Advertisement

An integrated approach of SWARA and fuzzy COPRAS for maintenance technicians’ selection factors ranking

  • Desmond Eseoghene Ighravwe
  • Sunday Ayoola OkeEmail author
Original Article
  • 3 Downloads

Abstract

In spite of proliferation of maintenance work-force research, the maintenance community has deficient insight into the technicians’ selection process. Building on studies focusing on technical crew selection and uncertainties, this paper offers a framework to potentially remedy this lack. First, the establishment of a fuzzy-rooted structure and connection of it with step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA) and complex proportional assessment of alternatives (COPRAS) can enlarge the research community’s comprehension of the competent selection process and could be initiated and completed by selection teams for maintenance technicians. Second, the put forward structure confronts the widespread description of where to obtain technicians, directing attention from the steps-to-selection to mere sources of obtaining technicians. Thus, this paper establishes the manner, in a particular context that the integration of fuzzy-SWARA and COPRAS could add to the research community’s perception of tackling uncertainties all around the maintenance technicians, while building on ideas from the human resource management literature as well as the technical engineering literature.

Keywords

SWARA Fuzzy COPRAS Maintenance technicians PROMETHEE Maintenance activities 

Notes

References

  1. Acikgoz Y (2018) Employee recruitment and job search: towards a multi-level integration. Hum Resour Manag Rev 29:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aghdaie MH, Zolfani SH, Zavadskas EK (2013) Decision making in machine tool selection: an integrated approach with SWARA and COPRAS-G methods. Inz Ekon Eng Econ 24(1):5–17Google Scholar
  3. Aguado D, Rico R, Rubio VJ, Fernandez L (2016) Applicant reactions to social network web use in personnel selection and assessment. Rev Psicol Trab Organ 32(3):183–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Ahmad S, Wong KY, Rajoo S (2019) Sustainability indicators for manufacturing sectors: a literature survey and maturity analysis from the triple-bottom line perspective. J Manuf Technol Manag 30(2):312–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andrews P, Playfoot J (2015a) Education and training for the oil and gas industry: building technically competent workforce, case study 7—Ogere Training Centre, Nigeria: developing nigerian technicians for the Agbami FPSO, pp 101–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Andrews P, Playfoot J (2015b) Education and training for the oil and gas industry: building technically competent workforce, Case Study 6—Capsian Technical Training Centre, Azerbaijan: Training national technicians for the Energy Industry in Azerbaijan, pp 87-100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Athawale VM, Chakraborty S (2010) Facility location selection using PROMETHEE II method. In: Proceedings of the 2010 international conference on industrial engineering and operations management, Dhaka, Bangladesh, January 9–10Google Scholar
  8. Balas-Timas D, Ignat S (2015) Conceptual applicant screening model with fuzzy logic in industrial organizational contexts. Proc Soc Behav Sci 203:257–263CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Baležentis A, Baležentis T, Brauers WKM (2012) Personnel selection based on computing with words and fuzzy MULTIMOORA. Expert Syst Appl 39(9):7961–7967zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Capaldo G, Zollo G (2001) Applying fuzzy logic to personnel assessment: a case study. Omega 29(6):585–597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carley LA, Haas CT, Borcherding JD, Goodrum PM (2003) Experiences with multiskilling among non-union craft workers in US industrial construction projects. Eng Constr Arch Manag 10(6):374–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cetin EI, Icigen ET (2017) Prsonnel selection based on step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis and multi-objective optimization on the basis of ratio analysis and multi-objective optimization on the basis of ratio analysis methods. Int J Econ Manag Eng 11(11):2553–2557Google Scholar
  13. Chapman DS, Webser J (2003) The use of technologies in the recruiting, screening and selection processes for job candidates. Int J Sel Assess 11(2–3):113–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chatterjee P, Athawale CS (2011) Materials selection using complex proportional assessment and evaluation of mixed data methods. Mater Des 32(2):851–860CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Doumpos M, Zopounidis C (2004) A multi-criteria classification approach based on pair-wise comparison. Eur J Oper Res 158:378–389zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. El-Ouirdi M, El-Ouirdi A, Segers J, Pais I (2016) Technology adoption in employee recruitment: the case of social media in Central and Eastern Europe. Comput Hum Behav 57:240–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Fouladgar MM, Yazdani-Chamzini A, Zavadskas EK, Haji Moini SH (2012) A new hybrid model for evaluating the working strategies: case study of construction company. Technol Econ Dev Econ 18(1):164–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Garg S, Vrat P, Kanda A (2002) Trade-offs between multiskilling and inventory in assembly line operations under demand variability. Int J Oper Prod Manag 22(5):565–583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Goldlücke S (2017) Strategic recruiting in ongoing hierarchies. Econ Lett 156:176–178MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Guimaraes T (1997) Assessing employee turnover intentions before/after TQM. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 14(1):46–63MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hajkowicz S, Higgins A (2008) A comparison of multiple criteria analysis techniques for water resource management. Eur J Oper Res 184:255–265zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hamimi I, Razak A, Kamaruddin S, Abdul AI (2011) Implementation of the workforce competency model for assessing maintenance workers’ performance. Int J Prod Qual Manag 7(4):440–462Google Scholar
  23. Hatami-Marbini A, Tavana M (2011) An extension of the Electre I method for group decision-making under a fuzzy environment. Omega 39:373–386zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Henao CA, Ferrer JC, Muñoz JC, Vera J (2016) Multiskilling with closed chains in a service industry: a robust optimization approach. Int J Prod Econ 179:166–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hertle C, Tisch M, Kläs H, Metternich J, Abele E (2016) Recording shop floor management competencies—a guideline for a systematic competency gap analysis. Proc CIRP 57:625–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ighravwe DE, Oke SA (2014) A non-zero integer non-linear programming model for maintenance workforce sizing. Int J Prod Econ 150:204–214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ighravwe DE, Oke SA (2016) A multi-attribute framework for determining the competitive advantages of products using grey-TOPSIS cum fuzzy-logic approach. Total Qual Manag Bus Excell.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14783363.2016.1234348 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ighravwe DE, Oke SA (2017) A multi-criteria multi-hierarchical framework for ranking maintenance sustainability strategies based on PROMETHEE andfuzzy entropy weighting methods. J. Build. Pathol. Rehabil. 2(9):1–18Google Scholar
  29. Ighravwe DE, Oke SA (2019) A multi-criteria decision-making framework for selecting a suitable maintenance strategy for public buildings using sustainability criteria. J Build Eng 24:100753 (in press) CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Ighravwe DE, Oke SA, Adebiyi KA (2016) Maintenance workload optimisation with accident occurrence considerations and absenteeism from work using a genetic algorithm. Int J Manag Sci Eng Manag 11(4):294–302Google Scholar
  31. Kabak M, Burmaoğlu S, Kazançoğlu Y (2012) A fuzzy hybrid MCDM approach for professional selection. Expert Syst Appl 39(3):3516–3525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kalugina E, Shyvdun S (2014) An effective personnel selection model. Proc Comput Sci 31:1102–1106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kannan K, Pokharel S, Kumar PS (2009) A hybrid approach using ISM and fuzzy TOPSIS for the selection of reverse logistics provider. Resour Conserv Recycl 54(1):28–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kersuliene V, Turskis Z (2011) Integrated fuzzy multiple criteria decision making model for architect selection. Technol Econ Dev Econ 17(4):645–666CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kersuliene V, Zavadskas EK, Turskis Z (2010) Selection of rational dispute resolution method by applying new step-wise weight assessment ratio analysis (SWARA). J Bus Econ Manag 11(2):243–258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kuo-Huie J, Suen CH-Y (2015) self-presentation and hiring recommendations in online communities: lessons from Linkedln. Comput Hum Behav 48:516–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lewis PA, Gospel H (2015) Technicians under the microscope: the training and skills of university laboratory and engineering workshop technicians. J Vocat Educ Train 67(4):421–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. McDonnell D, Balfe N, Pratto L, O’Donnell GE (2018) Predicting the unpredictable: consideration of human and organisational factors in maintenance prognostics. J Loss Prev Process Ind 54:131–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mobin M, Roshani A, Saeedpoor M, Mozaffari MM (2015) Integrating FAHP with COPRAS-G method for supplier selection (case study: an Iranian manufacturing company). In: Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Management, American Society for Engineering Management (ASEM), January 2015, p 1Google Scholar
  40. Nguyen H-T, Md Dawal SZ, Nukman Y, Aoyama H, Case K (2015) An integrated approach of fuzzy linguistic preference based AHP and fuzzy COPRAS for machine tool evaluation. PLoS ONE 10(9):e0133599.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0133599 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pastor I (2012) Increasing an organization’s attractiveness by promoting its reputation during the recruitment interview process. Proc Econ Finance 3:415–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Perçin S (2019) An integrated fuzzy SWARA and fuzzy AD approach for outsourcing provider selection. J Manuf Technol Manag 30(2):531–552CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Prakash C, Barua MK (2016) A combined MADM approach for evaluation and selection of third-party reverse logistics partner for Indian electronics industry. Sustain Prod Consum 7:66–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rao P (2010) A resource-based analysis of recruitment and selection practices of Indian software companies: a case study approach. J Indian Bus Res 2(1):32–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Salmasnia A, Noori S, Mokhtari H (2019) A redundancy allocation problem by using utility function method and ant colony optimization: tradeoff between availability and total cost. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-019-00800-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sang X, Liu X, Qin J (2015) An analytical solution to fuzzy TOPSIS and its application in personnel selection for knowledge-intensive enterprise. Appl Soft Comput 30:190–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Schrotenboer AH, uit het Broek MAJ, Jargalsaikhan B, Roodbergen KJ (2018) Coordinating technician allocation and maintenance routing for offshore wind farms. Comput Oper Res 98:185–197MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Seo YJ, Jeong HY, Song YJ (2005) Best web service selection based on the decision making between QoS criteria of service. In: International conference on embedded software and systems, Springer, Berlin, pp 408–419CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Shemshadi A, Shirazi H, Toreihi M, Tarokh MJ (2011) A fuzzy VIKOR method for supplier selection based on entropy measure for objective weighting. Exp Syst Appl 38:12160–12167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shen J, Edwards V (2004) Recruitment and selection in Chinese MNEs. Int J Hum Resour Manag 15(4–5):814–835CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sherman JD (1989) Technical supervision and turnover among engineers and technicians: influencing factors in the work environment. Group Org Manage 14(4):411–421Google Scholar
  52. Singh K, Sharma S (2014) Effective use of social media for talent acquisition and recruitment. Int J Int Inf Manag 4(4):228–237Google Scholar
  53. Smith AD, Rupp WT (2004) Managerial challenges of e-recruiting: extending the life cycle of new economy employees. Online Inf Rev 28(1):61–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Stanujkic D, Djordjevic B, Karabasevic D (2015a) Selection of candidates in the process if recruitment and recruitment and selection of personnel based on the SWARA and ARAS methods. Quaestus Multidiscip Res J 7:53–64Google Scholar
  55. Stanujkic D, Karabasevic D, Zavadskas EK (2015b) A framework for the selection of a packaging design based on the SWARA method. Eng Econ 26(2):181–187CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Tavana M, Zareinjad M, Santos-Arteaga FJ (2016) An intuitionistic fuzzy-grey superiority and inferiority ranking method for third-party reverse logistics provider selection. Int J Syst Sci Oper Logist 5:1–20Google Scholar
  57. Touat M, Bouzidi-Hassini S, Benbouzid-Sitayeb F, Benhamou B (2017) A hybridization of genetic algorithms and fuzzy logic for the single-machine scheduling with flexible maintenance problem under human resource constraints. Appl Soft Comput 59:556–573CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Vardarlıer P, Vural Y, Birgün S (2014) Modelling of the strategic recruitment process by axiomatic design principles. Proc Social Behav Sci 150:374–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wolkinson BW (1994) Recruitment and selection of workers in Israel: the question of disparate impact. Ethnic Racial Stud 17(2):260–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Yok S, Chrea S, Pak R (2019) Technical and vocational education and training in cambodia: current status and future development. In: Bai B (ed) Vocational education and training in ASEAN member states. Perspectives on rethinking and reforming education. Springer, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
  61. Zarbakhshnia N, Solimani H, Ghaderi H (2018) Sustainable third-party reverse logistics provider evaluation and selection using fuzzy SWARA and developed fuzzy COPRAS in the presence of risk criteria. Appl Soft Comput 65:307–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Zareinejad M, Javanmard H (2013) Evaluation and selection of a third-party reverse logistics provider using ANP and IFG_MADM methodology. Life Sci J 10(6s):350–355Google Scholar
  63. Zavadskas EK, Kaklauskas A (1996a) Multiple criteria evaluation of buildings. Technika, Vilnius (in Lithuanian) Google Scholar
  64. Zavadskas E, Kaklauskas A (1996b) Determination of an efficient contractor by using the new method of multicriteria assessment. In: International symposium for the organisation and management of construction, shaping theory and practice, pp 94–104Google Scholar
  65. Zhang S-F, Liu S-Y (2011) A GRA-based intuitionistic fuzzy multi-criteria group decision making method for personnel selection. Expert Syst Appl 38(9):11401–11405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zhao H, Xia B, Qin H, Morel JL, Qiu R-L (2014) A fuzzy-based methodology for an aggregative environmental risk assessment of rested soil. Pedosphere 24(2):220–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zolfani SH, Bahrami M (2014) Investment prioritizing in high tech industries based on SWARA–COPRAS approach. Technol Econ Dev Econ 20(3):534–553CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Zolfani SH, Banihashemi SSA (2014) Personnel selection based on a novel model of game theory and MCDM approaches. In: Proceedings of 8th international scientific conference business and management 2014, 15–16 May 2014, Vilnius, Lithuania, pp 191–198Google Scholar
  69. Zolfani SH, Saparauskas J (2013) New application of SWARA method in prioritizing sustainability assessment indicators of energy system. Eng Econ 24(5):408–414Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Reliability Engineering, Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM), India and The Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering ScienceUniversity of JohannesburgJohannesburgSouth Africa
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of LagosLagosNigeria

Personalised recommendations