarbeit Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rank S (2005) Towards reusable roleplayers using an appraisal-based architecture. Appl Artif Intell 19(3–4): 313–340. Special issue: educational agents and (e-)learning CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Rank S (2009) Behaviour coordination for models of affective behaviour. PhD thesis, Vienna University of Technology, carried out at the Austrian Research Institute for Artificial Intelligence. http://strank.info/phd/Rank2009-Dissertation-final.pdf
  13. 13.
    Rank S, Dos Anjos PL, Petta P, Aylett R (2005) What is in an affective architecture for situated agents. In: Canamero L (ed) Humaine deliverable D7a: WP7 workshop proceedings, King’s College, London, UK, July 4–5 Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rank S, Petta P (2006) Comparability is key to assess affective architectures. In: Trappl R (ed) Cybernetics and systems 2006—proceedings of the eighteenth meeting on cybernetics and systems research, April 18–21, University of Vienna. Austrian Society for Cybernetic Studies, Vienna, vols 1 and 2, pp 643–648 Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Reisenzein R (2001) Appraisal processes conceptualized from a schema-theoretic perspective—contributions to a process analysis of emotions. In: Scherer KR, Schorr A, Johnstone T (eds) Appraisal processes in emotion: theory, methods, research. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 187–201 Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Scherer KR (2005) What are emotions and how can they be measured? Soc Sci Inf 44(4):695–729 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Scherer KR, Schorr A, Johnstone T (eds) (2001) Appraisal processes in emotion: theory, methods, research. Oxford University Press, Oxford Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Thórisson KR (2007) Integrated AI systems. Minds Mach 17(1):11–25 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Austrian Research Institute for Artificial Intelligence (OFAI)ViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations