Applied Nanoscience

, Volume 9, Issue 3, pp 353–367 | Cite as

Ligand-based stoichiometric tuning in copper sulfide nanostructures and their catalytic ability

  • Mamta Jain
  • Dipak Gorakh Babar
  • Shivram S. GarjeEmail author
Original Article


In this paper, we report the synthesis of copper sulfide (CuxS) nanoparticles (NPs) with different stoichiometry from different Cu(II) thiosemicarbazone complexes. The complexes were used as single-source precursors (SSPs). Solvothermal decomposition of SSPs at 198 °C temperature in the presence of ethylene glycol (EG) leads to the formation of CuxS NPs. Obtained NPs were characterized by different techniques like UV–visible and photoluminescence spectroscopy, Powder X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). They are spherical in shape and shows good photoluminescence properties. The XRD patterns indicate that the solvothermal decomposition of different precursors results into the formation of NPs having different phases, viz., Cu2S, CuS, and mixed Cu2S/CuS. It is observed that the mixed-phase NPs show good photocatalytic activity towards degradation of Methylene Blue (MB) dye compared to other NPs. The composite of mixed Cu2S/CuS phase with carbon nanoparticles (CNPs) was prepared. It is further observed that this composite not only shows drastic increase in degradation of MB but also shows its sonocatalytic degradation.


Thiosemicarbazone Single source precursors Copper sulphide nanoparticles Photo-catalysis Sono-catalysis 



DGB thanks to University Grants Commission, India for providing Dr. D. S. Kothari Postdoctoral Fellowship.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

13204_2018_915_MOESM1_ESM.doc (1.4 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOC 1412 KB)


  1. Abdullah M, Low GKC, Matthews RW (1990) Effects of common inorganic anions on rates of photocatalytic oxidation of organic carbon over illuminated titanium dioxide. J Phys Chem 94:6820–6825. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aisien FA, Amenaghawon AA, Ekpenisi EF (2013) Photocatalytic decolourisation of industrial wastewater from a soft drink company. J Eng Appl Sci 9:11–16Google Scholar
  3. Ajibade PA, Botha NL (2016) Synthesis and structural studies of copper sulfide nanocrystals. Results Phys 6:581–589. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderson FE, Duca CJ, Scudi JV (1951) Some heterocyclic thiosemicarbazones. J Am Chem Soc 73:4967–4968. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Antoniadou M, Sfaelou S, Dracopoulos V, Lianos P (2014) Platinum-free photoelectrochemical water splitting. Catal Commun 43:72–74. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Babar DG, Sonkar SK, Tripathi KM, Sarkar S (2014) P2O5 assisted green synthesis of multicolor fluorescent water soluble carbon dots. J Nanosci Nanotechnol 14:2334–2342. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Biswal JB, Garje SS (2013) Preparation of antimony sulfide nanostructures from single-source antimony thiosemicarbazone precursors synthesis and reactivity in inorganic, metal-organic and nano-metal. Chemistry 43:461–465. Google Scholar
  8. Chen X, Zhang X, Wang Z, Wan J, Qian Y (2006) Biomolecule-assisted hydrothermal synthesis and one-dimensional self-assembly of copper sulfide nanocrystallites. Mater Chem Phys 98:419–421. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen X, Dai J, Shi G, Li L, Wang G, Yang H (2016) Sonocatalytic degradation of Rhodamine B catalyzed by β-Bi2O3 particles under ultrasonic irradiation. Ultrason Sonochem 29:172–177. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Das A, Sahoo RK, Kumar Mishra D, Singh SK, Mane RS, Kim KH (2019) Thermal plasma-inspired synthesis of ZnO1–XMnx dilute magnetic semiconductors for enhanced visible light photocatalysis. Appl Surf Sci 467–468:1059–1069. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Disale SD, Garje SS (2011) Preparation of ternary metal chalcogenide (M1-xFexS, M=Cd and Zn) nanocrystallites using single source precursors. J Organomet Chem 696:3328–3336. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Du Y et al (2018) Preparation of versatile yolk-shell nanoparticles with a precious metal yolk and a microporous polymer shell for high-performance catalysts and antibacterial agents. Polymer 137:195–200. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. El Qada EN, Allen SJ, Walker GM (2006) Adsorption of Methylene Blue onto activated carbon produced from steam activated bituminous coal: a study of equilibrium adsorption isotherm. Chem Eng J 124:103–110. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Feng C, Zhang L, Wang Z, Song X, Sun K, Wu F, Liu G (2014) Synthesis of copper sulfide nano wire bundles in a mixed solvent as a cathode material for lithium-ion batteries. J Power Sour 269:550–555. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ferrari AC, Robertson J (2000) Interpretation of Raman spectra of disordered and amorphous carbon. Phys Rev B 61:14095–14107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gao W et al (2018) Copper sulfide nanoparticles as a photothermal switch for TRPV1 signaling to attenuate atherosclerosis. Nat Commun 9:231. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ghezelbash A, Korgel BA (2005) Nickel sulfide and copper sulfide nanocrystal synthesis and polymorphism. Langmuir 21:9451–9456. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ghosh M, Sonkar SK, Saxena M, Sarkar S (2011) Carbon nano-onions for imaging the life cycle of Drosophila melanogaster. Small 7:3170–3177. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ghribi F, Alyamani A, Ayadi ZB, Djessas K, Mir LE (2015) Study of CuS thin films for solar cell applications sputtered from nanoparticles synthesised by hydrothermal route energy. Procedia 84:197–203. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gorai S, Ganguli D, Chaudhuri S (2005a) Shape selective solvothermal synthesis of copper sulphides: role of ethylenediamine–water solvent system. Mater Sci Eng B 116:221–225. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gorai S, Ganguli D, Chaudhuri S (2005b) Synthesis of copper sulfides of varying morphologies and stoichiometries controlled by chelating and nonchelating solvents in a solvothermal. Process Cryst Growth Des 5:875–877. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Guo Y et al (2011) Detection of reactive oxygen species (ROS) generated by TiO2(R), TiO2(R/A) and TiO2(A) under ultrasonic and solar light irradiation and application in degradation of organic dyes. J Hazard Mater 192:786–793. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Guo R, Qi X, Zhang X, Zhang H, Cheng X (2019) Synthesis of Ag2CO3/α-Fe2O3 heterojunction and it high visible light driven photocatalytic activity for elimination of organic pollutants. Sep Purif Technol 211:504–513. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Halden RU (2015) Epistemology of contaminants of emerging concern and literature meta-analysis. J Hazard Mater 282:2–9. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Harris PJF (2009) Carbon nanotube science: synthesis, properties and applications. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hou L, Shan X, Hao L, Feng Q, Zhang Z (2017) Copper sulfide nanoparticle-based localized drug delivery system as an effective cancer synergistic treatment and theranostic platform. Acta Biomater 54:307–320. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jeragh BJA, El-Dissouky A (2005) Synthesis, spectroscopic and the biological activity studies of thiosemicarbazones containing ferrocene and their copper(II) complexes. J Coord Chem 58:1029–1038. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jia Y et al (2019) Highly efficient (BiO)2CO3-BiO2-x-graphene photocatalysts: Z-Scheme photocatalytic mechanism for their enhanced photocatalytic removal of NO. Appl Catalysis B Environ 240:241–252. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kaczor GB, Chmielowski K, Bugajski P (2017) Influence of extraneous waters on the quality and loads of pollutants in wastewater discharged into the treatment plant. J Water Land Dev 33:73 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kumar RV, Palchik O, Koltypin Y, Diamant Y, Gedanken A (2002) Sonochemical synthesis and characterization of Ag2S/PVA and CuS/PVA nanocomposite. Ultrasonics Sonochem 9:65–70. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kumar P, Gusain M, Nagarajan R (2011) Synthesis of Cu1.8S and CuS from copper–thiourea containing precursors; anionic (Cl, NO3−, SO4 2−) Influence on the product stoichiometry. Inorg Chem 50:3065–3070. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kundu J, Pradhan D (2014) Controlled synthesis and catalytic activity of copper sulfide nanostructured assemblies with different morphologies. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6:1823–1834. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Leng K et al (2018) Construction of functional nanonetwork-structured carbon nitride with Au nanoparticle yolks for highly efficient photocatalytic applications. Chem Commun 54:7159–7162. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Li F, Wu J, Qin Q, Li Z, Huang X (2010) Controllable synthesis, optical and photocatalytic properties of CuS nanomaterials with hierarchical structures. Powder Technol 198:267–274. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Li Z et al (2012) Three-dimensional CuS hierarchical architectures as recyclable catalysts for dye decolorization. CrystEngComm 14:3965–3971 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Li D, Ma J, Zhou L, Li Y, Zou C (2015) Synthesis and characterization of Cu2S nanoparticles by diethylenetriamine-assisted hydrothermal method. Optik Int J Light Electron Opt 126:4971–4973. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Li Q et al (2017) Design and synthesis of Cu@CuS yolk–shell structures with enhanced photocatalytic activity. Nano-Micro Lett 9:35. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Liao X-H, Chen N-Y, Xu S, Yang S-B, Zhu J-J (2003) A microwave assisted heating method for the preparation of copper sulfide nanorods. J Cryst Growth 252:593–598. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lin X et al (2017) Mechanochemistry: a green, activation-free and top-down strategy to high-surface-area carbon materials. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 5:8535–8540. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Liu R, Ma L, Huang S, Mei J, Xu J, Yuan G (2017) A flexible polyaniline/graphene/bacterial cellulose supercapacitor electrode. New J Chem 41:857–864. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lvov YM, Pattekari P, Zhang X, Torchilin V (2011) Converting poorly soluble materials into stable. Aqueous Nanocoll Langmuir 27:1212–1217. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mai W et al (2017) Functional nanonetwork-structured polymers with inbuilt poly(acrylic acid) linings for enhanced adsorption. Polym Chem 8:4771–4775. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Masikane SC, Mlowe S, Gervas C, Revaprasadu N, Pawar AS, Garje SS (2018) Lead(II) halide cinnamaldehyde thiosemicarbazone complexes as single source precursors for oleylamine-capped lead sulfide nanoparticles. J Mater Sci Mater Electron 29:1479–1488. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Meng X et al (2013) Hierarchical CuS hollow nanospheres and their structure-enhanced visible light photocatalytic properties. CrystEngComm 15:5144–5149 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Min Y, Zhang K, Chen Y, Zhang Y (2012) Sonodegradation and photodegradation of methyl orange by InVO4/TiO2 nanojunction composites under ultrasonic and visible light irradiation. Ultrasonics Sonochem 19:883–889. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Nagata Y, Nakagawa M, Okuno H, Mizukoshi Y, Yim B, Maeda Y (2000) Sonochemical degradation of chlorophenols in water. Ultrasonics Sonochem 7:115–120. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Nair MTS, Laura G, Nair PK (1998) Conversion of chemically deposited CuS thin films to ##IMG## [] and ##IMG## [] by annealing. Semicond Sci Technol 13:1164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Novelli AA, Losso C, Ghetti PF, Ghirardini AV (2003) Toxicity of heavy metals using sperm cell and embryo toxicity bioassays with Paracentrotus lividus (Echinodermata: Echinoidea): comparisons with exposure concentrations in the Lagoon of Venice, Italy. Environ Toxicol Chem 22:1295–1301. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Pan W, Huang Y, Cui S, Chen W, Mi L (2016) Fabrication of CuS@Ni3S4-polyacrylonitrile textile fabric with enhanced reusability for the treatment of dyes wastewater. Chem Select 1:3618–3622. Google Scholar
  50. Park C, Ghosh T, Meng Z, Kefayat U, Vikram N, Oh W (2013) Preparation of CuS-graphene oxide/TiO2 composites designed for high photonic effect and photocatalytic activity under visible light. Chin J Catal 34:711–717. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Patterson AL (1939) The Scherrer formula for X-ray particle size determination. Phys Rev 56:978–982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Pawar AS, Mlowe S, Garje SS, Akerman MP, Revaprasadu N (2017) Zinc thiosemicarbazone complexes: single source precursors for alkylamine capped ZnS nanoparticles. Inorg Chim Acta 463:7–13. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Potgieter JH (1991) Adsorption of methylene blue on activated carbon: an experiment illustrating both the Langmuir and Freundlich isotherms. J Chem Educ 68:349. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Prasad KS, Amin T, Katuva S, Kumari M, Selvaraj K (2017) Synthesis of water soluble CdS nanoparticles and study of their DNA damage activity Arabian. J Chem 10:S3929–S3935. Google Scholar
  55. Priya MH, Madras G (2006) Kinetics of TiO2-catalyzed ultrasonic degradation of rhodamine dyes. Ind Eng Chem Res 45:913–921. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rabkin A, Friedman O, Golan Y (2015) Surface plasmon resonance in surfactant coated copper sulfide nanoparticles: Role of the structure of the capping agent. J Colloid Interface Sci 457:43–51. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Rao CNR, Venkataraghavan R (1989) The C=S stretching frequency and the “–N–C=S bands” in the infrared. Spectrochim Acta Part A Mol Spectrosc 45:299–305. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Rzigalinski BA, Strobl JS (2009) Cadmium-containing nanoparticles: perspectives on pharmacology and toxicology of quantum dots. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 238:280–288. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Sagade AA, Sharma R (2008) Copper sulphide (CuxS) as an ammonia gas sensor working at room temperature. Sens Actuators B 133:135–143. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Saharan VK, Pandit AB, Satish Kumar PS, Anandan S (2012) Hydrodynamic cavitation as an advanced oxidation technique for the degradation of acid red 88 dye. Ind Eng Chem Res 51:1981–1989. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Samant KM, Suroshe JS, Garje SS (2014) One-pot solvothermal coating of carbon spheres with ZnS nanocrystallites and their use in the photodegradation of dyes. Eur J Inorg Chem 2014:499–505. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Shabbir M, Akhter Z, Ahmad I, Ahmed S, Bolte M, Ismail H, Mirza B (2017a) Ferrocene-based Schiff bases copper (II) complexes: synthesis, characterization, biological and electrochemical analysis. Inorg Chim Acta 463:102–111. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Shabbir M, Akhter Z, Ahmad I, Ahmed S, McKee V, Ismail H, Mirza B (2017b) Copper (II) complexes bearing ether based ON donor bidentate Schiff bases: synthesis, characterization, biological and electrochemical investigations. Polyhedron 124:117–124. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Shamraiz U, Badshah A, Hussain RA, Nadeem MA, Saba S (2017) Surfactant free fabrication of copper sulphide (CuS–Cu2S) nanoparticles from single source precursor for photocatalytic applications. J Saudi Chem Soc 21:390–398. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Shi B, Liu W, Zhu K, Xie J (2017) Synthesis of flower-like copper sulfides microspheres as electrode materials for sodium secondary batteries. Chem Phys Lett 677:70–74. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Srinivas B, Kumar BG, Muralidharan K (2015) Stabilizer free copper sulphide nanostructures for rapid photocatalytic decomposition of rhodamine B. J Mol Catal A Chem 410:8–18. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Tanveer M et al (2014) Effect of the morphology of CuS upon the photocatalytic degradation of organic dyes. RSC Adv 4:63447–63456. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tripathi KM, Kim T, Losic D, Tung TT (2016) Recent advances in engineered graphene and composites for detection of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and non-invasive diseases diagnosis. Carbon 110:97–129. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Turchi CS, Ollis DF (1989) Mixed reactant photocatalysis: Intermediates and mutual rate inhibition. J Catal 119:483–496. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Wang X, Wang Y, Li X, Liu B, Zhao J (2015a) A facile synthesis of copper sulfides composite with lithium-storage properties. J Power Sources 281:185–191. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wang Y, Gai L, Ma W, Jiang H, Peng X, Zhao L (2015b) Ultrasound-assisted catalytic degradation of methyl orange with Fe3O4/polyaniline in near neutral solution. Ind Eng Chem Res 54:2279–2289. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Wang D, Pillai SC, Ho S-H, Zeng J, Li Y, Dionysiou DD (2018) Plasmonic-based nanomaterials for environmental remediation. Appl Catalysis B Environ 237:721–741. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. West DX, Liberta AE, Padhye SB, Chikate RC, Sonawane PB, Kumbhar AS, Yerande RG (1993) Thiosemicarbazone complexes of copper(II): structural and biological studies. Coord Chem Rev 123:49–71. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Williams DBG, Lawton M (2010) Drying of organic solvents: quantitative evaluation of the efficiency of several desiccants. J Org Chem 75:8351–8354. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wu Y, Wadia C, Ma W, Sadtler B, Alivisatos AP (2008) Synthesis and photovoltaic application of copper(I) sulfide. Nanocryst Nano Lett 8:2551–2555. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Yadav S, Bajpai PK (2017) Synthesis of copper sulfide nanoparticles: pH dependent phase stabilization. Nano Struct Nano Objects 10:151–158. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Zhang H-B, Lin G-D, Zhou Z-H, Dong X, Chen T (2002) Raman spectra of MWCNTs and MWCNT-based H2-adsorbing system. Carbon 40:2429–2436. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Zhao Y, Pan H, Lou Y, Qiu X, Zhu J, Burda C (2009) Plasmonic Cu2–xs nanocrystals: optical and structural properties of copper-deficient copper(I) sulfides. J Am Chem Soc 131:4253–4261. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ChemistryUniversity of MumbaiMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations