Effect of the C and S additives on structural, optical, and photocatalytic properties of TiO2

  • T. KhalyavkaEmail author
  • M. Bondarenko
  • N. Shcherban
  • I. Petrik
  • A. Melnyk
Original Article


Nanoscale composite materials based on titanium dioxide, sulphur, and carbons were obtained. The samples were characterized using X-ray powder diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, transmission electron microscopy, Brunauer–Emmett–Teller and Barret–Joiner–Halenda methods, electron paramagnetic resonance spectroscopy, and ultraviolet–visible and infrared spectroscopy. X-ray powder diffraction revealed the phase of anatase in all composites and appearance of rutile phase for samples with high sulphur content. It was established that composites consist of nanoparticles ca. 6–10 nm. Analysis of nitrogen adsorption–desorption isotherms for the synthesized samples showed the presence of a hysteresis loop which is the evidence for mesoporous structure of the powders. Absorption spectra of nanocomposites showed a bathochromic shift compared with the absorption band of pure TiO2. It was found that modification of titanium dioxide with sulphur and carbons leads to bandgap narrowing of composites. Nanocomposite samples showed higher photocatalytic activity in the destruction of safranin T under ultraviolet and visible irradiation compared to pure titanium dioxide. It can be connected with the participation of additives in the inhibition of electron–hole recombination, prolongation of charges lifetime, increasing of efficiency of interfacial charge separation, and formation of doping electronic states.


Titanium dioxide Carbon Sulphur Nanocomposites Photocatalysis Safranin T 


Author contributions

TK conceived and supervised the research and wrote the manuscript. TK and MB performed the synthesis of S/C/TiO2 composites and investigated its photocatalytic activity. NS made the XRD and IR spectroscopy. IP made UV–Vis spectroscopy. AM made EPR investigations. All the authors discussed the results. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.


  1. Ansón-Casaos A, Tacchini I, Unzue A, Martínez MT (2013) Combined modification of a TiO2 photocatalyst with two different carbon forms. Appl Surf Sci 270:675–684. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barret EP, Joyner LG, Halenda PP (1951) The determination of pore volume and area distributions in porous substances. I. Computations from nitrogen isotherms. J Am Chem Soc 73(3):373–380. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bender ET, Katta P, Lotus A, Park SJ, Chase GG, Ramsier RD (2006) Identification of CO2 sequestered in electrospun metal oxide nanofibers. Chem Phys Lett 423(86):302–306. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bondarenko MV, Khalyavka TA, Camyshan SV, Petrik IS (2016) Photocatalytic properties of titanium dioxide modified with carbon under UV and Vis irradiation. Chem Phys Technol Surf 7(4):432–438. Google Scholar
  5. Bondarenko MV, Khalyavka TA, Shcherban ND, Tsyba NN (2017) Mesoporous nanocomposites based on titanium dioxide and carbon as perspective photocatalysts for water purification. Nanosist Nanomater Nanotechnol 15(1):99–112Google Scholar
  6. Brunauer S, Emmett PH, Teller E (1938) Adsorption of gases in multimolecular layers. J Am Chem Soc 60(2):309–319. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheng CH, Lehmann J, Thies JE, Burton SD, Engelhard MH (2006) Oxidation of black carbon by biotic and abiotic processes. Org Geochem 37:1477–1488. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davydov A (1984) IK-Spektroskopiya v Khimii Poverkhnosti Okislov. Nauka, Novosibirsk (in Russian)Google Scholar
  9. Ding Z, Lu GQ, Greenfield PF (2000) Role of the crystallite phase of TiO2 in heterogeneous photocatalysis for phenol oxidation in water. J Phys Chem B 104(19):4815–4820. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fu XL, Long JL, Wang XX, Leung DYC, Ding ZX, Wu L, Zhang ZZ, Li ZH, Fu XZ (2008) Photocatalytic reforming of biomass: a systematic study of hydrogen evolution from glucose solution. Int J Hydrog Energy 33(22):6484–6491. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Guinier A (1956) Théorie et technique de la radiocristallographie. Dunot, ParisGoogle Scholar
  12. Ivanov S, Barylyak A, Besaha K, Bund A, Bobitski Y, Wojnarowska-Nowak R, Yaremchuk I, Kus-Liśkiewicz M (2016) Synthesis, characterization, and photocatalytic properties of sulfur- and carbon-codoped TiO2 nanoparticles. Nanoscale Res Lett 11:140. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Karmakar S, Biswas S, Kumbhakar P, Ganguly T (2017) Optical properties of TiO2@C nanocomposites: Synthesized by green synthesis technique. Adv Mater Lett 8(4):449–457. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Krasil’nikov VN, Shalaeva EV, Baklanova IV, Melkozerova MA, Kuznetsov MV, Zabolotskaya EV, Gyrdasova OI, Buldakova LYU, Murzakaev AM (2016) Synthesis, structure and spectroscopic characteristics of Ti(O, C)2/carbon nanostructured globules with visible light photocatalytic activity. Bull Mater Sci 39(6):1569–1579. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lei XF, Xue XX, Yang H, Chen C, Li X, Pei JX, Niu MC, Yang YT, Gao XY (2015) Visible light-responded C, N and S co-doped anatase TiO2 for photocatalytic reduction of Cr(VI). J Alloys Compd 646:541–549. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Li X, Xiong R, Wei G (2009) Preparation and photocatalytic activity of nanoglued Sn-doped TiO2. J Hazard Mater 164(2–3):587–591. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lowell S, Shields JE (1998) Powder surface area and porosity. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  18. Rengifo-Herrera JA, Kiwi J, Pulgarin C (2009) N, S co-doped and N-doped Degussa P-25 powders with visible light response prepared by mechanical mixing of thiourea and urea. Reactivity towards E. coli inactivation and phenol oxidation. J Photochem Photobiol A 205:109–115. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Rockafellow EM, Stewart LK, Jenks WS (2009) Is sulfur-doped TiO2 an effective visible light photocatalyst for remediation? Appl Catal B Environ 91:554–562. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sing K, Everett D, Haul R, Moscou L, Pierotti R, Rouquerol J, Siemieniewska T (1985) Reporting physisorption data for gas/solid systems with special reference to the determination of surface area and porosity (Recommendations 1984). Pur Appl Chem 57(4):603–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Teruhisa O, Toshiki T, Maki T, Ryoji I (2004) Photocatalytic activity of a TiO2 photocatalyst doped with C4+ and S4+ ions having a rutile phase under visible light. Catal Let 98(4):255–258. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Trikhleb V, Strelko VV (2016) Method of production of micro-, mesoporous carbon adsorbent: patent 1639892 SU. MKI, В22 F9/02, 9/14 (Buleten, No 16) (in Ukrainian)Google Scholar
  23. Yang GD, Yan ZF, Xiao TC (2012) Low-temperature solvothermal synthesis of visible-light-responsive S-doped TiO2 nanocrystal. Appl Surf Sci 258:4016–4022. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Yao N, Wu CC, Jia LC, Han S, Chi B, Pu J, Jian L (2012) Simple synthesis and characterization of mesoporous (N, S)-codoped TiO2 with enhanced visible light photocatalytic activity. Ceram Int 38:1671–1675. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zhang GS, Zhang YC, Nadagouda M, Han C, O’Shea K, El-Sheikh SM, Ismail AA, Dionysiou DD (2014) Visible light-sensitized S, N and C co-doped polymorphic TiO2 for photocatalytic destruction of microcystin-LR. Appl Catal B 144:614–621. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • T. Khalyavka
    • 1
    Email author
  • M. Bondarenko
    • 1
  • N. Shcherban
    • 2
  • I. Petrik
    • 3
  • A. Melnyk
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Sorption and Problems of Endoecology NAS of UkraineKievUkraine
  2. 2.L.V. Pisarzhevskii Institute of Physical Chemistry NAS of UkraineKievUkraine
  3. 3.Chuiko Institute of Surface Chemistry NAS of UkraineKievUkraine

Personalised recommendations