Advertisement

Nano-scale single layer TiO2-based artificial synaptic device

  • Fatih GulEmail author
Original Article
  • 71 Downloads

Abstract

Synaptic nano-electronic devices for brain-inspired computing have become increasingly popular because of their biological neuron-like properties such as massive parallelism with lower power consumption. Metal oxide-based resistive switching memory devices for the implementation of synapses are of great interest due to their low cost, easy production and complementary metal-oxide semiconductors (CMOS) compatibility. This study presents a simple, single-layer nano-scale TiO2-based artificial synaptic device for neuromorphic applications. The structural properties of the proposed nano-scale TiO2-based device were confirmed via both X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX). The bipolar resistive switching behavior of the device is shown by gradual increases in the low resistance (SET) state and gradual decreases in the high resistance (RESET) state. The synaptic characteristics of the device were resolved by applying voltage pulses. The typical potentiation and depression functions were obtained. Conforming to spike time dependent plasticity (STDP) was also achieved using synaptic weight changes. Homogeneous synaptic behaviors were associated with oxygen vacancies in the TiO2 layer, while abrupt changes in synaptic behavior were ascribed to filamentary transitions resulting from impurities in the metal oxide layer.

Keywords

Artificial synapse Memristor Resistive switching Titanium-dioxide 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The author is grateful to Dr. Hasan Efeoglu and Ataturk University Eastern Anatolian Technology Application and Research Center (DAYTAM), Erzurum, Turkey, for providing the fabrication and measurement facilities.

References

  1. Babacan Y, Yesil A, Gul F (2018) The fabrication and MOSFET—only circuit implementation of semiconductor memristor. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 65:1625–1632.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TED.2018.2808530 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bender H, Chen WD, Portillo J et al (1989) AES and XPS analysis of the interaction of Ti with Si and SiO2 during RTA. Appl Surf Sci 38:37–47.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0169-4332(89)90516-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bharti B, Kumar S, Lee HN, Kumar R (2016) Formation of oxygen vacancies and Ti3+ state in TiO2 thin film and enhanced optical properties by air plasma treatment. Sci Rep 6:32355.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep32355 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bi GQ, Poo MM (1998) Synaptic modifications in cultured hippocampal neurons: dependence on spike timing, synaptic strength, and postsynaptic cell type. J Neurosci 18:10464–10472.  https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.18-24-10464.1998 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burr GW, Shelby RM, Sebastian A et al (2017) Neuromorphic computing using non-volatile memory. Adv Phys X 2:89–124.  https://doi.org/10.1080/23746149.2016.1259585 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dongale TD, Patil PJ, Desai NK et al (2016) TiO2 based nanostructured memristor for RRAM and neuromorphic applications: a simulation approach. Nano Converg 3:16.  https://doi.org/10.1186/s40580-016-0076-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Gale E (2014) TiO2-based memristors and ReRAM: materials, mechanisms and models (a review). Semicond Sci Technol 29:104004.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0268-1242/29/10/104004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gao B, Kang J, Zhou Z et al (2016) Metal oxide resistive random access memory based synaptic devices for brain-inspired computing. Jpn J Appl Phys 55:04EA06.  https://doi.org/10.7567/JJAP.55.04EA06 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gul F (2018) Carrier transport mechanism and bipolar resistive switching behavior of a nano-scale thin film TiO2 memristor. Ceram Int 44:11417–11423.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CERAMINT.2018.03.198 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gul F (2019) Circuit implementation of nano-scale TiO2 memristor using only metal-oxide-semiconductor transistors. IEEE Electron Device Lett 40:643–646.  https://doi.org/10.1109/LED.2019.2899889 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gul F, Efeoglu H (2017) ZnO and ZnO1 − x based thin film memristors: the effects of oxygen deficiency and thickness in resistive switching behavior. Ceram Int 43:10770–10775.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CERAMINT.2017.05.090 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Haukka S, Lakomaa EL, Jylha O et al (1993) Dispersion and distribution of titanium species bound to silica from titanium tetrachloride. Langmuir 9(12):3497–3506.  https://doi.org/10.1021/la00036a026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hebb OD (1949) The organization of behavior; a neuropsycholocigal theory. A Wiley B Clin Psychol 62–78Google Scholar
  14. Hu W, Jiang J, Xie D et al (2018) Transient security transistors self-supported on biodegradable natural-polymer membranes for brain-inspired neuromorphic applications. Nanoscale 10:14893–14901.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C8NR04136A CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hu W, Jiang J, Xie D et al (2019) Proton–electron-coupled MoS 2 synaptic transistors with a natural renewable biopolymer neurotransmitter for brain-inspired neuromorphic learning. J Mater Chem C 7:682–691.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C8TC04740E CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Jiang J, Hu W, Xie D et al (2019) 2D electric-double-layer phototransistor for photoelectronic and spatiotemporal hybrid neuromorphic integration. Nanoscale 11:1360–1369.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C8NR07133K CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jo SH, Chang T, Ebong I et al (2010) Nanoscale memristor device as synapse in neuromorphic systems. Nano Lett 10:1297–1301.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nl904092h CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kuzum D (2018) Neuro-inspired computing with resistive switching devices [guest editorial]. IEEE Nanotechnol Mag 12:4.  https://doi.org/10.1109/MNANO.2018.2849799 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kuzum D, Jeyasingh RGD, Lee B, Wong H-SP (2012) Nanoelectronic programmable synapses based on phase change materials for brain-inspired computing. Nano Lett 12:2179–2186.  https://doi.org/10.1021/nl201040y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kuzum D, Yu S, Philip Wong H-S (2013) Synaptic electronics: materials, devices and applications. Nanotechnology 24:382001.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-4484/24/38/382001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pan X, Yang MQ, Fu X et al (2013) Defective TiO2 with oxygen vacancies: synthesis, properties and photocatalytic applications. Nanoscale 5(9):3601–3614.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c3nr00476g CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sawa A (2008) Resistive switching in transition metal oxides. Mater Today 11:28–36.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-7021(08)70119-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schultz SK (2002) Principles of neural science, 4th ed. Am J Psychiatry 158:662.  https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.158.4.662 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Song S, Miller KD, Abbott LF (2000) Competitive Hebbian learning through spike-timing-dependent synaptic plasticity. Nat Neurosci 3:919–926.  https://doi.org/10.1038/78829 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Strukov DB, Kohlstedt H (2012) Resistive switching phenomena in thin films: materials, devices, and applications. MRS Bull 37:108–114.  https://doi.org/10.1557/mrs.2012.2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Strukov DB, Borghetti JL, Williams RS (2009) Coupled ionic and electronic transport model of thin-film semiconductor memristive behavior. Small 5:1058–1063.  https://doi.org/10.1002/smll.200801323 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Sung C, Padovani A, Beltrando B et al (2019) Investigation of $I-V$ linearity in TaO x-Based RRAM devices for neuromorphic applications. IEEE J Electron Devices Soc 7:404–408.  https://doi.org/10.1109/JEDS.2019.2902653 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Vianello E, Ly DRB, Barbera S La, et al (2018) Metal oxide resistive memory (OxRAM) and phase change memory (PCM) as artificial synapses in spiking neural networks. In: 2018 25th IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits and Systems (ICECS) IEEE. pp 561–564.  https://doi.org/10.1109/ICECS.2018.8617869
  29. Wan Q, Sharbati MT, Erickson JR et al (2019) Emerging artificial synaptic devices for neuromorphic computing. Adv Mater Technol 4:1900037.  https://doi.org/10.1002/admt.201900037 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wu Q, Zheng Q, Van de Krol R (2012) Creating oxygen vacancies as a novel strategy to form tetrahedrally coordinated Ti4+ in Fe/TiO2 nanoparticles. J Phys Chem C 116(12):7219–7226.  https://doi.org/10.1021/jp212577g CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Xie D, Hu W, Jiang J (2018) Bidirectionally-trigged 2D MoS2 synapse through coplanar-gate electric-double-layer polymer coupling for neuromorphic complementary spatiotemporal learning. Org Electron 63:120–128.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ORGEL.2018.09.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Yang JJ, Pickett MD, Li X et al (2008) Memristive switching mechanism for metal/oxide/metal nanodevices. Nat Nanotechnol 3:429–433.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nnano.2008.160 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yang JJ, Miao F, Pickett MD et al (2009) The mechanism of electroforming of metal oxide memristive switches. Nanotechnology 20:215201.  https://doi.org/10.1088/0957-484/20/21/215201 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yu S, Wu Y, Jeyasingh R et al (2011) An electronic synapse device based on metal oxide resistive switching memory for neuromorphic computation. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 58:2729–2737.  https://doi.org/10.1109/TED.2011.2147791 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zhao Y, Jiang J (2018) Recent progress on neuromorphic synapse electronics: from emerging materials, devices, to neural networks. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 18:8003–8015.  https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2018.16428 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electrical and Electronics EngineeringRecep Tayyip Erdogan UniversityRizeTurkey

Personalised recommendations