Advertisement

3 Biotech

, 9:307 | Cite as

Assessment of different temporary immersion systems in the micropropagation of anthurium (Anthurium andreanum)

  • Marco A. Ramírez-Mosqueda
  • Carlos A. Cruz-Cruz
  • Adrián Cano-Ricárdez
  • Jericó J. Bello-BelloEmail author
Original Article
  • 22 Downloads

Abstract

Anthurium has been micropropagated mainly through conventional techniques in semisolid culture medium. However, this culture system involves constraints due to the low number of shoots produced and the high costs of the gelling agent and labor. Temporary immersion systems (TIS) are an alternative for increasing biological performance, reducing costs, and facilitating a semi-automated micropropagation process. The objective of this study was to compare the efficiency of different types of TIS during the in vitro propagation of anthurium. We used 2-cm-long nodal segments from in vitro plants. Explants were cultured in different TIS: temporary immersion bioreactors (TIB®), Ebb-and-Flow bioreactor, and recipient for automated temporary immersion (RITA®), with a 2-min immersion frequency at 12-h intervals. We used Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium supplemented with 3% (w/v) of sucrose and 8.88 µM benzylaminopurine. After 60 days of culture, we evaluated various physiological variables and the percent survival in the different TIS. The largest numbers of shoots per explant were observed in TIB® and Ebb-and-Flow, with 50.83 and 43.16 shoots per explant, respectively; the lowest number of shoots per explant was observed in RITA®, with 30.66. TIB® yielded the highest content of photosynthetic pigments (chlorophyll a, b, and total chlorophyll), stomatal index, and percentage of closed stomata relative to both Ebb-and-Flow and RITA®. The TIB® and RITA® systems showed a 99% shoot survival, while Ebb-and-Flow yielded 86% survival. In conclusion, TIS design and type affect a number of physiological processes and in vitro development, with TIB® as a feasible option for the commercial micropropagation of anthurium.

Keywords

Chlorophyll Stomatal functionality Bioreactors Acclimatization 

Notes

Author contributions

MARM, and JJBB conceived and designed research. CACC, and ACR conducted experiments. MARM and JJBB analyzed and reviewed the statistical analysis. MARM and JJBB wrote the manuscript. MARM, JJBB, CACC, and ACR read and approved the manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author(s) declare that they have no conflicting interests.

References

  1. Aliniaeifard S, van Meeteren U (2016) Stomatal characteristics and desiccation response of leaves of cut chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium) flowers grown at high air humidity. Sci Hortic 205:84–89.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2016.04.025 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aragón CE, Escalona M, Capote I, Pina D, Cejas I, Rodríguez R, Cañal MJ, Sandoval J, Roels S, Deberch P, Gonzalez-Olmedo J (2005) Photosynthesis and carbon metabolism in plantain (Musa AAB) plantlets growing in temporary immersion bioreactors and during ex vitro acclimatization. Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plan 41:550–554.  https://doi.org/10.1079/IVP2005640 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aragón CE, Sánchez C, Gonzalez-Olmedo J, Escalona M, Carvalho L, Amâncio S (2014) Comparison of plantain plantlets propagated in temporary immersion bioreactors and gelled medium during in vitro growth and acclimatization. Biol Plant 58:29–38.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10535-013-0381-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Asayesh MZ, Vahdati K, Aliniaeifard S, Askari N (2017) Enhancement of ex vitro acclimation of walnut plantlets through modification of stomatal characteristics in vitro. Sci Hortic 220:114–121.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2017.03.045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cardoso JC, Habermann G (2014) Adventitious shoot induction from leaf segments in anthurium andreanum is affected by age of explant, leaf orientation and plant growth regulator. Hort Eviron Biotechonol 55:56–62.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13580-014-0022-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chandler SF, Tanaka Y (2018) Transgenic research in floricultural crops. In: Rout GR, Peter KV (eds) Genetic engineering of horticultural crops. Academic Press, Cambridge, pp 121–136.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-810439-2.00006-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cui HY, Murthy HN, Mohc SH, Cuid YY, Leee EJ, Paeka KY (2014) Production of biomass and bioactive compounds in protocorm cultures of Dendrobium candidum Wall ex Lindl. using balloon type bubble bioreactors. Ind Crop Prod 53:28–33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2013.11.049 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ducos JP, Lambot C, Petiard V (2007) Bioreactors for coffee mass propagation by somatic embryogenesis. Int J P Dev Biol 1:1–12Google Scholar
  9. Escalona M, Lorenzo JC, González B, Daquinta M, González JL, Desjardins Y, Borroto CG (1999) Pineapple (Ananas comosus L. Merr) micropropagation in temporary immersion systems. Plant Cell Rep 18:743–748.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s002990050653 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Etienne H, Berthouly M (2002) Temporary immersion systems in plant micropropagation. Plant Cell, Tissue Organ Cult 69:215–231.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015668610465 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gantait S, Sinniah UR, Mandal N, Das PK (2012) Direct induction of protocorm-like bodies from shoot tips, plantlet formation, and clonal fidelity analysis in Anthurium andreanum cv. CanCan. Plant Growth Regul 67:257–270.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-012-9684-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Georgiev V, Schumann A, Pavlov A, Bley (2014) Temporary immersion systems in plant biotechnology. Eng Life Sci 14:607–621.  https://doi.org/10.1002/elsc.201300166 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harborne JB (1973) Nitrogen compounds. Phytochemical methods. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 166–211.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-5570-7_5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hazarika BN (2006) Morpho-physiological disorders in in vitro culture of plants. Sci Horti 108:105–120.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2006.01.038 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jahan MT, Islam MR, Khan R, Mamun ANK, Ahmed G, Hakim L (2009) In vitro clonal propagation of anthurium (Anthurium andraeanum L.) using callus culture. Plant Tissue Cult Biotechnol 19:61–69.  https://doi.org/10.3329/ptcb.v19i1.4961 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Luna CV, Gonzalez AM, Mroginski LA, Sansberro PA (2017) Anatomical and histological features of Ilex paraguariensis leaves under different in vitro shoot culture systems. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 129:457–467.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-017-1191-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Martínez-Estrada E, Caamal-Velázquez JH, Morales-Ramos V, Bello-Bello JJ (2016) Light emitting diodes improve in vitro shoot multiplication and growth of anthurium andreanum lind. Propag Ornam Plants 16:3–8Google Scholar
  18. Martins JPR, Schimildt ER, Alexandre RS, Falqueto AR, Otoni WC (2015) Chlorophyll a fluorescence and growth of Neoregelia concentrica (Bromeliaceae) during acclimatization in response to light levels. Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 51:471–481.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-015-9711-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Monja-Mio KM, Barredo PF, Herrera HG, Esqueda VM, Robert ML (2015) Development of the stomatal complex and leaf surface of Agave angustifolia Haw. `Bacanora´ plantlets during the in vitro to ex vitro transition process. Sci Hortic 189:32–40.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2015.03.032 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mosqueda-Frómeta O, Escalona-Morgado MM, Teixeira da Silva JA, Pina-Morgado D, Daquinta-Gradaille MA (2017) In vitro propagation of Gerbera jamesonii Bolus ex Hooker f. in a temporary immersion bioreactor. Plant Cell Tiss Organ Cult 129:543–551.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-017-1186-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue culture. Physiol Plant 15:179–473.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1962.tb08052.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Pinheiro MVM, Martins FB, Ferreira da Cruz FC, Pinto de Carvalho ACP, Jardim de Oliveira E, Otoni WC (2014) Somatic embryogenesis in anthurium (Anthurium andraeanum cv. Eidibel) as affected by different explants. Acta Sci Agron 36:87–98.  https://doi.org/10.4025/actasciagron.v36i1.16557 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ramírez-Mosqueda MA, Iglesias-Andreu LG (2016) Evaluation of different temporary immersion systems (BIT®, BIG, and RITA®) in the micropropagation of Vanilla planifolia Jacks. Vitro Cell Dev Biol Plant 52:154–160.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-015-9735-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Roels S, Escalona M, Cañal MJ, Debergh P, Noceda C, Sandoval JO, Rodriguez R (2006) The effect of headspace renewal in a temporary immersion bioreactor on plantain (Musa AAB) shoot proliferation and quality. Plant Cell, Tissue Organ Cult 84:155–163.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-005-9013-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Rosales C, Brenes J, Salas K, Arce-Solano S, Abdelnour-Esquivel A (2018) Micropropagation of Stevia rebaudiana in temporary immersion systems as an alternative horticultural production method. Rev Chap Ser Hort 24:69–84.  https://doi.org/10.5154/r.rchsh.2017.08.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ruffoni B, Savona M (2005) The temporary immersion system (TIS) for the improvement of micropropagation of ornamental plants. Acta Hortic 683:445–453.  https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2005.683.59 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sáez PL, Bravo LA, Sáez KL, Sánchez-Olate M, Latsague MI, Ríos DG (2012) Photosynthetic and leaf anatomical characteristics of Castanea sativa: a comparison between in vitro and nursery plants. Biol Plant 56:15–24.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10535-012-0010-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Sari YP (2010) Regenerasi tanaman Anthurium hookeri Merah (Anthurium hookeri Kunth. var Red hookeri) dengan penambahan zat pengatur tumbuh naa secara in vitro. Bioprospek 7:10–20 (in Indonesian with English abstract) Google Scholar
  29. Silva BD, Felipe SHS, Silva TD, Motta de Castro K, Mamedes-Rodrigues TC, Amaral MN, Ríos-Ríos AM, Vidal FD, Fortini EA, Chagas K, Torres-Silva G, Xavier A, Domingo AA, Campos OW (2018) Light quality in plant tissue culture: does it matter? Vitro Cell Dev Biol-Plant 54:195–215.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-018-9902-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Szopa A, Kokotkiewicz A, Luczkiewicz M, Ekierta H (2017) Schisandra lignans production regulated by different bioreactor type. J Biotechnol 247:11–17.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2017.02.007 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Teisson C, Alvard D (1995) A new concept of plant in vitro cultivation liquid medium: temporary immersion. In: Terzi M, Cella R, Falavigna A (eds) Current issues in plant molecular and cellular biology. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp 105–110.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0307-7_12 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Teixeira da Silva JA, Dobránszkib J, Winartoc B, Zengd S (2015) Anthurium in vitro: a review. Sci Hortic 186:266–298.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2014.11.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. van Tuyl J, Arens P, Miller W, Anderson N (2014) The role of ornamentals in human life. In: Dixon G, Aldous D (eds) Horticulture: plants for people and places, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 407–433.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8578-5_11 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Venkata SK, Bommisettya P, Patilb MS, Reddy L, Chennareddya A (2014) The genetic linkage maps of Anthurium species based on RAPD, ISSRand SRAP markers. Sci Hortic 178:132–137.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2014.08.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wani MA, Nazki IT, Sheikh M, Neelofar K, Shaziya H, Qja P (2016) Diversification through floriculture in Kashmir Valley. In: Bhat A, Singh SP (eds) Agricultural marketing: perspectives and potentials. New India Publishing Agency (nipa), Jammu, pp 209–233Google Scholar
  36. Wani MA, Nazki IT, Din A, Iqbal S, Wani SA, Khan FU, Neelofar K (2018) Floriculture Sustainability Initiative: the dawn of new era. In: Lichtfouse E (ed) Sustainable agriculture reviews 27, Sustainable Agriculture Reviews, vol 27. Springer, Cham, pp 91–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wilkinson H (1979) The plant surface (mainly leaf). In: Metcalfe CR, Chalk L (eds) Anatomy of dicotyledons. Claredon Press, Oxford, London, pp 97–165Google Scholar
  38. Winarto B (2010) Improving growth and regeneration of explants derived from anther culture of Anthurium via improving culture media. J Hortik 20:342–351 (in Indonesian with English abstract) Google Scholar
  39. Xu Z, Zhou G (2008) Responses of leaf stomatal density to water status and its relationship with photosynthesis in a Grass. J Exp Bot 59:3317–3325.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ern185 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Zhang B, Sarsaiyab S, Pana X, Jina L, Xub D, Zhangc B, Dunsa GJ, Shib J, Chena J (2018) Optimization of nutritional conditions using a temporary immersion bioreactor system for the growth of Bletilla striata pseudobulbs and accumulation of polysaccharides. Sci Hortic 240:155–161.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2018.06.010 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Colegio de Postgraduados Campus CórdobaAmatlán de los ReyesMexico
  2. 2.Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas y AgropecuariasUniversidad VeracruzanaAmatlán de los ReyesMexico
  3. 3.Facultad de Ciencias QuímicasUniversidad VeracruzanaOrizabaMexico
  4. 4.CONACYT-Colegio de Postgraduados Campus CórdobaAmatlán de los ReyesMexico

Personalised recommendations