Effects of heat and mass transfer on peristaltic flow of a nanofluid between eccentric cylinders


In the present investigation, we examined the heat and mass transfer analysis for the peristaltic flow of nanofluid through eccentric cylinders. The complexity of equations describing the flow of nanofluid is reduced through applying the low Reynolds number and long wavelength approximations. The resulting equations are highly nonlinear, coupled and nonhomogeneous partial differential equations. These complicated governing equations are solved analytically by employing the homotopy perturbation method. The obtained expressions for velocity, temperature and nanoparticle phenomenon are sketched through graphs for two as well as three dimensions. The resulting relations for pressure gradient and pressure rise are plotted for various pertinent parameters. The streamlines are drawn for some physical quantities to discuss the trapping phenomenon.


Nanofluid is a type of fluid having nanometer-sized particles (having size less than 10−2) known as nanoparticles. In nanofluid, nanoparticles are suspended in customary heat transfer basic fluids. The nanoparticles used in nanofluid are normally composed of metals, oxides, carbides or carbon nanotubes. Water, ethylene glycol and oil are common examples of base fluids. Nanofluid have their major applications in heat transfer, including microelectronics, fuel cells, pharmaceutical processes and hybrid-powered engines, domestic refrigerator, chiller, nuclear reactor coolant, grinding, space technology and in boiler flue gas temperature reduction. They demonstrate enhanced thermal conductivity and convective heat transfer coefficient counterbalanced to the base fluid. Acquaintance of the rheological properties of nanofluid is found to be very momentous in measuring their capability for convective heat transfer utilizations. Nanofluid have been the core of attention of many researchers for new production of heat transfer fluids in heat exchangers, plants and automotive cooling significations, due to their enormous thermal characteristics. A large amount of literature is available which deals with the study of nanofluid and its applications (Akbar et al. 2012; Manca et al. 2012; Wang and Mujumdar 2007).

Many researchers have been interested in analyzing the applications of peristaltic flow through different geometric shapes. A large number of articles (Srinivas and Kothandapani 2008; Nadeem and Akbar 2009; Sobh et al. 2010; Tripathi 2011a, b; Mekheimer and Abdelmaboud 2008; Mekheimer 2008) have been presented which reveal the properties and behavior of various types of fluids in peristalsis. Due to the non-Newtonian attributes of most of the biofluids, researchers have introduced different models of non-Newtonian fluids depending on their rheological properties (Ellahi and Hameed 2012; Malik 2011; Mahomed and Hayat 2007; Nadeem and Akbar 2010). The three-dimensional analysis of peristaltic flow has also been presented by some of the researchers to describe the peculiarity of different kinds of fluid in space. The influence of lateral walls on peristaltic flow in a rectangular duct has been described by Reddy et al. (2005). Mekheimer et al. (2012) have studied the mathematical model of peristaltic transport through an eccentric cylinders. The concept of nanofluid in peristalsis has been explored by some of the researchers. Nadeem and Maraj (2012) have presented the mathematical analysis for peristaltic flow of nanofluid in a curved channel with compliant walls under the constraints of long wavelength and low Reynolds number. Recently, Akbar and Nadeem (2011) have produced endoscopic effects on the peristaltic flow of a nanofluid. It is to be noted that in the studies (Mahomed and Hayat 2007; Nadeem and Akbar 2010), the flow is taken in a two-dimensional geometry. The peristaltic flow of nanofluid has not been discussed in three dimensions so far.

To observe the effects of space on the peristaltic flow of nanofluid, we intend to study the peristaltic flow of nanofluid through eccentric cylinders. The three-dimensional analysis is made in cylindrical coordinates to observe the flow in tubes. The constitutive equations are simplified by employing the assumptions of low Reynolds number and long wavelength. The graphs for velocity, temperature and nanoparticles concentration are plotted both in two and three dimensions. The expressions for pressure gradient and pressure rise are sketched under the impact of various physical parameters. The trapping bolus phenomenon is also elaborated through streamlines against different quantities.

Mathematical formulation of the problem

Let us consider the peristaltic flow of an incompressible nanofluid between two vertical eccentric cylinders. The geometry of the flow is described as the inner tube being rigid and the sinusoidal wave propagating at the outer tube along its length. The radius of the inner tube is δ, but we would like to discuss the motion to the center of the outer tube. The center of the inner tube is now at the position \(r=\epsilon,\,z=0,\) where r and z are coordinates in the cross section of the pipe as shown in the Fig. 1. Then the boundary of the inner tube is described to order \(\epsilon\) by \(r_{1}=\delta +\epsilon \cos \theta,\) where \(\epsilon\) is the parameter that controls the eccentricity of the inner tube position. Further, we assume that the boundary of the inner tube is at the temperature T0 and the outer tube is maintained at temperature T1. The nanoparticle concentration is described as C0 and C1 at the walls of the inner and outer cylinders correspondingly.

Fig. 1

The simplified model of geometry of the problem

The equations for the two boundaries (Mekheimer et al. 2012) are

$$ r_{1}=\delta +\epsilon \cos \theta, $$
$$ r_{2}=a+b\cos \left[ \frac{2\pi }{\lambda }(z-c_{1}t)\right], $$

where δ and a are the radii of the inner and outer tubes, b is the amplitude of the wave, λ is the wavelength, c1 is the propagation velocity and t is the time. The problem has been considered with the system of cylindrical coordinates (rθz) as radial, azimuthal and axial coordinates, respectively.

The equations for the conservation of mass, momentum, energy and nanoparticle concentration for an incompressible nanofluid are described as (Akbar and Nadeem 2011)

$$ \hbox{div } {\mathbf{V}}=0, $$
$$ \rho_{\rm f}\left( \frac{\partial {\mathbf{V}}}{\partial t}+{\mathbf{V}}\cdot {\mathbf{\nabla V}}\right) =-{\mathbf{\nabla }}p+\mu \hbox{div } {\mathbf{V+}}\rho_{\rm f}g\alpha \left( T-T_{0}\right) +\rho_{\rm f}g\alpha \left( C-C_{0}\right){\mathbf{,}} $$
$$ \left( \rho c\right)_{\rm f}\left( \frac{\partial {\mathbf{T}}}{\partial t}+ {\mathbf{V}}\cdot {\mathbf{\nabla T}}\right) ={\mathbf{\nabla }}\cdot k{\mathbf{ \nabla }}T+\left(\rho c\right)_{\rm p}\left( D_{\rm B}\left( {\mathbf{\nabla }}C\cdot {\mathbf{\nabla }}T\right) +\frac{D_{T}}{T_{0}}\left( {\mathbf{\nabla }}T\cdot {\mathbf{\nabla}}T\right) \right), $$
$$ \left( \frac{\partial {\mathbf{C}}}{\partial t}+{\mathbf{V}}\cdot {\mathbf{\nabla C}}\right) =D_{\rm B}{\mathbf{\nabla }}^{2}C+\frac{D_{T}}{T_{0}}{\mathbf{\nabla }}^{2}T, $$

where ρf is the density of the incompressible fluid, \(\left( \rho c\right)_{\rm f}\) is the heat capacity of the fluid, \(\left( \rho c\right)_{\rm p}\) gives the effective heat capacity of the nanoparticle material, k implies thermal conductivity, g stands for constant of gravity, μ is the viscosity of the fluid, d/dt gives the material time derivative, P is the pressure, C denotes the nanoparticle concentration, DB is the Brownian diffusion coefficient and D T is the thermophoretic diffusion coefficient.

We introduce a wave frame (rz) moving with velocity c1 away from the fixed frame (RZ) by the transformations

$$ z=Z-c_{1}t,\,r=R,\,w=W-c_{1},\,u=U,\,p=P. $$

Let us assume that the velocity field for the flow is \(\mathbf{V}=(u,0,w).\) The dimensionless parameters used in the problem are defined as follows

$$ \begin{aligned} &p^{\prime}=\frac{a^{2}}{\mu c\lambda }p,\,w^{\prime}= \frac{w}{c},\,u^{\prime}=\frac{\lambda }{ac}u,\,V^{\prime}=\frac{V}{c},\,z^{\prime}=\frac{z}{\lambda },\, r^{\prime}=\frac{r}{a},\, \theta^{\prime }=\theta ,\, t^{\prime}= \frac{c}{\lambda }t,\, \phi=\frac{b}{a},\\ &\epsilon^{\prime}=\frac{\epsilon }{a},\, \hbox{Re}=\frac{ \rho ca}{\mu },\, \delta^{\prime}=\frac{\delta }{a},\, \bar{\theta }=\frac{T-T_{0}}{T_{1}-T_{0}},\, \sigma =\frac{C-C_{0} }{C_{1}-C_{0}},\, P_{\rm r}=\frac{\mu }{\rho \alpha },\, S_{\rm c}=\frac{ \mu }{\rho D_{\rm B}},\\ &\delta_{0}=\frac{a}{\lambda },\, B_{\rm r}=\frac{\rho_{\rm f}g\alpha a^{2}}{\mu c}\left( C_{1}-C_{0}\right) ,\, G_{\rm r}=\frac{\rho_{\rm f}g\alpha a^{2}}{\mu c}\left( T_{1}-T_{0}\right) ,\, N_{\rm b}=\frac{\tau D_{\rm B}}{ \alpha_{\rm f}}\left(C_{1}-C_{0}\right),\\ &N_{\rm t}=\frac{\tau D_{\rm T}}{T_{0}\alpha_{\rm f}}\left(T_{1}-T_{0}\right) , \, \alpha_{\rm f}=\frac{k}{\left( \rho c\right)_{\rm f}},\tau =\frac{\left( \rho c\right)_{\rm p}}{\left( \rho c\right)_{\rm f}}, \end{aligned} $$

where Vϕ, Re, δ0PrNbNtGr and Br represent the velocity of the inner tube, amplitude ratio, Reynold’s number, dimensionless wave number, Prandtl number, Brownian motion parameter, thermophoresis parameter, local temperature Grashof number and local nanoparticle Grashof number, respectively. After using the above non-dimensional parameters and employing the assumptions of long wavelength \(\left( \delta_{0}\rightarrow 0\right)\) and low Reynolds number \(\left({ \hbox{Re}}\rightarrow 0\right),\) the dimensionless governing equations (without using primes) for nanofluid in the wave frame take the final form as

$$ \frac{\partial u}{\partial r}+\frac{u}{r}+\frac{\partial w}{\partial z}=0, $$
$$ \frac{\partial^{2}w}{\partial r^{2}}+\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial w}{\partial r }+\frac{1}{r^{2}}\frac{\partial^{2}w}{\partial \theta^{2}}+B_{\rm r}\sigma +G_{\rm r}\theta =\frac{{\rm{d}}p}{{\rm{d}}z}, $$
$$ \frac{\partial^{2}\bar{\theta }}{\partial r^{2}}+\frac{1}{r}\frac{ \partial \bar{\theta }}{\partial r}+\frac{1}{r^{2}}\frac{\partial^{2} \bar{\theta }}{\partial \theta^{2}}+N_{\rm b}\left( \frac{\partial \bar{\theta }}{\partial r}\frac{\partial \sigma }{\partial r}+\frac{1}{ r^{2}}\frac{\partial \bar{\theta }}{\partial \theta }\frac{\partial \sigma }{\partial \theta }\right) +N_{\rm t}\left( \left( \frac{\partial \bar{\theta }}{\partial r}\right)^{2}+\frac{1}{r^{2}}\left( \frac{ \partial \bar{\theta }}{\partial \theta }\right)^{2}\right) =0, $$
$$ \frac{\partial^{2}\sigma }{\partial r^{2}}+\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial \sigma }{\partial r}+\frac{1}{r^{2}}\frac{\partial^{2}\sigma }{\partial \theta^{2} }+\frac{N_{\rm t}}{N_{\rm b}}\left( \frac{\partial^{2}\bar{\theta }}{\partial r^{2}}+\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial \bar{\theta }}{\partial r}+\frac{1}{ r^{2}}\frac{\partial^{2}\bar{\theta }}{\partial \theta^{2}}\right) =0. $$

The non-dimensional boundaries will take the form as

$$ r_{1}=\delta +\epsilon \cos \theta, \quad r_{2}=1+\phi \cos 2\pi z. $$

The corresponding boundary conditions are described as

$$ w=V\quad \hbox{ at }r=r_{1}, \quad w=0\quad \hbox{ at }r=r_{2}, $$
$$ \bar{\theta }=0\quad \hbox{ at }r=r_{1},\quad\bar{\theta }=1 \quad \hbox{ at }r=r_{2}, $$
$$ \sigma =0\quad \hbox{ at }r=r_{1},\quad\sigma =1\quad \hbox{ at } r=r_{2}. $$

Solution to the problem

We use the homotopy perturbation method (He 2006) to solve the above nonlinear, nonhomogeneous and coupled partial differential equations of the second order. The deformation equations for the given problems are manipulated as

$$ \left(1-q\right) \left( {{\mathcal{L}}} \left[\widetilde{w}\right] -{{\mathcal{L}}} \left[ \widetilde{w}_{0}\right] \right) +q\left( {{\mathcal{L}}} \left[ \widetilde{w}\right] +\frac{1}{r^{2}}\frac{\partial^{2}\widetilde{w} }{\partial \theta^{2}}+B_{\rm r}\omega +G_{\rm r}\theta -\frac{{\rm d}p}{{\rm d}z}\right) =0, $$
$$ \begin{aligned} &\left(1-q\right) \left({{\mathcal{L}}} \left[\theta\right] -{{\mathcal{L}}} \left[\widetilde{\theta}_{0}\right] \right) +q\left( {{\mathcal{L}}} \left[ \theta \right] +\frac{1}{r^{2}}\frac{\partial^{2}\theta }{\partial \theta^{2}}+N_{\rm b}\left( \frac{\partial \theta }{\partial r}\frac{ \partial \omega }{\partial r}+\frac{1}{r^{2}}\frac{\partial \theta }{ \partial \theta }\frac{\partial \omega }{\partial \theta }\right)\right.\\ &\quad\left. + N_{\rm t}\left(\left(\frac{\partial \theta }{\partial r} \right)^{2}+\frac{1}{r^{2}}\left( \frac{\partial \theta }{\partial \theta } \right)^{2}\right) \right)=0,\end{aligned} $$
$$ \left(1-q\right) \left( {{\mathcal{L}}} \left[ \omega \right] -{{\mathcal{L}}} \left[ \bar{\sigma }_{0}\right] \right) + q \left( {{\mathcal{L}}} \left[ \omega \right] +\frac{1}{r^{2}} \frac{\partial^{2}\omega }{\partial \theta^{2}}+\frac{N_{\rm t}}{N_{\rm b}}\left( \frac{\partial^{2}\theta }{\partial r^{2}}+ \frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial \theta }{\partial r}+\frac{1}{r^{2}}\frac{\partial^{2}\theta }{\partial \theta^{2}}\right) \right) =0. $$

The linear operator is chosen as \({{\mathcal{L}} =\frac{1}{r}\frac{\partial }{\partial r}\left( r\frac{\partial }{\partial r}\right) .}\) We suggest the following initial guesses for \(w,\,\bar{\theta}\) and σ

$$ \widetilde{w}_{0}=\frac{V\left( \log \left( r\right) -\log \left(r_{2}\right) \right) }{\log \left( r_{1}\right) -\log \left(r_{2}\right) }, \quad \widetilde{\theta }_{0}=\frac{\log \left( r_{1}\right) -\log \left( r\right) }{\log \left( r_{1}\right)-\log \left( r_{2}\right) }= \widetilde{\sigma }_{0}. $$

Now, we describe

$$ \widetilde{w}\left(r,\theta ,z,q\right) =w_{0}+qw_{1}+{\cdots} $$
$$ \theta \left(r, \theta, z, q \right) =\bar{\theta }_{0} + q \bar{\theta}_{1}+{\cdots} $$
$$ \omega \left(r, \theta, z, q\right) = \sigma_{0}+q \sigma_{1}+{\cdots} $$

Combining Eqs. (19)–(21) with Eqs. (15)–(17) and comparing the terms of the first two orders, we have the following systems.

Zeroth order system

$$ {{\mathcal{L}}} \left[ w_{0}\right] -{{\mathcal{L}}} \left[ \widetilde{w}_{0}\right] =0, $$
$$ w_{0}=0,\quad \hbox{ at }r=r_{2}, \quad w_{0}=V,\quad \hbox{ at }r=r_{1}, $$
$$ {{\mathcal{L}}} \left[ \bar{\theta }_{0}\right] -{{\mathcal{L}}} \left[ \widetilde{\theta }_{0}\right] =0, $$
$$ \bar{\theta }_{0}=1,\quad \hbox{ at }r=r_{2}, \quad \bar{\theta }_{0}=0,\quad \hbox{ at }r=r_{1}, $$
$$ {{\mathcal{L}}} \left[ \sigma_{0}\right] -{{\mathcal{L}}} \left[ \widetilde{\sigma }_{0}\right] =0, $$
$$ \sigma_{0}=1,\quad \hbox{ at }r=r_{2}, \quad \sigma_{0}=0,\quad \hbox{ at }r=r_{1}, $$

The solutions of the above zeroth order systems can be obtained by using Eqs. (18), (22)–(27) and are found as

$$ w_{0}\left( r, \theta, z, q \right) =\frac{V\left( \log \left( r\right) -\log \left( r_{2}\right) \right) }{\log \left( r_{1}\right) -\log \left( r_{2}\right) },\, \bar{\theta }_{0}=\frac{\log \left( r_{1}\right) -\log \left( r\right) }{\log \left( r_{1}\right) -\log \left( r_{2}\right) }, \, \sigma_{0}=\frac{\log \left( r_{1}\right) -\log \left( r\right) }{ \log \left( r_{1}\right) -\log \left( r_{2}\right) }. $$

First order system

$$ {{\mathcal{L}}} \left[ w_{1}\right] +\frac{1}{r^{2}}\frac{\partial^{2}w_{0}}{ \partial \theta^{2}}+B_{\rm r}\sigma_{0}+G_{\rm r}\bar{\theta }_{0}-\frac{{\rm d}p}{{\rm d}z}=0, $$
$$ w_{1}=0,\quad \hbox{ at }r=r_{2}, \quad w_{1}=0,\quad \hbox{ at }r=r_{1}, $$
$$ {{\mathcal{L}}} \left[ \bar{\theta }_{1}\right] +\frac{1}{r^{2}}\frac{ \partial^{2}\bar{\theta }_{0}}{\partial \theta^{2}}+N_{\rm b}\left( \frac{ \partial \bar{\theta }_{0}}{\partial r}\frac{\partial \sigma_{0}}{ \partial r}+\frac{1}{r^{2}}\frac{\partial \bar{\theta }_{0}}{\partial \theta }\frac{\partial \sigma_{0}}{\partial \theta }\right) +N_{\rm t}\left( \left( \frac{\partial \bar{\theta }_{0}}{\partial r}\right)^{2}+\frac{1 }{r^{2}}\left( \frac{\partial \bar{\theta }_{0}}{\partial \theta } \right)^{2}\right) =0, $$
$$ \bar{\theta }_{1}=0,\quad \hbox{ at }r=r_{2}, \quad \bar{\theta }_{1}=0,\quad \hbox{ at }r=r_{1}, $$
$$ {{\mathcal{L}}} \left[ \sigma_{1}\right] +\frac{1}{r^{2}}\frac{\partial^{2}\sigma_{0}}{\partial \theta^{2}}+\frac{N_{\rm t}}{N_{\rm b}}\left( \frac{ \partial^{2}\bar{\theta }_{0}}{\partial r^{2}}+\frac{1}{r}\frac{ \partial \bar{\theta }_{0}}{\partial r}+\frac{1} {r^{2}}\frac{\partial^{2}\bar{\theta }_{0}}{\partial \theta^{2}}\right) =0, $$
$$ \sigma_{1}=1,\quad \hbox{ at }r=r_{2}, \quad \sigma_{1}=0,\quad \hbox{ at }r=r_{1}. $$

The solutions of the above nonlinear ordinary differential equations are found as

$$ \begin{aligned} u_{1} = \,& (-2(r-r_{1})(r-r_{2})(r_{1}-r_{2}) ( 2 ( r_{2}-\delta )^{2} ( B_{\rm r}(r+r_{1}+r_{2}-3\delta ) \\ & +G_{\rm r}(r+r_{1}+r_{2}-3\delta) G_{\rm r}(r+r_{1}+r_{2}-3\delta )+ 3\frac{{\rm d}p}{{\rm d}z}(-r_{2}+\delta )) \\& +( B_{\rm r}(r+r_{1}+7r_{2}-9\delta ) +G_{\rm r}(r+r_{1}+7r_{2}+G_{\rm r}(r+r_{1}+7r_{2}-9\delta ) +9\frac{{\rm d}p}{{\rm d}z}(-r_{2}+\delta )) \epsilon^{2}) \\ &+\epsilon \left( 3 \left( B_{\rm r}+G_{\rm r}-\frac{{\rm d}p}{{\rm d}z}\right) (r-r_{1})(r-r_{2})(r_{1}- r_{2})\epsilon^{2}\cos [3\theta ] +36V\epsilon ( (r_{1}-r_{2})(r+r_{2}) \log ( r) \right. \\&\left. -(r-r_{2})(r_{1}+r_{2})\log ( r_{1}) +2(r-r_{1})r_{2} \log ( r_{2}) \right) +\cos [\theta ] \left( (r-r_{1})(r-r_{2})(r_{1}-r_{2}) (4(r_{2}-\delta) \right. \\ & \times \left(2B_{\rm r}r +2G_{\rm r}r+2B_{\rm r}r_{1}+2G_{\rm r}r_{1} + 5B_{\rm r}r_{2}+5G_{\rm r}r_{2}-9r_{2}\frac{{\rm d}p}{{\rm d}z} -9 \left( B_{\rm r}+G_{\rm r}- \frac{{\rm d}p}{{\rm d}z} \right) \delta \right) \\ & \left. +9 \left( B_{\rm r}+G_{\rm r}-\frac{{\rm d}p}{{\rm d}z}\right) \epsilon^{2} \right) +24V(r_{2}-\delta) (-(r_{1}-r_{2})(r+r_{2})\log ( r ) +(r-r_{2})(r_{1}+r_{2})\log ( r_{1} ) \\ & +2(-r+r_{1})r_{2}\log ( r_{2} ) ))-2\epsilon \cos [2\theta] (6(r_{1}-r_{2})(r+r_{2})V\log ( r ) -6(r-r_{2})(r_{1}+r_{2})V\log ( r_{1}) \\ & +(r-r_{1})((r-r_{2})(r_{1}-r_{2})(B_{\rm r} (r+r_{1}+7r_{2}-9\delta )+G_{\rm r}(r+r_{1}+7r_{2}-9\delta )+ 9\frac{{\rm d}p}{{\rm d}z}(-r_{2}+\delta )) \\& +12r_{2}V\log ( r_{2}) )) ) )/ ( 24(r_{1}-r_{2})(r_{2}-\delta -\epsilon \cos [\theta ])^{3}), \end{aligned} $$
$$ \begin{aligned} \theta_{1} =&- \left( \left( \log ( r ) -\log ( r_{2} ) \right) \left( \log ( r ) -\log ( r_{1} ) \right) \left( N_{\rm b}\epsilon^{2} ( \log r )^{2} +N_{\rm t}\epsilon^{2} ( \log r )^{2}+4\epsilon^{2}\log ( r ) \log ( r_{2}) \right. \right.\\ & -3N_{\rm b}\epsilon^{2}\log \left( r\right) \log \left( r_{2}\right) -3N_{\rm t}\epsilon^{2}\log \left( r\right) \log \left( r_{2}\right) +12N_{\rm b}\delta^{2}\left( \log r_{2}\right)^{2}+12N_{\rm t}\delta^{2} \left( \log r_{2}\right)^{2}\\ &-8\epsilon^{2}\left( \log r_{2}\right)^{2}+9N_{\rm b}\epsilon^{2}\left( \log r_{2}\right)^{2}+9N_{\rm t}\epsilon^{2}\left( \log r_{2}\right)^{2}-4\epsilon^{2}\log \left( r\right) \left( \log r_{2}\right)^{2} +8\epsilon^{2}\log \left( r_{2}\right)^{3}\\ &+4\delta \epsilon \cos [\theta ](\log \left( r_{2}\right) -\log \left( r_{1}\right) )^{2}(6N_{\rm b}+6N_{\rm t}-\log \left( r\right) +2\log \left( r_{2}\right) -\log \left( r_{1}\right) )\\ &-4\epsilon^{2}\log \left( r\right) \log [\delta +\epsilon \cos [\theta ] ] +N_{\rm b}\epsilon^{2}\log \left( r\right) \log \left( r_{1}\right) +N_{\rm t}\epsilon^{2}\log \left( r\right) \log \left( r_{1}\right)\\ &-24N_{\rm b}\delta^{2}\log \left( r_{2}\right) \log \left( r_{1}\right) -24N_{\rm t}\delta^{2}\log \left( r_{2}\right) \log \left( r_{1}\right) +12\epsilon^{2}\log \left( r_{2}\right) \log \left( r_{1}\right)\\ & -15N_{\rm b}\epsilon^{2}\log \left( r_{2}\right) \log \left( r_{1}\right) -15N_{\rm t}\epsilon^{2}\log \left( r_{2}\right) \log \left( r_{1}\right) +8\epsilon^{2}\log \left( r\right) \log \left( r_{2}\right) \log \left( r_{1}\right)\\ & -20\epsilon^{2}\left( \log r_{2}\right)^{2}\log \left( r_{1}\right) +12N_{\rm b}\delta^{2}\left( \log \left( r_{1}\right) \right)^{2}+12N_{\rm t}\delta^{2}\left( \log \left( r_{1}\right) \right)^{2}-4\epsilon^{2}\left( \log \left( r_{1}\right) \right)^{2}\\ & +7N_{\rm b}\epsilon^{2}\left( \log \left( r_{1}\right) \right)^{2}+7N_{\rm t}\epsilon^{2}\left( \log \left( r_{1}\right) \right)^{2}-4\epsilon^{2}\log \left( r\right) \left( \log \left( r_{1}\right) \right)^{2}+16\epsilon^{2}\log \left( r_{2}\right) \left( \log \left( r_{1}\right) \right)^{2}\\ & -4\epsilon^{2}\left( \log \left( r_{1}\right) \right)^{3}-\epsilon^{2}\cos [2\theta ]((N_{\rm b}+N_{\rm t})\left( \log r\right)^{2}-(8+3N_{\rm b}+3N_{\rm t})\left( \log r_{2}\right)^{2}\\ & +3(4+3N_{\rm b}+3N_{\rm t})\log \left( r_{2}\right)\left( \log \left( r_{1}\right) \right) -(4+5N_{\rm b}+5N_{\rm t})\left( \log \left( r_{1}\right) \right)^{2}+\log \left( r\right) ((4-3N_{\rm b}-3N_{\rm t})\log \left( r_{2}\right)\\ &\left.\left. +(-4+N_{\rm b}+N_{\rm t})\left( \log \left( r_{1}\right) \right) ))))/(24(r_{1})^{2}((\log \left( r_{2}\right) -\left( \log \left( r_{1}\right) \right))^{4}\right)\right), \end{aligned} $$
$$ \begin{aligned} \sigma_{1}=\,&\left( (N_{\rm b}+N_{\rm t})\epsilon (\log \left( r\right) -\log \left( r_{2}\right) )\right. \left( -\epsilon +\epsilon \cos [2\theta ]+\right. (\epsilon +\delta \cos [\theta ])(\log \left( r_{2}\right) -\log \left( r_{1}\right))) (\log ( r ) \\ &-\log \left( r_{1}\right) )(\log \left( r\right) -2\log \left( r_{2}\right) +\log \left( r_{1}\right) ))/6N_{\rm b}r_{1}{}^{2}(\log \left( r_{2}\right) -\log \left( r_{1}\right))^{3}. \end{aligned} $$

For \(q\rightarrow 1,\) we approach the final solution. So from Eqs. (19)–(21), we get

$$ w\left( r,\theta ,z\right) =w_{0}+w_{1}, $$
$$ \bar{\theta }\left( r,\theta ,z\right) =\theta_{0}+\theta_{1}, $$
$$ \sigma \left( r,\theta ,z\right) =\sigma_{0}+\sigma_{1}, $$

where w0θ0σ0,  w1θ1 and σ1 are defined in Eqs. (28) and (35)–(37), respectively. The instantaneous volume flow rate \(\bar{Q}\) is given by

$$ \bar{Q}=2\pi \int\limits_{r_{1}}^{r_{2}}rwdr. $$

The mean volume flow rate Q over one period is given as [16]

$$ Q\left( z, t\right) =\frac{\bar{Q}}{\pi }-\frac{\phi^{2}}{2}+2\phi \cos \left[ 2\pi \left( z-t\right) \right] +\phi^{2}\cos^{2}[2\pi \left( z-t\right) ]. $$

Now we can evaluate the pressure gradient dp/dz by solving Eqs. (41) and (42) and is elaborated as

$$ \begin{aligned} \frac{{\rm d}p}{{\rm d}z} =&\frac{1}{60\pi (r_{1}-r_{2})^{3}(r_{1}+r_{2})(r_{2}-\delta -\epsilon \cos [\theta ])^{3}}(15\epsilon^{3}(24Q-(B_{\rm r}+G_{\rm r})\pi (r_{1}-r_{2})^{3}(r_{1}+r_{2}) \\ &+12\pi \phi (4\cos [2\pi (-t+z)]+\phi \cos [4\pi (-t+z)]))\cos [3\theta ]\\ & +2\epsilon^{2}\cos [2\theta ](2\pi ((B_{\rm r}+G_{\rm r})(r_{1}-r_{2})^{3}(4r_{1}^{2}+22r_{1}r_{2}+19r_{2}^{2})-5(8r_{1}^{3}-27r_{1}^{2}r_{2}+19r_{2}^{3})V)\\ & -1080Q(r_{2}-\delta )-45(B_{\rm r}+G_{\rm r})\pi (r_{1}-r_{2})^{3}(r_{1}+r_{2})\delta +60\pi (36(-r_{2}+\delta )\phi \cos [2\pi (-t+z)]\\ &+9(-r_{2}+\delta )\phi^{2}\cos [4\pi (-t+z)]-r_{2}(2r_{1}^{2}+2r_{1}r_{2}+r_{2}^{2})V (\log ( r_{1} ) -\log ( r_{2} ))))\\ &+\epsilon \cos [\theta ](-B_{\rm r}\pi (r_{1}-r_{2})^{3}(4(r_{2}-\delta )(16r_{1}^{2}+43r_{1}r_{2}+31 r_{2}^{2}-45(r_{1}+r_{2})\delta )\\ &+45(r_{1}+r_{2})\epsilon^{2})-G_{\rm r}\pi (r_{1}-r_{2})^{3}(4(r_{2}-\delta )(16r_{1}^{2}+43r_{1}r_{2} +31r_{2}^{2}-45(r_{1}+r_{2})\delta )\\ &+45(r_{1}+r_{2})\epsilon^{2})+40(\pi (r_{1}-r_{2})(28r_{1}^{2}+r_{1}r_{2}+r_{2}^{2})V (r_{2}-\delta )+27Q(4(r_{2}-\delta )^{2}+\epsilon^{2}))\\ &+60\pi (36(4(r_{2}-\delta )^{2}+\epsilon^{2})\phi \cos [2\pi (-t+z)] +9(4(r_{2}-\delta )^{2}+\epsilon^{2})\phi^{2}\cos [4\pi (-t+z)]\\ &-4r_{2}(2r_{1}^{2}+2r_{1}r_{2}+r_{2}^{2})V(r_{2}-\delta ) (\log \left( r_{1}\right) -\log \left( r_{2}\right) ))) +2(-120(\pi (r_{1}-r_{2})^{2}(2r_{1}+r_{2})V\\ &+6Q(r_{2}-\delta ))(r_{2}-\delta )^{2} -30(\pi (8r_{1}^{3}+3r_{1}^{2}r_{2}-11r_{2}^{3})V +36Q(r_{2}-\delta ))\epsilon^{2}\\ &+B_{\rm r}\pi (r_{1}-r_{2})^{3}(2(r_{2}-\delta )^{2}(8 r_{1}^{2}+14r_{1}r_{2}+8r_{2}^{2}-15(r_{1}+r_{2})\delta )\\ &+(8r_{1}^{2}+44r_{1}r_{2}+38r_{2}^{2}-45(r_{1}+r_{2})\delta )(\epsilon^{2})) +G_{\rm r}\pi (r_{1}-r_{2})^{3}(2(r_{2}-\delta )^{2}\\ &\times(8r_{1}^{2}+14r_{1}r_{2}+8r_{2}^{2}-15(r_{1}+r_{2})\delta )+(8r_{1}^{2}+44r_{1}r_{2}+38r_{2}^{2}-45(r_{1}+r_{2})\delta )\epsilon^{2})\\ &+180\pi (-4(r_{2}-\delta )(2(r_{2}-\delta )^{2}+3\epsilon^{2})\phi \cos [2\pi (-t+z)] -(r_{2}-\delta )(2(r_{2}-\delta )^{2}+3\epsilon^{2})\\ &\times\phi^{2}\cos [4\pi (-t+z)]+r_{2}(2r_{1}^{2}+2r_{1}r_{2}+r_{2}^{2})V\epsilon^{2}(\log \left( r_{1}\right) -\log \left( r_{2}\right) )))). \end{aligned} $$

The pressure rise \(\delta p\) in the non-dimensional form is defined as

$$ \delta p=\int\limits_{0}^{1}\frac{{\rm d}p}{{\rm d}z}{\rm d}z. $$

Results and discussions

In this section, we discuss the effects of different physical parameters on the profiles of velocity, temperature and nanoparticles concentration. Three-dimensional analysis is also made to measure the influence of physical quantities on the flow properties in space. The variation in pressure gradient and peristaltic pumping is also considered for various values of pertinent quantities. The trapping bolus phenomenon observing the flow behavior is also manipulated as well with the help of streamline graphs. Figures 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 9 show the impact of different parameters on the peristaltic pressure rise \(\delta p\) and pressure gradient dp/dz, respectively. Variations in velocity profile, temperature distribution and nanoparticle phenomenon under the influence of observing parameters are shown in Figs. 10, 11, 12, 13, 14 and 15, respectively. The streamlines for the parameters Br,  Gr,  Nb and Nt are displayed in Figs. 16, 17, 18 and 19.

Fig. 2

Variation in pressure rise \(\delta p\) with δ and Gr for fixed \(\theta =0.8,\,\phi =0.1,\,B_{\rm r}=0.2,\,N_{\rm b}=0.5,\,N_{\rm t}=0.2,\,\epsilon =0.1,\,V=0.3\)

Figure 2 represents the effects of parameters δ and Gr on the pressure rise \(\delta p.\) It is noticed here that pressure rise is an increasing function of local temperature Grashof number Gr throughout the domain, but for δ, the pressure rise \(\delta p\) increases in the retrograde pumping region \(\left( \delta p>0,\, Q<0\right),\) while decreasing in the peristaltic pumping region \(\left(\delta p>0,\, Q>0\right)\) and augmented pumping region \(\left(\delta p<0,\, Q>0\right).\) Figure 3 shows that \(\delta p\) decreases with the increasing effects of Brownian motion parameter Nb. Figure 4 shows that pressure rise \(\delta p\) varies linearly with local nanoparticle Grashof number Br and the effects of the parameter \(\epsilon \) are the same as that of δ measured in Figs. 2 and 3. Similarly, variation in the thermophoresis parameter Nt produces the same behavior on the pressure rise graph as seen for Gr (see Fig. 5).

Fig. 3

Variation in pressure rise \(\delta p\) with δ and Nb for fixed \(\theta =0.8,\,\phi =0.1,\,B_{\rm r}=0.2,\,G_{\rm r}=0.2,\,N_{\rm t}=2,\,\epsilon =0.2,\,V=0.3\)

Fig. 4

Variation in pressure rise \(\delta p\) with \(\epsilon \) and Br for fixed θ = 0.8,  ϕ = 0.1, Nb = 0.5, Gr = 0.2, Nt = 0.2, δ = 0.1, V = 0.3

Fig. 5

Variation in pressure rise \(\delta p\) with \(\epsilon \) and Nt for fixed θ = 0.8,  ϕ = 0.1,  Nb = 0.5,  Gr = 0.2,  Br = 0.5, δ = 0.1, V = 0.3

We can observe the impact of the parameters local temperature Grashof number Gr and local nanoparticle Grashof number Br on the variation in pressure gradient dp/dz from Fig. 6 when all other parameters are kept fixed. It is noted that the pressure gradient is directly proportional to both the parameters. It is also depicted from the considered graph that the pressure gradient is wider near the walls, but closer in the central part of the geometry which means that much pressure gradient is needed at the boundaries to maintain the flow as compared with the middle part for the parameters Gr and Br. To study the influence of radius δ and flow rate Q on the pressure gradient dp/dz, we prepared the graph shown in Fig. 7. It is seen here that the pressure gradient is a decreasing function of flow rate Q at all points within the flow. However, it has also been measured from this graph that dp/dz decreases in the middle of the flow, but rises at the boundaries of the container. Figure 8 presents the effects of velocity of the inner tube V and \(\epsilon\) on the pressure gradient profile. One comes to know from this graph that dp/dz changes linearly with V, but for \(\epsilon,\) the pressure gradient decreases in the region \(z\in \left[0.9,1.7\right]\) while an increment is observed at the walls of the outer cylinder, i.e., in the range \(z\in \left[ 0.64,0.9\right] \cup \left[ 1.7,1.97\right]\). We can observe the variation in pressure gradient with Brownian motion parameter Nb and thermophoresis parameter Nt from Fig. 9. We can observe that the pressure gradient profile rises directly when the magnitude of both the parameters is varied throughout the flow.

Fig. 6

Variation in pressure gradient dp/dz with Gr and Br for fixed \(\epsilon =0.01,\,\delta =0.02,\,V=0.3,\,\theta =0.8,\,\phi =0.1,\,Q=0.5,\,N_{\rm b}=0.5,\,N_{\rm t}=0.2\)

Fig. 7

Variation in pressure gradient dp/dz with δ and Q for fixed \(\epsilon =0.01,\,G_{\rm r}=2,\,V=0.3,\,\theta =0.8,\,\phi =0.1,\,B_{\rm r}=0.8,\,N_{\rm b}=0.5,\,N_{\rm t}=0.2\)

Fig. 8

Variation in pressure gradient dp/dz with \(\epsilon \) and V for fixed δ = 0.1,  Gr = 2,  Q = 0.5,  θ = 0.8,  ϕ = 0.1,  Br = 0.2,  Nb = 0.5,  Nt = 0.2

Fig. 9

Variation in pressure gradient dp/dz with Nb and Nt for fixed \(\delta =0.05,\,G_{\rm r}=2,\,Q=1,\,\theta =0.8,\,\phi =0.1,\,B_{\rm r}=0.2,\,\epsilon =0.01,\,V=0.1\)

It is observed from Fig. 10 that the velocity profile decreases in the region \(r\in \left[ 0.1,0.55\right],\) but increases in the rest of the domain with increase in the value of δ, while direct variation in velocity is observed in case of flow rate Q in every part of the region. We present Fig. 11 to obtain variation in the velocity profile w for varying magnitudes of parameters \(\epsilon \) and V. The velocity directly varies with V when seen in the range \(r\in \left[0.15,0.6\right),\) but inverse behavior is reported in the zone \(r\in \left[ 0.6,1.05\right]\) while totally reverse investigation is made for the parameter \(\epsilon.\) It is noticed from Fig. 12 that the velocity profile w increases when we increase the value of the Grashof number Gr and the local nanoparticle Grashof number Br at every point of the flow. The velocity profile obtains the maximum altitude with the increasing effects of Nt, but rise in the value of Nb lessens the height of velocity distribution w (see Fig. 13).

Fig. 10

Variation in velocity profile u with δ and Q for fixed \(\epsilon =0.1,\,N_{\rm t}=0.5,\,N_{\rm b}=0.1,\,B_{\rm r}=0.3,\,G_{\rm r}=1,\,z=0,\,V=0.3,\,\theta =0.8,\,\phi =0.1\) for (a) two-dimensional and (b) three-dimensional

Fig. 11

Variation in velocity profile u with \(\epsilon \) and V for fixed \(\delta =0.1,\,N_{\rm t}=0.5,\,N_{\rm b}=0.1,\,B_{\rm r}=0.3,\,G_{\rm r}=1,\,z=0,\,Q=1,\,\theta =0.8,\,\phi =0.1\) for (a) two-dimensional and (b) three-dimensional

Fig. 12

Variation in velocity profile u with Br and Gr for fixed \(\delta =0.1,\,N_{\rm t}=0.5,\,N_{\rm b}=2,\,\epsilon =0.01,\,V=0.3,\,z=0, \,Q=1,\,\theta =0.8,\,\phi =0.1\) for (a) two-dimensional and (b) three-dimensional

Fig. 13

Variation in velocity profile u with Nb and Nt for fixed \(\delta =0.1,\,B_{\rm r}=0.9,\,G_{\rm r}=2,\,\epsilon =0.3,\,V=0.1,\,z=0,\,Q=1,\,\theta =0.8,\,\phi =0.1 \) for (a) two-dimensional and (b) three-dimensional

To observe the behavior of temperature distribution θ with the variation in Brownian motion parameter Nb and thermophoresis parameter Nt, we display Figs. 14a, b and 15a, b, respectively. It may be concluded here that the temperature increases with the increase in the magnitude of Nb and Nt. Temperature attains the maximum value at the boundary of the outer tube and vanishes at the center of the outer tube. We look at the Figs. 16a, b and 17a, b to observe the impact of Nb and Nt on the nanoparticles' concentration σ. From these graphs, we observe that nanoparticles' distribution increases with rising Nt, but diminishes when we increase the effects of Nb.

Fig. 14

Variation in temperature profile θ with Nb for fixed \(\delta =0.1,\epsilon =0.4,\,V=0.1,\,N_{\rm t}=0.2,\,z=0,\,\theta =0.8,\,\phi =0.1 \) for (a) two-dimensional and (b) three-dimensional

Fig. 15

Variation in temperature profile θ with Nt for fixed \(\delta =0.2,\epsilon =0.4,\,V=0.1,\,N_{\rm b}=0.5,\,z=0,\,\theta =0.8,\,\phi =0.1 \) for (a) two-dimensional and (b) three-dimensional

Fig. 16

Variation in nanoparticles phenomenon σ with Nb for fixed \(\delta =0.1,\epsilon =0.2,\,N_{\rm t}=0.1,\,V=0.1,\,z=0,\,\theta =0.8, \,\phi =0.1 \) for (a) two-dimensional and (b) three-dimensional

Fig. 17

Variation in nanoparticles phenomenon σ with Nt for fixed \(\delta =0.1,\epsilon =0.4,\,N_{\rm b}=0.5,\,V=0.1,\,z=0,\,\theta =0.8, \,\phi =0.1 \) for (a) two-dimensional and (b) three-dimensional

A very interesting phenomenon in the fluid transport is trapping. In the wave frame, streamlines under certain circumstances swell to trap a bolus which travels as an inlet with the wave speed. The occurrence of an internally circulating bolus stiffened by closed streamline is called trapping. The bolus described as a volume of fluid bounded by a closed streamlines in the wave frame is moved at the wave pattern. Figure 18 shows the streamlines for the various values of the parameter local nanoparticle Grashof number Br in the upper part of the outer cylinder. It is noted that the number of trapping bolus decreases with increase in the magnitude of Br, while the bolus becomes large with greater values of Br. From Fig. 19, it can be seen that boluses increase in number, but the size of the bolus is reduced with increase in the values of local temperature Grashof number Gr. The number of trapping boluses is decreased with the rising effects of Nb, but the size of the bolus remains steady with varying Nb (see Fig. 20). Figure 21 reveals the effect of Nt on the streamlines for wave travelling down the tube. It is noticed here that number of bolus varies randomly with Nt, but the bolus expands across the wave with increase in the magnitude of Nt.

Fig. 18

Streamlines for different values of Bra For Br = 0.1, b for Br = 0.5, (c) for Br = 0.9, (d) for Br = 1.3. The other parameters are \(\epsilon =0.2,\,V=0.3,\,\theta =0.1,\,\phi =0.1,\,Q=0.6,\,\delta =0.1,\,N_{\rm t}=0.8,\,N_{\rm b}=0.1,\,G_{\rm r}=2\)

Fig. 19

Streamlines for different values of Gra For Gr = 1, b for Gr = 2, c for Gr = 3, d for Gr = 4. The other parameters are \(\epsilon =0.2,\,V=0.3,\,\theta =0.1,\,\phi =0.1,\,Q=0.6,\,\delta =0.1,\,N_{\rm t}=0.8,\,N_{\rm b}=0.1,\,B_{\rm r}=0.9\)

Fig. 20

Streamlines for different values of Nba For Nb = 0.1, b for Nb = 0.5, c for Nb = 0.9, d for Nb = 1.3. The other parameters are \(\epsilon =0.1,\,V=0.3,\,\theta =0.1,\,\phi =0.1,\,Q=0.6,\,\delta =0.1,\,N_{\rm t}=1,\,G_{\rm r}=2,\,B_{\rm r}=0.2\)

Fig. 21

Streamlines for different values of Nta For Nt = 0.1, b for Nt = 0.3, c for Nt = 0.5, d for Nt = 0.7. The other parameters are \(\epsilon =0.1,\,V=0.3,\,\theta =0.8,\,\phi =0.1,\,Q=0.6,\,\delta =0.1,\,N_{\rm b}=0.5,\,G_{\rm r}=1,\,B_{\rm r}=0.3\)


  1. Akbar NS, Nadeem S (2011) Endoscopic effects on peristaltic flow of a nanofluid. Commun Theor Phys 56:761–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Akbar NS, Nadeem S, Hayat T, Hendi AA (2012) Peristaltic flow of a nanofluid in a non-uniform tube. Heat Mass Transf 48:451–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ellahi R, Hameed M (2012) Numerical analysis of steady flows with heat transfer, MHD and nonlinear slip effects. Int J Numer Meth Heat Fluid Flow 22:24–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. He JH (2006) Homotopy perturbation method for solving boundary value problems. Phys Lett A 350:87–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mahomed FM, Hayat T (2007) Note on an exact solution for the pipe flow of a third grade fluid. Acta Mech 190:233–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Malik MY, Hussain A, Nadeem S (2011) Flow of a Jeffrey-six constant fluid between coaxial cylinders with heat transfer. Commun Theor Phys 56:345–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Manca O, Nardini S, Ricci D (2012) A numerical study of nanofluid forced convection in ribbed channels. Appl Therm Eng 37:280–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mekheimer KS, Abdelmaboud Y (2008) Peristaltic flow of a couple stress fluid in an annulus: application of an endoscope. Physica A 387:2403–2415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mekheimer KS (2008) Effect of the induced magnetic field on peristaltic flow of a couple stress fluid. Phys Lett A 372:4271–4278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mekheimer KS, Abdelmaboud Y, Abdellateef AI (2012) Peristaltic transport through an eccentric cylinder: mathematical model. Appl Bionics Biomech. doi:10.3233/ABB-2012-0071

  11. Nadeem S, Akbar NS (2009) Influence of heat transfer on a peristaltic flow of Johnson Segalman fluid in a non-uniform tube. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 36:1050–1059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nadeem S, Akbar NS (2010) Effects of temperature dependent viscosity on peristaltic flow of a Jeffrey-six constant fluid in a non-uniform vertical tube. Commun Nonlinear Sci Numer Simulat 15:3950–3964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nadeem S, Maraj EN (2012) The mathematical analysis for peristaltic flow of nanofluid in a curved channel with compliant walls. Appl Nanosci. doi:10.1007/s13204-012-0165-x

  14. Reddy MVS, Mishra M, Sreenadh S, Rao AR (2005) Influence of lateral walls on peristaltic flow in a rectangular duct. J Fluids Eng 127:824–827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Srinivas S, Kothandapani M (2008) Peristaltic transport in an asymmetric channel with heat transfer: a note. Int Commun Heat Mass Transf 20:514–522

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sobh AM, Azab SSA, Madi HH (2010) Heat transfer in peristaltic flow of viscoelastic fluid in an asymmetric channel. Appl Math Sci 4:1583–1606

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tripathi D (2011a) Peristaltic flow of a fractional second grade fluid through a cylindrical tube. Therm Sci 15:S167–S173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Tripathi D (2011b) A mathematical model for the peristaltic flow of chyme movement in small intestine. Math Biosci 233:90–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang X, Mujumdar AS (2007) Heat transfer characteristics of nanofluids: a review. Int J Therm Sci 46:1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Arshad Riaz.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nadeem, S., Riaz, A., Ellahi, R. et al. Effects of heat and mass transfer on peristaltic flow of a nanofluid between eccentric cylinders. Appl Nanosci 4, 393–404 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13204-013-0225-x

Download citation


  • Heat and mass transfer
  • Peristaltic flow
  • Nanofluid
  • Eccentric cylinders
  • Analytical solutions
  • Homotopy perturbation method