KI - Künstliche Intelligenz

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 57–61 | Cite as

Agreement Computing

  • Carles SierraEmail author
  • Vicent Botti
  • Sascha Ossowski


In this paper we introduce the concept of Agreement Computing, motivate the central role that the concept of agreement plays in open software systems and discuss a number of research challenges that need to be addressed to make the agreement computing vision a reality.


Semantics Norms Organisations Negotiation Trust 



Research supported by the Agreement Technologies CONSOLIDER project under contract CSD2007-0022 and INGENIO 2010 and by the Agreement Technologies COST Action, IC0801.


  1. 1.
    Arcos JL, Esteva M, Noriega P, Rodríguez JA, Sierra C (2005) Engineering open environments with electronic institutions. Eng Appl Artif Intell 18(2):191–204 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boella G, Noriega P, Pigozzi G, Verhagen H (2009) In: Dagstuhl seminar proceedings 09121: normative multi-agent systems. Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Henrik G, Wright V (1963) Norm and action, a logical enquiry. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hermenegildo M, Albert E, López-García P, Puebla G (2005) Abstraction carrying code and resource-awareness. In: Principle and practice of declarative programming. ACM Press, New York Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jennings N, Faratin P, Lomuscio A, Parsons S, Sierra C, Wooldridge M (2001) Automated negotiation: prospects methods and challenges. Group Decis Negot 10(2):199–215 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jøsang A, Ismail R, Boyd C (2007) A survey of trust and reputation systems for online service provision. Decis Support Syst 43(2):618–644 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kalfoglou Y, Schorlemmer M (2003) IF-Map: an ontology-mapping method based on information-flow theory. In: Spaccapietra S, March S, Aberer K (eds) Journal on data semantics I. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 2800. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 98–127 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ko RKL, Lee SSG, Lee EW (2009) Business process management (bpm) standards: a survey. Bus Process Manag J 15(5):744–791 CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kraus S (1997) Negotiation and cooperation in multi-agent environments. Artif Intell 94(1–2):79–97 zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    March J (1996) A preface to understanding how decisions happen in organizations. In: Organizational decision-making, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Necula GC, Lee P (1996) Proof-carrying code. Tech rep Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ross A (1968) Directives and norms. Humanities, Atlantic Highlands Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Sierra C, Debenham J (2006) Trust and honour in information-based agency. In: Proceedings of the 5th international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems. ACM Press, New York, pp 1225–1232 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Simon HA Administrative behavior. Free Press (1997) Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Vasirani M, Ossowski S (2009) A market-inspired approach to reservation-based urban road traffic management. In: Proceedings of the 8th international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems, IFAAMAS, pp. 617–624 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Artificial Intelligence Research Institute, IIIA-CSICBellaterraSpain
  2. 2.DSICUniversitat Politècnica de ValènciaValènciaSpain
  3. 3.CETINIAUniversity Rey Juan CarlosMóstoles, MadridSpain

Personalised recommendations