Advertisement

3 Biotech

, 9:136 | Cite as

BaCf3: highly thermostable bacteriocin from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens BTSS3 antagonistic on food-borne pathogens

  • E. S. Bindiya
  • K. J. Tina
  • Raghul Subin Sasidharan
  • Sarita G. BhatEmail author
Short Reports
  • 36 Downloads

Abstract

In the present study, we characterized bacteriocin BaCf3, isolated and purified from Bacillus amyloliquefaciens BTSS3, and demonstrated its inhibitory potential on growth and biofilm formation of certain food spoilage bacteria and pathogens. Purification was by gel filtration chromatography and its molecular weight was 3028.422 Da after MALDI-TOF MS. The bacteriocin was highly thermostable withstanding even autoclaving conditions and pH tolerant (2.0–13.0). The bacteriocin was sensitive to oxidizing agent (DMSO) and reducing agent (DTT). The de novo sequence of the bacteriocin BaCf3 was identified and was found to be novel. The sequence analysis shows the presence of a disulphide linkage between C6 and C13. The microtitre plate assay proved that BaCf3 could reduce up to 80% biofilm produced by strong biofilm producers from food samples. In addition, BaCf3 did not show cytotoxicity on 3-TL3 cell line.

Keywords

Bacteriocin Bacillus MALDI-TOF Biofilm Cytotoxicity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge project grants from Centre for Marine Living Resources & Ecology-Ministry of Earth Sciences, Government of India (MOES/10-MLR/2/2007 and MOES/10-MLR-TD/03/2013) given to Dr. Sarita G Bhat, Dept. of Biotechnology, Cochin University of Science and Technology, Kochi, India. The authors also acknowledge Dr. Laxmi. M for providing the biofilm producers.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

13205_2019_1639_MOESM1_ESM.docx (134 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 134 KB)

References

  1. Alley MC, Scudiero DA, Monks A, Hursey ML, Czerwinski MJ, Fine DL, Abbott BJ, Mayo JG, Shoemaker RH, Boyd MR (1988) Feasibility of drug screening with panels of human tumor cell lines using a microculture tetrazolium assay. Cancer Res 48:589–601PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Bindiya ES, Tina KJ, Raghul SS, Bhat SG (2015) Characterization of deep sea fish gut bacteria with antagonistic potential, from Centroscyllium fabricii (Deep Sea Shark). Probiotics Antimicrob Proteins 7:157–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chaieb K, Kouidhi B, Jrah H, Mahdouani K, Bakhrouf A (2011) Antibacterial activity of Thymoquinone, an active principle of Nigella sativa and its potency to prevent bacterial biofilm formation. BMC Complement Altern Med 11:29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Champomier-Vergès MC, Chaillou S, Cornet M, Zagorec M (2001) Lactobacillus sakei: recent developments and future prospects. Res Microbiol 152:839–848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chopra L, Singh G, Jena KK, Sahoo DK (2015) Sonorensin: a new bacteriocin with potential of an anti-biofilm agent and a food biopreservative. Sci Rep 5:13412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Costa GA, Rossatto FC, Medeiros AW, Correa APF, Brandelli A, Frazzon APG, Motta ADS (2018) Evaluation antibacterial and antibiofilm activity of the antimicrobial peptide P34 against Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecalis. An Acad Bras Ciênc 90:73–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Costerton JW, Cheng KJ, Geesey GG, Ladd TI, Nickel JC, Dasgupta M, Marrie TJ (1987) Bacterial biofilms in nature and disease. Ann Rev Microbiol 4:435–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deraz SF, Karlsson EN, Hedström M, Andersson MM, Mattiasson B (2005) Purification and characterisation of acidocin D20079, a bacteriocin produced by Lactobacillus acidophilus DSM 20079. J Biotechnol 117:343–354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Enan G, El-Essway AA, Uyttendaele M, Debevere J (1996) Antibacterial activity of Lactobacillus plantarum UG1 isolated from dry sausage: characterization, production and bactericidal action of plantaricin UG1. Int J Food Microbiol 30:189–215CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goh HF, Philip K (2015) Purification and characterization of bacteriocin produced by Weissella confusa A3 of dairy origin. PLoS One 10:0140434Google Scholar
  11. Heyns W, De Moor P (1971) The binding of 17β-hydroxy-5α-androstan-3-one to the steroid binding β-globulin in human plasma, as studied by means of ammonium sulphate precipitation. Steroids 18:709–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hunt DF, Henderson RA, Shabanowttz J, Sakaguchi K, Michel H, Sevilir N, Cox AL, Appella E, Engelhard VH (2007) Characterization of peptides bound to the class I MHC molecule HLA-A2. 1 by mass spectrometry. J Immunol 179:2669PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. Jackson DW, Suzuki K, Oakford L, Simecka JW, Hart ME, Romeo T (2002) Biofilm formation and dispersal under the influence of the global regulator CsrA of Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 184:290–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Korenblum E, Sebastián GV, Paiva MM, Coutinho CM, Magalhães FC, Peyton BM, Seldin L (2008) Action of antimicrobial substances produced by different oil reservoir Bacillus strains against biofilm formation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 79:97–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Laemmli UK (1970) Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4. Nature 227:680CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Laxmi M, Sarita GB (2014) Diversity characterization of biofilm forming microorganisms in food sampled from local markets in Kochi, Kerala, India. Int J Recent Sci Res 5:1070–1075Google Scholar
  17. Laxmi M, Kurian NK, Smitha S, Bhat SG (2016) Melanin and bacteriocin from marine bacteria inhibit biofilms of foodborne pathogens. Ind J Biotechnol 15:392–399Google Scholar
  18. Lewus CB, Kaiser A, Montville TJ (1991) Inhibition of food-borne bacterial pathogens by bacteriocins from lactic acid bacteria isolated from meat. Appl Environ Microbiol 57:1683–1688PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. Mayr-Harting A, Hedges AJ, Berkeley CW (1972) Methods for studying bacteriocins. Methods Microbiol 7:315–412 18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Niedermeyer TH, Strohalm M (2012) mMass as a software tool for the annotation of cyclic peptide tandem mass spectra. PLoS One 7:e44913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Papanyan Z, Markarian S (2013) Detection of oxidation of l-cysteine by dimethyl sulfoxide in aqueous solutions by IR spectroscopy. J Appl Spectrosc 80:775.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10812-013-9841-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sebei S, Zendo T, Boudabous A, Nakayama J, Sonomoto K (2007) Characterization, N-terminal sequencing and classification of cerein MRX1, a novel bacteriocin purified from a newly isolated bacterium: Bacillus cereus MRX1. J Appl Microbiol 103:1621–1631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Shanks RM, Dashiff A, Alster JS, Kadouri DE (2012) Isolation and identification of a bacteriocin with antibacterial and antibiofilm activity from Citrobacter freundii. Arch Microbiol 194:575–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Shevchenko A, Tomas H, Havlis J, Olsen JV, Mann M (2007) In-gel digestion for mass spectrometric characterization of proteins and proteomes. Nat Protoc 1:2856–2860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Spížek J, Novotná J, Řezanka T, Demain AL (2010) Do we need new antibiotics? The search for new targets and new compounds. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 37:1241–1248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Vincent SS, John SB (2009) Buffers: principles and practice. In: Richard RB, Murray PD (eds) Methods in enzymology. Elsevier Science & Technology Books, Massachusetts, pp 43–56Google Scholar
  27. Wang K, Shindoh H, Inoue T, Horii I (2002) Advantages of in vitro cytotoxicity testing by using primary rat hepatocytes in comparison with established cell lines. J Toxicol Sci 27:229–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wilson K, Walker J (eds) (2000) Principles and techniques of practical biochemistry. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  29. World Health Organization (2015) WHO estimates of the global burden of foodborne diseases: foodborne disease burden epidemiology reference group 2007-2015. World Health Organization No. 9789241565165Google Scholar
  30. Yamamoto Y, Togawa Y, Shimosaka M, Okazaki M (2003) Purification and characterization of a novel bacteriocin produced by Enterococcus faecalis strain RJ-11. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:5746–5753CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • E. S. Bindiya
    • 1
  • K. J. Tina
    • 1
  • Raghul Subin Sasidharan
    • 1
  • Sarita G. Bhat
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of BiotechnologyCochin University of Science and TechnologyCochinIndia

Personalised recommendations