ProCos (Protein Composition Server, script version), one of the machine learning techniques, was used to classify nitrilases as aliphatic and aromatic nitrilases. Some important feature vectors were used to train the algorithm, which included pseudo-amino acid composition (PAAC) and five-factor solution score (5FSS). This clearly differentiated into two groups of nitrilases, i.e., aliphatic and aromatic, achieving maximum sensitivity of 100.00%, specificity of 90.00%, accuracy of 95.00% and Mathew Correlation Coefficient (MCC) of about 0.90 for the pseudo-amino acid composition. On the other hand, five-factor solution score achieved a sensitivity of 96.00%, specificity of 84.00%, accuracy of 90.00% and Mathew Correlation Coefficient (MCC) of about 0.81. The total count of aliphatic amino acids, Ala (A), Gly (G), Leu (L), Ile (I), Val (V), Met (M) and Pro (P), was found to be higher, i.e., 42.7 in case of aliphatic nitrilases, whereas it was 40.1 in aromatic nitrilases. On the other hand, aromatic amino acids, Tyr (Y), Trp (W), His (H) and Phe (F) number, were found to be higher, i.e., 12.7 in aromatic nitrilases as compared to aliphatic nitrilases which was 10.7. This approach will help in predicting a nitrilase as aromatic or aliphatic nitrilase based on its amino acid sequence. Access to the scripts can be done logging onto GitHub using keyword ‘Nitrilase’ or ‘https://github.com/rover2380/Nitrilase.git’.
Aliphatic nitrilase Aromatic nitrilase Amino acid composition Protein composition server (ProCos)
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
The authors are thankful to the Department of Biotechnology, New Delhi for the continuous support to the Bioinformatics Centre, Himachal Pradesh University, Summer Hill, Shimla, India.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests.
Kaplan O, Bezouska K, Malandra A, Vesela AB, Petrıckova A, Felsberg J, Rinagelova A, Kren V, Martinkova L (2011) Genome mining for the discovery of new nitrilases in filamentous fungi. Biotechnol Lett 33:309–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaushik S, Mohan U, Banerjee UC (2012) Exploring residues crucial for nitrilase function by site directed mutagenesis to gain better insight into sequence-function relationships. Int J Biochem Biotechnol 3:384–391Google Scholar
Kumar N, Bhalla TC (2011) In silico analysis of amino acid sequences in relation to specificity and physiochemical properties of some aliphatic amidases and kynurenine formamidases. J Bioinform Seq Anal 3:116–123Google Scholar
Liu H, Gao Y, Zhang M, Qiu X, Cooper AJ, Niu L, Teng M (2013) Structures of enzyme-intermediate complexes of yeast Nit2: insights into its catalytic mechanism and different substrate specificity compared with mammalian Nit2. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 69:1470–1481. https://doi.org/10.1107/S0907444913009347CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yeom SJ, Kim HJ, Lee JK, Kim DE, Oh DK (2008) An amino acid at position 142 in nitrilase from Rhodococcus rhodochrous ATCC 33278 determines the substrate specificity for aliphatic and aromatic nitriles. Biochem J 415:401–407. https://doi.org/10.1042/BJ20080440CrossRefGoogle Scholar