Advertisement

3 Biotech

, 9:143 | Cite as

Transgenic tomatoes for abiotic stress tolerance: status and way ahead

  • Ram Krishna
  • Suhas G. Karkute
  • Waquar A. Ansari
  • Durgesh Kumar Jaiswal
  • Jay Prakash VermaEmail author
  • Major Singh
Review Article

Abstract

Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) is one of the most important vegetable crops; its production, productivity and quality are adversely affected by abiotic stresses. Abiotic stresses such as drought, extreme temperature and high salinity affect almost every stage of tomato life cycle. Depending upon the plant stage and duration of the stress, abiotic stress causes about 70% yield loss. Several wild tomato species have the stress tolerance genes; however, it is very difficult to transfer them into cultivars due to high genetic distance and crossing barriers. Transgenic technology is an alternative potential tool for the improvement of tomato crop to cope with abiotic stress, as it allows gene transfer across species. In recent decades, many transgenic tomatoes have been developed, and many more are under progress against abiotic stress using transgenes such as DREBs, Osmotin, ZAT12 and BADH2. The altered expression of these transgenes under abiotic stresses are involved in every step of stress responses, such as signaling, control of transcription, proteins and membrane protection, compatible solute (betaines, sugars, polyols, and amino acids) synthesis, and free-radical and toxic-compound scavenging. The stress-tolerant transgenic tomato development is based on introgression of a gene with known function in stress response and putative tolerance. Transgenic tomato plants have been developed against drought, heat and salt stress with the help of various transgenes, expression of which manages the stress at the cellular level by modulating the expression of downstream genes to ultimately improve growth and yield of tomato plants and help in sustainable agricultural production. The transgenic technology could be a faster way towards tomato improvement against abiotic stress. This review provides comprehensive information about transgenic tomato development against abiotic stress such as drought, heat and salinity for researcher attention and a better understanding of transgenic technology used in tomato improvement and sustainable agricultural production.

Keywords

Tomato Solanum lycopersicum Genetic engineering Abiotic stress Sustainable agriculture 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest among the authors; all authors contributed equally.

References

  1. Abdelmageed AHA, Gruda N (2009) Influence of high temperatures on gas exchange rate and growth of eight tomato cultivars under controlled heat stress conditions. Eur J Hortic Sci 74:152–159Google Scholar
  2. Acquaah G (2009) Principles of plant genetics and breeding. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  3. Amooaghaie R, Nikzad K (2013) The role of nitric oxide in priming-induced low-temperature tolerance in two genotypes of tomato. Seed Sci Res 23:123–131.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0960258513000068 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amudha J, Balasubramani G (2011) Recent molecular advances to combat abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Biotechnol Mol Biol Rev 6:31–58Google Scholar
  5. Anderson EN (2005) Everyone eats: understanding food and culture. New York University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  6. Battilani A, Prieto MH, Argerich C et al (2012) Tomato. In: Steduto P, Hsiao TC, Fereres E, Raes D (eds) Crop yield response to water, irrigation and drainage Paper 66. pp 174–180Google Scholar
  7. Bita CE, Gerats T (2013) Plant tolerance to high temperature in a changing environment: scientific fundamentals and production of heat stress-tolerant crops. Front Plant Sci 4:273.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00273 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Bommarco R, Kleijn D, Potts SG (2013) Ecological intensification: Harnessing ecosystem services for food security. Trends Ecol Evol 28:230–238.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2012.10.012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Böndel KB, Nosenko T, Stephan W (2018) Signatures of natural selection in abiotic stress-responsive genes of Solanum chilense. R Soc Open Sci 5:171198.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.171198 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Boyer JS, Byrne P, Cassman KG et al (2013) The US drought of 2012 in perspective: a call to action. Glob Food Sec 2:139–143.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfs.2013.08.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brown L (2012) World on the edge: how to prevent environmental and economic collapse. Routledge, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chai Q, Gan Y, Turner NC et al (2014) Water-saving innovations in Chinese agriculture. Adv Agron 126:149–201.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800132-5.00002-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chai Q, Gan Y, Zhao C et al (2016) Regulated deficit irrigation for crop production under drought stress. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 36:1–21.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-015-0338-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chen S, Liu A, Zhang S et al (2013) Overexpression of mitochondrial uncoupling protein conferred resistance to heat stress and Botrytis cinerea infection in tomato. Plant Physiol Biochem 73:245–253.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2013.10.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Cheng L, Zou Y, Ding S et al (2009) Polyamine accumulation in transgenic tomato enhances the tolerance to high temperature stress. J Integr Plant Biol 51:489–499.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-7909.2009.00816.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Deinlein U, Stephan AB, Horie T et al (2014) Plant salt-tolerance mechanisms. Trends Plant Sci 19:371–379.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2014.02.001 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Demidchik V (2015) Mechanisms of oxidative stress in plants: from classical chemistry to cell biology. Environ Exp Bot 109:212–228.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2014.06.021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dixit S (2008) Identification of plant genes for abiotic stress resistance. Doctoral thesis, Wageningen UniversityGoogle Scholar
  19. Dixon GR, Aldous DE (2014) Horticulture: plants for people and places. Environ Hortic 2:1–949.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8581-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. FAO (2011) http://faostat.fao.org. Accessed 11 Feb 2018
  21. Flowers TJ (2004) Improving crop salt tolerance. J Exp Bot 55:307–319.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erh003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fragkostefanakis S, Simm S, Paul P et al (2015) Chaperone network composition in Solanum lycopersicum explored by transcriptome profiling and microarray meta-analysis. Plant Cell Environ 38:693–709.  https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12426 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Frank G, Pressman E, Ophir R et al (2009) Transcriptional profiling of maturing tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) microspores reveals the involvement of heat shock proteins, ROS scavengers, hormones, and sugars in the heat stress response. J Exp Bot 60:3891–3908.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erp234 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Gan Y, Siddique KHM, Turner NC et al (2013) Ridge-furrow mulching systems-an innovative technique for boosting crop productivity in semiarid rain-fed environments. Adv Agron 118:429–476.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-405942-9.00007-4 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. García-Abellan JO, Egea I, Pineda B et al (2014) Heterologous expression of the yeast HAL5 gene in tomato enhances salt tolerance by reducing shoot Na+ accumulation in the long term. Physiol Plant 152:700–713.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.12217 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Gill SS, Tuteja N (2010) Reactive oxygen species and antioxidant machinery in abiotic stress tolerance in crop plants. Plant Physiol Biochem 48:909–930.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2010.08.016 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Goel D, Singh AK, Yadav V et al (2010) Overexpression of osmotin gene confers tolerance to salt and drought stresses in transgenic tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Protoplasma 245:133–141.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-010-0158-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Gould WA (1992) Tomato production, processing, and technology. Elsevier, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gourdji SM, Sibley AM, Lobell DB (2013) Global crop exposure to critical high temperatures in the reproductive period: historical trends and future projections. Environ Res Lett 8:24041.  https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/8/2/024041 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Greco M, Chiappetta A, Bruno L, Bitonti MB (2012) In Posidonia oceanica cadmium induces changes in DNA methylation and chromatin patterning. J Exp Bot 63:695–709.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/err313 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Grube R, Livingstone KD, Zamir D et al (1999) Comparative analysis of disease resistance within the Solanaceae. Plant Anim Genome VII Conf San Diego P350:873–887Google Scholar
  32. Gujjar RS, Karkute SG, Rai A, Singh M, Singh B (2018) Proline-rich proteins may regulate free cellular proline levels during drought stress in tomato. Curr Sci.  https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v114/i04/915-920 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hsieh T, Lee J, Yang P et al (2002) Heterology expression of the Arabidopsis C-repeat/dehydration response element binding factor 1 gene confers elevated tolerance to chilling and oxidative stresses in transgenic tomato. Plant Physiol 129:1086–1094.  https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.003442.1086 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  34. Hu D-G, Ma Q-J, Sun C-H et al (2016) Overexpression of MdSOS2L1, a CIPK protein kinase, increases the antioxidant metabolites to enhance salt tolerance in apple and tomato. Physiol Plant 156:201–214.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.12354 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Huertas R, Olías R, Eljakaoui Z et al (2012) Overexpression of SlSOS2 (SlCIPK24) confers salt tolerance to transgenic tomato. Plant, Cell Environ 35:1467–1482.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2012.02504.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ingram J (2011) A food systems approach to researching food security and its interactions with global environmental change. Food Secur 3:417–431.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-011-0149-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Julkowska MM, Testerink C (2015) Tuning plant signaling and growth to survive salt. Trends Plant Sci 20:586–594.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2015.06.008 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Karapanos IC, Akoumianakis KA, Olympios CM, Passam HC (2010) Tomato pollen respiration in relation to in vitro germination and pollen tube growth under favourable and stress-inducing temperatures. Sex Plant Reprod 23:219–224.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00497-009-0132-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Karkute SG, Krishna R, Ansari WA, Singh B, Singh PM, Singh M, Singh AK (2019) Heterologous expression of the AtDREB1A gene in tomato confers tolerance to chilling stress. Biol Plant.  https://doi.org/10.32615/bp.2019.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Khan AL, Waqas M, Asaf S et al (2017) Plant growth-promoting endophyte Sphingomonas sp. LK11 alleviates salinity stress in Solanum pimpinellifolium. Environ Exp Bot 133:58–69.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2016.09.009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kong F, Deng Y, Wang G et al (2014) LeCDJ1, a chloroplast DnaJ protein, facilitates heat tolerance in transgenic tomatoes. J Integr Plant Biol 56:63–74.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jipb.12119 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Kotak S, Larkindale J, Lee U et al (2007) Complexity of the heat stress response in plants. Curr Opin Plant Biol 10:310–316.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2007.04.011 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Krasensky J, Jonak C (2012) Drought, salt, and temperature stress induced metabolic rearrangements and regulatory networks. J Exp Bot 63:1593–1608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Kumar A, Verma JP (2018) Does plant—microbe interaction confer stress tolerance in plants: a review? Microbiol Res 207:41–52.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micres.2017.11.004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Kumar K, Aggarwal C, Sapna B et al (2018) Microbial genes in crop improvement. In: Crop improvement through microbial biotechnology. Elsevier, Amsterdam, Netherlands, pp 39–56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-63987-5.00003-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Laloi C, Apel K, Danton A (2004) Reactive oxygen signalling: the latest news. Curr Opin Plant Biol 7:323e326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Larkindale J (2005) Heat stress phenotypes of Arabidopsis mutants implicate multiple signaling pathways in the acquisition of thermotolerance. Plant Physiol 138:882–897.  https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.105.062257 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Lata C, Prasad M (2011) Role of DREBs in regulation of abiotic stress responses in plants. J Exp Bot 62:4731–4748.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/err210 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Lee JT, Prasad V, Yang PT et al (2003) Expression of Arabidopsis CBF1 regulated by an ABA/stress inducible promoter in transgenic tomato confers stress tolerance without affecting yield. Plant Cell Environ 26:1181–1190.  https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.01048.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Li Z, Peng Y, Zhang XQ et al (2014) Exogenous spermidine improves water stress tolerance of white clover (Trifolium repens L.) involved in antioxidant defence, gene expression and proline metabolism. Plant Omics 7:517–526.  https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules191118003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lim MY, Jeong BR, Jung M, Harn CH (2016) Transgenic tomato plants expressing strawberry d-galacturonic acid reductase gene display enhanced tolerance to abiotic stresses. Plant Biotechnol Rep 10:105–116.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11816-016-0392-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lin D, Xia J, Wan S (2010) Climate warming and biomass accumulation of terrestrial plants: a meta-analysis. New Phytol 188:187–198.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03347.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Liu H, Zhou Y, Li H et al (2018) Molecular and functional characterization of ShNAC1, an NAC transcription factor from Solanum habrochaites. Plant Sci 271:9–19.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.PLANTSCI.2018.03.005 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Lobell DB, Roberts MJ, Schlenker W et al (2014) Greater sensitivity to drought accompanies maize yield increase in the US Midwest. Science (80-) 344:516–519.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1251423 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Lu SW, Qi F, Li TL (2012) Effects of salt stress on sugar content and sucrose metabolism in tomato fruit. China Veg 20:56–61Google Scholar
  56. Masle J, Gilmore SR, Farquhar GD (2005) The ERECTA gene regulates plant transpiration efficiency in Arabidopsis. Nature 436:866–870.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature03835 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. McDowell NG (2011) Mechanisms linking drought, hydraulics, carbon metabolism, and vegetation mortality. Plant Physiol 155:1051–1059.  https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.110.170704 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Moghaieb REA, Tanaka N, Saneoka H et al (2000) Expression of betaine aldehyde dehydrogenase gene in transgenic tomato hairy roots leads to the accumulation of glycine betaine and contributes to the maintenance of the osmotic potential under salt stress. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 46:873–883.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2000.10409153 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Moghaieb REA, Nakamura A, Saneoka H, Fujita K (2011) Evaluation of salt tolerance in ectoine-transgenic tomato plants (Lycopersicon esculentum) in terms of photosynthesis, osmotic adjustment, and carbon partitioning. GM Crops 2:58–65.  https://doi.org/10.4161/gmcr.2.1.15831 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Mohanty A, Kathuria H, Ferjani A et al (2002) Transgenics of an elite indica rice variety Pusa Basmati 1 harbouring the coda gene are highly tolerant to salt stress. Theor Appl Genet 106:51–57.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-002-1063-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Morrow G, Tanguay RM (2012) Small heat shock protein expression and functions during development. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 44:1613–1621.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocel.2012.03.009 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Nautiyal PC, Shono M, Egawa Y (2005) Enhanced thermotolerance of the vegetative part of MT-sHSP transgenic tomato line. Sci Hortic (Amsterdam) 105:393–409.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2005.02.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Nebauer S, Sánchez M, Martínez L et al (2013) Differences in photosynthetic performance and its correlation with growth among tomato cultivars in response to different salts. Plant Physiol Biochem 63:61–69.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2012.11.006 PMID: 23232248CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Neta-Sharir I (2005) Dual role for tomato heat shock protein 21: protecting photosystem II from oxidative stress and promoting color changes during fruit maturation. Plant Cell Online 17:1829–1838.  https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.105.031914 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Nieto-Sotelo J (2002) Maize HSP101 plays important roles in both induced and basal thermotolerance and primary root growth. Plant Cell Online 14:1621–1633.  https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.010487 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Nir I, Moshelion M, Weiss D (2014) The Arabidopsis gibberellin methyl transferase 1 suppresses gibberellin activity, reduces whole-plant transpiration and promotes drought tolerance in transgenic tomato. Plant Cell Environ 37:113–123.  https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12135 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. Parfitt J, Barthel M, MacNaughton S (2010) Food waste within food supply chains: quantification and potential for change to 2050. Philos Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 365:3065–3081.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2010.0126 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Park S, Li J, Pittman JK et al (2005) Up-regulation of a H+-pyrophosphatase (H+-PPase) as a strategy to engineer drought-resistant crop plants. Proc Natl Acad Sci 102:18830–18835.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0509512102 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Park EJ, Jeknić Z, Pino MT et al (2007) Glycinebetaine accumulation is more effective in chloroplasts than in the cytosol for protecting transgenic tomato plants against abiotic stress. Plant Cell Environ 30:994–1005.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2007.01694.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Parmar N, Singh KH, Sharma D, Singh L, Kumar P, Nanjundan J, Khan YJ, Chauhan DK, Thakur AK (2017) Genetic engineering strategies for biotic and abiotic stress tolerance and quality enhancement in horticultural crops: a comprehensive review. 3 Biotech 7(4):239.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-017-0870-y CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  71. Peleman JD, Van Der Voort JR (2003) Breeding by design. Trends Plant Sci 8:330–334.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1360-1385(03)00134-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. Popp HW (1951) An introduction to plant physiology. Science Publishers, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Prasanna HC, Sinha DP, Rai GK, Krishna R, Kashyap SP, Singh NK, Singh M, Malathi VG (2015) Pyramiding T y-2 and T y-3 genes for resistance to monopartite and bipartite tomato leaf curl viruses of India. Plant Pathol 64(2):256–264.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ppa.12267 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Rai GK, Rai NP, Kumar S et al (2012) Effects of explant age, germination medium, pre-culture parameters, inoculation medium, pH, washing medium, and selection regime on Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of tomato. Vitr Cell Dev Biol Plant 48:565–578.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11627-012-9442-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Rai AC, Singh M, Shah K (2013a) Engineering drought tolerant tomato plants over-expressing BcZAT12 gene encoding a C2H2 zinc finger transcription factor. Phytochemistry 85:44–50.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2012.09.007 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. Rai GK, Rai NP, Rathaur S et al (2013b) Expression of rd29A:: AtDREB1A/CBF3 in tomato alleviates drought-induced oxidative stress by regulating key enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidants. Plant Physiol Biochem 69:90–100.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2013.05.002 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. Rivero RM, Kojima M, Gepstein A et al (2007) Delayed leaf senescence induces extreme drought tolerance in a flowering plant. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:19631–19636.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0709453104 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. Roy R, Purty RS, Agrawal V, Gupta SC (2006) Transformation of tomato cultivar “Pusa Ruby” with bspA gene from Populus tremula for drought tolerance. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 84:55–67.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2005.12.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Rosenzweig C, Elliott J, Deryng D et al (2014) Assessing agricultural risks of climate change in the 21st century in a global gridded crop model intercomparison. Proc Natl Acad Sci 111:3268–3273.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1222463110 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Ruiz-Vera UM, Siebers MH, Drag DW et al (2015) Canopy warming caused photosynthetic acclimation and reduced seed yield in maize grown at ambient and elevated [CO2]. Glob Chang Biol 21:4237–4249.  https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.13013 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Ryu H, Cho Y-G (2015) Plant hormones in salt stress tolerance. J Plant Biol 58:147–155.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12374-015-0103-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Saadi S, Todorovic M, Pereira LS (2010) Climate change and Mediterranean agriculture: 2. Impacts on wheat and tomato yields and water productivity. Elsevier 147:1–14Google Scholar
  83. Sahi C, Singh A, Blumwald E, Grover A (2006) Beyond osmolytes and transporters: novel plant salt-stress tolerance-related genes from transcriptional profiling data. Physiol Plant 127:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2005.00610.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Sakuma Y (2006) Functional analysis of an Arabidopsis transcription factor. DREB2A, involved in drought-responsive gene expression. Plant Cell Online 18:1292–1309.  https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.105.035881 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Sánchez-Rodríguez E, Rubio-Wilhelmi MM, Cervilla LM et al (2010) Genotypic differences in some physiological parameters symptomatic for oxidative stress under moderate drought in tomato plants. Plant Sci 178:30–40.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2009.10.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Sanmiya K, Suzuki K, Egawa Y, Shono M (2004) Mitochondrial small heat-shock protein enhances thermotolerance in tobacco plants. FEBS Lett 557:265–268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Schramm F, Larkindale J, Kiehlmann E et al (2008) A cascade of transcription factor DREB2A and heat stress transcription factor HsfA3 regulates the heat stress response of Arabidopsis. Plant J 53:264–274.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2007.03334.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  88. Scippa GS, Griffiths A, Chiatante D, Bray EA (2000) The H1 histone variant of tomato, H1-S, is targeted to the nucleus and accumulates in chromatin in response to water-deficit stress. Planta 211:173–181.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s004250000278 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  89. Seki M, Narusaka M, Abe H et al (2001) Monitoring the expression pattern of 1300 Arabidopsis genes under drought and cold stresses by using a full-length cDNA microarray. Plant Cell 13:61.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3871153 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  90. Seong ES, Cho HS, Choi D, Joung YH, Lim CK, Hur JH, Wang MH (2007) Tomato plants overexpressing CaKR1 enhanced tolerance to salt and oxidative stress. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 363:983–988.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2007.09.104 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  91. Shah K, Singh M, Rai AC (2013) Effect of heat-shock induced oxidative stress is suppressed in BcZAT12 expressing drought tolerant tomato. Phytochemistry 95:109–117.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phytochem.2013.07.026 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. Silva Dias J, Ryder EJ (2011) World vegetable industry: production, breeding, trends. Hortic Rev 38:299–356Google Scholar
  93. Tung SA, Smeeton R, White CA et al (2008) Over-expression of LeNCED1 in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.) with the rbcS3C promoter allows recovery of lines that accumulate very high levels of abscisic acid and exhibit severe phenotypes. Plant Cell Environ 31:968–981.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2008.01812.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  94. Turk H, Erdal S, Genisel M et al (2014) The regulatory effect of melatonin on physiological, biochemical and molecular parameters in cold-stressed wheat seedlings. Plant Growth Regul 74:139–152.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10725-014-9905-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Verslues PE, Agarwal M, Katiyar-Agarwal S et al (2006) Methods and concepts in quantifying resistance to drought, salt and freezing, abiotic stresses that affect plant water status. Plant J 45:523–539.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-313X.2005.02593.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Wang Y, Frei M (2011) Stressed food—the impact of abiotic environmental stresses on crop quality. Agric Ecosyst Environ 141:271–286.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.03.017 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Wang Y, Wisniewski M, Meilan R et al (2005) Overexpression of cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase in tomato confers tolerance to chilling and salt stress. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 130:167–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Wang BQ, Zhang QF, Liu JH, Li GH (2011) Overexpression of PtADC confers enhanced dehydration and drought tolerance in transgenic tobacco and tomato: Effect on ROS elimination. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 413:10–16.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2011.08.015 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. Wang JY, Lai L di, Tong SM, Li QL (2013) Constitutive and salt-inducible expression of SlBADH gene in transgenic tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L. cv. Micro-Tom) enhances salt tolerance. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 432:262–267.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.02.001 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  100. Wang G, Kong F, Zhang S et al (2015) A tomato chloroplast-targeted DnaJ protein protects Rubisco activity under heat stress. J Exp Bot 66:3027–3040.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erv102 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  101. Waters ER (2013) The evolution, function, structure, and expression of the plant sHSPs. J Exp Bot 64:391–403.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ers355 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  102. Wei D, Zhang W, Wang C et al (2017) Genetic engineering of the biosynthesis of glycinebetaine leads to alleviate salt-induced potassium efflux and enhances salt tolerance in tomato plants. Plant Sci 257:74–83.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2017.01.012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. Yarra R, He SJ, Abbagani S et al (2012) Overexpression of a wheat Na+/H+ antiporter gene (TaNHX2) enhances tolerance to salt stress in transgenic tomato plants (Solanum lycopersicum L.). Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult 111:49–57.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11240-012-0169-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  104. Zhai Y, Yang Q, Hou M (2015) The effects of saline water drip irrigation on tomato yield, quality, and blossom-end rot incidence—a 3a case study in the South of China. PLoS One 10:e0142204.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0142204 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  105. Zhao C, Shono M, Sun A et al (2007) Constitutive expression of an endoplasmic reticulum small heat shock protein alleviates endoplasmic reticulum stress in transgenic tomato. J Plant Physiol 164:835–841.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2006.06.004 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  106. Zhang HX, Blumwald E (2001) Transgenic salt-tolerant tomato plants accumulate salt in foliage but not in fruit. Nat Biotechnol 19:765–768.  https://doi.org/10.1038/90824 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. Zhang X, Fowler SG, Cheng H et al (2004) Freezing-sensitive tomato has a functional CBF cold responsive pathway, but a CBF regulon that differs from that of freezing tolerant Arabidopsis. Plant J 39:905–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  108. Zhu M, Chen G, Zhang J et al (2014) The abiotic stress-responsive NAC-type transcription factor SlNAC4 regulates salt and drought tolerance and stress-related genes in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). Plant Cell Rep 33:1851–1863.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00299-014-1662-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ram Krishna
    • 1
    • 2
  • Suhas G. Karkute
    • 2
  • Waquar A. Ansari
    • 2
  • Durgesh Kumar Jaiswal
    • 1
  • Jay Prakash Verma
    • 1
    • 3
    Email author
  • Major Singh
    • 4
  1. 1.Institute of Environment and Sustainable DevelopmentBanaras Hindu UniversityVaranasiIndia
  2. 2.Division of Vegetable ImprovementICAR-Indian Institute of Vegetable ResearchVaranasiIndia
  3. 3.Hawkesbury Institute for the EnvironmentWestern Sydney UniversitySydneyAustralia
  4. 4.ICAR-Directorate of Onion and Garlic ResearchPuneIndia

Personalised recommendations