Advertisement

Annals of Microbiology

, Volume 64, Issue 3, pp 1333–1346 | Cite as

In vitro antifungal, probiotic and antioxidant properties of novel Lactobacillus plantarum K46 isolated from fermented sesame leaf

  • Mariadhas Valan Arasu
  • Da Hye Kim
  • Pyoung Il Kim
  • Min Woong Jung
  • Soundarrajan Ilavenil
  • Mariamichael Jane
  • Kyung Dong Lee
  • Naif Abdullah Al-Dhabi
  • Ki Choon Choi
Original Article

Abstract

This study aimed to describe the diversity of antifungal lactic acid bacteria (LAB) in popular traditional Korean fermented food. A total of 22 LAB strains was selected and subjected to a monophasic identical approach using 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis. Antifungal LAB associated with fermented food was identified as Lactobacillus plantarum (9), Lactobacillus graminis (5), Lactobacillus pentosus (4), Lactobacillus sakei (2), Lactobacillus paraplantarum (1), and Leuconostoc mesenteroides subsp. mesenteroides (1). Novel Lactobacillus plantarum strain K46 exhibited comparatively better antifungal activity against several spoilage fungi, and was deposited in the Korean Collection for Type Cultures (KACC91758P). Antifungal substances from the spent medium in which K46 was cultivated were extracted with ethyl acetate. Antifungal activity was assessed using the broth micro dilution technique. Compounds were characterized based on infrared, 13C nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), and 1H NMR spectral data. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of the compounds against Aspergillus clavatus, Aspergillus oryzae, Penicillium chrysogenum and Penicillium roqueforti was 2.5 mg/mL and that against Aspergillus fumigatus, Aspergillus niger, Curvularia lunata and Gibberella moniliformis was 5.0 mg/mL. K46 was able to survive gastrointestinal conditions simulating the stomach and the duodenum passage with the highest percentage of hydrophobicity. In addition, its resistance to hydrogen peroxide and highest hydroxyl radical and 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH) scavenging activities, with inhibition rates of 43.53 % and 56.88 %, respectively, were to its advantage. An antimicrobial susceptibility pattern was an intrinsic feature of this strain, thus consumption does not represent a health risk to humans. The results showed the potential of K46 strain as an antifungal, probiotic and antioxidant culture, and hence it was determined to be suitable for application in functional foods.

Keywords

Lactobacillus plantarum Antifungal compound Probiotic properties Antioxidant activities 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Minister for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries, for their support to carry out this project under the grant No. PJ008445. We also extend our gratitude to NIAS, RDA for their support.

References

  1. Arasu MV, Duraipandiyan V, Ignacimuthu S (2013) Antibacterial and antifungal activities of polyketide metabolite from marine Streptomyces sp. AP-123 and its cytotoxic effect. Chemosphere 90:479–487PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bover-Cid S, Holzapfel WH (1999) Improved screening procedure for biogenic amine production by lactic acid bacteria. Int J Food Microbiol 53(1):33–41PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brul S, Coote P (1999) Preservative agents in foods: mode of action and microbial resistance mechanisms. Int J Food Microbiol 50:1–17PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Buchmeier N, Bossie S, Chen CY, Fang FC, Guiney DG, Libby SJ (1997) SlyA, a transcriptional regulator of Salmonella typhimurium, is required for resistance to oxidative stress and is expressed in the intracellular environment of macrophages. Infect Immun 65:3725–3730PubMedCentralPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Charteris WP, Kelly PM, Morelli L, Collins JK (1998) Development and application of an in vitro methodology to determine the transit tolerance of potentially probiotic Lactobacillus and Bifidobacterium species in the upper human gastrointestinal tract. J Appl Microbiol 84:759–768PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Citi JE, Sandime WE, Eliker PR (1963) Some observation on the Hull method for measurement of proteolysis in milk. J Dairy Sci 46:337–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Coda R, Cassone A, Rizzello CG, Nionelli L, Cardinali G, Gobbetti M (2011) Antifungal activity of Wickerhamomyces anomalus and Lactobacillus plantarum during sourdough fermentation: identification of novel compounds and long-term effect during storage of wheat bread. Appl Environ Microbiol 77(10):3484–3492PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Corsetti A, Settanni L (2007) Lactobacilli in sourdough fermentation. Food Res Int 40:539–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dal Bello F, Clarke CI, Ryan LAM, Ulmer H, Schober TJ, Strom K, Sjogren J, van Sinderen D, Schnurer J, Arendt EK (2007) Improvement of the quality and shelf-life of wheat bread by fermentation with the antifungal strain Lactobacillus plantarum FST 1.7. J Cereal Sci 45:309–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dieuleveux V, Lemarinier S, Gueguan M (1998) Antimicrobial spectrum and target site of d-3-phenyl lactic acid. Int J Food Microbiol 40:177–183PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Filtenborg O, Frisvad J, Thrane U (1996) Moulds in food spoilage. Int J Food Microbiol 33:85–102PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fuller R (1992) Probiotics: the scientific basis. Chapman and Hall, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Garofalo C, Silvestri G, Aquilanti L, Clementi F (2008) PCR-DGGE analysis of lactic acid bacteria and yeast dynamics during the production processes of three varieties of Panettone. J Appl Microbiol 105:243–254PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Garofalo C, Zannini E, Aquilanti L, Silvestri G, Fierro O, Picariello G, Clementi F (2012) Selection of sourdough lactobacilli with antifungal activity for use as biopreservatives in bakery products. J Agric Food Chem 60(31):7719–7728PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Georgieva R, Iliev I, Haertlé T, Chobert JM, Ivanova I, Danova S (2009) Technological properties of candidate probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum strains. Int Dairy J 19:696–702CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Goldstein EJC, Citron DM, Merriam CV, Warren Y, Tyrrell LL (2000) Comparative in vitro activities of ertapenem (MK-0826) against 1001 anaerobes isolated from human intra-abdominal infections. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 44:2389–2394PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gourama H, Bullerman LB (1995) Antimycotic and antiaflatoxigenic effect of lactic acid bacteria: a review. J Food Prot 57:1275–1280Google Scholar
  18. He ZS, Luo H, Cao CH, Cui ZW (2004) Photometric determination of hydroxyl free radical in Fenton system by brilliant green. Am J Clin Med 6:236–237Google Scholar
  19. Jamaly N, Benjouad A, Bouksaim M (2011) Probiotic potential of Lactobacillus strains isolated from known popular traditional moroccan dairy products. Br Microbiol Res 1(4):79–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kao T, Chen B (2006) Functional components in soybean cake and their effects on antioxidant activity. J Agric Food Chem 54:7544–7555PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Karunaratne A, Wezenberg E, Bullerman LB (1990) Inhibition of mould growth and aflatoxin production by Lactobacillus spp. J Food Prot 53:30–236Google Scholar
  22. Kullisaar T, Songisepp E, Mikelsaar M, Zilmer K, Vihalemm T, Zilmer M (2003) Antioxidative probiotic fermented goats’ milk decreases oxidative stress-mediated atherogenicity in human subjects. Br J Nutr 90:449–456PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lavermicocca P, Valerio F, Evidente A, Lazzaroni S, Corsetti A, Gobbetti M (2000) Purification and characterization of novel antifungal compounds from sourdough Lactobacillus plantarum strain 21B. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:4084–4090PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lee J, Hwang K, Chung M, Cho D, Park C (2005) Resistance of Lactobacillus casei KCTC 3260 to reactive oxygen species (ROS): role for a metal ion chelating effect. J Food Sci 70:388–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lee H, Yoon H, Ji Y, Kim H, Park H, Lee J, Shin H, Holzapfel W (2011) Functional properties of Lactobacillus strains isolated from kimchi. Int J Food Microbiol 145:155–161PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Legan JD (1993) Mold spoilage of bread: the problem and some solutions. Int J Biodeterior Biodegrad 32:33–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Li S, Zhao Y, Zhang L, Zhang X, Huang L, Li D, Niu C, Yang Z, Wang Q (2012) Antioxidant activity of Lactobacillus plantarum strains isolated from traditional Chinese fermented foods. Food Chem 135:1914–1919PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lindgren SE, Dobrogosz WJ (1990) Antagonistic activities of lactic acid bacteria in food and feed fermentations. FEMS Microbiol Rev 87:149–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Magnusson J, Strom K, Roos S, Sjogren J, Schnurer J (2003) Broad and complex antifungal activity among environmental isolates of lactic acid bacteria. FEMS Microbiol Lett 219:129–135PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Maragkoudakis PA, Zoumpopoulou G, Miaris C, Kalantzopoulos G, Pot B, Tsakalidou E (2006) Probiotic potential of Lactobacillus strains isolated from dairy products. Int Dairy J 16:189–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards (NCCLS) (1999). Document M31-A performance standards for antimicrobial disk and dilution susceptibility tests for bacteria isolated from animals, approved standard NCCLS, Villanova, p.57Google Scholar
  32. O’Sullivan L, Ross RP, Hill C (2002) Potential of bacteriocin- producing lactic acid bacteria for improvements in food safety and quality. Biochimie 84:593–604PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pfeiler EA, Klaenhammer TR (2007) The genomics of lactic acid bacteria. Trends Microbiol 15:546–553PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Pitt J (2000) Toxigenic fungi and mycotoxins. Br Med Bull 56:184PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Prema P, Smila D, Palavesam A, Immanuel G (2008) Production and characterization of an antifungal compound (3-phenyllactic acid) produced by Lactobacillus plantarum strain. Food Bioprod Technol 3:379–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rose WM, Creighton MO, Stewart DHPJ, Sanwal M, Trevithick GR (1972) In vivo effects of vitamin E on cataractogenesis in diabetic rats. Can J Ophthalmol 17:61–66Google Scholar
  37. Rossetti L, Carminati D, Zago M, Giraffa G (2009) A qualified presumption of safety approach for the safety assessment of Grana Padano whey starters. Int J Food Microbiol 130:70–73PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Salminen S, Isolauri E, Salminen E (1996) Clinical use of probiotics for stabilizing the gut mucosal barrier: successful strains and future challenges. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 70:347–358PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Schillinger U, Villarreal JV (2010) Inhibition of Penicillium nordicum in MRS medium by lactic acid bacteria isolated from foods. Food Control 21:107–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Schnürer J, Magnusson J (2005) Antifungal lactic acid bacteria as biopreservatives. Trends Food Sci Technol 16:70–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Smith J, Hong-Shum L (2003) Food additives data book. Blackwell Science, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  42. Stiles ME (1996) Biopreservation by lactic acid bacteria. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 70:331–345PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Strahinic I, Busarcevic M, Pavlica D, Milasin J, Golic N, Topisirovic L (2007) Molecular and biochemical characterizations of human oral lactobacilli as putative probiotic candidates. Oral Microbiol Immunol 22:111–117PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Strom K, Sjogren J, Broberg A, Schnurer J (2002) Lactobacillus plantarum MiLAB 393 produces the antifungal cyclic dipeptides cyclo (l-Phe-l-Pro) and cyclo (l-Phetrans- 4-OH-l-Pro) and 3-phenyllactic acid. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:4322–4327PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Succi M, Tremonte P, Reale A, Sorrentino E, Grazia L, Pacifico S, Coppola R (2005) Bile salt and acid tolerance of Lactobacillus rhamnosus strains isolated from Parmigiano Reggiano cheese. FEMS Microbiol 244:129–137CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Temmerman R, Pot B, Huys G, Swings J (2003) Identification and antibiotic susceptibility of bacterial isolates from probiotic products. Int J Food Microbiol 81:1–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Torkar KG, Vengust A (2008) The presence of yeasts, moulds and aflatoxin M1 in raw milk and cheese in Slovenia. Food Control 19:570–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Vinderola CG, Reinheimer JA (2003) Lactic acid starter and probiotic bacteria: a comparative in vitro study of probiotic characteristics and biological barrier resistance. Food Res Int 36:895–904CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wang HK, Yan YH, Wang JM, Zhang HP, Qi W (2012) Production and characterization of antifungal compounds produced by Lactobacillus plantarum IMAU10014. PLOS ONE 7(1)Google Scholar
  50. Zhang C, Brandt JM, Schwaba C, Gänzle GM (2010) Propionic acid production by cofermentation of Lactobacillus buchneri and Lactobacillus diolivorans in sourdough. Food Microbiol 27(3):390–395PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg and the University of Milan 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mariadhas Valan Arasu
    • 1
  • Da Hye Kim
    • 2
    • 3
  • Pyoung Il Kim
    • 4
  • Min Woong Jung
    • 1
  • Soundarrajan Ilavenil
    • 1
  • Mariamichael Jane
    • 1
  • Kyung Dong Lee
    • 5
  • Naif Abdullah Al-Dhabi
    • 6
  • Ki Choon Choi
    • 1
  1. 1.Grassland and Forage DivisionNational Institute of Animal Science, RDACheonan-SiRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.The United Graduate School of Agricultural SciencesTottori UniversityTottori-ShiJapan
  3. 3.Faculty of Life and Environmental ScienceShimane UniversityMatsue-ShiJapan
  4. 4.Jeonnam Bio Control Center, Im-myeonGokseong-gunRepublic of Korea
  5. 5.Department of Oriental Medicine MaterialsDongsin UniversityNajuRepublic of Korea
  6. 6.Department of Botany and Microbiology, College of ScienceKing Saud UniversityRiyadhSaudi Arabia

Personalised recommendations