Geochemical evaluation of fluoride contamination of groundwater in the Thoothukudi District of Tamilnadu, India
Fluoride is a chemical element that has been shown to cause significant effects on human health through drinking water. Different forms of fluoride exposure are of importance and have shown to affect the body’s fluoride content and thus increasing the risks of fluoride-prone diseases. Fluoride has beneficial effects on teeth; however, low concentrations of fluoride intensify the risk of tooth decay. Fluoride can also be quite detrimental at higher concentrations at skeletal fluorosis. The Thoothukudi District is a hard rock and alluvial plain marked as one of the Fluoride-increase area in Tamilnadu due to occurrence of various rock types including fluoride-bearing minerals. The F− content of groundwater can thus originate from the dissolution of Fluoride-bearing minerals in the bed rock. Hundred representative groundwater samples from Thoothukudi District were collected during two different seasons. Samples were analysed for F−, other major cations and anions. The study area is chiefly composed of hornblende biotite gneiss, charnockite, alluvio marine, fluvial marine and granite with small patches of quartzite and sandstone. Higher concentration of fluoride is observed during pre-monsoon (3.3 mg l–1) compared to the post-monsoon (2.4 mg l–1) due to the dilution effect. Spatial distribution and factor score show that higher concentrations of F− are noted in the north and central part of the study area owing to lithology. Bicarbonate is well correlated with F− which explains that both ions were derived from the weathering. While F− has a very weak correlation with pH which may be due to the increase of alkalinity resulting from the increase of carbonate and bicarbonate ions.
KeywordsFluoride Drinking water Hard rock Lithology Weathering
Water is a leading natural resource and essential for life on earth. About 80 % of the diseases in the world are due to poor quality of drinking water (WHO 1984).In groundwater, the natural concentration of fluoride depends on the geological, chemical and physical characteristics of the aquifer, the porosity and acidity of the soil and rocks, the temperature and the action of other chemical elements (Tahaikt et al. 2008). Fluoride ion in drinking water is known for both beneficial and detrimental effects on health. The total number of people affected in the world is not well known. Per day fluoride intake is directly related with the daily water intake. Therefore, USPHS (1962) set a range of allowable concentrations for fluoride in drinking water according to the climatic conditions (especially temperature).
Fluoride is essential for the development of tooth enamel, dentin, and the bones. It is harmful when it exceeds the permissible limit of 1.5 mg l–1(WHO 2008) in water. Low concentration of fluoride below 0.5 ppm causes dental caries (Clark 1993; Jones et al. 1997; Acharya et al. 2008). Smaller quantities (<1.0 mg l–1) in drinking water are usually considered good to have a beneficial effect on the rate of occurrence of dental carries, particularly among children (WHO 1997; Hussain et al. 2004, 2010). While high concentrations above 1.5 mg l–1 may cause an endemic disease called dental fluorosis, intake of F− concentrations above 3.0 mg l–1 may cause skeletal fluorosis (Handa 1975; WHO 1984; Vollmer 1993; Ripa 1993).
In India, it was first detected in Nellore District of Andhra Pradesh (Shortt 1937). Presently 22 states have been identified as endemic for fluorosis in man (Siddiqui 1955; Jolly et al. 1973). India has the most extensive areas of high F− ground waters. In India about 62 million people are at risk of developing fluorosis from drinking high F− water (Susheela 1999; Andezhath et al. 1999). Dental fluorosis is endemic in 14 states and 150,000 villages in India (Pillai and Stanley 2002). The problems are most pronounced in the states of Andhra Pradesh, Bihar, Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh, Punjab, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh and Tamilnadu is one of them (Pillai and Stanley 2002). Fluorosis is a considerable health problem worldwide, which is afflicting millions of people in many areas of the world, for example East Africa (Nanyaro et al. 1984; Gaciri and Davies 1993; Gizaw 1996), Turkey (Oruc 2003), India (Hussain 2001; Rao and Devadas 2003; Gupta et al. 2005), southeastern Korea (Kim and Jeong 2005) and northern China (Wang and Reardon 2001). The main source of fluoride in the groundwater is fluoride-bearing rocks from which it get weathered and/or leached out contaminating the water. Fluorides occur in three forms, namely fluorspar or calcium fluoride (CaF2), apatite or rock phosphate [Ca3F (PO4)3] and cryolite (Na3AlF6) (Sunitha et al. 2012). Fluoride content in groundwater is mainly due to natural contamination, but the process of dissolution is still not well understood (Handa 1975; Saxena and Ahmed 2001).The study area is a hard rock terrain and the fluoride in drinking water is mainly reported in the hard rock terrains in India (Siddiqui 1968; Handa 1975; Ramesham and Rajagopalan 1985; Rao and Devadas 2003; Gupta et al. 2005; Jacks et al. 2005; Shaji et al. 2007; Srinivasamoorthy et al. 2008; Reddy et al. 2010; Ramachandran et al. 2010; Deepu and Shaji 2011; Chidambaram et al. 2012; Singaraja et al. 2013b). In general, potential sources of fluoride in groundwater include various minerals in rocks and soils, such as fluorite, apatite, amphiboles and micas (Handa 1975; Pickering 1985; Wenzel and Blum 1992; Bardsen et al. 1996; Rao and Devadas 2003). Although high F− concentrations in groundwater were previously considered to be a problem mainly in hard rock areas, they have now been discovered in other environments as well (Chadha and Tamta 1999). Therefore, some researchers suggested that high fluoride concentrations in groundwater are likely a result of the dissolution of Biotite, which may contain significant fluorine at the OH-sites of their octahedral sheet (Nordstrom et al. 1989; Li et al. 2003).
Many workers (Karthikeyan and Shanmugasundarraj 2000; Srinivasamoorthy et al. 2008; Alagumuthu and Rajan 2010; Ramachandran et al. 2010; Chidambaram et al. 2012) have reported the level of fluoride concentration in different districts of Tamilnadu, and Thoothukudi is one of them. The high fluoride (4.34 mg l−1) contamination in drinking water was reported in Ottapidaram block part of Thoothukudi District (Veeraputhiran and Alagumuthu 2010). The main objectives of this study are: (1) to demarcate the relevant factors affecting the natural fluoride contamination in the ground waters (2) to understand the spatial and saturation index of fluoride and (3) fluoride relationship between the other hydrogeochemical parameters.
Materials and method
Major water-bearing formations are quaternary alluvium, tertiary sediments, teri sands, weathered fractured pink granites, charnockites and gneisses. Limited fresh water availability in sedimentary areas is present (Central Ground Water Board 2009). The types of industries found here include petrochemicals, thermal power plant, heavy water plant (HWP), chlor-alkali, HCl, trichloro-ethylene, cotton and staple yarn, caustic soda, poly vinyl chlorine resin, fertilizers, soda ash, carbon dioxide gas in liquid form and aromatics. The public sector undertakings are the Thoothukudi Thermal Power Station unit, HWP and Port Trust. Though there are different studies in the land-use and land-cover pattern in the study area along with few reports on the metal pollution in groundwater to highlight their effects of the industrial (SIPCOT) effluents on the Thoothukudi city (SelvinPitchaikani et al. 2010; Singaraja et al. 2013c).
Sample collection and analysis
A total of 100 water samples were collected from entire districts during Pre-monsoon (PRM) (May) and Post-monsoon (POM) (February). Water samples were collected from hand pumps after purging for 5–10 min and 500 ml of the sample was collected in the precleaned Teflon bottles without any air gap and sealed with a stopper. Immediately after collection, samples were stored at 4 °C in an ice chest and transported to laboratory for the chemical analysis. The pH, electrical conductivity (EC) and fluoride (F−) were immediately analysed using the Orion Ion hand-held electrodes after collection. HCO3− by titrimetry; Cl−, SO42−, PO4−, NO3−, H4SiO4, Ca2+, Mg2+, Na+ and K+ by the ion chromatograph (IC, Metrohm 861). Duplicate samples were analysed to check the analytical precision; it is ±5 % for all hydrogeochemical variables. The saturation indices (SI) of fluoride minerals were computed using the WATEQ4F (Hammarstrom et al. 2005).
Results and discussion
Range of F− concentration s (mg l–1) in groundwater of both seasons (n = 100)
Spatial distribution of fluoride
In general, in hard rock terrain, water quality variations and changes are common, especially for fluoride in shallow, intermediate and deep aquifers. In alluvial plain groundwater, however, such variation and changes in fluoride levels are usually rare. Similar observations were noted in Ganges alluvial plain, fluoride contamination has been reported by Indian state and central groundwater departments in a few districts like Unnao, Kanpur, and Agra (Misra et al. 2006). The sources of geogenic (apatite, biotite, and clays) and anthropogenic(chemical fertilizers), with a combination of higher rate of evaporation and longer interaction of water with the aquifer materials under alkaline environment, are the key factors for the concentration of F− in the study area (SubbaRao 2009). High concentrations of fluoride in groundwater were noted in granite and granitoid gneiss (Kim et al. 2006). Low concentration of F− is observed in northwestern part of the study area as subsurface lithology has very low hydrologic conductivity and the clays present in the highly weathered rock mass might have resulted in the removal of F− by OH molecules through the process of ion exchange (Misra 2005; Singaraja et al. 2012; Manikandan et al. 2012). Moreover, the weathering of alkaline sedimentary rocks (especially Shales) may also result in removal of F− into soil from the groundwater (McNelly et al. 1979). The present study area also represents higher F− concentrations in the northern part of the region covered by hard rock (HBG) and few representations of charnockites.
Relationship between F− and HCO3−
Saturation indices of fluoride minerals
Summary of fluoride represented factors during PRM and POM periods of the study
Total no. of factors
% of variance
In POM, Fluoride is represented as the second factor among the five factors of which the factor loadings were represented by HCO3− and F− and low loading of pH, Ca2+ and Mg2+. High fluoride ground water is generally associated with high bicarbonate ions. This has also been observed by Chatterjee and Mohabey (1998) in their investigation at Madhya Pradesh in Central India. Low concentrations of Ca2+ and Mg2+ corresponding to high fluoride in the water have earlier been reported by Nanyaro et al. 1984; Teotia et al. (1981) who also observed an inverse relationship between Ca2+ and Mg2+, than the one suggested by Gaciri and Davies (1993) on the basis of solubility product of Calcite and Fluorite (Kundu et al. 2001). The spatial representation of factor scores shows the positive representation in the northern part of the study area (Fig. 7). HCO3− is positively correlated with F− during two seasons. The dissolved silica lacks representations in the factor loadings in PRM and POM seasons. Therefore, it is inferred that F− in groundwater is less influenced by the dissolution of silica. There was higher fluoride concentration in the northern part of the study area during both seasons. Fluoride ions from the minerals leach into the groundwater and contribute to high fluoride concentrations (Suttie 1969; Jubb et al. 1993; Schultheiss and Godley 1995). pH is an important factor that has influence on fluoride ion concentration in drinking water, but the relationship between pH and fluoride is weak, because the increase in alkalinity is due to the increase of carbonate and bicarbonate ions. These ions do not have direct influence on pH level like hydroxyl ion, so the increase of alkalinity does not increase the pH level linearly during PRM and POM (Wodeyar and Sreenivasan1996; SubbaRao et al. 1998; SubbaRao 2003). There was no significant relationship of chloride and sulphate level on fluoride ion concentration in drinking water as observed during PRM and POM and the results were comparable with a previous study (Rajmohan 2003).
In recent years, there has been an increase in F− concentration in Thoothukudi District, which causes adverse impact on human health. The study proves a significant variation in the chemical composition of groundwater and in F− concentration in both seasons. High concentration of fluoride is observed in PRM and low levels in POM, which is due to the effect of dilution after monsoon in the study area. The spatial distribution of F− in both the seasons reveals that highest fluoride concentrations are shown in the north and central part of the study area. This region is chiefly composed of the HBG, alluvial plain followed by charnockite, which aids as one of the main source for F− in the study area. It is also interesting to note that that alluvial plain groundwater has high fluoride levels due to alteration of mud and clay layers in the subsurface lithology which has very low hydrologic conductivity. The southern, western and the eastern parts of the study area do not suffer from F− contamination. Fluoride has a strong loading with HCO3− but very low loading of pH, Ca2+ and Mg2+ during both seasons. It is interesting to note that increase of alkalinity is due to the increase of carbonate and bicarbonate ions, these ions not having direct influence on pH level, so the increase of alkalinity does not increase the pH and also show that very low Ca2+ and Mg2+ in water may be due to prior precipitation of CaCO3 and solubility product of calcite and fluorite in the study area.
- Alagumuthu G, Rajan M (2010) Chemometric studies of water quality parameters of Sankarankovil block of Tirunelveli, Tamilnadu. J Environ Biol 31(5):581–586Google Scholar
- Andezhath SK, Susheela AK, Ghosh G (1999) Fluorosis management in India: the impact due to networking between health and rural drinking water supply agencies. IAHS-AISH Publication 260:159–165Google Scholar
- Central Ground Water Board (2009) South eastern coastal region, District groundwater brochure, Thoothukudi district, Tamil naduGoogle Scholar
- Chadha DK, Tamta SR (1999) Occurrence and origin of groundwater fluoride in phreatic zone of Unnao district, Uttar Pradesh. J Appl Geochem 1:21–26Google Scholar
- Chidambara S, Ramanathan AL, Srinivasamoorthy K (2003) Lithological influences on the groundwater chemistry—Periyar district a case study. In: Conference on coastal and freshwater issue, p173. 12, pp 625–636Google Scholar
- Chidambaram S, Ramanathan AL, Srinivasamoorthy K, Anandhan P (2003) WATCLAST—a computer program for hydrogeochemical studies. Recent trends in Hydrogeochemistry (case studies from surface and subsurface waters of selected countries). Capital Publishing Company, New Delhi pp 203–207Google Scholar
- Chidambaram S, Ramanathan AL, Prasanna MV, Anandhan P, Srinivasamoorthy K, Vasudeven S (2007) Identification of Hrogeochemically Active Regimes in Groundwaters of Erode District, Tamilnadu A Statistical Approach. Asian J water, Environ pollut 5(3):93–102Google Scholar
- Clark DC (1993) Appropriate uses of fluorides for children: guidelines from the Canadian workshop on the evaluation of current recommendations concerning fluorides. CMAJ 149:1787–1793Google Scholar
- Deepu TR, Shaji E (2011) Fluoride contamination in groundwater resources of Chittur block, Palghat district, Kerala, India—a health risk. Disaster, risk and vulnerability conference. School of Environmental Sciences, Mahatma Gandhi University, India in association with the Applied Geoinformatics for Society and Environment, Germany March 12–14Google Scholar
- Hammarstrom JM, Seal RR II, Meier AL, Kornfeld JM (2005) Secondary sulfate minerals associated with acid drainage in the eastern US: recycling of metals and acidity in surficial environments. Geochemistry of sulfate minerals: a tribute to Robert O. Rye. Paper 2. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/usgsrye/2
- Hussain J (2001) Studies on the impact of industrial and domestic waste on groundwater quality, Ph.D. Thesis, MDS University Ajmer Rajasthan, IndiaGoogle Scholar
- Hussain J, Sharma KC, Hussain I (2004) Fluoride in drinking water and its ill affect on human health: a review. J Tissue Res 4(2):263–273Google Scholar
- Johnson RA, Wichern DW (1992) Applied multivariate statistical analysis, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
- Jolly SS, Prasad S, Sharma R, Chander R (1973) Endamic fluorosis in Punjab. I. Skeletal aspects. Fluoride 6:4–18Google Scholar
- Karro E, Rosentau A (2005) Fluoride levels in the silurian-ordovician aquifer system of western Estonia, research report. Fluoride 38(4):307–311Google Scholar
- Karthikeyan G, Shanmugasundarraj A (2000) Mapping of fluorotic areas using isopleths technique and in situ fluoride dependence on water quality. Fluoride 33(3):121–127Google Scholar
- Kim KH, Yun ST, Chae GT, Kim SY, Kwon JS, Koh YK (2006) Hydrogeochemical evolution related to high fluoride concentrations in deep bedrock groundwaters, Korea. Economic Environ Geo 39(1):12–17Google Scholar
- Manikandan S, Chidambaram S, Ramanathan AL, Prasanna MV, Karmegam U, Singaraja C, Paramaguru P, Jainab I (2012) A study on the high fluoride concentration in the magnesium-rich waters of hard rock aquiferin Krishnagiri district, Tamilnadu, India. Arab J Geosci doi:10.1007/s12517-012-0752-x
- McNelly RN, Neimenia IP, Dwyer L (1979) A guide to water quality parameters: inland water directorate, Canada, pp 1–65Google Scholar
- Misra AK (2005) Integrated water resource management and planning for its sustainable development using remote sensing and GIS techniques in the dark areas of Agra and Mathura district, Uttar Pradesh. Dissertation, University of LucknowGoogle Scholar
- Misra AK, Mishra A, Premraj R (2006) Escalation of groundwater fluoride in the Ganga alluvial plain of India, research report. Fluoride 39(1):35–38Google Scholar
- Nanyaro JT, Aswathanarayana U, Mungore JS, Lahermo PW (1984) A geochemical model for the abnormal fluoride concentrations in waters in parts of northern Tanzania. J Afr Earth Sci 2:129–140Google Scholar
- Oruc N (2003) Problems of high fluoride waters in Turkey (hydrogeology and health aspects). The short course on medical geology-health and environment. Canberra, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
- Pillai KS, Stanley VA (2002) Implications of fluoride—an endless uncertainty. J Environ Biol 23:81–97Google Scholar
- Rajmohan N (2003) Major correlation in ground water of Kancheepuram region, South India. Indian J Environ Health 45(1):1–5Google Scholar
- Ramesham V, Rajagopalan K (1985) Fluoride ingestion into the natural waters of hardrock areas, Peninsular India. J Geol Soc India 26:125–132Google Scholar
- Saxena VK, Ahmed S (2001) Dissolution of fluoride in groundwater: a water–rock interaction study. Environ Geol 40(8):1084–1087Google Scholar
- Schultheiss WA, Godley GA (1995) Chronic fluorosis in cattle due to the ingestion of a commercial lick. J S Afr Vet Assoc 66(2):83–84Google Scholar
- SelvinPitchaikani J, Ananthan G, Sudhakar M (2010) Studies on the effect of coolant water effluent of Tuticorin thermal power station on hydro biological characteristics of Tuticorin coastal waters, south east coast of India. Curr Res J Biol Sci 2(2):118–123Google Scholar
- Shaji E, BinduViju J, Thambi DS (2007) High fluoride in groundwater of Palghat district, Kerala. Curr Sci 92:240–245Google Scholar
- Shortt WE (1937) Endemic fluorosis in Nellore District, South India. Indian Med Gazette 72:396Google Scholar
- Siddiqui AH (1968) Fluorosis in Nalgonda district Hyderabad, India. Fluoride 1(2):76–85Google Scholar
- Singaraja C, Chidambaram S, Prasanna MV, Thivya C, Thilagavathi R (2013c) Appraisal of water quality pollution Indices for heavy metal contamination monitoring: A case study from Thoothukudi Districts, Tamilnadu, India. Inventi Rapid: Water Environ 4:1–5Google Scholar
- Singaraja C, Chidambaram S, Anandhan P, Prasann MV, Thivya C, Thilagavathi R, Sarathidasan J (2013d) Determination of the utility of groundwater with respect to the geochemical parameters: a case study from Tuticorin District of Tamil Nadu (India). Environ Dev Sustain. doi:10.1007/s10668-013-9502-9Google Scholar
- Singh R, Maheshwari RC (2001) Defluoridation of drinking water—a review. Indian J Environ Prot 21(11):983–991Google Scholar
- Srinivasamoorthy K (2005) Hydrogeochemistry of Groundwater in Salem district, Tamilnadu, India. Published PhD thesis, Annamalai UniversityGoogle Scholar
- Srinivasamoorthy K, Chidambaram M, Prasanna MV, Vasanthavigar M, John Peter A, Anandhan P (2008) Identification of major sources controlling groundwater chemistry from a hard rock terrain—a case study from Mettur taluk, Salem district, Tamilnadu, India. J Earth Syst Sci 117(1):49–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- SubbaRao N, Prakasa Rao J, Nagamalleswara Rao B, Nirranjan Babu P, Madhusudhana Reddy P, John Devadas D (1998) A preliminary report on fluoride content in groundwaters of Guntur area, Andhra Pradesh, India. Current Sci 75:887–888Google Scholar
- SubbaRao N, Surya Rao P, Venktram Reddy G, Nagamani M, Vidyasagar G, Satyanarayana NLVV (2012) Chemical characteristics of groundwater and assessment of groundwater quality in Varaha River Basin, Visakhapatnam District, Andhra Pradesh, India. Environ Monit Assess 184:5189–5214. doi:10.1007/s10661-011-2333-yCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sunitha V, Reddy BR, Reddy MR (2012) Groundwater quality evaluation with special reference to fluoride and nitrate pollution in Uravakonda, Anantapur District, Andhra Pradesh—a case study. Int J Res Chem Environ 2(1):88–96Google Scholar
- Susheela AK (1999) Fluorosis management programme in India. Curr Sci 77(10):1250–1256Google Scholar
- Teotia SDS, Teotia M, Singh RK (1981) Hydrogeochemical aspects of endemic skeletal fluorosis in India—an epidemiological study. Fluoride 14:69–74Google Scholar
- USPHS (1962) Drinking water standard, Washington: USPHS, Publication 956, USGPOGoogle Scholar
- Veeraputhiran V, Alagumuthu G (2010) A report on fluoride distribution in drinking Water. Int J Environ Sci 1:4Google Scholar
- Vollmer C (1993) Unter suchungenüber den Fluoridgehalt des Trinkwassersausprivaten was server sorgungs anlagen der Region Rietberg 3 (Mastholte). Dissertation, MünsterGoogle Scholar
- WHO (1984) Guidelines for drinking water quality, vol. 3. Drinking water quality control in small community supplies. GenevaGoogle Scholar
- WHO (1997) Guideline for drinking water quality health criteria and other supporting information, 2nd edn, vol 2. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- WHO (2008) International standards for drinking water, 3rd edn, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- Wodeyar BK, Sreenivasan G (1996) Occurrence of fluoride in the groundwaters and its impact in Peddavankahalla Basin, Bellary District, Karnataka, India—a preliminary study. Curr Sci 70:71–74Google Scholar
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.