Draft genome sequence of Paenibacillus strain LK1, a phytohormone producing bacterium Genome Letters First Online: 19 January 2018 Received: 14 November 2017 Accepted: 08 December 2017 Abstract
A high-quality draft genome sequence of a multi-antibiotic resistant strain,
Paenibacillus strain LK1 isolated from the rhizosphere of Auricularia auricular is described. Strain LK1 produced several types of phytohormones, which included Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) and Zeatin. Phylogenetic analysis of the 16S rRNA gene of strain LK1 showed a close relationship to P. taichungensis and P. pabuli (99% gene sequence similarity). The genome size of strain LK1 was estimated to be 7.16 Mb that consisted of 82 contigs contained in 49 scaffolds. The G + C content of the genome was 45.63% and it encoded 6499 genes, 115 pseudo genes, 8 rRNAs, 33 tRNAs, and 4 ncRNAs, based on the Prokaryotic Genome Annotation Pipeline (PGAP). Further analysis of the genome of strain LK1 identified 16 genes encoding monooxygenase and six genes encoding cytochrome P450, which may be potentially involved in zeatin biosynthesis. The draft whole genome sequence and annotation of strain LK1 has been deposited at DDBJ/EMBL/GenBank under the accession number (PEII00000000). Keywords Paenibacillus sp NGS WGS Phytohormone Monooxygenase
This whole-genome shotgun project has been deposited at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank under the accession number PEII00000000. The version described in this paper is version PEII00000000.1.
This work was partially supported by a grant from Zhoukou Normal University (no. ZKNU2015107) and a grant from the Education Department of Henan Province (no. 17A180017).
Compliance with ethical standards Conflict of interest
We declare no conflict of interest with respect to this paper.
Colston SM, Fullmer MS, Beka L et al (2014) Bioinformatic genome comparisons for taxonomic and phylogenetic assignments using
as a test case. MBio 5(6):e02136.
https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.02136-14 CrossRef Google Scholar
Delcher AL, Bratke KA, Powers EC et al (2007) Identifying bacterial genes and endosymbiont DNA with Glimmer. Bioinformatics 23(6):673–679.
https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm009 CrossRef Google Scholar
Grady EN, MacDonald J, Liu L et al (2016) Current knowledge and perspectives of
: a review. Microb Cell Fact 15:203.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12934-016-0603-7 CrossRef Google Scholar
Hinsch J, Vrabka J, Oeser B et al (2015) De novo biosynthesis of cytokinins in the biotrophic fungus
. Environ Microbiol 17(8):2935–2951.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1462-2920.12838 CrossRef Google Scholar
Keshishian EA, Rashotte AM (2015) Plant cytokinin signalling. Essays Biochem 58:13–27.
https://doi.org/10.1042/bse0580013 CrossRef Google Scholar
Liang TW, Wang SL (2015) Recent advances in exopolysaccharides from
spp.: production, isolation, structure, and bioactivities. Mar Drugs 13:1847–1863.
https://doi.org/10.3390/md13041847 CrossRef Google Scholar
Luo R, Liu B, Xie Y et al (2012) SOAPdenovo2: an empirically improved memory-efficient short-read de novo assembler. Gigascience 1:18.
https://doi.org/10.1186/2047-217X-1-18 CrossRef Google Scholar
Richter M, Rosselló-Móra R, Glöckner FO et al (2016) JSpeciesWS: a web server for prokaryotic species circumscription based on pairwise genome comparison. Bioinformatics 32(6):929–931.
https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btv681 CrossRef Google Scholar
Rybakova D, Cernava T, Köberl M et al (2016) Endophytes-assisted biocontrol: novel insights in ecology and the mode of action of
. Plant Soil 405:125–140.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-015-2526-1 CrossRef Google Scholar
Soussi A, Ferjani R, Marasco R et al (2016) Plant-associated microbiomes in arid lands: diversity, ecology and biotechnological potential. Plant Soil 405(1–2):357–370
CrossRef Google Scholar
Sun Z, Liu K, Zhang J et al (2017) IAA producing
alleviates iron stress in
L. seedling by both bioleaching of iron and up-regulation of genes encoding ferritins. Plant Soil 419(1–2):1–11.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-017-3218-9 CrossRef Google Scholar
Xie J, Shi H, Du Z et al (2016) Comparative genomic and functional analysis reveal conservation of plant growth promoting traits in
and its closely related species. Sci Rep 6:21329.
https://doi.org/10.1038/srep21329 CrossRef Google Scholar Copyright information
© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018