Advertisement

3 Biotech

, 9:404 | Cite as

Multi-walled carbon nanotubes improved growth, anatomy, physiology, secondary metabolism, and callus performance in Catharanthus roseus: an in vitro study

  • Masoumeh Ghasempour
  • Alireza IranbakhshEmail author
  • Mostafa Ebadi
  • Zahra Oraghi Ardebili
Original Article
  • 56 Downloads

Abstract

This study was conducted to monitor the physiological and molecular responses of Catharanthus roseus (rose periwinkle) to multi-walled carbon nanotube (MWCNT) incorporation into the culture medium. The seeds were grown on hormone-free MS medium supplemented with 0, 50, 100, and 150 mgL-1of MWCNT. The supplementations of culture medium with MWCNTs led to significant increases in plant growth indexes such as leaf width, leaf area, leaf fresh weight, root length, and total plant biomass). Slight increases were also observed in chlorophyll a (Chla), Chlb, and carotenoid contents (mean = 18.6%) in MWCNT-treated seedlings. Protein concentrations increased by an average of 34% relative to the control. The application of MWCNT resulted in twofold increases in the catalase and peroxidase activities. A similar trend was also observed in the phenylalanine ammonia lyase activities (by an average of 36.5%), soluble phenols (by 23%), and alkaloids (by 1.7-fold). Moreover, upregulations (mean = 37-fold) in the transcriptions of the DAT gene resulted from the MWCNT supplementations. Exposure to MWCNT improved cell sizes and xylem conducting tissue in treated seedlings. The applications of MWCNTs also stimulated the callus initiation and performance, implying their effects on proliferation and possible differentiation. This study has provided evidence of role MWCNT play in improving plant performance and production of pharmaceutical secondary metabolites.

Keywords

Carbon nanotube In vitro Nanoparticle Secondary metabolites 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Asgari-Targhi G, Iranbakhsh A, Oraghi Ardebili Z (2018) Potential benefits and phytotoxicity of bulk and nano-chitosan on the growth, morphogenesis, physiology, and micropropagation of Capsicum annuum. Plant Physiol Biochem 127:393–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Babajani A, Iranbakhsh A, Ardebili ZO, Eslami B (2019) Differential growth, nutrition, physiology, and gene expression in Melissa officinalis mediated by zinc oxide and elemental selenium nanoparticles. Environ Sci Poll Res 26:24430.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-05676-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beaudoin-Eagan LD, Thorpe TA (1985) Tyrosine and phenylalanine ammonia lyase activities during shoot initiation in tobacco callus cultures. Plant Physiol 78:438–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Begum P, Ikhtiari R, Fugetsu B (2014) Potential impact of multi-walled carbon nanotubes exposure to the seedling stage of selected plant species. Nanomaterials 4:203–221.  https://doi.org/10.3390/nano4020203 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. AnalBiochem 72(1–2):248–254Google Scholar
  6. De Volder MF, Tawfick SH, Baughman RH, Hart AJ (2013) Carbon nanotubes: present and future commercial applications. Science 339(6119):535–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dhindsa RS, Plumb-Dhindsa P, Thorpe TA (1981) Leaf senescence: correlated with increased levels of membrane permeability and lipid peroxidation, and decreased levels of superoxide dismutase and catalase. J Exp Bot 32:93–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ewais EA, Desouky SA, Elshazly EH (2015) Evaluation of callus responses of Solanum nigrum L. Exposed to biologically synthesized silver nanoparticles. Nanosci Nanotechnol 5(3):45–56Google Scholar
  9. Ghorbanpour M, Hadian J (2015) Multi-walled carbon nanotubes stimulate callus induction, secondary metabolites biosynthesis and antioxidant capacity in medicinal plant Saturejakhuzestanica grown in vitro. Carbon 94:749–759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Harborne JB (1973) Phytochemical methods. Chapman and Hall Ltd., London, pp 49–188Google Scholar
  11. Hatami M, Hadigan J, Ghorbanpour M (2017) Mechanisms underlying toxicity and stimulatory role of single-walled carbon nanotubes in Hyoscyamus nigerduring drought stress simulated by polyethylene glycol. J Hazard Mater 324:306–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Iranbakhsh A, Ardebili ZO, Ardebili NO, Ghoranneviss M, Safari N (2018) Cold plasma relieved toxicity signs of nano zinc oxide in Capsicum annuum cayenne via modifying growth, differentiation, and physiology. Acta Physiol Plant 40(8):154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Joshi A, Kaur S, Dharamvir K, Nayyar H, Verma G (2018) Multi-walled carbon nanotubes applied through seed-priming influence early germination, root hair, growth and yield of bread wheat (Triticumaestivum L.). J Sci Food Agric 98(8):3148–3160PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Khodakovskaya MV, De Silva K, Biris AS, Dervishi E, Villagarcia H (2012) Carbon nanotubes induce growth enhancement of tobacco cells. ACS Nano 6(3):2128–2135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kim DH, Gopal J, Sivanesan I (2017) Nanomaterials in plant tissue culture: the disclosed and undisclosed. RSC Adv 7(58):36492–36505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lahiani MH, Dervishi E, Chen J, Nima Z, Gaume A, Biris AS, Khodakovskaya MV (2013) Impact of carbon nanotube exposure to seeds of valuable crops. ACS Appl MaterInterfaces 5:7965–7973.  https://doi.org/10.1021/am402052x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lahiani MH, Dervishi E, Ivanov I, Chen J, Khodakovskaya M (2016) Comparative study of plant responses to carbon-based nanomaterials with different morphologies. Nanotechnology 27:265102.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/27/26/265102 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lahiani MH, Nima ZA, Villagarcia H, Biris AS, Khodakovskaya MV (2018) Assessment of effects of the long-term exposure of agricultural crops to carbon nanotubes. J Agric Food Chem 66:6654–6662.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jafc.7b01863 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lichtenthaler H, Wellburn A (1983) Determination of total carotenoids and chlorophylls a and b of leaf extracts in different solvents. BiochemSoc Trans 603:591–592CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lin C, Fugetsu B, Su Y, Watari F (2009) Studies on toxicity of multi-walled carbon nanotubes on Arabidopsis T87 suspension cells. J Hazard Mater 170(2–3):578–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Magnotta M, Murata J, Chen J, De Luca V (2007) Expression of deacetylvindoline-4-O-acetyltransferase in Catharanthus roseus hairy roots. Phytochemistry 68(14):1922–1931CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Manzetti S, Gabriel JC (2019) Methods for dispersing carbon nanotubes for nanotechnology applications: liquid nanocrystals, suspensions, polyelectrolytes, colloids and organization control. Int Nano Lett 9(1):31–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Martínez-Ballesta MC, Zapata L, Chalbi N, Carvajal M (2016) Multi-walled carbon nanotubes enter broccoli cells enhancing growth and water uptake of plants exposed to salinity. J Nanobiotechnol 14(1):42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Moghanloo M, Iranbakhsh A, Ebadi M, Ardebili ZO (2019a) Differential physiology and expression of phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL) and universal stress protein (USP) in the endangered species Astragalus fridae following seed priming with cold plasma and manipulation of culture medium with silica nanoparticles. 3 Biotech 9(7):288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Moghanloo M, Iranbakhsh A, Ebadi M, Satari TN, Ardebili ZO (2019b) Seed priming with cold plasma and supplementation of culture medium with silicon nanoparticle modified growth, physiology, and anatomy in Astragalusfridae as an endangered species. Acta Physiol Plant 41(4):54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bio assays with tobacco tissue cultures. Physiol Plant 15(3):473–497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Oloumi H, Mousavi EA, Nejad RM (2018) Multi-wall carbon nanotubes effects on plant seedlings growth and cadmium/lead uptake in vitro. Russ J Plant Physiol 65(2):260–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Safari N, Iranbakhsh A, Ardebili ZO (2017) Non-thermal plasma modified growth and differentiation process of Capsicum annuum PP805 Godiva in in vitro conditions. Plasma Sci Technol 19(5):055501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Safari M, Ardebili ZO, Iranbakhsh A (2018) Selenium nano-particle induced alterations in expression patterns of heat shock factor A4A (HSFA4A), and high molecular weight glutenin subunit 1Bx (Glu-1Bx) and enhanced nitrate reductase activity in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Acta Physiol Plant 40(6):117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Salah SM, Yajing G, Dongdong C, Jie L, Aamir N, Qijuan H, Weimin H, Mingyu N, Jin H (2015) Seed priming with polyethylene glycol regulating the physiological and molecular mechanism in rice (Oryza sativa L) under nano-ZnO stress. Sci Rep 5:14278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Seddighinia F, Iranbakhsh A, OraghiArdebili Z, NejadSatari T, Soleimanpour S (2019) Seed priming with cold plasma and multi-walled carbon nanotubes modified growth, tissue differentiation, anatomy, and yield in Bitter melon (Momordica charantia). J Plant Growth Regul.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-019-09965-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Senbagalakshmi P, Rao MV, Senthil Kumar T (2017) In vitro studies, biosynthesis of secondary metabolites and pharmacological utility of Catharanthus roseus (L.) G. Don.: a review. In: Naeem M, Aftab T, Khan M (eds) Catharanthus roseus. Springer, ChamCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sheteiwy MS, Fu Y, Hu Q, Nawaz A, Guan Y, Li Z, Huang Y, Hu J (2016) Seed priming with polyethylene glycol induces antioxidative defense and metabolic regulation of rice under nano-ZnO stress. Environ Sci Poll Res 23(19):19989–20002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sheteiwy MS, Dong Q, An J, Song W, Guan Y, He F, Huang Y, Hu J (2017) Regulation of ZnO nanoparticles-induced physiological and molecular changes by seed priming with humic acid in Oryza sativa seedlings. Plant Growth Regul 83(1):27–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sheteiwy MS, An J, Yin M, Jia X, Guan Y, He F, Hu J (2019) Cold plasma treatment and exogenous salicylic acid priming enhances salinity tolerance of Oryza sativa seedlings. Protoplasma 256:79–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tan XM, Lin C, Fugetsu B (2009) Studies on toxicity of multi-walled carbon nanotubes on suspension rice cells. Carbon 47(15):3479–3487CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wang Q, Yuan F, Pan Q, Li M, Wang G, Zhao J, Tang K (2010) Isolation and functional analysis of the Catharanthus roseus deacetylvindoline-4-O-acetyltransferase gene promoter. Plant Cell Rep 29(2):185–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang C, Liu H, Chen J, Tian Y, Shi J, Li D, Guo C, Ma Q (2014) Carboxylated multi-walled carbon nanotubes aggravated biochemical and subcellular damages in leaves of broad bean (Vicia faba L.) seedlings under combined stress of lead and cadmium. J Hazard Mater 274:404–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yan S, Zhao L, Li H, Zhang Q, Tan J, Huang M, He S, Li L (2013) Single-walled carbon nanotubes selectively influence maize root tissue development accompanied by the change in the related gene expression. J Hazard Mater 246:110–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhai G, Gutowski SM, Walters KS, Yan B, Schnoor JL (2015) Charge, size, and cellular selectivity for multiwall carbon nanotubes by maize and soybean. Environ Sci Technol 49:7380–7390.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b01145 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biology, Science and Research BranchIslamic Azad UniversityTehranIran
  2. 2.Department of Biology, Damghan BranchIslamic Azad UniversityDamghanIran
  3. 3.Department of Biology, Garmsar BranchIslamic Azad UniversityGarmsarIran

Personalised recommendations