Advertisement

BioChip Journal

, Volume 10, Issue 1, pp 16–24 | Cite as

Design and validation of on-chip planar mixer based on advection and viscoelastic effects

  • Lourdes Albina Nirupa Julius
  • Veerendra Kalyan Jagannadh
  • Issac J. Michael
  • Rajesh Srinivasan
  • Sai Siva GorthiEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Mixing at low Reynolds number is usually due to diffusion and requires longer channel lengths for complete mixing. In order to reduce the mixing lengths, advective flow can be induced by varying the channel geometry. Additionally, in non-newtonian fluids, appropriate modifications to channel geometry can be used to aid the mixing process by capitalizing on their viscoelastic nature. Here we have exploited the advection and viscoelastic effects to implement a planar passive micro-mixer. Microfluidic devices incorporating different blend of mixing geometries were conceived. The optimum design was chosen based on the results of the numerical simulations performed in COMSOL. The chosen design had sudden expansion and contraction along with teeth patterns along the channel walls to improve mixing. Mixing of two different dyes was performed to validate the mixing efficiency. Particle dispersion experiments were also carried out. The results indicated effective mixing. In addition, the same design was also found to be compatible with electrical power free pumping mechanism like suction. The proposed design was then used to carry out on-chip chemical cell lysis with human whole blood samples to establish its use with non-newtonian fluids. Complete lysis of the erythrocytes was observed leaving behind the white blood cells at the outlet.

Keywords

Microfluidics Lab-on-a-chip Planar micromixer Advection Viscoelastic effect Cell lysis 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Ottino, J.M. & Wiggins, S. Introduction: Mixing in microfluidics. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A 362, 923–935 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Glasgow, I. & Aubry, N. Enhancement of microfluidic mixing using time pulsing. Lab Chip 3, 114–120 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tsai J.-H. & Lin, L. Active microfluidic mixer and gas bubble filter driven by thermal bubble micropump. Sens. Actuators, A 97-98, 665–671 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Deval, J., Tabeling, P. & Ho, C.-M. A dielectrophoretic chaotic mixer. In The Fifteenth IEEE International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems, IEEE (2002).Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Affanni, A. & Chiorboli, G. Development of an enhanced MHD micromixer based on axial flow modulation. Sens. Actuators, B 147, 748–754 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Yang, Z., Matsumoto, S., Goto, H., Matsumoto, M. & Maeda, R. Ultrasonic micromixer for microfluidic systems. Sens. Actuators, A 93, 266–272 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kamholz, A., Weigl, B., Finlayson, B. & Yager, P. Quantitative analysis of molecular interaction in microfluidic channel: The T-sensor. Anal. Chem. 71, 5340–5347 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ismagilov, R. et al. Experimental and theoretical scaling laws for transverse diffusive broadening in two-phase laminar flows in microchannels. Appl. Phys. Lett. 76, 2376–2378 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kamholz, A. & Yager, P. Molecular diffusive scaling laws in pressure-driven microfluidic channels: Deviation from one-dimensional einstein approximations. Sens. Actuators, B 82, 117–121 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nguyen, N.-T. Micromixers Fundamentals, Design and Fabrication. William Andrew Inc. (2008).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Stroock, A.D. et al. Chaotic mixer for microchannels. Science 295, 647–651 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bessoth, F.G., deMello, A.J. & Manz, A. Microstructure for efficient continuous flow mixing. Anal. Commun. 36, 213–215 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chen, D.L., Gerdts, C.J. & Ismagilov, R.F. Using Microfluidics to observe the effect of mixing on nucleation of protein crystals. J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 127, 9672–9673 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Song, H.J., Tice, D. & Ismagilov, R.F. A microfluidic system for controlling reaction networks in time. Angewandte Chemie International Edition 42, 768–772 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Wong, S.H., Bryant, P., Ward, M. & Wharton, C. Investigation of mixing in a cross-shaped micromixer with static mixing elements for reaction kinetics studies. Sens. Actuators, B 95, 414–424 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wong, S.H., Ward, M.C.L. & Wharton, C.W. Micro T-mixer as a rapid mixing micromixer. Sens. Actuators, B 100, 365–385 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gan, H., Lam, Y., Nguyen, N., Yang, C. & Tam, K. Efficient mixing of viscoelastic fluids in a microchannel at low reynolds number. Microfluid. Nanofluidics 3, 101–108 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean BioChip Society and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lourdes Albina Nirupa Julius
    • 1
  • Veerendra Kalyan Jagannadh
    • 2
  • Issac J. Michael
    • 1
  • Rajesh Srinivasan
    • 1
  • Sai Siva Gorthi
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  1. 1.Incubated at Robert Bosch Centre for Cyber Physical Systems (RBCCPS)IIScBangaloreIndia
  2. 2.Department of Instrumentation and Applied PhysicsIndian Institute of Science (IISc)BangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations