Advertisement

Comparative metagenomics and functional profiling of crude oil-polluted soils in Bodo West Community, Ogoni, with other sites of varying pollution history

  • Chioma Blaise ChikereEmail author
  • Ijeoma Jessie Mordi
  • Blaise Ositadinma Chikere
  • Ramganesh Selvarajan
  • Tom Omotayo Ashafa
  • Chinedu Christopher Obieze
Original Article

Abstract

The impact of long-term crude oil pollution on soil microbial community structure in Bodo West Community, Ogoniland, Nigeria, was investigated to determine the amenability of the soil to microbial mediated remediation. Crude oil-polluted and pristine soil samples were collected approximately from 0 to 30 cm depth for both chemical and microbiological analyses. Total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAH) were determined using gas chromatograph–mass spectrophotometer (GC-MS). The soil microbiome was determined using the Illumina MiSeq platform. Results from this study were then compared with publicly available data from other oil-polluted sites. Taxonomic biomarkers and pathways associated with oil-polluted soils were detected using bioinformatics pipelines. TPH in the polluted and pristine soils were 7591 mg/kg and 199.70 mg/kg respectively, while the values of PAHs were significantly higher (p < 0.05) in the oil-polluted soil. Predictive functional and biomarker analysis demonstrated that microbes detected in the oil-polluted environment were involved in different metabolic pathways for degradation of a broad set of xenobiotic aromatic compounds. Established hydrocarbon degraders belonging to the families Alcanivoracaceae and Oceanospirillaceae were mostly detected in the oil-polluted soils. Sneathiella, Parvibaculum, Sphingobium, and Oceanicaulis were among biomarker taxa. The bacterial families Acidithiobacillaceae and Desulfobacteraceae were differentially more abundant in Bodo West spill site than any other site used for comparison. Furthermore, differentially represented species in our study site and other oil-polluted sites ranged from 21 to 42 bacterial families. The findings from this study revealed the bacterial community had a strong dependence on hydrocarbons and that acid-tolerant bacterial families can as well contribute significantly to biodegradation in the site and other polluted sites in Ogoniland usually known to have an acidic pH. Further research on Bodo West spill site will reveal the novel enzymes and pathways for enhanced microbial mediated eco-restoration.

Keywords

Crude oil pollution Metagenomics Biodegradation Soil microbiome Niger Delta 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Centre for High Performance Computing (CHPC) facility, South Africa, for providing computational support for sequence data analysis.

Data accessibility statement

Sequence reads for Bodo West, Ogoniland, samples were deposited in GenBank (Sequence Reads Archive) under the SRA accession number SRP133543.

Funding

This study was self-funded by the authors.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Research involving human participants and/or animals

N/A

Informed consent

N/A

References

  1. Abia ALK, Alisoltani A, Keshri J, Ubomba-Jaswa E, (2018) Metagenomic analysis of the bacterial communities and their functional profiles in water and sediments of the Apies River, South Africa, as a function of land use. Sci Total Environ 616–617:326–334.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.322
  2. Abubucker S, Segata N, Goll J, Schubert AM, Izard J, Cantarel BL, … Huttenhower C (2012) Metabolic reconstruction for metagenomic data and its application to the human microbiome, 8(6).  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002358
  3. Allen JP, Atekwana EA, Duris JW, Werkema DD, Rossbach S (2007) The microbial community structure in petroleum-contaminated sediments corresponds to geophysical signatures. Appl Environ Microbiol 73(9):2860–2870Google Scholar
  4. APHA (2012) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. Standard Methods, 541. ISBN 9780875532356
  5. Ataikiru TL, Okorhi-damisa BF, Akpaiboh JI (2017) Microbial community structure of an oil polluted site in. International Research Journal of Public and Environmental Health, 4(3), 41–47Google Scholar
  6. Bao YJ, Xu Z, Li Y, Yao Z, Sun J, Song H (2017) High-throughput metagenomic analysis of petroleum-contaminated soil microbiome reveals the versatility in xenobiotic aromatics metabolism. J Environ Sci (China) 56:25–35.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jes.2016.08.022 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y (1995) Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol. WileyRoyal Statistical Society.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2346101
  8. Berthe-Corti L, Nachtkamp M (2010) Bacterial communities in hydrocarbon-contaminated marine coastal environments. In: Timmis KN (ed) Handbook of hydrocarbon and lipid microbiology. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  9. Caporaso JG, Lauber CL, Walters WA, Berg-Lyons D, Lozupone CA, Turnbaugh PJ et al (2011a) Global patterns of 16S rRNA diversity at a depth of millions of sequences per sample. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108(Supplement_1):4516–4522.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1000080107
  10. Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, … Walters WA (2011b). QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods 7(5), 335–336.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.f.303
  11. Chen C, Khaleel SS, Huang H, Wu CH (2014) Software for pre-processing Illumina next-generation sequencing short read sequences. Source Code Biol Med 9(8):1–11.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1486
  12. Chikere CB, Azubuike CC, Fubara EM (2017). Shift in microbial group during remediation by enhanced natural attenuation (RENA) of a crude oil-impacted soil: A case study of Ikarama Community, Bayelsa, Nigeria. 3Biotech 7:152.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-017-0782-x
  13. Chikere CB, Obieze CC (2018) Effect of hydrocarbon pollution on microbial diversity and implication for bioremediation. In Proceedings of the 2018 International Women in Science Without Borders (WISWB) – Indaba. (pp. 10–11). Johannesburg. Retrieved from https://researchspace.csir.co.za/dspace/handle/10204/10251
  14. dos Santos M, Sabirova V, Timmis J, Yakimov MM (2010) Alcanivorax borkumensis. In: Timmis KN (ed) Handbook of hydrocarbon and lipid microbiology. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 1266–1285Google Scholar
  15. dos Santos HF, Cury JC, do Carmo FL, dos Santos AL, Tiedje J, van Elsas JD, Rosado AS, Peixoto RS, Heimesaat M (2011) Mangrove bacterial diversity and the impact of oil contamination revealed by pyrosequencing: bacterial proxies for oil pollution. PLoS ONE 6(3):e16943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. DPR (2002) Environmental Guidelines and Standards for the Petroleum Industry in Nigeria (Egaspin). Lagos. Retrieved from http://www.ngfcp.gov.ng/media/1066/dprs-egaspin-2002-revised-edition.pdf
  17. Edgar RC, Haas BJ, Clemente JC, Quince C, Knight R (2011) UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics 27(16):2194–2200.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr381 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Fahrenfeld N, Cozzarelli IM, Bailey Z, Pruden A (2014) Insights into biodegradation through depth-resolved microbial community functional and structural profiling of a crude-oil contaminant plume. Microb Ecol 68(3):453–462CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Feng G, Xie T, Wang X, Bai J, Tang L, Zhao H et al (2018) Metagenomics analysis of microbial community and function involved in Cd-contaminated soil. BMC Microbiol 18(11):1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-018-1152-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gałązka A, Grządziel J, Gałązka R, Ukalska-Jaruga A, Strzelecka J, Smreczak B (2018) Genetic and functional diversity of bacterial microbiome in soils with long term impacts of petroleum hydrocarbons. Front Microbiol 9:1923.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01923 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Gibson J, Harwood CS, Harwood SC (2002) Metabolic diversity in aromatic compound utilization by anaerobic microbes. Annu Rev Microbiol. 56(1):345–369.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.micro.56.012302.160749
  22. Greer CW (2010) Bacterial diversity in hydrocarbon-polluted rivers, estuaries and sediments. In: Timmis KN (ed) Handbook of hydrocarbon and lipid microbiology. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  23. Hamamura N, Olson SH, Ward DM, Inskeep WP (2005) Diversity and functional analysis of bacterial communities associated with natural hydrocarbon seeps in acidic soils at Rainbow Springs, Yellowstone National Park. Appl Environ Microbiol 71(10):5943–5950CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hammer O, Harper DAT, Ryan PD (2001) PAST: Palentological Statistics Software Package for Education and Data Analysis, 4(1), 1–9Google Scholar
  25. Hassanshahian M, Zeynalipour MS, Musa FH, Hassanshahian M, Zeynalipour MS, Musa FH (2014) Isolation and characterization of crude oil degrading bacteria from the Persian Gulf (Khorramshahr provenance). Mar Pollut Bull 82(1–2):39–44.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.03.027 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Hazen TC, Dubinsky EA, DeSantis TZ, Andersen GL, Piceno YM et al (2010) Deep-sea oil plume enriches indigenous oil-degrading bacteria. Science 330(6001):204–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Head IM, Jones DM, Röling WFM (2006) Marine microorganisms make a meal of oil. Nat Rev Microbiol 4(3):173–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Huettel M, Overholt WA, Kostka JE, Hagan C, Kaba J, Brian W, Dudley S (2018) Degradation of Deepwater Horizon oil buried in a Florida beach influenced by tidal pumping Gulf of Mexico, 126(December 2017), 488–500Google Scholar
  29. Joshi MN, Dhebar SV, Bhargava P, Pandit AS, Patel RP, Saxena AK, Bagatharia SB (2014) Metagenomic approach for understanding microbial population from petroleum muck. Genome Announc. 2(3):e00533–e00514.  https://doi.org/10.1128/genomeA.00533-14.Copyright
  30. Joye S, Kleindienst S, Gilbert JA, Handley KM, Weisenhorn P, Overholt WA, Kostka JE (2016) Responses of microbial communities to hydrocarbon exposures. Oceanography 29(3):1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kadali KK, Simons KL, Skuza PP, Moore RB, Ball AS (2012) A complementary approach to identifying and assessing the remediation potential of hydrocarbonoclastic bacteria. J Microbiol Methods 88(3):348–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kappell AD, Wei Y, Newton RJ, Van Nostrand JD, Zhou J, McLellan SL, Yakimov MM (2014) The polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon degradation potential of Gulf of Mexico native coastal microbial communities after the deepwater horizon oil spill. Front Microbiol 5:1–13Google Scholar
  33. Keshri J, Mankazana BJ, Momba MN (2015) Profile of bacterial communities in South African mine-water samples using Illumina next-generation sequencing platform. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99(7):3233–3242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kimes NE, Callaghan AV, Aktas DF, Smith WL, Sunner J, Golding B, Morris PJ (2013) Metagenomic analysis and metabolite profiling of deep–sea sediments from the Gulf of Mexico following the Deepwater Horizon oil spill. Front Microbiol 4:1–17Google Scholar
  35. Kostka JE, Prakash O, Overholt WA, Green SJ, Freyer G, Canion A, Delgardio J, Norton N, Hazen TC, Huettel M (2011) Hydrocarbon-degrading bacteria and the bacterial community response in Gulf of Mexico beach sands impacted by the deepwater horizon oil spill. Appl Environ Microbiol 77(22):7962–7974CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kumari S, Kumar R, Manickam N (2018) Improved polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon degradation in a crude oil by individual and a consortium of bacteria. Bioresour Technol 254(November 2017):1–26.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.01.075 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kümmel S, Herbst F, Bahr A, Duarte M, Pieper DH, Jehmlich N, Seifert J, von Bergen M, Bombach P, Richnow HH, Vogt C (2015) Anaerobic naphthalene degradation by sulfate-reducing Desulfobacteraceae from various anoxic aquifers. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 91(3)Google Scholar
  38. Lamendella R, Strutt S, Borglin S, Chakraborty R, Tas N, Mason OU, Hultman J, Prestat E, Hazen TC, Jansson JK (2014) Assessment of the deepwater horizon oil spill impact on Gulf coast microbial communities. Front Microbiol 5Google Scholar
  39. Langille MGI, Zaneveld J, Caporaso JG, Mcdonald D, Knights D, Reyes JA et al (2013) Analysis predictive functional profiling of microbial communities using 16S rRNA marker gene sequences. Nat Biotechnol 31(9):814–821.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.2676 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Leahy JG, Colwell RR (1990) Microbial degradation of hydrocarbons in the environment. Microbiol Rev 54(3):305–315PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Lindén O, Pålsson J (2013) Oil contamination in ogoniland, Niger delta. Ambio 42(6):685–701.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-013-0412-8 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. Looper JK, Cotto A, Kim B, Lee M, Liles MR, Chadhain SM, Son A (2013) Microbial community analysis of Deepwater Horizon oil-spill impacted sites along the Gulf coast using functional and phylogenetic markers. Environ Sci Process Impacts 15(11):2068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Liu Z, Liu J (2013) Evaluating bacterial community structures in oil collected from the sea surface and sediment in the northern Gulf of Mexico after the oil spill. MicrobiologyOpen 2(3):492–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lu L, Xing D, Ren N (2012) Pyrosequencing reveals highly diverse microbial communities in microbial electrolysis cells involved in enhanced H 2 production from waste activated sludge. Water Res 46(7):2425–2434.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.02.005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. McMurdie PJ, Holmes S (2013) Phyloseq: an R package for reproducible interactive analysis and graphics of microbiome census data. PLoS One 8:e61217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Militon C, Boucher D, Vachelard C, Perchet G, Barra V, Troquet J, Peyretaillade E, Peyret P (2010) Bacterial community changes during bioremediation of aliphatic hydrocarbon-contaminated soil. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 74(3):669–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Mukherjee A, Chettri B, Langpoklakpam JS, Basak P, Prasad A, Mukherjee AK, Bhattacharyya M, Singh AK, Chattopadhyay D (2017) Bioinformatic approaches including predictive metagenomic profiling reveal characteristics of bacterial response to petroleum hydrocarbon contamination in diverse environments. Sci Rep 7(1):1108.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-01126-3 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Muyzer G, de Waal EC, Uitterlinden AG (1993) Profiling of complex microbial populations by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis analysis of polymerase chain reaction-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 59(3):695–700 Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7683183 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. Nacke H, Thürmer A, Wollherr A, Will C, Hodac L, Herold N, Schöning I, Schrumpf M, Daniel R, Gilbert J (2011) Pyrosequencing-based assessment of bacterial community structure along different management types in German forest and grassland soils. PLoS ONE 6(2):e17000CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Newton RJ, Huse SM, Morrison HG, Peake CS, Sogin ML, McLellan SL (2013) Shifts in the microbial community composition of gulf coast beaches following beach oiling. PLoS ONE 8:1–13Google Scholar
  51. Nwinyi OC, Ajayi OO, Amund OO (2016) Degradation of polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons by two strains of Pseudomonas. Braz J Microbiol 47(3):551–562.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjm.2016.04.026
  52. Parks DH, Tyson GW, Hugenholtz P, Beiko RG, Parks DH, Tyson GW, Hugenholtz P, Beiko RG (2014) STAMP: statistical analysis of taxonomic and functional profiles. Bioinformatics 30(21):3123–3124.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btu494 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Parthipan P, Preetham E, Machuca LL, Rahman PKSM, Murugan K, Rajasekar A (2017) Biosurfactant and degradative enzymes mediated crude oil degradation by bacterium Bacillus subtilis A1. Front Microbiol 8(FEB):1–14.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.00193 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Paul S, Cortez Y, Vera N, Villena GK, Gutiérrez-Correa M (2016) Metagenomic analysis of microbial community of an Amazonian geothermal spring in Peru. Genom Data 9:63–66.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gdata.2016.06.013
  55. Selvarajan R, Maredza TA, Tekere M (2014). Microbial exploration in extreme conditions: metagenomic analysis and future perspectives. In: BENEDETTI C (ed) Metagenomics—methods, applications and perspectives. Nova Science Publishers, Inc., New York, pp 157–181Google Scholar
  56. Selvarajan R, Sibanda T, Tekere M (2018a). Thermophilic bacterial communities inhabiting the microbial mats of “indifferent” and chalybeate (iron-rich) thermal springs: Diversity and biotechnological analysis. MicrobiologyOpen 7, 1–12.Google Scholar
  57. Selvarajan R, Sibanda T, Venkatachalam S, Kamika I, Nel W (2018b) Industrial wastewaters harbor a unique diversity of bacterial communities revealed by high-throughput amplicon analysis. Ann Microbiol, 1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13213-018-1349-8
  58. Sutton NB, Maphosa F, Morillo JA, Al-Soud WA, Langenhoff AM, Grotenhuis T, Rijnaarts HM, Smidt H (2012) Impact of long-term diesel contamination on soil microbial community structure. Appl Environ Microbiol 79(2):619–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Reid T, Chaganti S, Droppo IG, Weisener CG (2018) Novel insights into freshwater hydrocarbon-rich sediments using metatranscriptomics: opening the black box. Water Res, 1–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.02.039
  60. Roesch LFW, Fulthorpe RR, Riva A, Casella G, Hadwin AKM, Kent AD, Daroub SH, Camargo FAO, Farmerie WG, Triplett EW (2007) Pyrosequencing enumerates and contrasts soil microbial diversity. ISME J 1(4):283–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Schulz S, Brankatschk R, Dümig A, Kögel-Knabner I, Schloter M, Zeyer J (2013) The role of microorganisms at different stages of ecosystem development for soil formation. Biogeosciences 10(6):3983–3996.  https://doi.org/10.5194/bg-10-3983-2013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Sibanda T, Selvarajan R, Tekere M (2017) Synthetic extreme environments: overlooked sources of potential biotechnologically relevant microorganisms. Microb Biotechnol.  https://doi.org/10.1002/mrd.22357
  63. Stefani FOP, Bell TH, Marchand C, De La Providencia IE, El Yassimi A, St-Arnaud M, Hijri M (2015) Culture-dependent and -independent methods capture different microbial community fractions in hydrocarbon-contaminated soils. PLoS One 10(6):1–16.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0128272 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. The Guardian. (2018) Fishing in oily waters: Bodo’s long, painful wait for pollution clean-up. Retrieved June 26, 2018, From https://guardian.ng/features/fishing-in-oily-waters-bodos-long-painful-wait-for-pollution-clean-up/
  65. USEPA (1978) Test method for evaluating total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbon, method 418.1 (spectrophotometric, infrared). Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
  66. Valdés J, Pedroso I, Quatrini R, Dodson RJ, Tettelin H, Blake R, Eisen JA, Holmes DS (2008) Acidithiobacillus ferrooxidans metabolism: from genome sequence to industrial applications. BMC Genomics 9(1):597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wang L, Wang W, Lai Q, Shao Z (2010) Gene diversity of CYP153A and AlkB alkane hydroxylases in oil-degrading bacteria isolated from the Atlantic Ocean. Environ Microbiol 12:1230–1242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wang F, Li C, Wang H, Chen W, Huang Q, Wang F, Li C, Wang H, Chen W, Huang Q (2016) Characterization of a phenanthrene-degrading microbial consortium enriched from petrochemical contaminated environment. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 98:4209–4221.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2016.08.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Weisburg WG, Barns SM, Pelletier DA, Lane DJ (1991) 16S ribosomal DNA amplification for phylogenetic study. J Bacteriol 173(2):697–703 Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1987160 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Yakimov MM, Timmis KN, Golyshin PN (2007) Obligate oil-degrading marine bacteria. Curr Opin Biotechnol 18(3):257–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Ye Y, Doak TG (2009) A parsimony approach to biological pathway reconstruction/inference for genomes and metagenomes. PLoS Comput Biol 5(8):e1000465.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000465 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Università degli studi di Milano 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MicrobiologyUniversity of Port HarcourtPort HarcourtNigeria
  2. 2.Environmental Studies UnitShell Petroleum Development Company (SPDC) Port HarcourtPort HarcourtNigeria
  3. 3.Department of Plant SciencesUniversity of the Free StatePhuthaditjhabaSouth Africa
  4. 4.Africa Centre of Excellence in Oilfield Chemicals ResearchUniversity of Port HarcourtPort HarcourtNigeria

Personalised recommendations