Advertisement

3 Biotech

, 9:397 | Cite as

Physiological response of tomato plant to chitosan-immobilized aggregated Methylobacterium oryzae CBMB20 inoculation under salinity stress

  • Mak Chanratana
  • Manoharan Melvin Joe
  • Aritra Roy Choudhury
  • Rangasamy Anandham
  • Ramasamy Krishnamoorthy
  • Kiyoon Kim
  • Sunyoung Jeon
  • Joonho Choi
  • Jeongyun Choi
  • Tongmin SaEmail author
Original Article
  • 5 Downloads

Abstract

The use of plant growth promoting bacteria as bioinoculant to alleviate salt stress is a sustainable and eco-friendly approach in agriculture. However, the maintenance of the bacterial population in the soil for longer period is a major concern. In the present study, chitosan-immobilized aggregated Methylobacterium oryzae CBMB20 was used as a bioinoculant to improve tomato plant (Solanum lycopersicum Mill.) growth under salt stress. The chitosan-immobilized aggregated M. oryzae CBMB20 was able to enhance plant dry weight, nutrient uptake (N, P, K and Mg2+), photosynthetic efficiency and decrease electrolyte leakage under salt stress conditions. The oxidative stress exerted by elevated levels of salt stress was also alleviated by the formulated bioinoculant, as it up-regulated the antioxidant enzyme activities and enhanced the accumulation of proline which acts as an osmolyte. The chitosan-immobilized aggregated M. oryzae CBMB20 was able to decrease the excess Na+ influx into the plant cells and subsequently decreasing the Na+/K+ ratio to improve tomato plant growth under salt stress conditions. Therefore, it is proposed that the chitosan-immobilized aggregated M. oryzae CBMB20 could be used as a bioinoculant to promote the plant growth under salt stress conditions.

Keywords

Carrier material Enzyme activity Immobilization Methylobacterium oryzae CBMB20 Salt stress Tomato 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Basic Science Research Program, National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF), Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [2015R1A2A1A05001885], Republic of Korea.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that we have no competing interests.

References

  1. Abdel-Mawgoud AMR, Tantawy AS, El-Nemr MA, Sassine YN (2010) Growth and yield responses of strawberry plants to chitosan application. Eur J Sci Res 39(1):170–177Google Scholar
  2. Ambrosini A, de Souza R, Passaglia LM (2016) Ecological role of bacterial inoculants and their potential impact on soil microbial diversity. Plant Soil 400:193–207.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-015-2727-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Angelim AL, Costa SP, Farias CS, Freitas FL, Melo MVM (2013) An innovative bioremediation strategy using a bacterial consortium entrapped in Chitosan beads. J Enviorn Manag 127:10–17.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.04.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arbona V, Hossain Z, Lopez-Climent MF, Perez-Clement RM, Gomez Cadenas A (2008) Antioxidant enzymatic activity is linked to water-logging stress tolerance in citrus. Physiol Plant 132:452–466.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2007.01029.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Arshad M, Shaharoona B, Mahmood T (2008) Inoculation with Pseudomonas spp. containing ACC-deaminase partially eliminates the effects of drought stress on growth, yield, and ripening of pea (Pisum sativum L.). Pedosphere 18:611–620.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1002-0160(08)60055-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bashan Y, de Bashan LE, Prabhu SR, Hernandez JP (2014) Advances in plant growth-promoting bacterial inoculant technology: formulations and practical perspectives (1998–2013). Plant Soil 378:1–33.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-013-1956-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bates LS, Waldren RP, Teare ID (1973) Rapid determination of free proline for water-stress studies. Plant Soil 39:205–207.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00018060 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bhattacharyya PN, Jha DK (2012) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR): emergence in agriculture. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 28:1327–1350.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11274-011-0979-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bradford MM (1976) A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72:248–254.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Bradstreet RB (1954) Kjeldahl method for organic nitrogen. Anal Chem 26:185–187.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60085a028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chanratana M, Han GH, Choudhury AR, Sundaram S, Halim MA, Krishnamoorthy R, Kang Y, Sa T (2017) Assessment of Methylobacterium oryzae CBMB20 aggregates for salt tolerance and plant growth promoting characteristics for bioinoculant development. AMB Express 7:208.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s13568-017-0518-7 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Chanratana M, Han GH, Joe MM, Choudhury AR, Sundaram S, Halim MA, Sa T (2018) Evaluation of chitosan and alginate immobilized Methylobacterium oryzae CBMB20 on tomato plant growth. Arch Agro Soil Sci 2018:1–14.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03650340.2018.1440390 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chatterjee P, Samaddar S, Anandham R, Kang Y, Kim K, Selvakumar G, Sa T (2017) Beneficial soil bacterium Pseudomonas frederiksbergensis OS261 augments salt tolerance and promotes red pepper plant growth. Front Plant Sci.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00705 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Chatterjee P, Samaddar S, Niinemets Ü, Sa T (2018) Brevibacterium linens RS16 confers salt tolerance to Oryza sativa genotypes by regulating antioxidant defense and H+ ATPase activity. Microbial Res 215:89–101.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2018.06.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dar TA, Uddin M, Masroor AK, Ali A, Mir SR, Varshney L (2015) Effect of Co-60 gamma irradiated Chitosan and phosphorus fertilizer on growth, yield and trigonelline content of Trigonella foenum-graecum L. J Radiat Res Appl Sci 8:446–458.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrras.2015.03.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. de Azevedo Neto AD, Prisco JT, Enéas-Filho J, de Abreu CEB, Gomes-Filho E (2006) Effect of salt stress on antioxidative enzymes and lipid peroxidation in leaves and roots of salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive maize genotypes. Environ Exp Bot 56:87–94.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.01.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. De Pinto MC, Locato V, Gara DL (2012) Redox regulation in plant programmed cell death. Plant Cell Environ 35:234–244.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02387.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Duca D, Lorv J, Patten CL, Rose D, Glick BR (2014) Indole-3-acetic acif in plant-microbe interactions. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 106:85–125.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10482-013-0095-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Glick BR (2012) Plant growth-promoting bacteria: mechanisms and applications. Scientifica 2012:1–15.  https://doi.org/10.6064/2012/963401 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Heidari M, Golpayegani A (2012) Effects of water stress and inoculation with plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) on antioxidant status and photosynthetic pigments in basil (Ocimum basilicum L.). J Saudi Soc Agric Sci 11:57–61.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssas.2011.09.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ilangumaran G, Smith DL (2017) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria in amelioration of salinity stress: a systems biology perspective. Front Plant Sci.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.01768 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Jabeen N, Ahmad R (2013) The activity of antioxidant enzymes in response to salt stress in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) and sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) seedlings raised from seed treated with chitosan. J Sci Food Agric 93(7):1699–1705.  https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.5953 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Jha Y, Subramanian RB (2014) PGPR regulate caspase-like activity, programmed cell death, and antioxidant enzyme activity in paddy under salinity. Physiol Mol Biol Plants 20:201–207.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-014-0224-8 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Joe M, Karthikeyan MB, Sekar C, Deiveekasundaram M (2010) Optimization of biofloc production in Azospirillum brasilense (MTCC-125) and evaluation of its adherence with the roots of certain crops. Indian J Microbiol 50:21–25.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-010-0050-9 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Joe MM, Devaraj S, Benson A, Sa T (2016) Isolation of phosphate solubilizing endophytic bacteria from Phyllanthus amarus Schum and Thonn: evaluation of plant growth promotion and antioxidant activity under salt stress. J Appl Res Med Aromat Plants 3:71–77.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmap.2016.02.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lee G, Carrow RN, Duncan RR, Eiteman MA, Rieger MW (2008) Synthesis of organic osmolytes and salt tolerance mechanisms in Paspalum vaginatum. Environ Exp Bot 63:19–27.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.10.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lee YW, Krishnamoorthy M, Selvakumar G, Kum KY, Sa T (2016) Alleviation of salt stress in maize plant by co-inoculation of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Methylobacterium oryzae CBMB20. J Korean Soc Appl Biol Chem 58:533–540.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13765-015-0072-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Liu CH, Wu JY, Chang JS (2008) Diffusion characteristics and controlled the release of bacterial Fertilizer from modified calcium alginate capsules. Bioresour Technol 99:1904–1910.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.03.029 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Machado RMA, Serralheiro RP (2017) Soil Salinity: effect on vegetable crop growth. Management practices to prevent and mitigate soil salinization. Horticulturae 3:30.  https://doi.org/10.3390/horticulturae3020030 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Madhaiyan M, Kim BY, Poonguzhali S, Kwon SW, Song MH, Ryu JH, Sa TM (2007a) Methylobacterium oryzae sp. nov., an aerobic, pink-pigmented, facultatively methylotrophic, 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate deaminase-producing bacterium isolated from rice. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57(2):326–331.  https://doi.org/10.1099/ijs.0.64603-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Madhaiyan M, Poonguzhali S, Sa T (2007b) Characterization of 1-aminocyclopropane-1-carboxylate (ACC) deaminase containing Methylobacterium oryzae and interactions with auxins and ACC regulation of ethylene in canola (Brassica campestris). Planta 226(4):867–876.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-007-0532-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Miller GAD, Suzuki N, Ciftci-Yilmaz SULTAN, Mittler RON (2010) Reactive oxygen species homeostasis and signaling during drought and salinity stresses. Plant Cell Environ 33:453–467.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2009.02041.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mishra PK, Bisth SC, Ruwari P, Selvakumar G, Joshi GK, BisthJK Bhatt JC, Gupta HS (2011) Alleviation of cold stress in inoculated wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) seedlings with psychrotolerant Pseudomonas from NW Himalayas. Arch Microbiol 193:497–513.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00203-011-0693-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Misra N, Gupta AK (2006) Interactive effects of sodium and calcium on proline metabolism in salt tolerant green gram cultivar. Am J Plant Physiol 1:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mohamed HI, Gomaa EZ (2012) Effect of plant growth promoting Bacillus subtilis and Pseudomonas fluorescens on growth and pigment composition of radish plants (Raphanus sativus) under NaCl stress. Photosynthetica 50:263–272.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11099-012-0032-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nadeem SM, Zahir ZA, Naveed M, Arshad M (2007) Preliminary investigations on inducing salt tolerance in maize through inoculation with rhizobacteria containing ACC deaminase activity. Can J Microbiol 53(10):1141–1149.  https://doi.org/10.1139/W07-081 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Parray JA, Jan S, Kamili AN, Qadri RA, Egamberdieva D, Ahmad P (2016) Current perspectives on plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria. J Plant Growth Regul 35:877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Patel D, Saraf M (2013) Influence of soil ameliorants and microflora on induction of antioxidant enzymes and growth promotion of Jatropha curcas L. under saline condition. Euro J Soil Bio 55:47–54.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejsobi.2012.12.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Percival GC (2005) The use of chlorophyll fluorescence to identify chemical and environmental stress in leaf tissue of three oak (Quercus) species. J Arboric 31:215Google Scholar
  40. Ramadoss D, Lakkineni VK, Bose P, Ali S, Annapurna K (2013) Mitigation of salt stress in wheat seedlings by halotolerant bacteria isolated from saline habitats. Springer Plus 2:6.  https://doi.org/10.1186/2193-1801-2-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Ramírez MÁ, Rodriguez AT, Alfonso L, Peniche C (2010) Chitin and its derivatives as biopolymers with potential agricultural applications. Biotecnol Apl 27:270–276Google Scholar
  42. Schoebitz M, López MD, Roldán A (2013) Bioencapsulation of microbial inoculants for better soil–plant fertilization. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 33:751–765.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-013-0142-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Singh RP, Jha PN (2016) Mitigation of salt stress in the wheat plant (Triticum aestivum) by ACC deaminase bacterium Enterobacter sp. SBP-6 isolated from Sorgum bicolor. Acta Physiol Plant 38:110.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-016-2123-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Souza RD, Amborosini A, Passaglia MP (2015) Plant growth—promoting bacteria as inoculants in agricultural soils. Genet Mol Biol 38:401–409.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-475738420150053 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Sumanta N, Haque CI, Nishika J, Suprakash R (2014) Spectrophotometric analysis of chlorophylls and carotenoids from commonly grown fern species by using various extracting solvents. Res J Chem Sci 4:63–69Google Scholar
  46. Tank N, Saraf M (2010) Salinity-resistant plant growth promoting rhizobacteria ameliorates sodium chloride stress on tomato plants. J Plant Interact 5(1):51–58.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17429140903125848 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Yen MT, Mau JL (2007) Selected physical properties of chitin prepared from shiitake stipes. Food Sci Technol 40:558–563.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lwt.2005.10.008 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Zhou B, Wang J, Guo Z, Tan H, Zhu X (2006) A simple colorimetric method for determination of hydrogen peroxide in plant tissues. Plant Growth Regul 49:113–118.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-006-9000-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mak Chanratana
    • 1
    • 6
  • Manoharan Melvin Joe
    • 1
    • 2
  • Aritra Roy Choudhury
    • 1
  • Rangasamy Anandham
    • 3
  • Ramasamy Krishnamoorthy
    • 4
  • Kiyoon Kim
    • 1
    • 7
  • Sunyoung Jeon
    • 1
  • Joonho Choi
    • 5
  • Jeongyun Choi
    • 1
  • Tongmin Sa
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Environmental and Biological ChemistryChungbuk National UniversityCheongjuRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Department of Industrial MicrobiologySam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and SciencesAllahabadIndia
  3. 3.Department of Agricultural MicrobiologyTamil Nadu Agricultural UniversityCoimbatoreIndia
  4. 4.Department of Crop ManagementVanavarayar Institute of AgriculturePollachiIndia
  5. 5.Department of Food Science and BiotechnologyWonkwang UniversityIksanRepublic of Korea
  6. 6.Department of Plant Protection Sanitary and PhytosanitaryGeneral Directorate of Agriculture, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and FisheriesPhnom PenhCambodia
  7. 7.Forest Medicinal Resources Research CenterNational Institute of Forest ScienceYongjuRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations