Polyphasic analysis in the description of Sulfitobacter salinus sp. nov., a marine alphaproteobacterium isolated from seawater
A polyphasic analysis was performed on a novel bacterium, designated strain KMU-143T, which was isolated from seawater collected in the Republic of Korea.
A novel marine bacterium KMU-143T was analyzed and described using a polyphasic taxonomic method including 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis, DNA–DNA hybridization, and physiological, biochemical, and chemotaxonomic analyses.
Strain KMU-143T was Gram-stain-negative, strictly aerobic, oval-shaped, non-motile, and chemoorganoheterotrophic. Phylogenetic analysis based on the 16S rRNA gene sequence demonstrated that the novel marine bacterium belongs to the family Rhodobacteraceae, of the class Alphaproteobacteria, and that it possessed the highest (97.1%) sequence similarity with Sulfitobacter pontiacus ChLG 10T and Sulfitobacter undariae W-BA2T. DNA–DNA relatedness values between strains KMU-143T, S. pontiacus JCM 21789T, and S. undariae KCTC 42200T were less than 70%. The major isoprenoid quinone of the novel isolate was ubiquinone-10 (Q-10) and the major (> 10%) cellular fatty acids were C16:0 and C18:1 ω7c. The genomic DNA G+C content of strain KMU-143T was 56.1 mol%. The polar lipid profile of the strain KMU-143T was found to consist of phosphatidylglycerol, diphosphatidylglycerol, phosphatidylcholine, an unidentified aminolipid, and two unidentified lipids.
Based on the discriminative phylogenetic position and combination of genotypic and phenotypic properties, the strain is considered to represent a new species of the genus Sulfitobacter for which the name Sulfitobacter salinus sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain of S. salinus sp. nov. is KMU-143T (= KCCM 90322T = NBRC 113459T).
KeywordsAlphaproteobacteria Sulfitobacter salinus sp. nov. Seawater 16S rRNA gene Polyphasic taxonomy
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The author declares that he has no conflicts of interest.
Research involving human participants and/or animals
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the author.
- Garrity GM, Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT (2005) Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology, vol 2, 2nd edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Giovannoni SJ, Rappé M (2000) Evolution, diversity, and molecular ecology of marine prokaryotes. In: Kirchman D (ed) Microbial ecology of the Oceans. Wiley, New York, pp 47–84Google Scholar
- Lane DJ (1991) In: Stackebrandt E, Goodfellow M (eds) 16S/23S rRNA sequencing. In Nucleic acid techniques in bacterial systematics. Wiley, Chichester, pp 115–175Google Scholar
- Power DA, Johnson JA (2009) Difco™ and BBL™ manual: manual of microbiological culture media, 2nd edn. Becton Dickinson and Company, Sparks, pp 359–360Google Scholar
- Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425Google Scholar
- Sasser M (1990) Identification of bacteria by gas chromatography of cellular fatty acids, MIDI Technical Note 101. MIDI Inc, NewarkGoogle Scholar
- Sorokin DY (1995) Sulfitobacter pontiacus gen. nov., sp. nov. – a new heterotrophic bacterium from the Black Sea, specialized on sulfite oxidation. Microbiology (English translation of Mikrobiologiia) 64:354–365Google Scholar
- Yoon JH, Kang SJ, Lee MH, Oh TK (2007) Description of Sulfitobacter donghicola sp. nov., isolated from seawater of the East Sea in Korea, transfer of Staleya guttiformis Labrenz et al. 2000 to the genus Sulfitobacter as Sulfitobacter guttiformis comb. nov. and emended description of the genus Sulfitobacter. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57:1788–1792CrossRefGoogle Scholar