Effect of thermomechanical treatment on deformational behavior of ferromagnetic Fe–Ni–Co–Ti alloy under uniaxial tension

  • A. N. Titenko
  • L. D. DemchenkoEmail author
  • M. B. Babanli
  • I. V. Sharai
  • Ya. А. Titenko
Original Article


To improve the functional properties of a ferromagnetic shape memory alloy, a thermomechanical treatment that includes drawing followed by quenching and high-temperature annealing was proposed, as a result of which a nanostructured state is formed. Thermomechanical treatment (TMT) increases the alloy thermoelasticity, although it is accompanied by a large temperature hysteresis of martensitic transformation and results in a significant hardening of the matrix, which, in its turn, enlarges the effects of shape memory and superelasticity (or pseudoelasticity). It has been established that TMT of Fe–Ni–Co–Ti shape memory alloy contributes to an increase in reversible superelastic deformation up to ~ 3%. In a superelastic cycle with wide mechanical hysteresis, a large dissipation energy per loading–unloading cycle was gained, that favors the use of this alloy as a damper of mechanical oscillations.


Ferromagnetic iron-based alloys Mechanical stresses Superelastic deformation Shape memory effect Thermomechanical treatment Nanoparticles Hysteresis Grain size 



Shape memory


Shape memory effect


Shape memory alloy


Ferromagnetic shape memory alloy


Thermomechanical treatment


Scanning electron microscope




Martensitic transformations



This research was supported by the laboratories of the Institute of Magnetism and the National Technical University of Ukraine “KPI” of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine and the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that none of the authors have any competing interests in the manuscript. On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.


  1. Chumlyakov YuI, Kireeva IV, Panchenko EYu (2004) Shape memory effects in FeNiCoTi single crystals undergoing γ↔α’ thermoelastic martensitic transformations. Dokl Phys 49(1):47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Chumlyakov YI, Kireeva IV, Kuts OA, Platonova YN, Poklonov VV, Kukshauzen IV, Kukshauzen DA, Panchenko MY, Reunova KA (2016) Thermoelastic martensitic transformations in single crystals of FeNiCoAlX(B). Alloys [Russian Physics Journal] 58(11):1549Google Scholar
  3. Demers V, Brailovski V, Prokoshkin S, Inaekyan K (2009) Thermomechanical fatigue of nanostructured Ti–Ni shape memory alloys. Mater Sci Eng A 513–514: 185Google Scholar
  4. Gun’ko LP, Takzei GA, Titenko AN (2001) Superelasticity of Fe–Ni–Co–Ti alloys with thermoelastic martensite. Phys Met Metallogr 91(6):624–628Google Scholar
  5. Hornbogen E, Jost N (1991) Alloys of iron and reversibility of martensitic transformations, European symposium on martensitic transformation and shape memory properties. J Phys IV France 01(C4):199–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kokorin VV (1987) Martensite transformations in heterogeneous solid solutions [in Russian]. Naukova Dumka, KievGoogle Scholar
  7. Kokorin VV, Gun’ko LP (1995) Tetragonality of martensite lattice and γ↔α transformation parameters in Fe–Co–Ni–Ti alloys. Metal Phys Adv Technol 17(11):30Google Scholar
  8. Kokorin VV, Chernenko VA, Babiy OM (1999) Investigation of reversion stresses generated in Fe–Ni–Co–Ti alloy. Metal Phys Adv Technol 18(2):211–218Google Scholar
  9. Kokorin VV, Kozlova LE, Titenko AN (2002) Temperature hysteresis of martensite transformation in aging Cu–Mn–Al alloy. Scripta Mater 47:499–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kokorin VV, Kozlova LE, Titenko AN, Perekos AE, Levchuk YuS (2008) Characteristics of thermoelastic martensitic transformation in ferromagnetic Fe–Co–Ni–Ti alloys alloyed with Cu. Phys Met Metallogr 105(6):564CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Maki T, Kobayashi K, Minato M, Tamura I (1984) Thermoelastic martensite in an ausaged Fe–Ni–Ti–Co alloy. Scr Metall 18(10):1105–1109. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Nemat-Nasser S, Guo WG (2006) Superelastic and cyclic response of NiTi SMA at various strain rates and temperatures. Mech Mater 38:463–474CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Omori T, Abe S, Tanaka Y et al (2013) Thermoelastic martensitic transformation and superelasticity in Fe–Ni–Co–Al–Ni–B polycrystalline alloy. Scripta Mater 69:812CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Otsuka K, Wayman CM (1998) Shape memory materials. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  15. Sehitoglu H, Zhang XY, Kotil T, Canadinc D, Chumlyakov Y, Maier HJ (2002) Shape memory behavior of single and polycrystals. Metall Mater Trans A 33A:3661–3672CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sehitoglu H, Efstathiou C, Maier HJ (2006) Hysteresis and deformation mechanisms of transforming FeNiCoTi. Mech Mater 38:538–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Tanaka Y, Himuro Y, Kainuma R et al (2010) Ferrous polycrystalline shape memory alloy showing huge superelasticity. Science 327(5972):1488–1490. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Titenko A, Demchenko L (2012) Superelastic deformation in polycrystalline Fe–Ni–Co–Ti-Cu alloys. J Mater Eng Perform 21(10):2011–2206. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Titenko A, Demchenko L (2016) Effect of annealing in magnetic field on ferromagnetic nanoparticle formation in Cu–Al–Mn alloy with induced martensite transformation. Nanoscale Res Lett 11:237. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Titenko A, Demchenko L, Perekos A, Gerasimov O (2017) Effect of thermomagnetic treatment on structure and properties of Cu–Al–Mn alloy. Nanoscale Res Lett 12:285. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Titenko A, Demchenko L, Kozlova L, Babanli M (2018) Effect of thermomechanical treatment on mechanical properties of ferromagnetic Fe–Ni–Co–Ti alloy. In: Stebner A, Olson G (eds) Proceedings of the international conference on martensitic transformations, the minerals, metals & materials series. Springer, Cham, pp 115–120. Google Scholar
  22. Tong HC, Wayman CM (1974) Characteristic temperatures and other properties of thermoelastic martensites. Acta Metall 22(7):887–896. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Zurbitu J, Santamarta R, Picornell C, Gan WM, Brokmeier H-G, Aurrekoetxea J (2010) Impact fatigue behavior of superelastic NiTi shape memory alloy wires. Mater Sci Eng A 528:764–769CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of MagnetismNational Academy of Sciences and Ministry of Education and Science of UkraineKyivUkraine
  2. 2.National Technical University of Ukraine “Igor Sikorsky Kyiv Polytechnic Institute”KyivUkraine
  3. 3.Azerbaijan State University of Oil and IndustryBakuAzerbaijan

Personalised recommendations