Advertisement

Applied Water Science

, Volume 2, Issue 4, pp 285–291 | Cite as

Changes in water volume of the Aral Sea after 1960

  • Behzod GaybullaevEmail author
  • Su-Chin ChenEmail author
  • Dilmurod Gaybullaev
Open Access
Original Article

Abstract

The Aral Sea is the biggest saline lake in Central Asia. This brackish water body was the world’s fourth largest lake before it started to shrink in the 1960’s due to water withdrawal for land irrigation. The runoff decreased from 20.6 km3 in 2003 to 4.5 km3 in 2010 and precipitation reduced from 9.4 km3 in 1960 to 3 km3 in 2010. Based on comparative hydrological data between 1960 and 2005, water volume of the Aral Sea reduced significantly. The observed values of runoff, evaporation, precipitation, and water volume were used to estimate water volume from 1957 to 2010, and the coefficient of determination for predicted water volume is 0.7647. We have obtained regression parameters using previously observed data to further estimate corresponding magnitudes of precipitation, runoff, and evaporation from 2011 to 2031, and as a result are then applied in the estimation of the water volume. Our prediction proposes that water volume of the Aral Sea will be decrease approximately to 75.4 km3 in 2031.

Keywords

Aral Sea Water balance Evaporation Irrigation 

Introduction

The Aral Sea is a terminal lake, has no outlet, and is located in Central Asia (Fig. 1). The Aral Sea was the world’s fourth largest lake with surface area of 68,000 km2, water level of 53.4 m, and salinity of 10 g/L in 1960 (Micklin 2007; Glantz 1999; Aralgenefund 2011). It has existed in that form during the past 8,000–10,000 years (Boomer et al. 2000). The Aral Sea surface area has declined from 68,000 km2 in 1960 to 14,280 km2 in 2010, water volume reduced from 1,093.0 km3 in 1960 to 98.1 km3 in 2010, and salinity increased from 10 g/L in 1960 to 130 g/L in 2010 (Alikhanov 2010; Aralgenefund 2011). The Aral Sea water level declined by more than 29 m (Large Sea) in 2007 (Aralgenefund 2011).
Fig. 1

Aral Sea Basin (Micklin 2007)

The initial reason for the Aral’s decline was the fact that Soviet planners’ diverted water from Aral Sea’s two big feeding rivers (the Amu Darya and the Syr Darya) into cotton fields in the territory of Uzbekistan. The Amu Darya and Syr Darya are major rivers in the Central Asia. This rivers’ water flows from the Tien Shan and Pamir mountains (it is chiefly fed by glaciers and snowmelt) across Kara-Kum and Kyzyl-Kum deserts into the Aral Sea. This is intensively used for irrigated agriculture, especially 85 % of water used for irrigation areas. The average annual flow from the drainage basin is around 79 km3 of Amu Darya and 37 km3 of Syr Darya river (Micklin 2000). The irrigation areas in this rivers’ basin have rapidly increased, which had grown to 30,000 km2 in 1913, 45,000 km2 in 1960, and then to 70,000 km2 in 2000 (Bortnik 1999; UNDP 2007).

The Aral Sea crisis was one of the world’s largest environmental disasters (Glazovsky 1990; Kostianoy 2006). The Aral Sea-exposed dry seabed has reached from 45,000 km2 in 1960 to 87,000 km2 in 2010 (Dukhovny 2010). As a result, each year the wind spreads 45 million metric tons of salty and contaminated dust into the atmosphere; dust plumes can be 400 km long and 40 km wide, while the range of dust storms can reach 300 km (Alikhanov 2010). This altered atmosphere is salty and dust spoiled, and is polluting the Aral Sea region, resulting in serious public health problems (US Geological Survey 2007). This massive environmental disaster affects approximately 5 million people (Kostianoy 2006; UNDP 2007; Micklin and Aladin 2008), and every second female suffered from inflammation of the gastroenteric of the vulva, vagina as disbiosis and bacterial vaginosis in the Aral Sea region (Elpiner 1999; Alieva 2008). Decreasing water levels of the Aral Sea has also resulted in the loss of fishery (20 species in 1960, and, 5 species in 1980), the significant change in the climate of area (hotter summers and colder winters), and the loss of wild animals (58 heads in 1960, 14 heads in 2000) (Alikhanov 2010; Forkutsa 2006; US Geological Survey 2007; Elpiner 1999).

The water balance method has been widely used in water resources engineering, particularly in farming applications. Monthly water balance models have been used for examine the various components of the hydrologic cycle (e.g., precipitation, evapotranspiration and runoff). Monthly water balance models were first developed in the 1940’s by Thornthwaite (1948). Recently, they have been employed to explore the impact of climate change (McCabe and Ayers 1989), estimate the global water balance (Mather 1969; Legates and McCabe 2005), river runoff (Wolock and McCabe 1999) and soil moisture storage (Mintz and Serafini 1992), and to develop climate classifications (Thornthwaite 1948) and irrigation demand (McCabe and Wolock 1992).

The objectives of this study are as follows:
  1. 1.

    To determine the total water volume lost from the Aral Sea since 1957–2010;

     
  2. 2.

    To extrapolate river runoff, evaporation, and precipitation data by regression equations, and to predict future the Aral Sea volume reduction from 2010 to 2031.

     

Materials and methods

Study area

The Aral Sea is a saline endorheic basin in Central Asia. The Aral Sea basin includes Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, and near the Caspian Sea, occupied an area of 68,000 km2 and had a volume of 1.093 km3 in 1960 (Micklin 2004; Fig. 2). The Aral Sea has been gradually shrinking since the 1960’s after the rivers that fed it were diverted by Soviet Union irrigation projects. In the last half century, the Aral Sea level has fallen by 16 m (small Sea) and 23 m (large Sea), the water surface decreased by 80 %, the water volume reduced from 1.093 to 98.1 km3 (Fig. 2) and water salinity increased to 130 g/L (Alikhanov 2010). As a consequence, the Aral Sea has virtually turned into a ‘dead’ Sea. The Aral Sea exposed dry seabed has reached 87,000 km2 in 2010.
Fig. 2

Changing profile of the Aral Sea 1960–2010 (UNDP 2007)

The Amu Darya River is at the south of the Aral Sea basin, and has a mean annual flow of 70–80 km3/year. The river is 2,400 km long, with a basin area of more than 300,000 km2. The Syr Darya River runs in the north of the basin. Its annual flow is half of the Amu Darya. The Syr Darya is the longest river in Central Asia, 2,790 long, with a basin area of almost 300,000 km2.

Summer temperatures reach 40 °C and winter temperatures fall to −20 °C. Precipitation is minimal, and the average annual precipitation is approximately 100 mm, which is partial to spring and fall, and is a typical continental climate. The main volume of water comes from high glaciers feeding into the main rivers of the Amu Darya and the Syr Darya, which flow into the Aral Sea from the north and south, respectively.

Data collection

Data on evaporation, river runoff (RO, including surface water and groundwater runoff), water volume, precipitation and salinity observation of the Aral Sea from 1960 to 2010 were collected (Aralgenefund 2011; Aladin and Potts 1992; Bjorklund 1999; Central Asian States 2000; Jarsjo and Destouni 2004; Mikhailov et al. 2001; Oroud 1999; UNDP 2007, 2008; UNESCO 2000; Zavialov et al. 2003), as a result shown in Table 1. The Aral Sea eventually separated into two sub-divisions: namely, the Large Aral Sea located to the south, and small Aral Sea located to the north. This occurred over a 26 years period from 1961 to 1987 during which river inflow reduced to approximately zero into the Aral Sea. After the Aral Sea separation, water flow from the Amu Darya and Syr Darya rivers into the Aral Sea increased from 1988 to 2004. Table 1 shows that the runoff was 31.5 km3 in 1988. However, the rivers’ annual flow into the Aral Sea decreased to 15.8 km3 in 2004 and then reduced to 4.5 km3 in 2010. In 1987, the evaporation was 36.8 km3, water volume was 345.6 km3, precipitation was 6.2 km3, and salinity was 25.0 g/L of the Aral Sea as shown in Table 1. However, the water volume decreased to 98.1 km3, precipitation reduced to 3 km3, evaporation decreased to 11.4 km3, and salinity increased to 130 g/L in 2010.
Table 1

Hydrological observation data of the Aral Sea, 1957–2009

Period

River runoff, R (km3)

Evaporation, E (km3)

Water volume, V (km3)

Precipitation, P (km3)

Salinity (g/L)

Amu Darya

Syr Darya

Total

Small Sea

Large Sea

Total

1957

9.5

9.9

19.4

68.1

  

1,080.0

8.5

10.0

1960

20.7

21.3

42.0

71.1

  

1,093.0

9.4

10.0

1973

0.6

0.3

0.9

60.0

  

824.2

4.4

13.4

1977

0.0

0.2

0.2

45.7

  

749.2

5.0

15.4

1982

0.0

1.3

1.3

38.5

  

579.8

8.5

18.8

1984

0.0

0.3

0.3

47.9

  

502.7

3.5

21.9

1987

0.0

1.0

1.0

36.8

22.4

323.2

345.6

6.2

25.0

1989

0.0

3.1

3.1

35.3

20.3

306.9

327.2

5.3

30.0

1992

7.4

3.2

10.6

31.9

20.3

240.2

260.5

5.4

35.0

1995

3.1

1.6

4.7

28.5

21.8

217.2

239.0

2.5

38.0

1996

5.0

1.6

6.6

25.7

21.8

195.6

217.4

3.0

39.0

1998

23.9

7.6

31.5

24.6

27.0

168.4

195.4

6.0

42.0

2001

0.4

2.7

3.1

23.1

17.9

131.2

149.1

2.5

58.6

2002

6.7

6.4

13.1

37.1

18.4

110.8

129.2

4.0

82.0

2003

11.4

9.2

20.6

36.7

19.8

97.2

117.0

5.4

86.0

2004

5.9

9.9

15.8

24.8

22.4

93.5

115.9

3.0

91.0

2005

3.0

4.4

7.4

14.0

22.5

89.8

112.3

3.5

98.0

2006

1.5

3.5

5.0

11.8

24.0

81.3

105.3

2.8

109.0

2007

2.5

4.5

7.0

11.9

23.2

81.1

104.3

3.0

112.0

2008

2.0

4.1

6.1

10.1

23.0

80.1

103.1

2.5

117.0

2009

2.1

3.1

5.2

8.3

22.8

79.2

102.0

3.2

120.0

2010

2.0

2.5

4.5

11.4

22.6

75.5

98.1

3.0

130.0

Water balance

Figure 3 depicts water volume reduction within the Aral Sea based on a volume change ΔV over time interval Δt formula, more clearly expressed in Eq. (1) below:
$$ \Updelta V = P + RO - E $$
(1)
where P is the precipitation, RO is the runoff (including surface water and groundwater), E is the evaporation, and ΔV is the changes of the Aral Sea water volume.
Fig. 3

Illustration of water balance changes in the Aral Sea with decreasing volume

The Nash–Sutcliffe model efficiency coefficient was used to assess the predictive power of the hydrological models. It is defined as:
$$ C_{eff} = 1 - \frac{{\sum\nolimits_{i = 1}^{N} {\left( {O_{i} - P_{i} } \right)^{2} } }}{{\sum\nolimits_{i = 1}^{N} {\left( {O_{i} - \bar{O}} \right)^{2} } }} $$
(2)
where \( O_{i} \)is the observed data, \( P_{i} \) is the predicted data, and \( \bar{O} \) is the mean of observed data. The Nash–Sutcliffe coefficient of efficiency (−∞ ≤ Ceff ≤ 1) (Nash and Sutcliffe 1970) is a relative assessment of the model performance, and was adopted to evaluate the estimation of water volume. If \( C_{eff} = 1 \), then the pair of observed and estimated data match well.

Results and discussion

Data in Figs. 4, 5, 6, and 7 were estimated according to Table 1 observations by interpolation equation calculation. Combined, these figures show that estimated values of water volume reduction were very high during 1960 to 2005. This severe water volume reduction was directly linked to reduced river runoff into the Aral Sea, reduced precipitation rates, increased evaporation rates, and increased use of the Aral Sea for irrigation purposes.
Fig. 4

Observed and estimated variations of precipitation in the Aral Sea

Fig. 5

Observed and estimated variations of runoff into the Aral Sea

Fig. 6

Observed and estimated variations of evaporation in the Aral Sea

Fig. 7

Observed and estimated variations of salinity in the Aral Sea

Precipitation

Decreasing of the Aral Sea water levels has caused losing soil degradation, water salinity, and local climate change (Elpiner 1999). Increased greenhouse gas emissions, combined with vegetation growth throughout the dry Aral Seabed facilitated an increase in atmospheric temperature (hotter summers and colder winters; Forkutsa 2006). Consequently, precipitation magnitude has reduced (Fig. 4). Figure 4 shows that the precipitation was 9.4 km3 in 1960 (Aralgenefund 2011). The precipitation was 3.5 km3, water volume was 502.7 km3, and river runoff into the Aral Sea was 0.3 km3 in 1884 (Aralgenefund 2011), as a consequence, the Aral Sea separated two parts. Precipitation linearly decreased (R2 = 0.5973) from 9.4 km3 in 1960 to 2.1 km3 in 2010. Estimated precipitation was 7.7 km3 in 1960, which is less than the result for 1960 in Fig. 4, and it was 3.5 km3 in 1995, which was higher than the result for 1995 from Fig. 4, and it has been polynomially reduced (R2 = 0.7753) to 3.05 km3 in 2009.

River runoff

Observed river runoff into the Aral Sea was 42 km3 in 1960 as shown in Fig. 5. Water flow polynomially decreased (R2 = 0.2665) from 0.2 km3 in 1977 to 0.3 km3 in 1984, comparing the estimated data, which was two times less than the observed result from Fig. 5. Estimated river runoff similarly reduced polynomially (R2 = 0.5915) to 4.8 km3 in 2009. After separation of the Aral Sea, water from Amu Darya and Syr Darya rivers flowed into the Aral Sea was increased between 1998 and 2004. However, river inflow was decreased to 4.5 km3 in 2010.

Evaporation

The observed evaporation value was 71.1 km3 in 1960, and fell exponentially (R2 = 0.7411) to 11.4 km3 in 2010 (Fig. 6). Estimated evaporation was 66.6 km3 in 1960, which is less than the observed result for 1960 in Fig. 6. Estimated evaporation was 9.7 km3 in 2008, which was less than the observed result for 2008 from Fig. 6. It has been decreased exponentially (R2 = 0.9214) to 10.5 km3 in 2009. The Aral Sea evaporation reduction was caused by water volume and water surface area alteration.

Salinity

The Aral Sea water salinity was 10 g/L in 1960 (Aralgenefund 2011) and it is polynomially increased (R2 = 0.9692) to 130 g/L in 2010 (Alikhanov 2010). The water volume, water surface area and river runoff changes, and evaporation can produce corresponding salinity indicators that are consistent with resulting data in Fig. 7. Our estimation of the Aral Sea water salinity was polynomially increased from 10.6 g/L in 1960 (R2 = 0.9601) to 122.5 g/L in 2009, which is higher than the result for 2009 in Fig. 7. Briefly, the increased water salinity is dependent upon precipitation, river runoff and evaporation.

Water volume

Reduction of water volume from 1960 to 2010 is given in Fig. 8. The water volume of the Aral Sea was 1,093 km3 in 1960, exponentially decreased (R2 = 0.982) to 102 km3 in 2009. Further predicted values of water volume with the regression equations (Figs. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8) were used to estimate corresponding magnitudes of precipitation, runoff, and evaporation from 2011 to 2031. These magnitudes were also used to estimate the water volume based on Eq. (1). Figure 8 shows that the water volume will decrease to approximately 75.4 km3 by 2031. The \( C_{eff} \) value of water volume was 0.7647 (Fig. 8). According to our prediction, the water quality and volume will continue aggravated in the next decade. Suggested solutions for these problems in the past years are mainly improving the quality of irrigation canals, charging farmers to use the water from the rivers, redirecting water from the Volga, Ob and Irtysh rivers, and pump and dilute water from the Caspian Sea via pipelines. Implementing these projects needs sufficient budget and investments. UNESCO in its forecast for 2025 anticipates that the basin will need to save 23 km3 of water annually for the surface area of the Aral Sea to stabilize at its current level (UNESCO 2000).
Fig. 8

Estimated versus observed values of water volume in the Aral Sea

Conclusions

The Aral Sea is a saline lake, located in the middle of Central Asia. This brackish water body was the world’s fourth largest lake before it started to shrink in the 1960’s due to water withdrawal for land irrigation. Consequently, the Aral Sea divided into two parts: Large Aral Sea and Small Aral Sea in 1987. Observed water salinity increased from 10 g/L in 1960 to 120 g/L in 2009 (R2 = 0.9692) and our estimated water salinity was 10.6 g/L in 1960 to 122.5 g/L in 2009 (R2 = 0.9601). Observed evaporation decreased from 71.1 km3 in 1960 (R2 = 0.7411) to 8.3 km3 in 2009. Our estimated value was 66.6 km3 in 1960, which is less than the observed value, and it was 10.5 km3 in 2009, which was higher (R2 = 0.9214). Since 1960, during this period, the water surface area was reduced by 3 times, and water volume was reduced almost 14 times. We have obtained regression parameters using observed data for the estimation of corresponding magnitudes of precipitation, runoff, and evaporation from 2011 to 2031. Our prediction suggests that water volume of the Aral Sea will decrease approximately to 75.4 km3 in 2031.

References

  1. Aladin NV, Potts WTW (1992) Changes in the Aral Sea ecosystem during the period 1960–1990. Hydrobiologia 237:67–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alieva D (2008) Reproductive health in females of the Aral Sea area. Gynecol Obstet 70:64Google Scholar
  3. Alikhanov B (2010) Environmental challenges of the Aral Sea and the Aral Sea area. International Meeting Report, Tashkent, pp 5–27Google Scholar
  4. Aralgenefund (2011) Evolution of the Aral Sea. http://www.aralgenefund.org/eng/evolution/
  5. Bjorklund G (1999) The Aral Sea—water resources, use and misuse. In: Lindhal KK (ed) Alleviating the consequences of an ecological catastrophe, Swedish Uniform Common Stockholm, pp 42–50Google Scholar
  6. Boomer I, Aladin N, Plotnikov I, Whatley R (2000) The palaeolimnology of the Aral Sea: a review. Quat Sci Rev 19(13):1259–1278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bortnik VN (1999) Alteration of water level and salinity of the Aral Sea. In: Glantz MH (ed) Creeping environmental problems and sustainable development in the Aral Sea basin, Cambridge University Press, UK, pp 47–66Google Scholar
  8. Central Asian States (CAS) (2000) State of environment of the Aral Sea Basin. Regional Report CAS. http://www.grida.no/aral/aralsea/-english/arsea/arsea.htm
  9. Dukhovny V (2010) Uzbekistan on the way to overcome the Aral Sea disaster. International Meeting Report, Tashkent, p 54Google Scholar
  10. Elpiner L (1999) Public health in the Aral Sea coastal region and the dynamics of changes in the ecological situation. In: Glantz MH (ed) Creeping environmental problems and sustainable development in the Aral Sea Basin. Cambridge University Press, UK, pp 47–66Google Scholar
  11. Forkutsa I (2006) Modeling water and salt dynamics under irrigated cotton with hallow groundwater in the Khorezm region of Uzbekistan, University Bonn ZEF. Series Ecol Devel 37:155–158Google Scholar
  12. Glantz MH (1999) Creeping environmental problems and sustainable development in the Aral Sea Basin. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 47–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Glazovsky NF (1990) A concept on the resolving of the Aral Crisis. Proceeding of the USSR Academia Sciences, Geog Ser 4:28–41 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  14. Jarsjo J, Destouni G (2004) Groundwater discharge into the Aral Sea after 1960. Mar Syst 47:109–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kostianoy AG (2006) Dead and dying Seas. Encyclopedia of Water Science, Taylor and Francis. doi: 10.1081/E-EWS-1200042068
  16. Legates DR, McCabe GJ (2005) A reevaluation of the average annual global water balance. Phys Geog 26:467–479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mather JR (1969) The average annual water balance of the world. In: Symposium on water balance in North America. Series No. 7, Proceedings: Banff, Alberta, Canada, American Water Resource Association, pp 29–40Google Scholar
  18. McCabe GJ, Ayers MA (1989) Hydrologic effects of climate change in the Delaware River basin. Wat Res Bull 25:1231–1242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. McCabe GJ, Wolock DM (1992) Sensitivity of irrigation demand in a humid-temperate region to hypothetical climatic change. Wat Res Bull 28:535–543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Micklin PP (2000) Managing water in Central Asia. Central Asian and Caucasian Prospect. Research Institute International Affairs, London, pp 72Google Scholar
  21. Micklin PP (2004) Aral Sea Crisis. In: Nihoul CJ, Zavialov PO, Micklin PP (eds) Dying and Dead Seas: climatic versus anthropogenic causes. NATO Sci Ser Kluwer Acad Pub, Dordrecht, pp 99–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Micklin PP (2007) The Aral Sea disaster. Annual review. Earth Plan Sci 35:47–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Micklin PP, Aladin NV (2008) Reclaiming the Aral Sea. Scientific American, pp 64–71Google Scholar
  24. Mikhailov VN, Kravtsova VI, Gurov FN, Markov DV (2001) Assessment of the present day state of the Aral Sea. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta (Moscow University Gerald) 5(6):14–21 (in Russian)Google Scholar
  25. Mintz Y, Serafini YA (1992) A global monthly climatology of soil moisture and water balance. Clim Dyn 8:13–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models. Part 1A: discussion of principle. Hydrol 10:282–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Oroud IM (1999) Temperature and evaporation dynamics of saline solutions. Hydrology 226:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Thornthwaite CW (1948) An approach toward a rational classification of climate. Geog Rev 38:55–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. US Geological Survey (2007) Aral Sea, Central Asia, 1964, 1973, 1987, 1999. http://ear-thshots.usgs.gov/Aral/Aral. Retrieved 15 April 2011
  30. UNDP (2007) Water, critical resource for Uzbekistan’s future. UNDP Program, Tashkent, p 121Google Scholar
  31. UNDP (2008) Review of donor assistance in the Aral Sea region, UNDP, Tashkent. http://www.undp.uz/en/publications/publication.php?id=99. Accessed 1 March 2008
  32. UNESCO (2000) Water related vision for the Aral Sea basin for the year 2025. UNESCO, Paris, p 237Google Scholar
  33. Wolock DM, McCabe GJ (1999) Effects of potential climatic change on annual runoff in the conterminous United States. Am Wat Res Ass 35:1341–1350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Zavialov PO, Kostianov AG, Emelianov SV, Ni AA, Ishniyazov D, Kudyshin TV (2003) Hydrographic survey in the dying Aral Sea. Geophys Res Let 30(13):1959–1971CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 2.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Soil and Water ConservationNational Chung Hsing UniversityTaichungTaiwan, ROC
  2. 2.Department of Sustainable TechnologiesCzech University of Life Sciences PraguePrague 6Czech Republic

Personalised recommendations