Advertisement

BioChip Journal

, Volume 7, Issue 2, pp 95–103 | Cite as

High-speed three-dimensional characterization of fluid flows induced by micro-objects in deep microchannels

  • Chia-Yuan Chen
  • Kerem PekkanEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Bio-inspired studies of micro-objects in microfluidics demand quantitative microflow visualization tools to evaluate their three-dimensional (3D) fluid dynamic performance. Experimental fluid dynamic measurements of bio-hybrid systems are employed when non-traditional small-scales, magnetohydrodynamic coupling and nonlinear material properties are involved. In this study a stereoscopic micro- Particle Image Velocimetry (μPIV) system was developed to characterize instantaneous flow fields induced by (1) a micro-robot (280×200×150 μm3) and (2) self-assembled magnetically actuated artificial cilia (∼50 μm in diameter and 500 μm in depth). A custom built micro jet flow microchannel was tested to provide the quantitative evidence of measurement accuracy with 14% error compared to theoretical solutions in the out-of-plane velocity component. Followed by these verification experiments, instantaneous in-plane spinning motion was analyzed in conjunction with translational movement and out-of-plane rotational movements of the micro-robot to obtain the induced 2D-3C (two-dimension, three-component) fluid velocity data. The second test case investigated the microscale vortical flow structures that were generated by self-assembled magnetically driven artificial cilia. The strength of this 3D micro vortex structure was computed based on the 3D flow measurements. In combination with the asymmetric cyclic motion of the magnetically actuated artificial cilia, it is expected that these structures can generate transverse flow efficiently in 3D, and thus provide a potential alternative for mixing in low Reynolds number flows, analogous to a micromixer. The acquired 3D microflow field, along with the validation tests, further extends the capability of using stereoscopic μPIV technique to evaluate the performance of noninvasive microflow manipulators.

Keywords

Micro particle image velocimetry PIV micro-robot Artificial cilia Biomimetics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Lindken, R., Rossi, M., Grosse, S. & Westerweel, J. Micro-Particle Image Velocimetry (microPIV): recent developments, applications, and guidelines. Lab on a chip 9, 2551–2567 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen, C.-Y., Chang, B.Y. & Pekkan, K. Feeding flow dynamics of developing zebrafish larvae. in 65th APS DFD Meeting (San Diego, California, USA, 2012).Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vennemann, P., Lindken, R. & Westerweel, J. In vivo whole-field blood velocity measurement techniques. Experiments in Fluids 42, 495–511 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Erkan, N., Shinohara, K., Someya, S. & Okamoto, K. Three-component velocity measurement in microscale flows using time-resolved PIV. Measurement Science & Technology 19, 057003 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Huang, T.J., Mao, X.L., Lin, S.C.S. & Dong, C. Singlelayer planar on-chip flow cytometer using microfluidic drifting based three-dimensional (3D) hydrodynamic focusing. Lab on a Chip 9, 1583–1589 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hussong, J. et al. Experimental investigation of the flow induced by artificial cilia. Lab on a Chip 11, 2017–2022 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Yu, Z.T.F., Lee, Y.K., Wong, M. & Zohar, Y. Fluid flows in microchannels with cavities. Journal of Microelectromechanical Systems 14, 1386–1398 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Whitesides, G.M. What Comes Next? Lab on a Chip 11, 191–193 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Khatavkar, V.V., Anderson, P.D., den Toonder, J.M.J. & Meijer, H.E.H. Active micromixer based on artificial cilia. Physics of Fluids 19, 083605 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kenis, P.J., Ismagilov, R.F. & Whitesides, G.M. Microfabrication inside capillaries using multiphase laminar flow patterning. Science 285, 83–85 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Vilfan, M. et al. Self-assembled artificial cilia. PNAS 107, 1844–1847 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Evans, B.A. et al. Magnetically actuated nanorod arrays as biomimetic cilia. Nano Letters 7, 1428–1434 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    den Toonder, J. et al. Artificial cilia for active microfluidic mixing. Lab on a Chip 8, 533–541 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    van Oosten, C.L., Bastiaansen, C.W.M. & Broer, D.J. Printed artificial cilia from liquid-crystal network actuators modularly driven by light. Nature Materials 8, 677–682 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Stroock, A.D. et al. Chaotic mixer for microchannels. Science 295, 647–651 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yang, J.T., Tung, K.Y. & Li, C.C. Mixing and hydrodynamic analysis of a droplet in a planar serpentine micromixer. Microfluidics and Nanofluidics 7, 545–557 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ugaz, V.M. & Sudarsan, A.P. Fluid mixing in planar spiral microchannels. Lab on a Chip 6, 74–82 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Hulsen, M.A., Kang, T.G., den Toonder, J.M.J., Anderson, P.D. & Meijer, H.E.H. A direct simulation method for flows with suspended paramagnetic particles. Journal of Computational Physics 227, 4441–4458 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hayes, M.A., Polson, N.A. & Garcia, A.A. Active control of dynamic supraparticle structures in microchannels. Langmuir 17, 2866–2871 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Purcell, E.M. Life at Low Reynolds-Number. American Journal of Physics 45, 3–11 (1977).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Richards, J.R., Beris, A.N. & Lenhoff, A.M. Steady laminar flow of liquid-liquid jets at high Reynolds numbers. Physics of Fluids A 5, 1703–1717 (1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Meng, H. & Hussain, F. Holographic Particle Velocimetry — a 3d Measurement Technique for Vortex Interactions, Coherent Structures and Turbulence. Fluid Dynamics Research 8, 33–52 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Elsinga, G.E., Scarano, F., Wieneke, B. & van Oudheusden, B.W. Tomographic particle image velocimetry. Experiments in Fluids 41, 933–947 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Patrick, M.J., Chen, C.Y., Frakes, D., Dur, O. & Pekkan, K. Cellular-level near-wall unsteadiness of highhematocrit erythrocyte flow using confocal μPIV. Experiments in Fluids 50, 887–904 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Adrian, R.J. Twenty years of particle image velocimetry. Experiments in Fluids 39, 159–169 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chen, C.-Y., Menon, P., Kowalski, W. & Pekkan, K. Time-resolved OCT-μPIV: A new microscopic PIV technique for noninvasive depth-resolved pulsatile flow profile acquisition. Experiments in Fluids 54, 1426 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lindken, R., Westerweel, J. & Wieneke, B. Stereoscopic micro particle image velocimetry. Experiments in Fluids 41, 161–171 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Calhoun, R. et al. Paramagnetic particles and mixing in micro-scale flows. Lab on a Chip 6, 247–257 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Floyd, S., Diller, E., Pawashe, C. & Sitti, M. Control methodologies for a heterogeneous group of untethered magnetic micro-robots. International Journal of Robotics Research 30, 1553–1565 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wieneke, B. Stereo-PIV using self-calibration on particle images. Experiments in Fluids 39, 267–280 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Calluaud, D. & David, L. Stereoscopic particle image velocimetry measurements of the flow around a surface-mounted block. Experiments in Fluids 36, 53–61 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Korean BioChip Society and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringNational Taiwan University of Science and TechnologyTaipeiTaiwan
  2. 2.Department of Biomedical and Mechanical EngineeringCarnegie Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA
  3. 3.Department of Mechanical EngineeringKoc UniversityRumelifeneri, IstanbulTurkey

Personalised recommendations