Advertisement

The study of Fe-doped CdS nanoparticle-assisted photocatalytic degradation of organic dye in wastewater

  • M. Junaid
  • M. Imran
  • M. IkramEmail author
  • M. Naz
  • M. Aqeel
  • H. Afzal
  • H. Majeed
  • S. Ali
Original Article
  • 7 Downloads

Abstract

Size-tunable nanoparticles (NPs) for pristine cadmium sulfide (CdS) and iron (Fe)-doped (5, 10 and 15%) CdS were synthesized using facile chemical co-precipitation. Size-controlled NPs were prepared with thioglycolic acid (TGA) as the capping agent and their structural, optical, morphological and physiochemical evaluations were performed using X-ray diffraction (XRD), UV–visible spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy, field emission scanning electron microscopy (FESEM) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR). XRD revealed single cubic phase of CdS and later broader peaks upon mixing of Fe, and intensive absorption was recorded in the visible regime upon doping with redshift. FESEM confirmed spherical nanoparticles of Fe–CdS, and Cd–S linkage along with other functional groups was recognized by FTIR. Cd1−xFexS (x = 0, 0.05, 0.10 and 0.15) powder was used as the photocatalyst for methylene blue (MB) degradation in visible light and catalyst in NaBH4’s presence. The control CdS bleached MB faster than doped but doped CdS showed higher catalytic degradation. The Fe-doped CdS NPs showed superior catalytic potential compared to undoped CdS which suggests their use in dye industries, especially leather and tanneries. Additionally, NPs not only show superior catalytic characteristics but also help in cost reduction and complete removal of dyes for wastewater management.

Keywords

Metal oxide Graphene Sol–gel XRD Photocatalytic activity 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by higher education commission (HEC), Pakistan, through start research project no. 21-1669/SRGP/R&D/HEC/2017 and CAS-TWAS President’s Fellowship for international PhD students, China.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors have confirmed no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abdolahzadeh Ziabari A, Ghodsi FE (2012) Growth, characterization and studying of sol–gel derived CdS nanoscrystalline thin films incorporated in polyethyleneglycol: effects of post-heat treatment. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells 105:249–262.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOLMAT.2012.05.014 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Al-Degs YS, El-Barghouthi MI, El-Sheikh AH, Walker GM (2008) Effect of solution pH, ionic strength, and temperature on adsorption behavior of reactive dyes on activated carbon. Dye Pigment 77:16–23.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.DYEPIG.2007.03.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Al-Kdasi A, Idris A, Saed K, Teong Guan C (2004) Treatment of textile wastewater by advanced oxidation processes-a review. Glob Nest Int J 6(3):222–230Google Scholar
  4. Basnet P, Zhao Y (2016) Tuning the Cu × O nanorod composition for efficient visible light induced photocatalysis. Catal Sci Technol 6:2228–2238.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CY01464F CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chauhan R, Kumar A, Chaudhary RP (2013) Visible-light photocatalytic degradation of methylene blue with Fe doped CdS nanoparticles. Appl Surf Sci 270:655–660.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.APSUSC.2013.01.110 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chowdhury S, Saha P (2011) Adsorption kinetic modeling of safranin onto rice husk biomatrix using pseudo-first- and pseudo-second-order kinetic models: comparison of linear and non-linear methods. Clean Soil Air Water 39:274–282.  https://doi.org/10.1002/clen.201000170 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Deng X, Zhang Q, Zhou E et al (2015) Morphology transformation of Cu2O sub-microstructures by Sn doping for enhanced photocatalytic properties. J Alloys Compd 649:1124–1129.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JALLCOM.2015.07.124 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Deng X, Wang C, Shao M et al (2017a) Low-temperature solution synthesis of CuO/Cu2 O nanostructures for enhanced photocatalytic activity with added H2 O2: synergistic effect and mechanism insight. RSC Adv 7:4329–4338.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA27634B CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Deng X, Wang C, Yang H et al (2017b) One-pot hydrothermal synthesis of CdS decorated CuS microflower-like structures for enhanced photocatalytic properties. Sci Rep 7:3877.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-04270-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Desai KR, Pathan AA, Bhasin CP (2017) Synthesis, characterization of cadmium sulphide nanoparticles and its application as photocatalytic degradation of congored. Int J Nanomater Chem 3:39.  https://doi.org/10.18576/ijnc/030204 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Devi RA, Latha M, Velumani S et al (2015) Synthesis and characterization of cadmium sulfide nanoparticles by chemical precipitation method. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 15:8434–8439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dhage SR, Colorado HA, Hahn HT (2013) Photoluminescence properties of thermally stable highly crystalline CdS nanoparticles. Mater Res 16:504–507.  https://doi.org/10.1590/S1516-14392013005000020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dong F, Zhao Z, Xiong T et al (2013) In Situ construction of g-C3 N4/g-C3 N4 metal-free heterojunction for enhanced visible-light photocatalysis. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 5:11392–11401.  https://doi.org/10.1021/am403653a CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Elevathoor Vikraman A, Rosin Jose A, Jacob M, Girish Kumar K (2015) Thioglycolic acid capped CdS quantum dots as a fluorescent probe for the nanomolar determination of dopamine. Anal Methods 7:6791–6798.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5AY01412C CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ertis IF, Boz I (2017) Synthesis and optical properties of Sb-doped CdS photocatalysts and their use in methylene blue (MB) degradation. Int J Chem React Eng 15:.  https://doi.org/10.1515/ijcre-2016-0102
  16. He J, Chen L, Yi Z-Q et al (2016) CdS nanorods coupled with WS 2 nanosheets for enhanced photocatalytic hydrogen evolution activity. Ind Eng Chem Res 55:8327–8333.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.6b01511 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. He W, Wang C, Zhuge F et al (2017) Flexible and high energy density asymmetrical supercapacitors based on core/shell conducting polymer nanowires/manganese dioxide nanoflakes. Nano Energy 35:242–250.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.NANOEN.2017.03.045 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hong E, Kim D, Kim JH (2014) Heterostructured metal sulfide (ZnS–CuS–CdS) photocatalyst for high electron utilization in hydrogen production from solar water splitting. J Ind Eng Chem 20:3869–3874.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JIEC.2013.12.092 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Jiang W, Wu Z, Yue X et al (2015) Photocatalytic performance of Ag 2 S under irradiation with visible and near-infrared light and its mechanism of degradation. RSC Adv 5:24064–24071.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA15774E CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kaur K, Lotey GS, Verma NK (2014) Optical and magnetic properties of Fe-doped CdS dilute magnetic semiconducting nanorods. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 25:2605–2610.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-014-1918-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kriegel I, Jiang C, Rodríguez-Fernández J et al (2012) Tuning the excitonic and plasmonic properties of copper chalcogenide nanocrystals. J Am Chem Soc 134:1583–1590.  https://doi.org/10.1021/ja207798q CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kumar S, Sharma JK (2017) Effect of nickel doping on optical properties of CdS nanoparticles synthesized via. Co-precipitation technique. Mater Sci Res India 14:05–08.  https://doi.org/10.13005/msri/140102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kumar S, Kumar S, Jain S, Verma NK (2012) Magnetic and structural characterization of transition metal co-doped CdS nanoparticles. Appl Nanosci 2:127–131.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-011-0046-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kundu J, Pradhan D (2014) Controlled synthesis and catalytic activity of copper sulfide nanostructured assemblies with different morphologies. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:1823–1834.  https://doi.org/10.1021/am404829g CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Li K-Q, Huang F-Q, Lin X-P (2008) Pristine narrow-bandgap Sb2S3 as a high-efficiency visible-light responsive photocatalyst. Scr Mater 58:834–837.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SCRIPTAMAT.2007.12.033 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ma L, Zhao Q, Zhang Q et al (2014) Controlled assembly of Bi2 S3 architectures as Schottky diode, supercapacitor electrodes and highly efficient photocatalysts. RSC Adv 4:41636–41641.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C4RA07169G CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mercy A, Jesper Anandhi A, Sakthi Murugesan K et al (2014) Synthesis, structural and property studies of Ni doped cadmium sulphide quantum dots stabilized in DETA matrix. J Alloys Compd 593:213–219.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JALLCOM.2013.12.161 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Park JC, Kim J, Kwon H, Song H (2009) Gram-scale synthesis of Cu2 O nanocubes and subsequent oxidation to CuO hollow nanostructures for lithium-ion battery anode materials. Adv Mater 21:803–807.  https://doi.org/10.1002/adma.200800596 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Patel NH, Deshpande MP, Chaki SH, Keharia HR (2017) Tuning of optical, thermal and antimicrobial capabilities of CdS nanoparticles with incorporated Mn prepared by chemical method. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 28:10866–10876.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10854-017-6865-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Qutub N, Pirzada BM, Umar K, Sabir S (2016) Synthesis of CdS nanoparticles using different sulfide ion precursors: formation mechanism and photocatalytic degradation of Acid Blue-29. J Environ Chem Eng 4:808–817.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JECE.2015.10.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Rathore KS, Deepika, Patidar D et al (2010) Cadmium sulphide nanocrystallites: synthesis, optical and electrical studies. In: AIP conference proceedings. American Institute of Physics, pp 145–148Google Scholar
  32. Seoudi R, Allehyani SHA, Said DA et al (2015) Preparation, characterization, and size control of chemically synthesized CdS nanoparticles capped with poly(ethylene glycol). J Electron Mater 44:3367–3374.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-015-3838-x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Shaban M, Ashraf AM, Abukhadra MR (2018) TiO2 nanoribbons/carbon nanotubes composite with enhanced photocatalytic activity; fabrication, characterization, and application. Sci Rep 8:781.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-19172-w CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sivakumar M, Towata A, Yasui K et al (2010) Dependence of sonochemical parameters on the platinization of rutile titania—an observation of a pronounced increase in photocatalytic efficiencies. Ultrason Sonochem 17:621–627.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ULTSONCH.2009.11.013 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Su J, Zhang T, Li Y et al (2016) Photocatalytic activities of copper doped cadmium sulfide microspheres prepared by a facile ultrasonic spray-pyrolysis method. Molecules 21:735.  https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules21060735 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Thambidurai M, Muthukumarasamy N, Agilan S et al (2010) Studies on optical absorption and structural properties of Fe doped CdS quantum dots. Solid State Sci 12:1554–1559.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SOLIDSTATESCIENCES.2010.06.020 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Waly SA, Shehata MM, Mahmoud HH (2017) Synthesis and characterization of CdS nanoparticles prepared by precipitation in the presence of span 20 as surfactant. Russ J Appl Chem 90:292–297.  https://doi.org/10.1134/S1070427217020203 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wan X, Liang X, Zhang C et al (2015) Morphology controlled syntheses of Cu-doped ZnO, tubular Zn(Cu)O and Ag decorated tubular Zn(Cu)O microcrystals for photocatalysis. Chem Eng J 272:58–68.  https://doi.org/10.1016/J.CEJ.2015.02.089 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wang Q, Lian J, Li J et al (2015) Highly efficient photocatalytic hydrogen production of flower-like cadmium sulfide decorated by histidine. Sci Rep 5:13593.  https://doi.org/10.1038/srep13593 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wang A, Wang Y, Yu W et al (2016) TiO2—multi-walled carbon nanotube nanocomposites: hydrothermal synthesis and temporally-dependent optical properties. RSC Adv 6:20120–20127.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA26677G CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Xu X, Zhai T, Shao M, Huang J (2012) Anodic formation of anatase TiO2 nanotubes with rod-formed walls for photocatalysis and field emitters. Phys Chem Chem Phys 14:16371.  https://doi.org/10.1039/c2cp43168h CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Xu X, Gao Z, Cui Z et al (2016) Synthesis of Cu2 O octadecahedron/TiO2 quantum dot heterojunctions with high visible light photocatalytic activity and high stability. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 8:91–101.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acsami.5b06536 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhao Q, Deng X, Ding M et al (2015) One-pot synthesis of Zn-doped SnO2 nanosheet-based hierarchical architectures as a glycol gas sensor and photocatalyst. CrystEngComm 17:4394–4401.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CE00546A CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Fujishima A, Honda K (1972) Electrochemical photolysis of water at a semiconductor electrode. Nature 238:37–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© King Abdulaziz City for Science and Technology 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Solar Cells Applications Research Lab, Department of PhysicsGovernment College University LahoreLahorePakistan
  2. 2.Technical Institute of Physics and ChemistryChinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  3. 3.University of Chinese Academy of SciencesBeijingChina
  4. 4.Biochemistry Lab, Department of ChemistryGovernment College University LahoreLahorePakistan
  5. 5.Department of BotanyGovernment College UniversityLahorePakistan
  6. 6.Department of Food SciencesCholistan University of Veterinary and Animal SciencesBahawalpurPakistan
  7. 7.Department of Physics, Riphah Institute of Computing and Applied Sciences (RICAS)Riphah International UniversityLahorePakistan

Personalised recommendations