Advertisement

Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

Development of a risk-based maintenance decision making approach for automotive production line

  • 31 Accesses

Abstract

Automotive industries require effective and reliable maintenance strategies to ensure high levels of availability and safety. Risk-based maintenance approach is a useful tool for maintenance decision making with the aim of reducing the overall risk in operating activities. In this paper, a Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) model as one of the risk assessment techniques is developed with subjective information derived from domain experts. To overcome the drawbacks of traditional FMEA for risk priority number (RPN) estimation, a linguistic fuzzy set theory, through effective decision attributes in complex automotive equipment is conducted. The main attributes of this approach include the effect of experts’ traits, scales variation, using various membership functions and defuzzification algorithms on reliable Fuzzy-RPN (FRPN) estimation. The result of the proposed model revealed that altering membership functions and defuzzification algorithms had no significant effect on the FRPN estimation, but their values are highly affected by the number of scales. The sensitivity analysis showed that experts’ traits have no sensible impact on experts’ opinion for FRPN estimation, while the detectability index has more impact on FRPN variation. The result of risk classification number showed that the maintenance decision making could be included for the failure modes with the highest RPN values as a priority, which it would be useful to achieve the high level of availability and safety.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

  1. Bahill AT, Smith ED (2009) An industry standard risk analysis technique. Eng Manag J 21(4):16–29

  2. Banduka N, Veža I, Bilić B (2016) An integrated lean approach to process failure mode and effect analysis (PFMEA): a case study from automotive industry. Adv Prod Eng Manag 11(4):355–365. https://doi.org/10.14743/apem2016.4.233

  3. Bertolini M, Bevilacqua M, Massini R (2006) FMECA approach to product traceability in the food industry. Food Control 17(2):137–145

  4. Bona GD, Forcina A, Falcone D (2018) Maintenance strategy design in a sintering plant based on a multicriteria approach. Int J Manag 17(1):29–49

  5. Cagliano AC, Grimaldi S, Rafele C (2011) A systemic methodology for risk management in healthcare sector. Saf Sci 49(5):695–708

  6. Carbone TA, Tippett DD (2004) Project risk management using the project risk FMEA. Eng Manag J 16(4):28–35

  7. Chanamool N, Naenna T (2016) Fuzzy FMEA application to improve decision-making process in an emergency department. Appl Soft Comput 43:441–453

  8. Chen S-J, Hwang C-L (1992) Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making methods. In: Fuzzy multiple attribute decision making. Springer, pp 289–486

  9. Dağsuyu C, Göçmen E, Narlı M, Kokangül A (2016) Classical and fuzzy FMEA risk analysis in a sterilization unit. Comput Ind Eng 101:286–294

  10. Di Bona G, Silvestri A, Forcina A, Petrillo A (2018) Total efficient risk priority number (TERPN): a new method for risk assessment. J Risk Res 21(11):1384–1408

  11. Feili HR, Akar N, Lotfizadeh H, Bairampour M, Nasiri S (2013) Risk analysis of geothermal power plants using failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) technique. Energy Convers Manag 72:69–76

  12. Guimarães ACF, Lapa CMF (2007) Fuzzy inference to risk assessment on nuclear engineering systems. Appl Soft Comput 7(1):17–28

  13. Gupta S, Bhattacharya J (2007) Reliability analysis of a conveyor system using hybrid data. Qual Reliab Eng Int 23(7):867–882

  14. Hekmatpanah M, Shahin A, Ravichandran N (2011) The application of FMEA in the oil industry in Iran: the case of four litre oil canning process of Sepahan Oil Company. Afr J Bus Manag 5(7):3019

  15. Helvacioglu S, Ozen E (2014) Fuzzy based failure modes and effect analysis for yacht system design. Ocean Eng 79:131–141

  16. Hsu H-M, Chen C-T (1996) Aggregation of fuzzy opinions under group decision making. Fuzzy Sets Syst 79(3):279–285

  17. Johnson K, Khan MK (2003) A study into the use of the process failure mode and effects analysis (PFMEA) in the automotive industry in the UK. J Mater Process Technol 139(1):348–356

  18. Kang HG, Kim MC, Lee SJ, Lee HJ, Eom HS, Choi JG, Jang S-C (2009) An overview of risk quantification issues for digitalized nuclear power plants using a static fault tree. Nucl Eng Technol 41(6):849–858

  19. Keskin GA, Özkan C (2009) An alternative evaluation of FMEA: fuzzy ART algorithm. Qual Reliab Eng Int 25(6):647–661

  20. Kirkire MS, Rane SB, Jadhav JR (2015) Risk management in medical product development process using traditional FMEA and fuzzy linguistic approach: a case study. J Ind Eng Int 11(4):595–611

  21. Kolich M (2014) Using failure mode and effects analysis to design a comfortable automotive driver seat. Appl Ergon 45(4):1087–1096

  22. Liu H-C, You J-X, Lin Q-L, Li H (2015a) Risk assessment in system FMEA combining fuzzy weighted average with fuzzy decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 28(7):701–714

  23. Liu HC, Li P, You JX, Chen YZ (2015b) A novel approach for FMEA: combination of interval 2-tuple linguistic variables and gray relational analysis. Qual Reliab Eng Int 31(5):761–772

  24. Liu H-C, Chen Y-Z, You J-X, Li H (2016) Risk evaluation in failure mode and effects analysis using fuzzy digraph and matrix approach. J Intell Manuf 27(4):805–816

  25. Nicolis JS, Tsuda I (1985) Chaotic dynamics of information processing: the “magic number seven plus-minus two” revisited. Bull Math Biol 47(3):343–365

  26. Pollard SJ, Strutt J, MacGillivray BH, Hamilton PD, Hrudey SE (2004) Risk analysis and management in the water utility sector: a review of drivers, tools and techniques. Process Saf Environ Prot 82(6):453–462

  27. Press D (2003) Guidelines for failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA), for automotive, aerospace, and general manufacturing industries. CRC Press, Boca Raton

  28. Preyssl C (1995) Safety risk assessment and management—the ESA approach. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 49(3):303–309

  29. Semp BW, Pathan A, Dessert PE (2006) The role of automated FMEA in automotive reliability improvement. In: SAE technical paper

  30. Sharma RK, Sharma P (2015) Qualitative and quantitative approaches to analyse reliability of a mechatronic system: a case. J Ind Eng Int 11(2):253–268

  31. Soltanali H, Garmabaki A, Thaduri A, Parida A, Kumar U, Rohani A (2018) Sustainable production process: an application of reliability, availability, and maintainability methodologies in automotive manufacturing. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part O J Risk Reliab 233:682–697. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748006x18818266

  32. Verma AK, Ajit S, Karanki DR (2010) Reliability and safety engineering, vol 43. Springer, Berlin

  33. Vinodh S, Santhosh D (2012) Application of FMEA to an automotive leaf spring manufacturing organization. TQM J 24(3):260–274

  34. Woodhouse S (2005) Engineering for safety: use of failure mode and effects analysis in the laboratory: a well-known engineering tool now being used to assure patient safety. Lab Med 36(1):16–18

  35. Yazdi M, Soltanali H (2018) Knowledge acquisition development in failure diagnosis analysis as an interactive approach. Int J Interact Des Manuf 13:193–210

  36. Yazdi M, Daneshvar S, Setareh H (2017) An extension to fuzzy developed failure mode and effects analysis (FDFMEA) application for aircraft landing system. Saf Sci 98:113–123

  37. Zhou Q, Thai VV (2016) Fuzzy and grey theories in failure mode and effect analysis for tanker equipment failure prediction. Saf Sci 83:74–79

Download references

Acknowledgements

The financial support provided by the Ferdowsi University of Mashhad (Project No. 43956) is duly acknowledged.

Author information

Correspondence to Abbas Rohani.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Soltanali, H., Rohani, A., Abbaspour-Fard, M.H. et al. Development of a risk-based maintenance decision making approach for automotive production line. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 11, 236–251 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-019-00927-1

Download citation

Keywords

  • Automotive industry
  • Fuzzy set theory
  • Maintenance decision making
  • RPN value
  • Sensitivity analysis