Advertisement

3 Biotech

, 8:281 | Cite as

Cultivated methanotrophs associated with rhizospheres of traditional rice landraces from Western India belong to Methylocaldum and Methylocystis

Short Reports

Abstract

Aerobic methanotrophs associated with Indian rice plants have rarely been cultivated. In the present study, we cultured aerobic methanotrophic bacteria from the rhizosphere regions of rice plants. Rhizospheric soils from seven rice landraces traditionally grown and maintained by tribal people in Jawhar region belonging to part of the Western Ghats in India, were used. Seven methanotrophic cultures were isolated from the last positive dilution (10− 4). Methanotrophs were identified by analyzing the partial methane monooxygenase gene, pmoA gene and three of these belonged to the genus Methylocaldum (gammaproteobacterial, Type I methanotrophs) and four belonged to the genus Methylocystis (alphaproteobacterial, Type II methanotrophs). We present here the first report on the cultivation of methanotrophs from Indian traditional rice landraces originating from a biodiversity hotspot.

Keywords

Methanotrophs Rice rhizosphere Aerobic Methane-oxidizing bacteria Cultivation PmoA Rice landraces Western Ghats 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Pranitha S. Pandit MACS, Agharkar Research Institute for the help during DNA isolation of the cultures.

Author contributions

MCR and RAB planned the work, wrote the manuscript and prepared figures and tables. SP maintained the rice landraces at Jawhar and also did the sampling. RAB performed initial processing of samples and helped in phylogenetic analysis. MCR did all the microbiological and molecular biological work. PKD reviewed the work and helped in writing the manuscript.

Funding

This work was partially supported by DBT BioCARe program (BT/BioCARe/06/840/2012) sanctioned to MCR. We thank both the institutes for providing institutional funds.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

Supplementary material

13205_2018_1306_MOESM1_ESM.jpg (83 kb)
Supplementary Figure 1. Photographs of the grains of various landraces used in this study (Suklya, Bangalya, Najar Bhat, Juna Kolam and Dhaval Bhat) (JPG 82 KB)
13205_2018_1306_MOESM2_ESM.jpg (41 kb)
Supplementary Figure 2. Photomicrographs of four methanotrophs in this study. Cultures 117 and 321 are Methylocaldum species and 47 and 79 are Methylocystis species. Bar represents 5 µm (JPG 41 KB)
13205_2018_1306_MOESM3_ESM.docx (15 kb)
Supplementary Table 1 Details of rice landraces with geographical locations and names of the villages from which they were collected (DOCX 14 KB)

References

  1. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bodelier PL, Roslev P, Henckel T, Frenzel P (2000) Stimulation by ammonium-based fertilizers of methane oxidation in soil around rice roots. Nature 403(6768):421–424.  https://doi.org/10.1038/35000193 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Conrad R (2009) The global methane cycle: recent advances in understanding the microbial processes involved. Environ Microbiol Rep 1(5):285–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Costello AM, Auman AJ, Macalady JL, Scow KM, Lidstrom ME (2002) Estimation of methanotroph abundance in a freshwater lake sediment. Environ Microbiol 4(8):443–450CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dianou D, Ueno C, Ogiso T, Kimura M, Asakawa S (2012) Diversity of cultivable methane-oxidizing bacteria in microsites of a rice paddy field: investigation by cultivation method and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). Microbes Environ 27(3):278–287.  https://doi.org/10.1264/jsme2.ME11327 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dubey SK (2001) Methane emission and rice agriculture. Curr Sci 81(4):345–346Google Scholar
  7. Dubey SK (2005) Microbial ecology of methane emission in rice agroecosystem: a review. Appl Ecol Environ Res 3(2):1–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Garrity G, Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JR (2005) Bergey’s Manual® of Systematic Bacteriology, vol 2. Volume two the proteobacteria part C the alpha-, beta-, delta-, and epsilonproteobacteria, 2 nd edn. Springer, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Leng L, Chang J, Geng K, Lu Y, Ma K (2015) Uncultivated Methylocystis species in paddy soil include facultative methanotrophs that utilize acetate. Microb Ecol 70(1):88–96.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-014-0540-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Ma K, Conrad R, Lu Y (2013) Dry/wet cycles change the activity and population dynamics of methanotrophs in rice field soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 79(16):4932–4939.  https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.00850-13 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Murase J, Hordijk K, Tayasu I, Bodelier PL (2011) Strain-specific incorporation of methanotrophic biomass into eukaryotic grazers in a rice field soil revealed by PLFA-SIP. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 75(2):284–290.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.01007.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pandey VC, Singh JS, Singh DP, Singh RP (2013) Methanotrophs: promising bacteria for environmental remediation. Int J Environ Sci Technol 11(1):241–250.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-013-0387-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pandit PS, Ranade DR, Dhakephalkar PK, Rahalkar MC (2016a) A pmoA-based study reveals dominance of yet uncultured Type I methanotrophs in rhizospheres of an organically fertilized rice field in India. 3 Biotech 6(2):135.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13205-016-0453-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pandit PS, Rahalkar M, Dhakephalkar P, Ranade DR, Pore S, Arora P, Kapse N (2016b) Deciphering community structure of methanotrophs dwelling in rice rhizospheres of an Indian rice field using cultivation and cultivation independent approaches. Microb Ecol 71:634–644. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-015-0697-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Qiu Q, Noll M, Abraham WR, Lu Y, Conrad R (2008) Applying stable isotope probing of phospholipid fatty acids and rRNA in a Chinese rice field to study activity and composition of the methanotrophic bacterial communities in situ. ISME J 2(6):602–614.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2008.34 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Reim A, Luke C, Krause S, Pratscher J, Frenzel P (2012) One millimetre makes the difference: high-resolution analysis of methane-oxidizing bacteria and their specific activity at the oxic-anoxic interface in a flooded paddy soil. ISME J 6(11):2128–2139.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2012.57 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Shenton M, Iwamoto C, Kurata N, Ikeo K (2016) Effect of wild and cultivated rice genotypes on rhizosphere bacterial community composition. Rice 9(42):1–12.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s12284-016-0111-8 Google Scholar
  18. Shrestha M, Abraham WR, Shrestha PM, Noll M, Conrad R (2008) Activity and composition of methanotrophic bacterial communities in planted rice soil studied by flux measurements, analyses of pmoA gene and stable isotope probing of phospholipid fatty acids. Environ Microbiol 10(2):400–412.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1462-2920.2007.01462.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Shrestha M, Shrestha PM, Frenzel P, Conrad R (2010) Effect of nitrogen fertilization on methane oxidation, abundance, community structure, and gene expression of methanotrophs in the rice rhizosphere. ISME J 4(12):1545–1556.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ismej.2010.89 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Strong PJ, Xie S, Clarke WP (2015) Methane as a resource: can the methanotrophs add value? Environ Sci Technol 49:4001–4018CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tamura K, Stecher G, Peterson D, Filipski A, Kumar S (2013) MEGA6: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 6.0. Mol Biol Evol 30(12):2725–2729.  https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst197 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Vishwakarma P, Dubey SK (2010) Diversity of methanotrophs in urea-fertilized tropical rice agroecosystem. Indian J Microbiol 50(2):205–211.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12088-010-0040-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Whittenbury R, Davies S, Davey JF (1970a) Exospores and cysts formed by methane-utilizing bacteria. J Gen Microbiol 61:219–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Whittenbury R, Phillips KC, Wilkinson JF (1970b) Enrichment, isolation and some properties of methane utilising bacteria. J Gen Microbiol 61:205–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bioenergy GroupMACS Agharkar Research InstitutePuneIndia
  2. 2.Central Research StationBAIF Development Research FoundationUruli KanchanIndia

Personalised recommendations