Comparative study of growth temperature impact on the susceptibility of biofilm-detached and planktonic Staphylococcus aureus cells to benzalkonium chloride
- 27 Downloads
The present study investigated and compared the effect of growth temperature on the susceptibility of biofilm-detached and planktonic Staphylococcus aureus cells, to benzalkonium chloride (BAC). This study also highlights the impact of BAC on the bacterial physiology and the role of membrane fluidity regulation as a bacterial resistance mechanism. The minimum inhibitory concentration of BAC was characterized with micro-dilution growth inhibition assay. The BAC treatment was performed on S. aureus cultured at 20 °C and 37 °C, for 24 h. The morphology of S. aureus cells was examined using scanning electron microscopy. The loss of bacterial membrane integrity after BAC treatment was studied by monitoring the intracellular potassium ion leakage using the atomic absorption spectroscopy. The bacterial membrane total fatty acid composition, controlling the membrane fluidity, was analyzed by GC/MS. The results showed that the resistance of S. aureus cells to BAC increased with the increase of growth temperature. The planktonic cells were more susceptible to BAC than biofilm-detached ones. The rise of growth temperature resulted in an increase of S. aureus membrane rigidity. Furthermore, a higher membrane fluidity was observed in planktonic cells when compared to that in the biofilm-detached ones. The resistance of S. aureus seems to depend on the growth temperature. Compared to planktonic cells, biofilm-detached cells showed a greater resistance to BAC. The BAC targets and disturbs the bacterial membrane. Membrane fluidity modulation is likely a one of resistance mechanisms for S. aureus to BAC at the cellular scale. Therefore, disinfection procedures, in food sector, should be adapted for bacteria detached from biofilm.
KeywordsStaphylococcus aureus Biofilm-detached cells Planktonic cells Growth temperature Membrane fluidity Susceptibility to BAC
The authors thank the Haut de France region and FEDER (Fonds européen de développement régional) for their financial support.
This work was carried out within the framework of ALIBIOTECH (Agroalimentaire et Biotechnologie, Nord Pas-de-Calais region) program.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Research involving human participants and/or animals
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
- Berne C, Ellison CK, Ducret A, Brun YV (2018) Bacterial adhesion at the single-cell level. Nat Rev Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41579-018-0057-5
- Chihib N-E, Tierny Y, Mary P, Hornez JP (2005) Adaptational changes in cellular fatty acid branching and unsaturation of Aeromonas species as a response to growth temperature and salinity. Int J Food Microbiol 102:113–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2004.12.005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Khelissa SO, Abdallah M, Jama C et al (2017a) Bacterial contamination and biofilm formation on abiotic surfaces and strategies to overcome their persistence. J Mater Environ Sci 8:3326–3346Google Scholar
- Khelissa SO, Jama C, Abdallah M et al (2017b) Effect of incubation duration, growth temperature, and abiotic surface type on cell surface properties, adhesion and pathogenicity of biofilm-detached Staphylococcus aureus cells. AMB Express 7:191. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-017-0492-0 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Rollet C, Gal L, Guzzo J (2009) Biofilm-detached cells, a transition from a sessile to a planktonic phenotype: a comparative study of adhesion and physiological characteristics in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. FEMS Microbiol Lett 290:135–142. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2008.01415.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Wang L-H, Wang M-S, Zeng X-A, Liu Z-W (2016) Temperature-mediated variations in cellular membrane fatty acid composition of Staphylococcus aureus in resistance to pulsed electric fields. Biochim Biophys Acta BBA Biomembr 1858:1791–1800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbamem.2016.05.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar