Advertisement

3 Biotech

, 9:331 | Cite as

Chloroplast proteins involved in drought stress response in selected cultivars of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)

  • Tanja ZadražnikEmail author
  • Anders Moen
  • Jelka Šuštar-Vozlič
Original Article
  • 1 Downloads

Abstract

One of the major cell organelles, whose functions are affected during drought stress are chloroplasts. In this study, chloroplast proteome under drought was studied in two cultivars of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L), Tiber and more sensitive to drought, Starozagorski čern, which were subjected to drought for 6 and 13 days. A comparative proteomic analysis with 2D-DIGE was performed on the isolated chloroplast proteins from leaves. Together, 44 proteins with changed abundance between control and stressed plants were identified with LC–MS/MS from both cultivars. The majority of the identified proteins were involved in photosynthetic processes. The results showed a decrease in abundance in different structure components of photosystem I and II, and ATP synthase, which may indicate a suppression of light-dependent reactions by drought stress. Similar proteomic response for both cultivars after 6 and 13 days of drought was observed. Proteins with contrasting abundance patterns between the cultivars or proteins specific for only one cultivar, such as ferredoxin–NADP reductase, photosystem II stability/assembly factor HCF136, curvature thylakoid protein 1B, and plastidial membrane protein porin were pointed out as major identified proteins revealing differential abundance between the cultivars. Taken together, our results provide insight into the molecular response of chloroplasts in common bean under drought stress, whereas conclusions about the tolerance mechanisms require further studies.

Keywords

Phaseolus vulgaris Chloroplast Drought stress Proteomics 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Slovenian Research Agency (Z4-8223 and P4-0072).

Author’s contributions

TZ and JŠV designed the experiment. TZ performed the proteomic experiment and the data analysis. AM performed mass spectrometry analysis and protein identification. All authors participated in manuscript writing and approved the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

13205_2019_1862_MOESM1_ESM.xlsx (12 kb)
Experimental design for 2D-DIGE. Four replicates from each control and drought-stressed protein samples from two cultivars subjected to drought for 6 and 13 days were labelled and combined for 2D-DIGE Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 11 kb)
13205_2019_1862_MOESM2_ESM.xlsx (106 kb)
The detailed list of identified proteins with peptides and identification parameters Supplementary material 2 (XLSX 105 kb)

References

  1. Aas FE, Egge-Jacobsen W, Winther-Larsen HC et al (2006) Neisseria gonorrhoeae type IV pili undergo multisite, hierarchical modifications with phosphoethanolamine and phosphocholine requiring an enzyme structurally related to lipopolysaccharide phosphoethanolamine transferases. J Biol Chem 281:27712–27723PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson NL, Esquer-Blasco R, Hofmann JP et al (1991) A two-dimensional gel database of rat liver proteins useful in gene regulation and drug effects studies. Electrophoresis 12:907–930PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armbruster U, Labs M, Pribil M et al (2013) Arabidopsis CURVATURE THYLAKOID1 proteins modify thylakoid architecture by inducing membrane curvature. Plant Cell 25:2661–26678PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Athar HR, Ashraf M (2005) Photosynthesis under drought stress. In: Pessarakli M (ed) Handbook of photosynthesis, 2nd edn. Taylor and Francis Inc, New York, pp 793–809Google Scholar
  5. Barajas-López JD, Blanco NE, Strand Å (2013) Plastid-to-nucleus communication, signals controlling the running of the plant cell. Biochim Biophys Acta 1833:425–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bittelli M (2011) Measuring soil water content: a review. HortTechnology 21:293–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bréhélin C, Kessler F, van Wijk KJ (2007) Plastoglobules: versatile lipoprotein particles in plastids. Trends Plant Sci 2:260–266CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Budič M, Cigič B, Šoštarič M et al (2016) The response of aminopeptidases of Phaseolus vulgaris to drought depends on the developmental stage of the leaves. Plant Physiol Biochem 109:326–336PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Castañeda-Saucedo MC, Córdova-Téllez L, Tapia-Campos E et al (2014) Dehydrins patterns in common bean exposed to drought and watered conditions. Rev Fitotec Mex 7:59–68Google Scholar
  10. Hajheidari M, Abdollahian-Noghabi M, Askari H et al (2005) Proteome analysis of sugar beet leaves under drought stress. Proteomics 5:950–960PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Han Q, Kang G, Guo T (2013) Proteomic analysis of spring freeze-stress responsive proteins in leaves of bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Plant Physiol Biochem 63:236–244PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. He ZH, Li HW, Shen Y et al (2013) Comparative analysis of the chloroplast proteomes of a wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) single seed descent line and its parents. J Plant Physiol 170:1139–1147PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hieng B, Ugrinović K, Sustar-Vozlic J et al (2004) Different classes of proteases are involved in the response to drought of Phaseolus vulgaris L. cultivars differing in sensitivity. J Plant Physiol 161:519–530PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ji K, Wang Y, Sun W et al (2012) Drought-responsive mechanisms in rice genotypes with contrasting drought tolerance during reproductive stage. J Plant Physiol 169:336–344PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kamal AH, Cho K, Choi JS et al (2013) Patterns of protein expression in water-stressed wheat chloroplasts. Biol Plant 57:305–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kang G, Li G, Zheng B et al (2012) Proteomic analysis on salicylic acid-induced salt tolerance in common wheat seedlings (Triticum aestivum L.). Biochim Biophys Acta 1824:1324–1333PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. King BR, Guda C (2007) ngLOC: an n-gram-based Bayesian method for estimating the subcellular proteomes of eukaryotes. Genome Biol 8:R68PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kley J, Heil M, Muck A et al (2010) Isolating intact chloroplasts from small Arabidopsis samples for proteomic studies. Anal Biochem 398:198–202PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Komenda J, Nickelsen J, Tichy M et al (2008) The cyanobacteria homologue of HCF136/YCF48 is a component of an early photosystem II assembly complex and is important for both the efficient assembly and repair of photosystem II in Synechocystic sp. PCC 6803. J Biol Chem 283:22390–22399PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kosmala A, Perlikowski D, Pawłowicz I et al (2012) Changes in the chloroplast proteome following water deficit and subsequent watering in a high- and a low-drought-tolerant genotype of Festuca arundinacea. J Exp Bot 63:6161–6172PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kosová K, Vítámvás P, Urban MO et al (2018) Plant abiotic stress proteomics: the major factors determining alterations in cellular proteome. Front Plant Sci 9:122PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lang EGE, Mueller SJ, Hoernstein SNW et al (2011) Simultaneous isolation of pure and intact chloroplasts and mitochondria from moss as the basis for sub-cellular proteomics. Plant Cell Rep 30:205–215PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Li C, Bian B, Gong T et al (2018) Comparative proteomic analysis of key proteins during abscisic acid-hydrogen peroxide-induced adventitious rooting in cucumber (Cucumis sativus L.) under drought stress. J Plant Physiol 229:185–194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Liu Y, Wu L, Baddeley JA et al (2011) Models of biological nitrogen fixation of legumes. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 31:155–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lorentzen E, Siebers B, Hensel R et al (2005) Mechanism of the Schiff base forming fructose-1,6-bisphosphate aldolase: structural analysis of reaction intermediates. Biochemistry 44:4222–4229PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lu C, Zhang J (1999) Effects of water stress on photosystem II photochemistry and its thermostability in wheat plants. J Exp Bot 50:1199–1206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Luna-Vital DA, Mojica L, Gonzalez de Mejía E et al (2015) Biological potential of protein hydrolysates and peptides from common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.): a review. Food Res Int 76:39–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Maiwald D, Dietzmann A, Jahns P et al (2003) Knock-out of the genes coding for the Rieske protein and the ATP-synthase delta-subunit of Arabidopsis. Effects on photosynthesis, thylakoid protein composition, and nuclear chloroplast gene expression. Plant Physiol 133:191–202PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Millar AH, Taylor NL (2014) Subcellular proteomics-where cell biology meets protein chemistry. Front Plant Sci 5:55PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Moolna A, Bowsher CG (2010) The physiological importance of photosynthetic ferredoxin NADP + oxidoreductase (FNR) isoforms in wheat. J Exp Bot 61:2669–2681PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Polania JA, Poschenrieder C, Beebe S et al (2016) Effective use of water and increased dry matter partitioned to grain contribute to yield of common bean improved for drought resistance. Front Plant Sci 7:660PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Rottet S, Besagni C, Kessler F (2015) The role of plastoglobules in thylakoid lipid remodeling during plant development. Biochim Biophys Acta 1847:889–899PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tamburino R, Vitale M, Ruggiero A (2017) Chloroplast proteome response to drought stress and recovery in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). BMC Plant Biol 17:40PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Timpte C (2001) Auxin binding protein: curiouser and curiouser. Trends Plant Sci 6:586–590PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Uematsu K, Suzuki N, Iwamae T et al (2012) Increased fructose 1,6-bisphosphate aldolase in plastids enhances growth and photosynthesis of tobacco plants. J Exp Bot 63:3001–3009PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Utrillas MJ, Alegre L (1997) Impact of water stress on leaf anatomy and ultrastructure in Cynodon dactylon (L.) Pers. under natural conditions. Int J Plant Sci 158:313–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Villordo-Pineda E, González-Chavira MM, Giraldo-Carbajo P et al (2015) Identification of novel drought-tolerant-associated SNPs in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Front Plant Sci 6:546PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wang J, Yu Q, Xiong H et al (2016) Proteomic insight into the response of Arabidopsis chloroplasts to darkness. PLoS One 11:e0154235PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Yang ZB, Eticha D, Führs H et al (2013) Proteomic and phosphoproteomic analysis of polyethylene glycol-induced osmotic stress in root tips of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). J Exp Bot 64:5569–5586PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Yang H, Liu J, Wen X et al (2015) Molecular mechanism of photosystem I assembly in oxygenic organisms. Biochim Biophys Acta 1847:838–848PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zadražnik T, Hollung K, Egge-Jacobsen W et al (2013) Differential proteomic analysis of drought stress response in leaves of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). J Proteomics 78:254–272PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zadražnik T, Egge-Jacobsen W, Meglič V et al (2017) Proteomic analysis of common bean stem under drought stress using in-gel stable isotope labeling. J Plant Physiol 209:42–50PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zargar SM, Mahajan R, Nazir M (2017a) Common bean proteomics: present status and future strategies. J Proteomics 169:239–248PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zargar SM, Gupta N, Nazir M et al (2017b) Impact of drought on photosynthesis: molecular perspective. Plant Gene 11:154–159CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tanja Zadražnik
    • 1
    Email author
  • Anders Moen
    • 2
  • Jelka Šuštar-Vozlič
    • 3
  1. 1.Biotechnical FacultyUniversity of LjubljanaLjubljanaSlovenia
  2. 2.Department of Molecular BiosciencesUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
  3. 3.Agricultural Institute of SloveniaLjubljanaSlovenia

Personalised recommendations