Abstract
Saccharomyces cerevisiae KCCM 51299, a potential probiotic yeast overproducing glutathione, has been isolated from among 272 yeast strains from the relatively safe Nuruk. The genome sequence of S. cerevisiae KCCM 51299 was analyzed and a near-complete genome (12 Mb) with 19 contigs was assembled after PacBio single-molecule real-time (SMRT) sequencing. The genome of S. cerevisiae KCCM 51299 was compared to the S. cerevisiae s288c reference genome. Additionally, genes involved in glutathione biosynthesis were identified, and the glutathione biosynthesis pathway was constructed in silico based on these genes. Furthermore, S. cerevisiae KCCM 51299 genes were compared with those in other yeast genomes. Finally, genome-scale in silico flux analysis was carried out, and a metabolic engineering strategy for glutathione biosynthesis was generated. These results provide useful information to further develop eukaryotic probiotics to overproduce glutathione.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bertuccini L, Russo R, Iosi F, Superti F (2017) Effects of Lactobacillus rhamnosus and Lactobacillus acidophilus on bacterial vaginal pathogens. Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol 30(2):163–167. https://doi.org/10.1177/0394632017697987
Botstein D, Chervitz SA, Cherry JM (1997) Yeast as a model organism. Science 277(5330):1259–1260
Bradnam KR, Seoighe C, Sharp PM, Wolfe KH (1999) G + C content variation along and among Saccharomyces cerevisiae chromosomes. Mol Biol Evol 16(5):666–675. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026149
Cani PD, de Vos WM (2017) Next-generation beneficial microbes: the case of Akkermansia muciniphila. Front Microbiol 8:1765. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a026149
Chew SY, Cheah YK, Seow HF, Sandai D, Than LT (2015) Probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 and Lactobacillus reuteri RC-14 exhibit strong antifungal effects against vulvovaginal candidiasis-causing Candida glabrata isolates. J Appl Microbiol 118(5):1180–1190. https://doi.org/10.1111/jam.12772
Chin CS, Alexander DH, Marks P, Klammer AA, Drake J, Heiner C, Clum A, Copeland A, Huddleston J, Eichler EE, Turner SW, Korlach J (2013) Nonhybrid, finished microbial genome assemblies from long-read SMRT sequencing data. Nat Methods 10(6):563–569. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2474
Costanzo M, Baryshnikova A, Bellay J, Kim Y, Spear ED, Sevier CS, Ding H, Koh JL, Toufighi K, Mostafavi S, Prinz J, St Onge RP, VanderSluis B, Makhnevych T, Vizeacoumar FJ, Alizadeh S, Bahr S, Brost RL, Chen Y, Cokol M, Deshpande R, Li Z, Lin ZY, Liang W, Marback M, Paw J, San Luis BJ, Shuteriqi E, Tong AH, van Dyk N, Wallace IM, Whitney JA, Weirauch MT, Zhong G, Zhu H, Houry WA, Brudno M, Ragibizadeh S, Papp B, Pal C, Roth FP, Giaever G, Nislow C, Troyanskaya OG, Bussey H, Bader GD, Gingras AC, Morris QD, Kim PM, Kaiser CA, Myers CL, Andrews BJ, Boone C (2010) The genetic landscape of a cell. Science 327(5964):425–431. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1180823
Cullen PJ, Sprague GF Jr (2000) Glucose depletion causes haploid invasive growth in yeast. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97(25):13619–13624. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.240345197
Czerucka D, Piche T, Rampal P (2007) Review article: yeast as probiotics—Saccharomyces boulardii. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 26(6):767–778. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2036.2007.03442.x
Da Silva NA, Srikrishnan S (2012) Introduction and expression of genes for metabolic engineering applications in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res 12(2):197–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1567-1364.2011.00769.x
Duina AA, Miller ME, Keeney JB (2014) Budding yeast for budding geneticists: a primer on the Saccharomyces cerevisiae model system. Genetics 197(1):33–48. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.114.163188
Ebrahim A, Lerman JA, Palsson BO, Hyduke DR (2013) COBRApy: constraints-based reconstruction and analysis for python. BMC Syst Biol 7:74
Edwards JS, Palsson BO (2000) Metabolic flux balance analysis and the in silico analysis of Escherichia coli K-12 gene deletions. BMC Bioinform 1(1):1
Goffeau A, Barrell BG, Bussey H, Davis RW, Dujon B, Feldmann H, Galibert F, Hoheisel JD, Jacq C, Johnston M, Louis EJ, Mewes HW, Murakami Y, Philippsen P, Tettelin H, Oliver SG (1996) Life with 6000 genes. Science 274(5287):546
Hill C, Guarner F, Reid G, Gibson GR, Merenstein DJ, Pot B, Morelli L, Canani RB, Flint HJ, Salminen S, Calder PC, Sanders ME (2014) Expert consensus document. The International Scientific Association for Probiotics and Prebiotics consensus statement on the scope and appropriate use of the term probiotic. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 11(8):506–514. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrgastro.2014.66
Holt C, Yandell M (2011) MAKER2: an annotation pipeline and genome-database management tool for second-generation genome projects. BMC Bioinform 12(1):1
Jin J, Kim SY, Jin Q, Eom HJ, Han NS (2008) Diversity analysis of lactic acid bacteria in takju, Korean rice wine. J Microbiol Biotechnol 18(10):1678–1682
Jung MJ, Nam YD, Roh SW, Bae JW (2012) Unexpected convergence of fungal and bacterial communities during fermentation of traditional Korean alcoholic beverages inoculated with various natural starters. Food Microbiol 30(1):112–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fm.2011.09.008
Kavšček M, Stražar M, Curk T, Natter K, Petrovič U (2015) Yeast as a cell factory: current state and perspectives. Microb Cell Fact. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-015-0281-x
Kim HJ, Turner TL, Jin YS (2013) Combinatorial genetic perturbation to refine metabolic circuits for producing biofuels and biochemicals. Biotechnol Adv 31(6):976–985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.03.010
Kim D, Seo SW, Gao Y, Nam H, Guzman GI, Cho BK, Palsson BO (2018) Systems assessment of transcriptional regulation on central carbon metabolism by Cra and CRP. Nucleic Acids Res 46(6):2901–2917. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gky069
King ZA, Dräger A, Ebrahim A, Sonnenschein N, Lewis NE, Palsson BØ (2015) Escher: a web application for building, sharing, and embedding data-rich visualizations of biological pathways. PLoS Comput Biol 11(8):e1004321
King ZA, Lu J, Drager A, Miller P, Federowicz S, Lerman JA, Ebrahim A, Palsson BO, Lewis NE (2016) BiGG Models: a platform for integrating, standardizing and sharing genome-scale models. Nucleic Acids Res 44(D1):D515–D522. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv1049
Koren S, Walenz BP, Berlin K, Miller JR, Bergman NH, Phillippy AM (2017) Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation. Genome Res 27(5):722–736. https://doi.org/10.1101/gr.215087.116
Marques WL, Raghavendran V, Stambuk BU, Gombert AK (2016) Sucrose and Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a relationship most sweet. FEMS Yeast Res 16 (1):fov107. https://doi.org/10.1093/femsyr/fov107
McFarland LV (2010) Systematic review and meta-analysis of Saccharomyces boulardii in adult patients. World J Gastroenterol 16(18):2202–2222
Nile SH (2015) The nutritional, biochemical and health effects of makgeolli—a traditional Korean fermented cereal beverage. J Inst Brew 121(4):457–463. https://doi.org/10.1002/jib.264
Orth JD, Thiele I, Palsson BØ (2010) What is flux balance analysis? Nat Biotechnol 28(3):245–248
Palma ML et al (2015) Probiotic Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains as biotherapeutic tools: is there room for improvement? Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 99(16):6563–6570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-015-6776-x
Pscheidt B, Glieder A (2008) Yeast cell factories for fine chemical and API production. Microb Cell Fact 7:25. https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2859-7-25
Richardson SM, Mitchell LA, Stracquadanio G, Yang K, Dymond JS, DiCarlo JE, Lee D, Huang CL, Chandrasegaran S, Cai Y, Boeke JD, Bader JS (2017) Design of a synthetic yeast genome. Science 355(6329):1040–1044. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf4557
Ridaura VK, Faith JJ, Rey FE, Cheng J, Duncan AE, Kau AL, Griffin NW, Lombard V, Henrissat B, Bain JR, Muehlbauer MJ, Ilkayeva O, Semenkovich CF, Funai K, Hayashi DK, Lyle BJ, Martini MC, Ursell LK, Clemente JC, Van Treuren W, Walters WA, Knight R, Newgard CB, Heath AC, Gordon JI (2013) Gut microbiota from twins discordant for obesity modulate metabolism in mice. Science 341(6150):1241214. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1241214
Russo M, Fabersani E, Abeijon-Mukdsi MC, Ross R, Fontana C, Benitez-Paez A, Gauffin-Cano P, Medina RB (2016) Lactobacillus fermentum CRL1446 ameliorates oxidative and metabolic parameters by increasing intestinal feruloyl esterase activity and modulating microbiota in caloric-restricted mice. Nutrients. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu8070415
Saini JK, Saini R, Tewari L (2015) Lignocellulosic agriculture wastes as biomass feedstocks for second-generation bioethanol production: concepts and recent developments. 3 Biotech 5(4):337–353. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-014-0246-5
Sonnhammer EL, Ostlund G (2015) InParanoid 8: orthology analysis between 273 proteomes, mostly eukaryotic. Nucleic Acids Res 43(Database issue):D234-239. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gku1203
Tejero-Sarinena S, Barlow J, Costabile A, Gibson GR, Rowland I (2012) In vitro evaluation of the antimicrobial activity of a range of probiotics against pathogens: evidence for the effects of organic acids. Anaerobe 18(5):530–538. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anaerobe.2012.08.004
Tong AH, Lesage G, Bader GD, Ding H, Xu H, Xin X, Young J, Berriz GF, Brost RL, Chang M, Chen Y, Cheng X, Chua G, Friesen H, Goldberg DS, Haynes J, Humphries C, He G, Hussein S, Ke L, Krogan N, Li Z, Levinson JN, Lu H, Menard P, Munyana C, Parsons AB, Ryan O, Tonikian R, Roberts T, Sdicu AM, Shapiro J, Sheikh B, Suter B, Wong SL, Zhang LV, Zhu H, Burd CG, Munro S, Sander C, Rine J, Greenblatt J, Peter M, Bretscher A, Bell G, Roth FP, Brown GW, Andrews B, Bussey H, Boone C (2004) Global mapping of the yeast genetic interaction network. Science 303(5659):808–813. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1091317
Toscano M, De Grandi R, Stronati L, De Vecchi E, Drago L (2017) Effect of Lactobacillus rhamnosus HN001 and Bifidobacterium longum BB536 on the healthy gut microbiota composition at phyla and species level: a preliminary study. World J Gastroenterol 23(15):2696–2704. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i15.2696
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2018R1D1A1B07051143) and by the Ministry of Science and ICT (NRF-2018M3C1B5052439).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hwang, J., Bang, I., Kim, D. et al. Genome sequence of the potential probiotic eukaryote Saccharomyces cerevisiae KCCM 51299. 3 Biotech 10, 185 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-020-02174-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-020-02174-9