Advertisement

Preventive maintenance model for heating ventilation air conditioning in pharmacy manufacturing sector

  • Jacky ChinEmail author
  • Herlina
  • Shu-Chiang Lin
  • Satria Fadil Persada
  • Choesnul Jaqin
  • Ilma Mufidah
Original Article
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

One of the most important factors for the success of maintenance system in heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) implementation is satisfaction rate of preventive maintenance. However, there is only few research available regarding the factors influence in the success of maintenance system in manufacturing facilities, including HVAC. The study unearths the complexity link by using the Preventive Maintenance Satisfaction Model, specifically constructed for this study by combining four external factors and two internal factors to evaluate the implementation of the preventive maintenance system in the pharmacy manufacturing industries. The Indonesia pharmacy manufacturing is selected as a case study. The Structural Equation Modeling approach is applied in the analysis phase. Four factors are explored in this evaluation, tools, duration, rate of skill competency, and rate of machine complexity. The analysis results indicated that all factors positively influenced the rate of preventive maintenance satisfaction through facilitating conditions (β = 0.566, p < 0.001). The significant contribution of this research is to develop methodologically factors of the satisfaction rate of preventive maintenance in terms of HVAC maintenance system in manufacturing, supporting company sustainability programs. This study gives valuable insights to decision-makers involved in the implementation and development of maintenance system.

Keywords

Preventive maintenance system Structural equation modeling Sustainability 

Notes

References

  1. Aslam W, Soban M, Akhtar F, Zaffar NA (2015) Smart meters for industrial energy conservation and efficiency optimization in Pakistan: scope, technology and applications. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 44:933–943CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Broekel T (2017) Measuring technological complexity-current approaches and a new measure of structural complexity. arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.07357
  3. Chin J, Lin S-C (2015) Investigating users’ perspectives in building energy management system with an extension of technology acceptance model: a case study in Indonesian manufacturing companies. Proc Comput Sci 72:31–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chin J, Lin S-C (2016) A behavioral model of managerial perspectives regarding technology acceptance in building energy management systems. Sustainability 8:641CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chin J, Jiang B, Mufidah I, Persada S, Noer B (2018) The investigation of consumers’ behavior intention in using green skincare products: a pro-environmental behavior model approach. Sustainability 10:3922CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chou J-S, Yutami IGAN (2014) Smart meter adoption and deployment strategy for residential buildings in Indonesia. Applied Energy 128:336–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cimperman M, Brenčič MM, Trkman P (2016) Analyzing older users’ home telehealth services acceptance behavior—applying an extended UTAUT model. Int J Med Inf 90:22–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cronbach LJ (1951) Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16:297–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dalmazzo A (2002) Technological complexity, wage differentials and unemployment. Scand J Econ 104:515–530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. de Gennaro G, Dambruoso PR, Di Gilio A, Di Palma V, Marzocca A, Tutino M (2015) Discontinuous and continuous indoor air quality monitoring in homes with fireplaces or wood stoves as heating system. Int J Environ Res Public Health 13:78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Demichela M, Baldissone G, Darabnia B (2018) Using field data for energy efficiency based on maintenance and operational optimisation. A step towards PHM in process plants. Processes 6:25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fai F, Von Tunzelmann N (2001) Industry-specific competencies and converging technological systems: evidence from patents. Struct Change Econ Dyn 12:141–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Farrell AM, Rudd JM (2009) Factor analysis and discriminant validity: a brief review of some practical issues. ANZMAC, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  14. Fornell C, Larcker DF (1981) Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. J Mark Res 18:39–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hasibuan S, Hidayati J (2019) The improvement of technology utilization in the framework of the competitiveness and sustainability of Indonesia palm oil industry. In: Proceedings of the international conference on industrial engineering and operations management, pp 2608–2615Google Scholar
  16. Hooper D, Coughlan J, Mullen M (2008) Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit. Articles, p 2Google Scholar
  17. Ikatrinasari ZF, Hasibuan S, Kosasih K (2018) The implementation lean and green manufacturing through sustainable value stream mapping. In: IOP Conference series: materials science and engineering, 2018. IOP Publishing, p 012004Google Scholar
  18. Iskandar A, Sogen MDT, Chin J, Satria E, Dijaya R (2019) Mobile based android application pharmaceutical dictionary with direct search as searching process. Int J Sci Technol Res 8:1–3Google Scholar
  19. Kim H-J, Mannino M, Nieschwietz RJ (2009) Information technology acceptance in the internal audit profession: impact of technology features and complexity. Int J Account Inf Syst 10:214–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Laskurain I, Ibarloza A, Larrea A, Allur E (2017) Contribution to energy management of the main standards for environmental management systems: the case of iso 14001 and emas. Energies 10:1758CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lin S-C, Mufidah I, Persada SF (1965) Safety-culture exploration in Taiwan’s metal industries: identifying the workers’ background influence on safety climate. Sustainability 2017:9Google Scholar
  22. Lin S-C, Persada SF, Nadlifatin R (2014) A study of student behavior in accepting the blackboard learning system: a technology acceptance model (tam) approach. In: Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE 18th international conference on computer supported cooperative work in design (CSCWD), 2014. IEEE, pp 457–462Google Scholar
  23. Lin S-C, Persada SF, Nadlifatin R, Tsai H-Y, Chu C-H (2015) Exploring the influential factors of manufacturers’ initial intention in applying for the green mark ecolabel in Taiwan. Int J Precis Eng Manuf Green Technol 2:359–364CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lowry G (2002) Modelling user acceptance of building management systems. Autom Constr 11:695–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Marques G, Pitarma R (2016) An indoor monitoring system for ambient assisted living based on internet of things architecture. Int J Environ Res Public Health 13:1152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Mufidah I, Jiang BC, Lin S-C, Chin J, Rachmaniati YP, Persada SF (2018) Understanding the consumers’ behavior intention in using green ecolabel product through pro-environmental planned behavior model in developing and developed regions: lessons learned from Taiwan and Indonesia. Sustainability 10:1423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nguyen DQ (1998) The essential skills and attributes of an engineer: a comparative study of academics, industry personnel and engineering students. Global J Eng Educ 2:65–75Google Scholar
  28. Pendyala RM, Bhat CR (2004) An exploration of the relationship between timing and duration of maintenance activities. Transportation 31:429–456CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Prytz R (2014) Machine learning methods for vehicle predictive maintenance using off-board and on-board data. Halmstad University Press, HalmstadGoogle Scholar
  30. Purba HH, Jemali SE, Nugeroho AAU (2018) Productivity improvement with implementation of 5S: a case study in mining services industry in the general services department. Int J Res Eng Sci Manag 1:1–7Google Scholar
  31. Son H, Park Y, Kim C, Chou J-S (2012) Toward an understanding of construction professionals’ acceptance of mobile computing devices in South Korea: an extension of the technology acceptance model. Autom Constr 28:82–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Trimarjoko A, Saroso D, Purba H, Hasibuan S, Jaqin C, Aisyah S (2019) Integration of nominal group technique, Shainin system and DMAIC methods to reduce defective products: a case study of tire manufacturing industry in Indonesia. Manag Sci Lett 9:2421–2432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Venkatesh V, Thong JY, Xu X (2016) Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: a synthesis and the road ahead. J Assoc Inf Syst 17:328–376Google Scholar
  34. Zaki MU, Mishra DP (2015) Overview of HVAC system: operational significance of HVAC provision for pharmaceutical facilities. Int J Recent Innov Trends Comput Commun 3:1261–1267CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Reliability Engineering, Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM), India and The Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Industrial EngineeringMercu Buana UniversityJakartaIndonesia
  2. 2.Department of Industrial EngineeringUniversal UniversityBatamIndonesia
  3. 3.Department of Business AdministrationTexas Health and Science UniversityAustinUSA
  4. 4.Department of Business ManagementInstitut Teknologi Sepuluh Nopember (ITS)SurabayaIndonesia
  5. 5.Department of Industrial EngineeringTelkom UniversityBandungIndonesia

Personalised recommendations