Advertisement

3 Biotech

, 8:314 | Cite as

In silico design of potentially functional artificial metallo-haloalkane dehalogenase containing catalytic zinc

  • Thiau-Fu Ang
  • Abu Bakar Salleh
  • Yahaya M. Normi
  • Thean Chor Leow
Original Article
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

Artificial metalloenzymes are unique as they combine the good features of homogeneous and enzymatic catalysts, and they can potentially improve some difficult catalytic assays. This study reports a method that can be used to create an artificial metal-binding site prior to proving it to be functional in a wet lab. Haloalkane dehalogenase was grafted into a metal-binding site to form an artificial metallo-haloalkane dehalogenase and was studied for its potential functionalities in silico. Computational protocols regarding dynamic metal docking were studied using native metalloenzymes and functional artificial metalloenzymes. Using YASARA Structure, a simulation box covering template structure was created to be filled with water molecules followed by one mutated water molecule closest to the metal-binding site to metal ion. A simple energy minimization step was subsequently run using an AMBER force field to allow the metal ion to interact with the metal-binding residues. Long molecular dynamic simulation using YASARA Structure was performed to analyze the stability of the metal-binding site and the distance between metal-binding residues. Metal ions fluctuating around 2.0 Å across a 20 ns simulation indicated a stable metal-binding site. Metal-binding energies were predicted using FoldX, with a native metalloenzyme (carbonic anhydrase) scoring 18.0 kcal/mol and the best mutant model (C1a) scoring 16.4 kcal/mol. Analysis of the metal-binding site geometry was performed using CheckMyMetal, and all scores for the metalloenzymes and mutant models were in an acceptable range. Like native metalloenzymes, the metal-binding site of C1a was supported by residues in the second coordination shell to maintain a more coordinated metal-binding site. Short-chain multihalogenated alkanes (1,2-dibromoethane and 1,2,3-trichloropropane) were able to dock in the active site of C1a. The halides of the substrate were in contact with both the metal and halide-stabilizing residues, thus indicating a better stabilization of the substrate. The simple catalytic mechanism proposed is that the metal ion interacted with halogen and polarized the carbon–halogen bond, thus making the alpha carbon susceptible to attack by nucleophilic hydroxide. The interaction between halogen in the metal ion and halide-stabilizing residues may help to improve the stabilization of the substrate–enzyme complex and reduce the activation energy. This study reports a modified dynamic metal-docking protocol and validation tests to verify the metal-binding site. These approaches can be applied to design different kinds of artificial metalloenzymes or metal-binding sites.

Keywords

Artificial metallo-haloalkane dehalogenase Artificial metalloenzyme Dynamic metal docking 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was funded by the Ministry of Higher Education (MOHE) Malaysia under Grant ERGS/1-2013/5527134. TA was awarded a Graduate Research Fellowship by the Universiti Putra Malaysia and received a scholarship from the Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia, under the MyMaster program when working on this research.

Author contributions

TA and TCL designed the experiment and drafted the manuscript. TCL, ABS, and YMN reviewed and edited the manuscript. TCL and TA designed the experiments in coordination with ABS and NMY. TA carried out the experiments.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

We declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary material

13205_2018_1333_MOESM1_ESM.docx (18.2 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 18597 KB)

References

  1. Andreini C, Bertini I, Cavallaro G et al (2008) Metal ions in biological catalysis: from enzyme databases to general principles. JBIC J Biol Inorg Chem 13:1205–1218.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00775-008-0404-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. ATSDR US (1989) 1,2-dibromoethane—production, import, use and disposal. pp 81–84Google Scholar
  3. ATSDR US (2001) Toxicological profile for 1,2-dichloroethane. pp 1–297Google Scholar
  4. Auffinger P, Bielecki L, Westhof E (2003) The Mg2+ binding sites of the 5S rRNA loop E motif as investigated by molecular dynamics simulations. Chem Biol 10:551–561.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1074-5521(03)00121-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Barkigia KM, Berber MD, Fajer J et al (1990) Nonplanar porphyrins. X-ray structures of (2,3,7,8,12,13,17,18-octaethyl-and-octamethyl-5,10,15,20-tetraphenylporphinato)zinc(II). J Am Chem Soc 112:8851–8857.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja00180a029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Belkin S (1992) Biodegradation of haloalkanes. Biodegradation 3:299–313.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00129090 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bendl J, Stourac J, Sebestova E et al (2016) HotSpot Wizard 2.0: automated design of site-specific mutations and smart libraries in protein engineering. Nucleic Acids Res 44:1–9.  https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkw416 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bidmanova S, Chaloupkova R, Damborsky J, Prokop Z (2010) Development of an enzymatic fiber-optic biosensor for detection of halogenated hydrocarbons. Anal Bioanal Chem 398:1891–1898.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00216-010-4083-z CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chaudhry GR, Chapalamadugu S (1991) Biodegradation of halogenated organic compounds. Microbiol Rev 55:59–79Google Scholar
  10. Chovancová E, Kosinski J, Bujnicki JM, Damborský J (2007) Phylogenetic analysis of haloalkane dehalogenases. Proteins 67:305–316.  https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.21313 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chovancová E, Pavelka A, Benes P et al (2012) CAVER 3.0: a tool for the analysis of transport pathways in dynamic protein structures. PLoS Comput Biol 8:e1002708.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002708 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Clarke ND, Yuan SM (1995) Metal search: a computer program that helps design tetrahedral metal-binding sites. Proteins 23:256–263.  https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.340230214 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Damborský J, Chaloupková R, Pavlová M et al (2010) Structure–function relationships and engineering of haloalkane dehalogenases. In: Timmis KN (ed) Handbook of hydrocarbon and lipid microbiology. Springer, Berlin, pp 1082–1098Google Scholar
  14. Dudev T, Lim C (2000) Tetrahedral vs octahedral zinc complexes with Ligands of biological interest: a DFT/CDM study. J Am Chem Soc 122:11146–11153.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0010296 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dudev T, Lim C (2008) Metal binding affinity and selectivity in metalloproteins: insights from computational studies. Annu Rev Biophys 37:97–116.  https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.biophys.37.032807.125811a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Franken SM, Rozeboom HJ, Kalk KH, Dijkstra BW (1991) Crystal structure of haloalkane dehalogenase: an enzyme to detoxify halogenated alkanes. EMBO J 10:1297–1302Google Scholar
  17. Gehret JJ, Gu L, Geders TW et al (2012) Structure and activity of DmmA, a marine haloalkane dehalogenase. Protein Sci 21:239–248.  https://doi.org/10.1002/pro.2009 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goldman P (1965) The enzymatic cleavage of the carbon–fluoride bond in fluoroacetae. J Biol Chem 240:3434–3438Google Scholar
  19. Hellinga HW, Richards FM (1991) Construction of new ligand binding sites in proteins of known structure. I. Computer-aided modeling of sites with pre-defined geometry. J Mol Biol 222:763–785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hellinga HW, Caradonna JP, Richards FM (1991) Construction of new ligand binding sites in proteins of known structure. II. Grafting of a buried transition metal binding site into Escherichia coli thioredoxin. J Mol Biol 222:787–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Janssen DB (2004) Evolving haloalkane dehalogenases. Curr Opin Chem Biol 8:150–159.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cbpa.2004.02.012 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Johnson R (2014) Artificial metalloenzymes: encoding copper catalysts. Nat Chem 6:1027–1027.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.2127 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kamachi T, Nakayama T, Shitamichi O et al (2009) The catalytic mechanism of fluoroacetate dehalogenase: a computational exploration of biological dehalogenation. Chemistry 15:7394–7403.  https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.200801813 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kennes C, Pries F, Krooshof GH et al (1995) Replacement of tryptophan residues in haloalkane dehalogenase reduces halide binding and catalytic activity. Eur J Biochem 228:403–407.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1432-1033.1995.0403n.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Khare SD, Kipnis Y, Greisen P et al (2012) Computational redesign of a mononuclear zinc metalloenzyme for organophosphate hydrolysis. Nat Chem Biol 8:294–300.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.777 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Koike T, Inoue M, Kimura E, Shiro M (1996) Novel properties of cooperative dinuclear zinc(II) ions: the selective recognition of phosphomonoesters and their P–O ester bond cleavage by a new dinuclear zinc(II) cryptate. J Am Chem Soc 118:3091–3099.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja953413m CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Koudelakova T, Bidmanova S, Dvorak P et al (2013a) Haloalkane dehalogenases: biotechnological applications. Biotechnol J 8:32–45.  https://doi.org/10.1002/biot.201100486 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Koudelakova T, Chaloupkova R, Brezovsky J et al (2013b) Engineering enzyme stability and resistance to an organic cosolvent by modification of residues in the access tunnel. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 52:1959–1963.  https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201206708 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Krieger E, Koraimann G, Vriend G (2002) Increasing the precision of comparative models with YASARA NOVA—a self-parameterizing force field. Proteins 47:393–402.  https://doi.org/10.1002/prot.10104 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Krooshof GH, Ridder IS, Tepper AWJW et al (1998) Kinetic analysis and X-ray structure of haloalkane dehalogenase with a modified halide-binding site. Biochemistry 37:15013–15023.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bi9815187 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kulakova AN, Larkin MJ, Kulakov LA (1997) The plasmid-located haloalkane dehalogenase gene from Rhodococcus rhodochrous NCIMB 13064. Microbiology 143:109–115.  https://doi.org/10.1099/00221287-143-1-109 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Liu J-Q, Kurihara T, Ichiyama S et al (1998) Reaction mechanism of fluoroacetate dehalogenase from Moraxella sp. B. J Biol Chem 273:30897–30902.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.273.47.30897 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lovell T, Himo F, Han W-G, Noodleman L (2003) Density functional methods applied to metalloenzymes. Coord Chem Rev 238:211–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Makarewicz T, Kaźmierkiewicz R (2013) Molecular dynamics simulation by GROMACS using GUI plugin for PyMOL. J Chem Inf Model 53:1229–1234.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ci400071x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McCall KA, Huang C, Fierke CA (2000) Function and mechanism of zinc metalloenzymes. J Nutr 130:1437S–1446SCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Miner KD, Mukherjee A, Gao Y-G et al (2012) A designed functional metalloenzyme that reduces O2 to H2O with over one thousand turnovers. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 51:5589–5592.  https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201201981 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Morris GM, Goodsell DS, Halliday RS et al (1998) Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function. J Comput Chem 19:1639–1662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Newman J, Peat TS, Richard R et al (1999) Haloalkane dehalogenases: structure of a Rhodococcus enzyme. Biochemistry 38:16105–16114.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bi9913855 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pavelka A, Chovancova E, Damborsky J (2009) HotSpot Wizard: a web server for identification of hot spots in protein engineering. Nucleic Acids Res 37:W376–W383.  https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkp410 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Peat TS, Newman J, Balotra S et al (2015) The structure of the hexameric atrazine chlorohydrolase AtzA. Acta Crystallogr Sect D Biol Crystallogr 71:710–720.  https://doi.org/10.1107/S1399004715000619 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Petrek M, Otyepka M, Banás P et al (2006) CAVER: a new tool to explore routes from protein clefts, pockets and cavities. BMC Bioinform 7:316.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2105-7-316 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Prokop Z, Monincová M, Chaloupková R et al (2003) Catalytic mechanism of the maloalkane dehalogenase LinB from Sphingomonas paucimobilis UT26. J Biol Chem 278:45094–45100.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M307056200 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schymkowitz JWH, Rousseau F, Martins IC et al (2005) Prediction of water and metal binding sites and their affinities by using the Fold-X force field. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:10147–10152.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0501980102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Seffernick JL, McTavish H, Osborne JP et al (2002) Atrazine chlorohydrolase from Pseudomonas sp. strain ADP is a metalloenzyme. Biochemistry 41:14430–14437.  https://doi.org/10.1021/bi020415s CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Seffernick JL, Reynolds E, Fedorov AA et al (2010) X-ray structure and mutational analysis of the atrazine chlorohydrolase TrzN. J Biol Chem 285:30606–30614.  https://doi.org/10.1074/jbc.M110.138677 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sigman JA, Kwok BC, Lu Y (2000) From myoglobin to heme-copper oxidase: design and engineering of a Cu B center into sperm whale myoglobin. J Am Chem Soc 122:8192–8196.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja0015343 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Stepankova V, Khabiri M, Brezovsky J et al (2013) Expansion of access tunnels and active-site cavities influence activity of haloalkane dehalogenases in organic cosolvents. ChemBioChem 14:890–897.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cbic.201200733 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Stsiapanava A, Dohnalek J, Gavira J et al (2010) Atomic resolution studies of haloalkane dehalogenases DhaA04, DhaA14 and DhaA15 with engineered access tunnels. Acta Crystallogr Sect D Biol Crystallogr 66:962–969.  https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444910027101 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. U.S. EPA (2004) Toxicological review of 1,2-dibromoethane (CAS No. 106-93-4). In: Support of summary information on the integrated risk information system (IRIS). EPA/635/R-04/067. 1–240Google Scholar
  50. U.S. EPA (2009) Toxicological review of 1,2,3-trichloropropane (CAS No. 96-18-4). In Support of summary information on the integrated risk information system (IRIS). EPA/635/R-08/010F. 1–247Google Scholar
  51. Ueno T, Koshiyama T, Abe S et al (2007) Design of artificial metalloenzymes using non-covalent insertion of a metal complex into a protein scaffold. J Organomet Chem 692:142–147.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jorganchem.2006.08.043 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Valdez CE, Smith QA, Nechay MR, Alexandrova AN (2014) Mysteries of metals in metalloenzymes. Acc Chem Res 47:3110–3117.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ar500227u CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Van Durme J, Delgado J, Stricher F et al (2011) A graphical interface for the FoldX forcefield. Bioinformatics 27:1711–1712.  https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btr254 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Verschueren KH, Seljée F, Rozeboom HJ et al (1993) Crystallographic analysis of the catalytic mechanism of haloalkane dehalogenase. Nature 363:693–698.  https://doi.org/10.1038/363693a0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Wu S, Zhang C, Xu D, Guo H (2010) Catalysis of carboxypeptidase A: promoted-water versus nucleophilic pathways. J Phys Chem B 114:9259–9267.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jp101448j CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Yeung N, Lin Y-W, Gao Y-G et al (2009) Rational design of a structural and functional nitric oxide reductase. Nature 462:1079–1082.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08620 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Zastrow ML, Peacock AFA, Stuckey JA, Pecoraro VL (2012) Hydrolytic catalysis and structural stabilization in a designed metalloprotein. Nat Chem 4:118–123.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1201 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Zheng H, Chordia MD, Cooper DR et al (2014) Validation of metal-binding sites in macromolecular structures with the CheckMyMetal web server. Nat Protoc 9:156–170.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2013.172 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Cell and Molecular Biology, Faculty of Biotechnology and Biomolecular SciencesUniversiti Putra Malaysia (UPM)SerdangMalaysia
  2. 2.Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Biotechnology and Biomolecular SciencesUniversiti Putra Malaysia (UPM)SerdangMalaysia
  3. 3.Enzyme and Microbial Technology Research Centre (EMTech)Universiti Putra Malaysia (UPM)SerdangMalaysia
  4. 4.Institute of BioscienceUniversiti Putra Malaysia (UPM)SerdangMalaysia

Personalised recommendations