Advertisement

Modelling of the factors affecting lean implementation in healthcare using structural equation modelling

  • Vineet JainEmail author
  • Puneeta Ajmera
Original Article

Abstract

Lean is a quality enhancement process which has been implemented by several industries including healthcare to get leverage in this era of globalization and liberalization. The objective of present work is to identify the variables affecting implementation of lean principles in healthcare industry. To achieve this objective, a survey was conducted by using a structured questionnaire which was distributed among 460 health professionals in different hospitals in India to collect their responses about lean applications in healthcare. EFA was applied to identify the factor structure with the help of the SPSS software version 20 and dimensions were extracted from the variables. After that, CFA was carried out by SEM statistical approach to verify these dimensions in the factor analysis by AMOS software. Fifteen variables were explored and three factors i.e. organizational factors, management commitment and communication and human resource factors were extracted which affect lean application in healthcare. SEM was used to identify first order three factor structure. The managers and healthcare professionals can acquire information about the strength of various factors in advance which would help them to thoroughly understand the relative importance, interdependencies and relationships among these factors so that lean principles can be applied successfully in the organization.

Keywords

Lean principles SEM CFA EFA Healthcare industry 

Notes

References

  1. Achanga P, Shehab E, Roy R, Nelder G (2006) Critical success factors for lean implementation within SMEs. J Manuf Technol Manag 17:460–471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ajmera P (2017) Ranking the strategies for Indian medical tourism sector through the integration of SWOT analysis and TOPSIS method. Int J Health Care Qual Assur 30:668–679CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bañuelas R, Antony J (2001) A strategy for survival. Manuf Eng 80:119–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Banuelas Coronado R, Antony J (2002) Critical success factors for the successful implementation of six sigma projects in organisations. TQM Mag 14(2):92–99CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baumgartner H, Homburg C (1996) Applications of structural equation modeling in marketing and consumer research: a review. Int J Res Mark 13:139–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bentler PM (1990) Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol Bull 107:238–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bentler PM, Bonett DG (1980) Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol Bull 88:588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bercaw R (2016) Lean leadership for healthcare: approaches to lean transformation. Productivity Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  9. Bhatia N, Drew J (2006) Applying lean production to the public sector. McKinsey Q 3:97–98Google Scholar
  10. Bowen DE, Youngdahl WE (1998) “Lean” service: in defense of a production-line approach. Int J Serv Ind Manag 9:207–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Brandao de Souza L (2009) Trends and approaches in lean healthcare. Leadersh Health Serv 22:121–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burgess N, Radnor Z (2013) Evaluating lean in healthcare. Int J Health Care Qual Assur 26:220–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Byrne BM (1998) Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: basic concepts, application, and programming. Lawrence Erlabum, MathwahzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. Byrne BM (2013) Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: basic concepts, applications, and programming. Psychology Press, New YorkCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. Camuffo A, Gerli F (2018) Modeling management behaviors in lean production environments. Int J Oper Prod Manag 38:403–423CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cattell RB (1966) The scree test for the number of factors. Multivar Behav Res 1:245–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chavez R, Yu W, Jacobs M, Fynes B, Wiengarten F, Lecuna A (2015) Internal lean practices and performance: the role of technological turbulence. Int J Prod Econ 160:157–171.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.10.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chen K, Hsu C, Ouyang L (2007) Applied product capability analysis chart in measure step of Six Sigma. Qual Quant 41:387–400CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. D’Andreamatteo A, Ianni L, Lega F, Sargiacomo M (2015) Lean in healthcare: a comprehensive review. Health Policy 119:1197–1209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dahlgaard JJ, Østergaard P (2000) TQM and lean thinking in higher education. Best Qual Targets Improv Syst 11:203–226Google Scholar
  21. Dahlgaard-Park SM (2011) The quality movement: where are you going? Total Qual Manag Bus Excell 22:493–516CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. De Jonge J, Schaufeli WB (1998) Job characteristics and employee well-being: a test of Warr’s Vitamin Model in health care workers using structural equation modelling. J Organ Behav 19:387–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. de Souza LB, Pidd M (2011) Exploring the barriers to lean health care implementation. Public Money Manag 31:59–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Diamantopoulos A, Siguaw JA (2000) Introducing LISREL: a guide for the uninitiated. Sage Publication Ltd, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Diamantopoulos A, Siguaw JA, Siguaw JA (2000) Introducing LISREL: a guide for the uninitiated. Sage Publication Ltd., LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Drotz E, Poksinska B (2014) Lean in healthcare from employees’ perspectives. J Health Organ Manag 28:177–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fabrigar LR, Wegener DT (2011) Exploratory factor analysis. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Fadly Habidin N, Mohd Yusof S (2013) Critical success factors of Lean Six Sigma for the Malaysian automotive industry. Int J Lean Six Sigma 4:60–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fan X, Thompson B, Wang L (1999) Effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on structural equation modeling fit indexes. Struct Equ Model A Multidiscip J 6:56–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fitch D (2007) Structural equation modeling the use of a risk assessment instrument in child protective services. Decis Support Syst 42:2137–2152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Francis DJ (1988) An introduction to structural equation models. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 10:623–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Golob TF (2003) Structural equation modeling for travel behavior research. Transp Res Part B: Methodol 37:1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hair JF, Sarstedt M, Ringle CM, Mena JA (2012) An assessment of the use of partial least squares structural equation modeling in marketing research. J Acad Mark Sci 40:414–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Halling B, Wijk K (2013) Experienced barriers to lean in Swedish manufacturing and health care. Int J Lean Think 4:43–63Google Scholar
  35. Hihnala S, Kettunen L, Suhonen M, Tiirinki H (2018) The Finnish healthcare services lean management: health services managers’ experiences in a special health care unit. Leadersh Health Serv 31:17–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hines P, Holweg M, Rich N (2004) Learning to evolve: a review of contemporary lean thinking. Int J Oper Prod Manag 24:994–1011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hooper D, Coughlan J, Mullen MR (2008) Structural equation modelling: guidelines for determining model fit. Electron J Bus Res Methods 6:53–60Google Scholar
  38. Hu Lt, Bentler PM (1999) Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Model Multidiscip J 6:1–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hutchins K (2006) United Airlines says goodbye to “the Big B”. Ground Support Mag 14:14–17Google Scholar
  40. Jain V, Ajmera P (2018a) Modelling the factors affecting Indian medical tourism sector using interpretive structural modeling. Benchmark Int J 25:1461–1479CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jain V, Ajmera P (2018b) Quantifying the variables affecting Indian medical tourism sector by graph theory and matrix approach. Manag Sci Lett 8:225–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Jain V, Raj T (2013) Evaluating the variables affecting flexibility in FMS by exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Global J Flex Syst Manag 14:181–193.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-013-0042-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Jain V, Raj T (2014) Modelling and analysis of FMS productivity variables by ISM, SEM and GTMA approach. Front of Mech Eng 9:218–232.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11465-014-0309-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Jain V, Raj T (2016) Modeling and analysis of FMS performance variables by ISM, SEM and GTMA approach. Int J Prod Econ 171:84–96.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.10.024 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D (1993) LISREL 8: structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Scientific Software International, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  46. Kim CS, Spahlinger DA, Kin JM, Billi JE (2006) Lean health care: what can hospitals learn from a world-class automaker? J Hosp Med 1:191–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kline R (2011) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling, 3rd edn. Guilford Press, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  48. Lander E, Liker JK (2007) The Toyota Production System and art: making highly customized and creative products the Toyota way. Int J Prod Res 45:3681–3698CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  49. Langabeer JR, DelliFraine JL, Heineke J, Abbass I (2009) Implementation of Lean and Six Sigma quality initiatives in hospitals: a goal theoretic perspective. Oper Manag Res 2:13–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Lau AK, Yam RC, Tang EP (2010) Supply chain integration and product modularity: an empirical study of product performance for selected Hong Kong manufacturing industries. Int J Oper Prod Manag 30:20–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Lawal AK et al (2014) Lean management in health care: definition, concepts, methodology and effects reported (systematic review protocol). Syst Rev 3:103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lee D, Rho B-H, Yoon SN (2015) Effect of investments in manufacturing practices on process efficiency and organizational performance. Int J Prod Econ 162:45–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Liker JK (2004) The Toyota Way: 14 management principles from the World’s greatest automaker. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  54. Lukas CV, Holmes SK, Cohen AB, Restuccia J, Cramer IE, Shwartz M, Charns MP (2007) Transformational change in health care systems: an organizational model. Health Care Manag Rev 32:309–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. MacCallum RC, Browne MW, Sugawara HM (1996) Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychol Methods 1:130–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Magd HA (2008) ISO 9001: 2000 in the Egyptian manufacturing sector: perceptions and perspectives. Int J Qual Reliab Manag 25:173–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Maiga AS, Nilsson A, Ax C (2015) Relationships between internal and external information systems integration, cost and quality performance, and firm profitability. Int J Prod Econ 169:422–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Mazzocato P, Holden RJ, Brommels M, Aronsson H, Bäckman U, Elg M, Thor J (2012) How does lean work in emergency care? A case study of a lean-inspired intervention at the Astrid Lindgren Children’s hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. BMC Health Serv Res 12:28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. McDonald RP, Ho M-HR (2002) Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychol Methods 7:64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Miles J, Shevlin M (2007) A time and a place for incremental fit indices. Personal Individ Differ 42:869–874CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Mittal VK, Sindhwani R, Kapur P (2016) Two-way assessment of barriers to lean–green manufacturing system: insights from India. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 7:400–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Mulaik SA, James LR, Van Alstine J, Bennett N, Lind S, Stilwell CD (1989) Evaluation of goodness-of-fit indices for structural equation models. Psychol Bull 105:430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Naik T, Duroseau Y, Zehtabchi S, Rinnert S, Payne R, McKenzie M, Legome E (2012) A structured approach to transforming a large public hospital emergency department via lean methodologies. J Healthc Qual 34:86–97CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Nunnally JC (1978) Psychometric theory, 2nd edn. Tata McGraw-Hill Education, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  65. Park HS, Dailey R, Lemus D (2002) The use of exploratory factor analysis and principal components analysis in communication research. Hum Commun Res 28:562–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Patidar L, Soni VK, Soni PK (2017) Manufacturing wastes analysis in lean environment: an integrated ISM-fuzzy MICMAC approach. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 8:1783–1809.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-017-0669-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Patri R, Suresh M (2018) Factors influencing lean implementation in healthcare organizations: AN ISM approach. Int J Healthc Manag 11:25–37.  https://doi.org/10.1080/20479700.2017.1300380 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Pettersen J (2009) Defining lean production: some conceptual and practical issues. TQM J 21:127–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Punnakitikashem P, Buavaraporn N, Chen L (2013) An investigation of factors affecting Lean implementation success of Thai logistics companies. In: 24th POMS annual conferenceGoogle Scholar
  70. Radnor ZJ, Holweg M, Waring J (2012) Lean in healthcare: the unfilled promise? Soc Sci Med 74:364–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Reinhardt K (2007) Kaizen: a change for the better. Ground Support Worldw 15:14–17Google Scholar
  72. Rother M, Shook J (1999) Learning to see. Lean Enterprise Institute, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  73. Ryman TK, Austin MA, Hopkins S, Philip J, O’Brien D, Thummel K, Boyer BB (2014) Using exploratory factor analysis of FFQ data to identify dietary patterns among Yup’ik people. Public Health Nutr 17:510–518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Schoenherr T, Narayanan S, Narasimhan R (2015) Trust formation in outsourcing relationships: a social exchange theoretic perspective. Int J Prod Econ 169:401–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Schonberger RJ (2018) Reconstituting lean in healthcare: from waste elimination toward ‘queue-less’ patient-focused care. Bus Horiz 61:13–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Schumacker RE, Lomax RG (2012) A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. Routledge, New YorkCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  77. Shah R, Goldstein SM (2006) Use of structural equation modeling in operations management research: looking back and forward. J Oper Manag 24:148–169CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Shazali NA, Habidin NF, Ali N, Khaidir NA, Jamaludin NH (2013) Lean healthcare practice and healthcare performance in Malaysian healthcare industry. Int J Sci Res Publ 3:1–5Google Scholar
  79. Stevens JP (2012) Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. In: Stevens JP (ed) Applied multivariate statistics for the social sciences. Routledge, New York, pp 337–406Google Scholar
  80. Su Y-f, Yang C (2010) A structural equation model for analyzing the impact of ERP on SCM. Expert Syst Appl 37:456–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Suárez-Barraza MF, Ramis-Pujol J (2008) Process standardisation and sustainable continuous improvement: a closer look at the application of ISO 9000 to Logroño City Council (Spain). Int J Qual Stand 1:1–35Google Scholar
  82. Suhr DD (2006) Exploratory or confirmatory factor analysis. SAS Institute, CaryGoogle Scholar
  83. Swank CK (2003) The lean service machine. Harvard Bus Rev 81:123–130Google Scholar
  84. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS (2007) Using multivariate statistics. Allyn and Bacon, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  85. Toussaint J, Gerard R (2010) On the mend: revolutionizing healthcare to save lives and transform the industry. Lean Enterprise Institute, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  86. Valmohammadi C, Roshanzamir S (2015) The guidelines of improvement: relations among organizational culture, TQM and performance. Int J Prod Econ 164:167–178.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.12.028 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Womack JP, Jones DT (1997) Lean thinking—banish waste and create wealth in your corporation. J Oper Res Soc 48:1148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Zeng J, Phan CA, Matsui Y (2015) The impact of hard and soft quality management on quality and innovation performance: an empirical study. Int J Prod Econ 162:216–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Society for Reliability Engineering, Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM), India and The Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringAmity University HaryanaGurgaonIndia
  2. 2.Department of Hospital Administration, Amity Medical SchoolAmity University HaryanaGurgaonIndia

Personalised recommendations